Auditory steady-state responses in normal hearing adults: A test-retest reliability study

References

• American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. 2004. Guidelines for the Audiologic Assessment of Children from Birth to 5 Years of Age. Rockville, MD: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. Available at: www.asha.org/NR/rdonlyres/0BB7C840-27D2-4DC6-861B-1709ADD78BAF/0/v2GLAudAssessChild.pdf. Accessed February 22, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Aoyagi M., Kiren T., Furuse H., Fuse T., Suzuki Y., et al. Pure-tone threshold prediction by 80-Hz amplitude-modulation following response. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl 1994; 511: 7–14
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Atkinson G., Nevill A. Comment on the use of concordance correlation to assess the agreement between two variables. Biometrics 1997; 53: 775–777
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkinson G., Nevill A.M. Statistical methods for assessing measurement error (reliability) in variables relevant to sports medicine. Sports Med 1998; 26: 217–238
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carhart R., Jerger J.J. Preferred method for clinical determination of pure-tone thresholds. J Speech Hear Res 1959; 24: 330–345
   Google Scholar
• Carmines E.G. & Zeller R.A. 1979. Reliability and Validity Assessment. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen L.T., Rickards F.W., Clark G.M. A comparison of steady-state evoked potentials to modulated tones in awake and sleeping humans. J Acoust Soc Am 1991; 90: 2467–2479
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dimitrijevic A., John M.S., Van R.P., Purcell D.W., Adamonis J., et al. Estimating the audiogram using multiple auditory steady-state responses. J Am Acad Audiol 2002; 13: 205–224
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• D'haenens W., Dhooge I., De Vel E., Maes L., Bockstael A., et al. Auditory steady-state responses to MM and exponential envelope AM(2)/FM stimuli in normal-hearing adults. Int J Audiol 2007; 46: 399–406
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gross Portney L. & Watkins M.P. 2000. Foundations of Clinical Research: Applications to Practice. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Hall J. 2006. Frequency-specific auditory brainstem response (ABR) and auditory steady-state responses (ASSR). In: New Handbook of Auditory Evoked Responses. Boston: Allyn and Bacon, pp. 258–312.
   Google Scholar
• Henry J.A., Flick C.L., Gilbert A., Ellingson R.M., Fausti S.A. Reliability of hearing thresholds: Computer-automated testing with ER-4B Canal Phone earphones. J Rehabil Res Dev 2001; 38: 567–581
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herdman A.T., Stapells D.R. Thresholds determined using the monotic and dichotic multiple auditory steady-state response technique in normal-hearing subjects. Scand Audiol 2001; 30: 41–49
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herdman A.T., Stapells D.R. Auditory steady-state response thresholds of adults with sensorineural hearing impairments. Int J Audiol 2003; 42: 237–248
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopkins W.G. Measures of reliability in sports medicine and science. Sports Med 2000; 30: 1–15
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jerger J. Comparative evaluation of some auditory measures. J Speech Hear Res 1962; 5: 3–17
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• John M.S., Brown D.K., Muir P.J., Picton T.W. Recording auditory steady-state responses in young infants. Ear Hear 2004; 25: 539–553
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• John M.S., Dimitrijevic A., Picton T.W. Weighted averaging of steady-state responses. Clin Neurophysiol 2001a; 112: 555–562
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• John M.S., Dimitrijevic A., Picton T.W. Auditory steady-state responses to exponential modulation envelopes. Ear Hear 2002a; 23: 106–117
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• John M.S., Dimitrijevic A., van Roon P., Picton T.W. Multiple auditory steady-state responses to AM and FM stimuli. Audiol Neurootol 2001b; 6: 12–27
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• John M.S., Lins O.G., Boucher B.L., Picton T.W. Multiple auditory steady-state responses (MASTER): Stimulus and recording parameters. Audiology 1998; 37: 59–82
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• John M.S., Picton T.W. MASTER: A Windows program for recording multiple auditory steady-state responses. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 2000; 61: 125–150
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• John M.S., Purcell D.W., Dimitrijevic A., Picton T.W. Advantages and caveats when recording steady-state responses to multiple simultaneous stimuli. J Am Acad Audiol 2002b; 13: 246–259
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Joint Committee on Infant Hearing; American Academy of Audiology, American Academy of Pediatrics, American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, Directors of Speech and Hearing Programs in State Health and Welfare Agencies. 2000. Year 2000 position statement: Principles and guidelines for early hearing detection and intervention programs. Pediatrics, 106, 798–817.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joint Committee on Infant Hearing; American Academy of Pediatrics. 2007. Year 2007 position statement: Principles and guidelines for early hearing detection and intervention programs. Pediatrics, 120, 898–921.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaf W.A., Sabo D.L., Durrant J.D., Rubinstein E. Reliability of electric response audiometry using 80-Hz auditory steady-state responses. Int J Audiol 2006; 45: 47–486
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Killion M.C., Villchur E. Comments on ‘Earphones in audiometry’ [Zwislocki et al, J Acoust Soc Am, 83, 1688–1689 (1988)]. J Acoust Soc Am 1989; 85: 1775–1779
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larson V.D., Cooper W.A., Talbott R.E., Schwartz D.M., Ahlstrom C., et al. Reference threshold sound-pressure levels for the TDH-50 and ER-3A earphones. J Acoust Soc Am 1988; 84: 46–51
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lexell J.E., Downham D.Y. How to assess the reliability of measurements in rehabilitation. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2005; 84: 719–723
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lins O.G., Picton T.W. Auditory steady-state responses to multiple simultaneous stimuli. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1995; 96: 420–432
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lins O.G., Picton T.W., Boucher B.L., Durieux-Smith A., Champagne S.C., et al. Frequency-specific audiometry using steady-state responses. Ear Hear 1996; 17: 81–96
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luts H., Wouters J. Hearing assessment by recording multiple auditory steady-state responses: The influence of test duration. Int J Audiol 2004; 43: 471–478
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luts H., Wouters J. Comparison of MASTER and AUDERA for measurement of auditory steady-state responses. Int J Audiol 2005; 44: 244–253
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagele P. Misuse of standard error of the mean (SEM) when reporting variability of a sample. A critical evaluation of four anaesthesia journals. Br J Anaesthesiol 2003; 90: 514–516
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NHSP (newborn hearing screening programme) clinical group: Stevens J. Sutton G. Wood S. & Mason S. March 2007. Newborn hearing screening and assessment: Guidelines for the early audiological assessment and management of babies referred from the newborn hearing screening programme. Version 1.1. Retrieved September 5, 2007, from http://hearing.screening.nhs.uk/getdata.php?id=1337.
   Google Scholar
• Perez-Abalo M.C., Savio G., Torres A., Martin V., Rodriguez E., et al. Steady-state responses to multiple amplitude-modulated tones: An optimized method to test frequency-specific thresholds in hearing-impaired children and normal-hearing subjects. Ear Hear 2001; 22: 200–211
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Picton T.W., Dimitrijevic A., Perez-Abalo M.C., Van Roon P. Estimating audiometric thresholds using auditory steady-state responses. J Am Acad Audiol 2005; 16: 140–156
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Picton T.W., John M.S. Avoiding electromagnetic artifacts when recording auditory steady-state responses. J Am Acad Audiol 2004; 15: 541–554
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Picton T.W., John M.S., Dimitrijevic A., Purcell D. Human auditory steady-state responses. Int J Audiol 2003a; 42: 177–219
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Picton T.W., John M.S., Purcell D.W., Plourde G. Human auditory steady-state responses: The effects of recording technique and state of arousal. Anesth Analg 2003b; 97: 1396–1402
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rance G., Dowell R.C., Rickards F.W., Beer D.E., Clark G.M. Steady-state evoked potential and behavioral hearing thresholds in a group of children with absent click-evoked auditory brain stem response. Ear Hear 1998; 19: 48–61
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rance G., Rickards F.W., Cohen L.T., De V.S., Clark G.M. The automated prediction of hearing thresholds in sleeping subjects using auditory steady-state evoked potentials. Ear Hear 1995; 16: 499–507
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Small S.A., Stapells D.R. Artifactual responses when recording auditory steady-state responses. Ear Hear 2004; 25: 611–623
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stapells D.R., Herdman A., Small S.A., Dimitrijevic A., Hatton J. Current status of the auditory steady-state responses for estimating an infant's audiogram. A Sound Foundation Through Early Amplification 2004, R.C. Seewald, J.M. Bamford. Phonak AG, Basel 2005; 43–59
   Google Scholar
• Stapells D.R. 2007. Evoked potential audiometry – tips for clinicians: Auditory steady-state responses. Retrieved August 20, 2007 from http://www.audiospeech.ubc.ca/haplab/ASSR. html.
   Google Scholar
• Stelmachowicz P.G., Beauchaine K.A., Kalberer A., Langer T., Jesteadt W. The reliability of auditory thresholds in the 8- to 20-kHz range using a prototype audiometer. J Acoust Soc Am 1988; 83: 1528–1535
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stürzebecher E., Cebulla M., Elberling C. Automated auditory response detection: Statistical problems with repeated testing. Int J Audiol 2005; 44: 110–117
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stürzebecher E., Cebulla M., Elberling C., Berger T. New efficient stimuli for evoking frequency-specific auditory steady-state responses. J Am Acad Audiol 2006; 17: 448–461
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tlumak A.I., Rubinstein E., Durrant J.D. Meta-analysis of variables that affect accuracy of threshold estimation via measurement of the auditory steady-state response (ASSR). Int J Audiol 2007; 46: 692–710
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valdes J.L., Perez-Abalo M.C., Martin V., Savio G., Sierra C., et al. Comparison of statistical indicators for the automatic detection of 80-Hz auditory steady-state responses. Ear Hear 1997; 18: 420–429
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• v.d. Drift J.F., Brocaar M.P., von Zanten G.A., Lamoré P.J. Inaccuracies in the measurement of auditory brainstem response data in normal hearing and cochlear hearing loss. Audiology 1988; 27: 109–118
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• van der Reijden C.S., Mens L.H., Snik A.F. Signal-to-noise ratios of the auditory steady-state response from 55 EEG derivations in adults. J Am Acad Audiol 2004; 15: 692–701
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• van der Reijden C.S., Mens L.H., Snik A.F. Frequency-specific objective audiometry: Tone-evoked brainstem responses and steady-state responses to 40-Hz and 90-Hz amplitude modulated stimuli. Int J Audiol 2006; 45: 40–45
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Maanen A., Stapells D.R. Comparison of multiple auditory steady-state responses (80 versus 40 Hz) and slow cortical potentials for threshold estimation in hearing-impaired adults. Int J Audiol 2005; 44: 613–624
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weir J.P. Quantifying test-retest reliability using the intraclass correlation coefficient and the SEM. J Strength Cond Res 2005; 19: 231–240
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilber L.A., Kruger B., Killion M.C. Reference thresholds for the ER-3A insert earphone. J Acoust Soc Am 1988; 83: 669–676
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zwislocki J., Kruger B., Miller J.D., Niemoeller A.F., Shaw E.A., et al. Earphones in audiometry. J Acoust Soc Am 1998; 83: 1688–1689
   Google Scholar