Digital noise reduction: Outcomes from laboratory and field studies

References

• Alcantara J.I., Moore B.C., Kuhnel V., Launer S. Evaluation of the noise reduction system in a commercial digital hearing aid. Int J Audiol 2003; 42: 34–42
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American National Standards Institute (ANSI). 1996. American National Standard Specification for Audiometers (ANSI S3.6-1996). New York: ANSI.
   Google Scholar
• American National Standards Institute (ANSI). 1996. American National Standard Specification of Hearing Aid Characteristics (ANSI S3.22-1996). New York: ANSI.
   Google Scholar
• Bentler R.A. Effectiveness of directional microphones and noise reduction schemes in hearing aids: A systematic review of the evidence. J Amer Acad Audol 2005; 16: 477–488
   Google Scholar
• Bentler R.A., Anderson C.V., Niebuhr D., Getta J. A longitudinal study of noise reduction circuits. Part I: Objective measures. J Speech Hear Res 1993; 36: 808–819
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bentler R.A., Chiou L-K. Digital noise reduction: An overview. Trends Amplif 2006; 10: 67–83
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bentler R.A., Cooley L. An examination of several characteristics that affect the prediction of OSPL90. Ear Hear 2001; 22: 3–20
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bentler R.A., Palmer C., Mueller H.G. Evaluation of a second-order directional microphone hearing aid. I: Speech perception outcomes. J Amer Acad Audiol 2006; 17: 179–189
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bilger R.C., Neutzel J.M., Rabinowitz W.M., Rzeczkowski C. Standardization of a test of speech perception in noise. J Speech Hear Res 1984; 27: 32–48
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Boymans M., Dreschler W.A. Field trials using a digital hearing aid with active noise reduction and dual-microphone directionality. Audiology 2000; 39: 260–268
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bridges J., Bentler R. Relating well-being to successful hearing-aid use in older adults. Hear J 1998; 51: 39–44
   Google Scholar
• Chung K. Challenges in recent developments in hearing aids. Part 1. Speech understanding in noise, microphone technologies, and noise reduction algorithms. Trends Amplif 2004; 8: 83–124
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Costa P.T., Herbst J.H., McCrae R.R. 1992. NEO-PI-R Professional Manual. Edessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
   Google Scholar
• Costa P.T., Herbst J.H., McCrae R.R. Longitudinal stability in adult personality. Handbook of Personality Psychology, R. Hogan, J. Johnson, S. Briggs. Academic Press, San Diego, CA 1997; 269–290
   Google Scholar
• Costa P.T., Herbst J.H., McCrae R.R., Siegler I.C. Personality at midlife: Stability, intrinsic maturation, and response to life event. Assessment 2000; 7: 365–378
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox R.M., Alexander G.C. The abbreviated profile of hearing-aid benefit (APHAB). Ear Hear 1995; 16: 176–186
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox R.M., Alexander G.C., Gilmore C., Pusakalich K. Use of the connected speech test with hearing-impaired listeners. Ear Hear 1988; 9: 198–207
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox R.M., Alexander G.C., Gray G.A. Personality and the subjective assessment of hearing aids. J Am Acad Audiol 1999; 10: 1–13
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cox R.M., Alexander G.C., Gray G.A. Who wants a hearing aid? Personality profiles of hearing-aid seekers. Ear Hear 2005; 26: 12–26
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dicarlo L., Kataja R. Analysis of the Utley lip-reading test. J Speech Hear Dis 1951; 16: 26–240
   Google Scholar
• Dillon H. NAL-NL1: A new prescriptive fitting procedure for nonlinear hearing aids. Hear J 1999; 52: 10–16
   Google Scholar
• Dillon H., James A., Ginis J. Client-oriented scale of improvement (COSI) and its relationship to several other measures of benefit and satisfaction provided by hearing aids. J Am Acad Audiol 1997; 8: 27–43
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Erber N.P. Interaction of audition & vision in the recognition of oral speech stimuli. J Speech Hear Res 1969; 12: 423–425
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Erber N.P. Auditory, visual, & auditory-visual recognition of consonants by children with normal & impaired hearing. J Speech Hear Res 1972; 15: 413–422
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Grant K.W. Measures of auditory-visual integration for speech understanding: A theoretical perspective (L). J Acoust Soc Am 2002; 112: 30–33
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant K., Seitz P.F. Measures of auditory-visual integration in nonsense syllables and sentences. J Acoust Soc Am 1998; 104: 2438–2450
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hurtig R. (in preparation). Development of a speech-in-noise test for audio-only and audio + visual use.
   Google Scholar
• Kalikow D.N., Stevens K.N., Elliot L.I. Development of a test of speech intelligibility in noise using sentence materials with controlled word predictability. J Acoust Soc Am 1977; 61: 1337–1351
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lovie-Kitchin J.E. Validity and reliability of visual acuity measurements. Opthal Physiol 1988; 8: 363–370
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacLeod A., Summerfield Q. Quantifying the contribution of vision to speech perception in noise. Br J Audiol 1987; 21: 131–141
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Massaro D. From multisensory integration to talking heads and language learning. The Handbook of Multisensory Processes, G. Calvert, C. Spence, B. Stein. MIT Press. 2004
   Google Scholar
• Massaro D.W., Cohen M.M. Tests of auditory-visual integration efficiency within the framework of the fuzzy logical model of perception. J Acoust Soc Am 2000; 108: 784–789
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCrae R.R., Costa P.T. Personality trait structure as a human universal. American Psychologist 1997; 52: 509–516
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGurk H., MacDonald J. Hearing lips & seeing voices. Nature 1976; 264: 746–748
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Middelweerd M.J., Plomp R. The effect of speech-reading on the speech-reception threshold of sentences in noise. J Acoust Soc Am 1987; 82: 2145–2147
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mueller H.G., Weber J., Hornsby B.W. The effects of digital noise reduction on the acceptance of background noise. Trends Amplif 2006; 10: 83–93
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Palmer C., Bentler R., Mueller H.G. Amplification and the perception of annoying and aversive sounds. Trends Amplif 2006a; 10: 95–104
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Palmer C., Bentler R., Mueller H.G. Evaluation of a second-order directional microphone hearing aid: Self-report outcomes. J Am Acad Audiol 2006b; 17: 190–201
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reisberg D., McLean J., Goldfield A. Easy to hear but hard to understand: A lip-reading advantage with intact auditory stimuli. Hearing by Eye: The Psychology of Lip-reading, B. Dodd, P. Campbell. LEA, Hillsdale, NJ 1987; 97–113
   Google Scholar
• Ricketts T.A., Hornsby B.W.Y. Sound quality measures for speech in noise through a commercial hearing aid implementing ‘digital noise reduction’. J Am Acad Audiol 2005; 16: 270–277
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shua-Haim J., Koppuzha G., Shua-Haim R.N., Gross J. A simple scoring system for clock-drawing in patients with Alzheimer's disease. J Am Geriatric Soc 1996; 44: 335–337
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sumby W.H., Pollack I. Visual contribution to speech intelligibility in noise. J Acoust Soc Am 1954; 26: 212–215
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Summerfield Q. Some preliminaries to a comprehensive account of audio-visual speech perception. Hearing by Eye: The Psychology of Lip-reading, B. Dodd, R. Campbell. LEA, Hillsdale, NJ 1987; 3–51
   Google Scholar
• Utley J. A test of lip-reading ability. J Speech Dis 1946; 11: 109–116
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Walden B., Surr R., Cord M., Edward B., Olson L. Comparison of benefits provided by different hearing-aid technologies. J Am Acad Audiol 2000; 11: 540–560
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yesavage J.A., Brink T.L., Rose T.L., Lum O. Development and validation of a geriatric depression screening scale: A preliminary report. J Psychiatric Res 1983; 17: 37–49
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar