Analysis of measurements from the first Swedish universal neonatal hearing screening program

References

• Anderssen S.H., Andresen J., Andersen R., Sponheim L. Universal neonatal hearing screening of infants with otoacoustic emissions (in Norwegian). Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen 2002; 122: 2187–2189
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bray P., Kemp D. An advanced cochlear echo technique suitable for infant screening. Br J Audiol 1987; 21: 191–204
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Davis A., Bamford J., Wilson I., Ramkalawan T., Forshaw M., et al. A critical review of the role of neonatal hearing screening in the detection of congenital hearing impairment. Health Technol Assess 1997; 1(i–iv)1–176
   Google Scholar
• Davis A., Waddell N., Stevenson A., Sancho J., Kimm L. , et al. 2006. Newborn Hearing Screening Programme: Consultation with Parents and Supporting Professionals. NHS 2006 Conference, Como, Italy, viewed 12 December 2006, http://www.nhsp.info/cms.php?folder=288.
   Google Scholar
• De Barros Boishardy A., Lenoir F.M., Brami P., Kapella M., Obstoy M.F., et al. Universal hearing screening: 10 835 newborns tested in maternity wards of the geographical Department of Eure, France (in French). Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac 2005; 122: 223–230
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• De Ceulaer G., Daemers K., Van Driessche K., Yperman M., Govaerts P.J. Neonatal hearing screening with transient evoked otoacoustic emissions: Retrospective analysis on performance parameters. Scand Audiol Suppl 2001; 52: 109–111
   Google Scholar
• Doyle K.J., Burggraaff B., Fujikawa S., Kim J. Newborn hearing screening by otoacoustic emissions and automated auditory brainstem response. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 1997; 41: 111–119
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonzalez de Aledo Linos A., Bonilla Miera C., Morales Angulo C., Gomez Da Casa F., Barrasa Benito J. Universal newborn hearing screening in Cantabria (Spain): Results of the first two years (in Spanish). An Pediatr (Barc) 2005; 62: 135–140
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Grandori F. European Consensus Statement on Neonatal Hearing Screening. J Laryngol Otol 1998; 112: 1219
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Headley G.M., Campbell D.E., Gravel J.S. Effect of neonatal test environment on recording transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions. Pediatrics 2000; 105: 1279–1285
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hildingsson I.M., Lindgren H.E., Haglund B., Radestad I.J. Characteristics of women giving birth at home in Sweden: A national register study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006; 195: 1366–1372
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• ILO OAE Instrument User Manual, Issue 5a. 1997. London: Otodynamics Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobson J.T., Jacobson C.A. The effects of noise in transient EOAE newborn hearing screening. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 1994; 29: 235–248
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaldestad R.H., Wingaard L., Hansen T.W. Screening for congenital hearing loss: A pilot project (in Norwegian). Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen 2002; 122: 2190–2193
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kemp D. Understanding & Using Otoacoustic Emissions. Otodynamics Ltd, London 1997
   Google Scholar
• Kemp D., Thornton R., Kimm L., Lutman M. & Watkin P. 2001. Neonatal hearing screening and assessment. Transient-evoked otoacoustic emission (TEOAE) testing in babies. Recommended test protocol. www.nhsp.info/workbook.shtml.
   Google Scholar
• Khandekar R., Khabori M., Jaffer Mohammed A., Gupta R. Neonatal screening for hearing impairment: The Oman experience. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2006; 70: 663–670
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin H.C., Shu M.T., Chang K.C., Bruna S.M. A universal newborn hearing screening program in Taiwan. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2002; 63: 209–218
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maxon A.B., White K.R., Culpepper B., Vohr B.R. Maintaining acceptably low referral rates in TEOAE-based newborn hearing screening programs. J Commun Disord 1997; 30: 457–475
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Møller T.R., Jensen F.K., Ekmann A., Wetke R., Ovesen T. Screening project of identification of hearing deficits in newborns (in Danish). Ugeskr Laeger 2007; 169(10)900–3
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Norton S.J., Gorga M.P., Widen J.E., Vohr B.R., Folsom R.C., et al. Identification of neonatal hearing impairment: Transient evoked otoacoustic emissions during the perinatal period. Ear Hear 2000; 21: 425–442
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pastorino G., Sergi P., Mastrangelo M., Ravazzani P., Tognola G., et al. The Milan Project: A newborn hearing screening programme. Acta Paediatr 2005; 94: 458–463
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Spivak L., Dalzell L., Berg A., Bradley M., Cacace A., et al. New York State universal newborn hearing screening demonstration project: In-patient outcome measures. Ear Hear 2000; 21: 92–103
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Todd N.W. Universal newborn hearing screening follow-up in two Georgia populations: Newborn, mother and system correlates. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2006; 70: 807–815
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vohr B.R., Carty L.M., Moore P.E., Letourneau K. The Rhode Island Hearing Assessment Program: Experience with statewide hearing screening (1993–1996). J Pediatr 1998; 133: 353–357
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vohr B.R., White K.R., Maxon A.B., Johnson M.J. Factors affecting the interpretation of transient evoked otoacoustic emission results in neonatal hearing screening. Seminars in Hearing 1993; 14: 57–72
   Google Scholar
• Weichbold V., Nekahm-Heis D., Welzl-Mueller K. Ten-year outcome of newborn hearing screening in Austria. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2006; 70: 235–240
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wessex Universal Neonatal Hearing Screening Trial Group 1998. Controlled trial of universal neonatal screening for early identification of permanent childhood hearing impairment. Lancet, 352, 1957–1964.
   Google Scholar