Automatic screening and detection of threshold fine structure

References

• Cleveland W.S. Robust locally weighted regression and smoothing scatterplots. J Am Stat Assoc 1979; 74: 829–836
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen M.F. Detection threshold microstructure and its effect on temporal integration data. J Acoust Soc Am 1982; 71: 405–409
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliott E. A ripple effect in the audiogram. Nature 1958; 181: 1076
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furst M., Reshef I., Attias J. Manifestations of intense noise stimulation on spontaneous otoacoustic emission and threshold microstructure: Experiment and model. J Acoust Soc Am 1992; 91: 1003–1014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heise S.J., Verhey J.L. & Mauermann M. 2006a. Effizientes Verfahren zur Bestimmung der Feinstruktur der Hörschwelle. In: 9. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Audiologie, Zeitschrift für Audiologie. Suppl. 9, CDROM.
   Google Scholar
• Heise S.J., Mauermann M. & Verhey J.L. 2006b. Modulationswahrnehmung nahe der Hörschwelle. In: 9. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Audiologie, Zeitschrift für Audiologie. Suppl. 9, CDROM.
   Google Scholar
• Heise S.J., Verhey J.L. & Mauermann M. 2006c. Optimized Békésy tracking for the detection of hearing threshold fine structure. In: XXVIIIth International Congress of Audiology.
   Google Scholar
• Heise S.J., Verhey J.L., Mauermann M. Ein effizientes Verfahren zur Bestimmung der Feinstruktur der Hörschwelle. Z Audiol 2007; 46: 126–136
   Google Scholar
• Horst J.W., de Kleine E. Audiogram fine structure and spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in patients with Menière's disease. Audiology 1999; 38: 267–270
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Horst J.W., Wit H.P., Albers F.W.J. Quantification of audiogram fine-structure as a function of hearing threshold. Hear Res 2003; 176: 105–112
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IEC 60645-1, 2001. Audiological equipment – Part 1: Pure-tone audiometers.
   Google Scholar
• ISO 389-8, 2004. Reference zero for the calibration of audiometric equipment – Part 8: Reference equivalent threshold sound pressure levels for pure tones and circumaural earphones.
   Google Scholar
• ISO 8253-1, 1989. Acoustics – Audiometric test methods – Part 1: Basic pure-tone air and bone conduction threshold audiometry.
   Google Scholar
• Kapadia S., Lutman M.E. Reduced ‘audiogram ripple’ in normally-hearing subjects with weak otoacoustic emissions. Audiology 1999; 38: 257–261
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kemp D.T. The evoked cochlear mechanical response and the auditory microstructure – evidence for a new element in cochlear mechanics. Scand Audiol Suppl 1979; 9: 35–47
   Google Scholar
• De Kleine E., Wit H.P., van Dijk P., Avan P. The behavior of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions during and after postural changes. J Acoust Soc Am 2000; 107: 3308–3316
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kollmeier B., Gilkey R.H., Sieben U.K. Adaptive staircase techniques in psychoacoustics: A comparison of human data and a mathematical model. J Acoust Soc Am 1988; 83: 1852–1862
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levitt H. Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. J Acoust Soc Am 1971; 49: 467–477
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long G.R. Perceptual consequences of otoacoustic emissions. Contributions to Psychological Acoustics: Results of the 6th Oldenburg Symposium on Psychological Acoustics, A. Schick. University of Oldenburg Press. 1993; 59–80
   Google Scholar
• Long G.R., Talmadge C.L. Spontaneous otoacoustic emission frequency is modulated by heartbeat. J Acoust Soc Am 1997; 102: 2831–2848
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long G.R., Tubis A. Investigations into the nature of the association between threshold microstructure and otoacoustic emissions. Hear Res 1988a; 36: 125–138
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long G.R., Tubis A. Modification of spontaneous and evoked otoacoustic emissions and associated psychoacoustic microstructure by aspirin consumption. J Acoust Soc Am 1988b; 84: 1343–1353
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall L., Jesteadt W. Comparison of pure-tone audibility thresholds obtained with audiological and two-interval forced-choice procedures. J Speech Hear Res 1986; 29: 82–91
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mauermann M., Long G.R., Kollmeier B. Fine structure of hearing threshold and loudness perception. J Acoust Soc Am 2004; 116: 1066–1080
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McFadden D., Mishra R. On the relation between hearing sensitivity and otoacoustic emissions. Hear Res 1993; 71: 208–213
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McFadden D., Pasanen E.G. Otoacoustic emissions and quinine sulfate. J Acoust Soc Am 1994; 95: 3460–3474
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer-Bisch C. Audioscan: a high-definition audiometry technique based on constant-level frequency sweeps – a new method with new hearing indicators. Audiology 1996; 35: 63–72
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norton S.J., Mott J.B., Champlin C.A. Behavior of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions following intense ipsilateral acoustic stimulation. Hear Res 1989; 38: 243–258
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rabinowitz W.M., Widin G.P. Interaction of spontaneous oto-acoustic emissions and external sounds. J Acoust Soc Am 1984; 76: 1713–1720
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reuter K., Hammershøi D. Distortion product otoacoustic emission fine structure analysis of 50 normal-hearing humans. J Acoust Soc Am 2006; 120: 270–279
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schloth E. Relation between spectral composition of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions and fine-structure of threshold in quiet. Acustica 1983; 53: 250–256
   Google Scholar
• Shera C.A. & Zweig G. 1993. Order from chaos: Resolving the paradox of periodicity in evoked otoacoustic emissions. In: Biophysics of Hair Cell Sensory Systems, Singapore: World Scientific, pp. 54–63.
   Google Scholar
• Silver N.C., Dunlap W.P. Averaging correlation coefficients: Should Fisher's z transformation be used?. J Appl Psychol 1987; 72: 146–148
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smurzynski J., Probst R. The influence of disappearing and reappearing spontaneous otoacoustic emissions on one subject's threshold microstructure. Hear Res 1998; 115: 197–205
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talmadge C.L., Tubis A., Long G.R., Piskorski P. Modeling otoacoustic emission and hearing threshold fine structures. J Acoust Soc Am 1998; 104: 1517–1543
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zweig G., Shera C.A. The origin of periodicity in the spectrum of evoked otoacoustic emissions. J Acoust Soc Am 1995; 98: 2018–2047
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zwicker E. Spontaneous oto-acoustic emissions, threshold in quiet, and just noticeable amplitude modulation at low levels. Auditory Frequency Selectivity, B.C.J. Moore, R.D. Patterson. Plenum. 1986; 49–59
   Google Scholar
• Zwicker E., Schloth E. Interrelation of different oto-acoustic emissions. J Acoust Soc Am 1984; 75: 1148–1154
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar