References
- Boothroyd A., Nittrouer S. Mathematical treatment of context effects in phoneme and word recognition. J Acoust Soc Am 1988; 84: 101–114
- Fairbanks G. Test of phonemic differentiation: The rhyme test. J Acoust Soc Am 1958; 30: 596–600
- Glasberg B.R., Moore B.C.J. Psychoacoustic abilities of subjects with unilateral and bilateral cochlear hearing impairments and their relationship to the ability to understand speech. Scand Audiol 1989, Suppl. 32: 1–25
- Hagerman B. Sentences for testing speech intelligibility in noise. Scand Audiol 1982; 11: 79–87
- Hällgren M., Larsby B., Arlinger S. A Swedish version of the hearing in noise test (HINT) for measurement of speech recognition. Int J Audiol 2006; 45: 227–237
- House A.S., Williams C.E., Hecker M.H.L., Kryter K.D. Articulation-testing methods: Consonantal differentiation with a closed-response set. J Acoust Soc Am 1965; 37: 158–166
- Kalikow D.N., Stevens K.N., Elliot L.L. Development of a test of speech intelligibility in noise using sentence materials with controlled word predictability. J Acoust Soc Am 1977; 61: 1337–1351
- Kollmeier B., Wesselkamp M. Development and evaluation of a German sentence test for objective and subjective speech intelligibility assessment. J Acoust Soc Am 1997; 102: 2412–2421
- MacLeod A., Summerfield Q. A procedure for measuring auditory and audio-visual speech-reception thresholds for sentences in noise: rationale, evaluation, and recommendations for use. Br J Audiol 1990; 24: 29–43
- Middelweerd M.J., Festen J.M., Plomp R. Difficulties with speech intelligibility in noise in spite of a normal pure-tone audiogram. Audiology 1990; 29: 1–7
- Nilsson M., Soli S.D., Sullivan J.A. Development of the hearing in noise test for the measurement of speech reception thresholds in quiet and in noise. J Acoust Soc Am 1994; 95: 1085–1099
- Plomp R. Auditory handicap of hearing impairment and the limited benefit of hearing aids. J Acoust Soc Am 1978; 63: 533–549
- Plomp R., Mimpen A.M. Improving the reliability of testing the speech reception threshold for sentences. Audiology 1979; 18: 43–52
- Prosser S., Turrini M., Arslan E. Effects of different noises on speech discrimination by the elderly. Acta Oto-Laryngol (Stockholm) 1991, Suppl. 476: 136–142
- Soli S.D., Wong L.L.N. Assessment of speech intelligibility in noise with the hearing in noise test. Int J Audiol 2008; 47: 356–361
- Vaillancourt V., Laroche C., Mayer C., Basque C., Nali M., et al. Adaptation of the HINT (hearing in noise test) for adult Canadian Francophone populations. Int J Audiol 2005; 44: 358–369
- Versfeld N.J., Daalder L., Festen J.M., Houtgast T. Method for the selection of sentence materials for efficient measurement of the speech reception threshold. J Acoust Soc Am 2000; 107: 1671–1684
- Wagener K., Josvassen J.L., Ardenkjaer R. Design, optimization, and evaluation of a Danish sentence test in noise. Int J Audiol 2003; 42: 10–17
- Wong L.L.N., Soli S.D. Development of the Cantonese hearing in noise test (CHINT). Ear Hear 2005; 26: 276–289