Discrimination of envelope statistics reveals evidence of sub-clinical hearing damage in a noise-exposed population with ‘normal’ hearing thresholds

References

• Alberti P.W., Morgan P.P., LeBlanc J.C. Occupational hearing loss: An otologist's view of a long-term study. Laryngoscope 1974; 84: 1822–1834
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Attias J., Bresloff I., Reshef I., Horowitz G., Furman V. Evaluating noise induced hearing loss with distortion product otoacoustic emissions. Br J Audiol 1998; 32: 39–46
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biassoni E.C., Serra M.R., Richtert U., Joekes S., Yacci M.R., et al. Recreational noise exposure and its effects on the hearing of adolescents. Part II: Development of hearing disorders. Int J Audiol 2005; 44: 74–85
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borg E., Canlon B. & Engström B. 1995. Noise-induced hearing loss: Literature review and experiments in rabbits. Morphological and electrophysiological features, exposure parameters and temporal factors, variability and interactions. Scand Audiol, 24, Suppl. 40, 1–147.
   Google Scholar
• Bracewell R.N. The Fourier Transform and its Applications. Mc-Graw Hill, New York 1986
   Google Scholar
• Chen Y.S., Liu T.C., Cheng C.H., Yeh T.H., Lee S.Y., et al. Changes of hair cell stereocilia and threshold shift after acoustic trauma in guinea pigs: Comparison between inner and outer hair cells. J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec (ORL) 2003; 65: 266–274
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engström B. 1983. Stereocilia of sensory cells in normal and hearing impaired ears. Scand Audiol, Suppl. 19, 1–34.
   Google Scholar
• Fay J.P., Puria S., Steele C.R. The discordant eardrum. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2006; 103: 19743–19748
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geisler C.D. From Sound to Synapse: Physiology of the Mammalian Ear. Oxford University Press, Oxford 1998
   Google Scholar
• Glasberg B.R., Moore B.C.J. Derivation of auditory filter shapes from notched-noise data. Hear Res 1990; 47: 103–138
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glasberg B.R., Moore B.C.J., Nimmo-Smith I. Comparison of auditory filter shapes derived with three different maskers. J Acoust Soc Am 1984; 75: 536–544
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall A.J., Lutman M.E. Methods for early identification of noise-induced hearing loss. Audiology 1999; 38: 277–280
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hartmann W.M., Pumplin J. Noise power fluctuations and the masking of sine signals. J Acoust Soc Am 1988; 83: 2277–2289
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson D., Hamernik R.P., Sitler R.W. Audiometric and histological correlates of exposure to 1-msec noise impulses in the chinchilla. J Acoust Soc Am 1974; 56: 1210–1221
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson D., Subramaniam M., Boettcher F.A. Individual susceptibility to noise-induced hearing loss: An old topic revisited. Ear Hear 1993; 14: 152–168
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirsh I.J., Ward W.D. Recovery of the auditory threshold after strong acoustic stimulation. J Acoust Soc Am 1952; 24: 131–141
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houtgast T. Auditory-filter characteristics derived from direct-masking data and pulsation-threshold data with a rippled-noise masker. J Acoust Soc Am 1977; 62: 409–415
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huss M., Moore B.C.J. Tone decay for hearing-impaired listeners with and without dead regions in the cochlea. J Acoust Soc Am 2003; 114: 3283–3294
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huss M., Moore B.C.J. Dead regions and noisiness of pure tones. Int J Audiol 2005; 44: 599–611
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lentz J.J., Leek M.R. Psychophysical estimates of cochlear phase response: Masking by harmonic complexes. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 2001; 2: 408–422
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levitt H. Transformed Up-Down Methods in Psychoacoustics. J Acoust Soc America 1971; 19: 467–477
   Google Scholar
• Liberman M.C., Dodds L.W. Single neuron labeling and chronic cochlea pathology. III. Stereocilia damage and alterations in threshold tuning curves. Hear Res 1984; 16: 54–74
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucertini M., Moleti A., Sisto R. On the detection of early cochlear damage by otoacoustic emission analysis. J Acoust Soc Am 2002; 111: 972–978
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melnick W. Human temporary threshold shift (TTS) and damage risk. J Acoust Soc Am 1991; 90: 147–154
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore B.C.J. Dead regions in the cochlea: Diagnosis, perceptual consequences, and implications for the fitting of hearing aids. Trends Amplif 2001; 5: 1–34
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moore B.C.J. 2003. An Introduction to the Psychology of Hearing, 5th Ed. San Diego: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moore B.C.J. Dead regions in the cochlea: Conceptual foundations, diagnosis and clinical applications. Ear Hear 2004a; 25: 98–116
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore B.C.J. Testing the concept of softness imperception: Loudness near threshold for hearing-impaired ears. J Acoust Soc Am 2004b; 115: 3103–3111
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore B.C.J. 2007. Cochlear Hearing Loss: Physiological, Psychological and Technical Issues, 2nd Ed. Chichester: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Moore B.C.J., Glasberg B.R. A model of loudness perception applied to cochlear hearing loss. Auditory Neurosci 1997; 3: 289–311
   Google Scholar
• Moore B.C.J., Glasberg B.R. A revised model of loudness perception applied to cochlear hearing loss. Hear Res 2004; 188: 70–88
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore B.C.J., Glasberg B.R. Modeling binaural loudness. J Acoust Soc Am 2007; 121: 1604–1612
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore B.C.J., Glasberg B.R., Baer T. A model for the prediction of thresholds, loudness and partial loudness. J Audio Eng Soc 1997; 45: 224–240
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore B.C.J., Glasberg B.R., Stone M.A. New version of the TEN test with calibrations in dB HL. Ear Hear 2004; 25: 478–487
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore B.C.J., Wojtczak M., Vickers D.A. Effect of loudness recruitment on the perception of amplitude modulation. J Acoust Soc Am 1996; 100: 481–489
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nordmann A.S., Bohne B.A., Harding G.W. Histopathological differences between temporary and permanent threshold shift. Hear Res 2000; 139: 13–30
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oxenham A.J., Dau T. Towards a measure of auditory-filter phase response. J Acoust Soc Am 2001; 110: 3169–3178
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patterson R.D. Auditory filter shapes derived with noise stimuli. J Acoust Soc Am 1976; 59: 640–654
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patuzzi R. Exponential onset and recovery of temporary threshold shift after loud sound: Evidence for long-term inactivation of mechano-electrical transduction channels. Hear Res 1998; 125: 17–38
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plack C.J., Skeels V. Temporal integration and compression near absolute threshold in normal and impaired ears. J Acoust Soc Am 2007; 122: 2236–2244
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pumplin J. Low-noise noise. J Acoust Soc Am 1985; 78: 100–104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhode W.S., Recio A. Basilar-membrane response to multicomponent stimuli in chinchilla. J Acoust Soc Am 2001; 110: 981–994
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rice S.O. Mathematical analysis of random noise. Selected Papers on Noise and Stochastic Processes, N. Wax. Dover, New York 1954; 133–294
   Google Scholar
• Robertson D. Effects of acoustic trauma on stereocilia structure and spiral ganglion cell tuning properties in the guinea pig cochlea. Hear Res 1982; 7: 55–74
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robles L., Ruggero M.A. Mechanics of the mammalian cochlea. Physiol Rev 2001; 81: 1305–1352
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruggero M.A., Rich N.C., Recio A., Narayan S.S., Robles L. Basilar-membrane responses to tones at the base of the chinchilla cochlea. J Acoust Soc Am 1997; 101: 2151–2163
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan A., Dallos P. Effect of absence of cochlear outer hair cells on behavioural auditory threshold. Nature 1975; 253: 44–46
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saunders J.C., Cohen Y.E., Szymko Y.M. The structural and functional consequences of acoustic injury: A five years update. J Acoust Soc Am 1991; 90: 136–141
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuknecht H.F. 1993. Pathology of the Ear, 2nd Ed. Philadelphia: Lea and Febiger.
   Google Scholar
• Schuknecht H.F. & Gacek M.R. 1993. Cochlear pathology in presbycusis. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol, 102, Suppl. 158, 1–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terhardt E. On the perception of periodic sound fluctuations (roughness). Acustica 1974; 30: 201–213
   Google Scholar
• Wang Y., Hirose K., Liberman M.C. Dynamics of noise-induced cellular injury and repair in the mouse cochlea. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 2002; 3: 248–68
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West P.D., Evans E.F. Early detection of hearing damage in young listeners resulting from exposure to amplified music. Br J Audiol 1990; 24: 89–103
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wright A., Davis A., Bredberg G., Ulehlova L. & Spencer H. 1987. Hair cell distributions in the normal human cochlea. Acta Otolaryngol, Suppl. 444, 1–48.
   Google Scholar