Modification of otoacoustic emissions following ear-level exposure to MP3 player music

References

• Attias J., Bresloff I. Noise induced temporary otoacoustic emission shifts. J Basic Clin Physiol Pharmacol 1996; 7: 221–233
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Axelsson A., Lindgren F. Temporary threshold shift after exposure to pop music. Scand Audiol 1978; 7: 127–135
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bilger R.C., Matthies M.L., Hammel D.R., Demorest M.E. Genetic implications of gender differences in the prevalence of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions. J Speech Hear Res 1990; 33: 418–432
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brownell W.E. Outer hair cell electromotility and otoacoustic emissions. Ear Hear 1990; 11: 82–92
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cacace A.T., McClelland W.A., Weiner J., McFarland D.J. Individual differences and the reliability of 2F1-F2 distortion-product otoacoustic emissions: Effects of time-of-day, stimulus variables, and gender. J Speech Hear Res 1996; 39: 1138–1148
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chen G.D., Zhao H.B. Effects of intense noise exposure on the outer hair cell plasma membrane fluidity. Hear Res 2007; 226: 14–21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark J.A., Pickles J.O. The effects of moderate and low levels of acoustic overstimulation on stereocilia and their tip links in the guinea pig. Hear Res 1996; 99: 119–128
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cody A.R., Russell I.J. Outer hair cells in the mammalian cochlea and noise-induced hearing loss. Nature 1985; 315: 662–665
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis B., Qiu W., Hamernik R.P. Sensitivity of distortion product otoacoustic emissions in noise-exposed chinchillas. J Am Acad Audiol 2005; 16: 69–78
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Davis B., Qiu W., Hamernik R.P. The use of distortion product otoacoustic emissions in the estimation of hearing and sensory cell loss in noise-damaged cochleas. Hear Res 2004; 187: 12–24
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhar S., Talmadge C.L., Long G.R., Tubis A. Multiple internal reflections in the cochlea and their effect on DPOAE fine structure. J Acoust Soc Am 2002; 112: 2882–2897
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emmerich E., Richter F., Hagner H., Giessler F., Gehrlein S., et al. Effects of discotheque music on audiometric results and central acoustic evoked neuromagnetic responses. Int Tinnitus J 2002; 8: 13–19
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Engdahl B., Kemp D. The effect of noise exposure on the details of distortion product otoacoustic emissions in humans. J Acoust Soc Am 1996; 99: 1573–1587
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furst M., Reshef I., Attias J. Manifestations of intense noise stimulation on spontaneous otoacoustic emission and threshold microstructure: experiment and model. J Acoust Soc Am 1992; 91: 1003–1014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaskill S.A., Brown A.M. The behavior of the acoustic distortion product, 2f1–f2, from the human ear and its relation to auditory sensitivity. J Acoust Soc Am 1990; 88: 821–839
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamernik R.P., Ahroon W.A., Lei S.F. The cubic distortion product otoacoustic emissions from the normal and noise-damaged chinchilla cochlea. J Acoust Soc Am 1996; 100: 1003–1012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hellström P.A., Axelsson A., Costa O. Temporary threshold shift induced by music. Scand Audiol Suppl 1998; 48: 87–94
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hodgetts W.E., Rieger J.M., Szarko R.A. The effects of listening environment and earphone style on preferred listening levels of normal hearing adults using an MP3 player. Ear Hear 2007; 28: 290–297
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooks-Horton S., Geer S., Stuart A. Effects of exercise and noise on auditory thresholds and distortion-product otoacoustic emissions. J Am Acad Audiol 2001; 12: 52–58
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hu B.H. Delayed mitochondrial dysfunction in apoptotic hair cells in chinchilla cochleae following exposure to impulse noise. Apoptosis 2007; 12: 1025–1036
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keogh T., Kei J., Driscoll C., Smyth V. Distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in schoolchildren: Effects of ear asymmetry, handedness, and gender. J Am Acad Audiol 2001; 12: 506–513
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kim J.S., Nam E.C., Park S.I. Electrocochleography is more sensitive than distortion-product otoacoustic emission test for detecting noise-induced temporary threshold shift. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2005; 133: 619–624
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konrad-Martin D., Keefe D. Time-frequency analyses of transient-evoked stimulus-frequency and distortion-product otoacoustic emissions: Testing cochlear model predictions. J Acoust Soc Am 2003; 114: 2021–2043
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kramer S., Dreisbach L., Lockwood J., Baldwin K., Kopke R., et al. Efficacy of the antioxidant N-acetylcysteine (NAC) in protecting ears exposed to loud music. J Am Acad Audiol 2006; 17: 265–278
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krishnamurti S., Grandjean P.W. Effects of simultaneous exercise and loud music on hearing acuity and auditory function. J Strength Cond Res 2003; 17: 307–313
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuroda T., Fukuda S., Chida E., Kashiwamura M., Matsumura M., et al. Effects of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions on distortion product otoacoustic emission. Auris Nasus Larynx, 28. supp 2001; 1: S33–S38
   Google Scholar
• Linss V., Emmerich E., Richter F., Linss W. Is there a close relationship between changes in amplitudes of distortion product otoacoustic emissions and hair cell damage after exposure to realistic industrial noise in guinea pigs?. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2005; 262: 488–495
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lonsbury-Martin B., Martin G.K. Otoacoustic emissions. Physiology of the Ear, A.F. Jahn, J. Santos-Sacchi. Singular, San Diego 2001; 443–480
   Google Scholar
• Martin G.K., Probst R., Lonsbury-Martin B.L. Otoacoustic emissions in human ears: Normative findings. Ear Hear 1990; 11: 106–120
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McFadden D., Mishra R. On the relation between hearing sensitivity and otoacoustic emissions. Hear Res 1993; 71: 208–213
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McFadden D., Pasanen E.G. Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in heterosexuals, homosexuals, and bisexuals. J Acoust Soc Am 1999; 105: 2403–2413
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morata T.C. Young people: Their noise and music exposures and the risk of hearing loss. Int J Audiol 2007; 46: 111–112
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nordmann A.S., Bohne B.A., Harding G.W. Histopathological differences between temporary and permanent threshold shift. Hear Res 2000; 139: 13–30
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norton S.J., Mott J.B., Champlin C.A. Behavior of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions following intense ipsilateral acoustic stimulation. Hear Res 1989; 38: 243–258
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Occupational Safety and Health Administration. 1981. Occupational noise exposure: Hearing conservation amendment. Federal Register, 46, 4078–4179.
   Google Scholar
• Peitz M., Waelbroeck P. An economist's guide to digital music. CESifo Economic Studies 2005; 51: 359–428
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penner M.J., Glotzbach L., Huang T. Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions: Measurement and data. Hear Res 1993; 68: 229–237
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plinkert P.K., Hemmert W., Wagner W., Just K., Zenner H.P. Monitoring noise susceptibility: Sensitivity of otoacoustic emissions and subjective audiometry. Br J Audiol 1999; 33: 367–382
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reuter K., Hammershøi D. Distortion product otoacoustic emission of symphony musicians before and after rehearsal. J Acoust Soc Am 2007; 121: 327–336
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reuter K., Ordoñez R., Hammershøi D. Overexposure effects of a 1-kHz tone on the distortion-product otoacoustic emission in humans. J Acoust Soc Am 2007; 122: 378–386
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santos L., Morata T.C., Jacob L.C., Albizu E., Marques J.M., et al. Music exposure and audiological findings in Brazilian disc jockeys (DJs). Int J Audiol 2007; 46: 223–231
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmuziger N., Patscheke J., Probst R. An assessment of threshold shifts in nonprofessional pop/rock musicians using conventional and extended high-frequency audiometry. Ear Hear 2007; 28: 643–648
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shera C. Mechanisms of mammalian otoacoustic emission and their implications for the clinical utility of otoacoustic emissions. Ear Hear 2004; 25: 86–97
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shera C.A., Guinan J.J., Jr. Evoked otoacoustic emissions arise by two fundamentally different mechanisms: A taxonomy for mammalian OAEs. J Acoust Soc Am 1999; 105: 782–798
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sisto R., Chelotti S., Moriconi L., Pellegrini S., Citroni A., et al. Otoacoustic emission sensitivity to low levels of noise-induced hearing loss. J Acoust Soc Am 2007; 122: 387–401
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sisto R., Moleti A., Lucertini M. Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions and relaxation dynamics of long decay time OAEs in audiometrically normal and impaired subjects. J Acoust Soc Am 2001; 109: 638–647
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sisto R., Moleti A. Modeling otoacoustic emissions by active nonlinear oscillators. J Acoust Soc Am 1999; 106: 1893–1906
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutton L.A., Lonsbury-Martin B.L., Martin G.K., Whitehead M.L. Sensitivity of distortion- product otoacoustic emissions in humans to tonal over-exposure: Time course of recovery and effects of lowering L2. Hear Res 1994; 75: 161–174
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talmadge C.L., Long G.R., Tubis A., Dhar S. Experimental confirmation of the two-source interference model for the fine structure of distortion product otoacoustic emissions. J Acoust Soc Am 1999; 105: 275–292
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talmadge C.L., Tubis A., Long G.R., Piskorski P. Modeling otoacoustic emission and hearing threshold fine structures. J Acoust Soc Am 1998; 104: 1517–1543
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsuprun V., Schachern P.A., Cureoglu S., Paperella M. Structure of the stereocilia side links and morphology of auditory hair bundle in relation to noise exposure in the chinchilla. J Neurocytol 2003; 32: 1117–1128
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Veuillet E., Martin V., Suc B., Vesson J.F., Morgon A., et al. Otoacoustic emissions and medial olivocochlear suppression during auditory recovery from acoustic trauma in humans. Acta Otolaryngol 2001; 121: 278–283
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vinck B.M., Van Cauwenberge P.B., Leroy L., Corthals P. Sensitivity of transient evoked and distortion product otoacoustic emissions to the direct effects of noise on the human cochlea. Audiology 1999; 38: 44–52
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zogby International. 2006. Survey of Teens and Adults about the Use of Personal Electronic and Head Phones. Available at: http://www.asha.org/NR/rdonlyres/10B67FA1-002C-4C7B-BA0B-1C0A3AF98A63/0/zogby_survey2006.pdf. Retrieved December 20, 2007.
   Google Scholar