Advanced search
Publication Cover
International Journal of Audiology Volume 55, 2016 - Issue 7
Submit an article Journal homepage
1,367
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Technical Report

Wireless and acoustic hearing with bone-anchored hearing devices

Arjan J. BosmanHearing and Implants, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen, The NetherlandsCorrespondence[email protected]
,
Emmanuel A.M. MylanusHearing and Implants, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen, The Netherlands
,
Myrthe K.S. HolHearing and Implants, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen, The Netherlands
&
Ad F.M. SnikHearing and Implants, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen, The Netherlands
Pages 419-424 | Received 24 Jun 2015, Accepted 05 Apr 2016, Published online: 13 May 2016

References

  • ASHA (2002). Guidelines for fitting and monitoring FM systems. www.asha.org/policy/GL2002-00010.htm
  • Bosman A.J., Hol M., Snik A.F.M. & Mylanus E.A. (2014). Evaluating Oticon medical Ponto Plus and Ponto Pro sound processor. Online. Available: www.audiologyonline.com/audiology-ceus/course/evaluating-oticon-medical-ponto-plus-24323.
  • Bosman A.J., Snik A.F.M., Mylanus E.A.M. & Hol M.K.S. (2011). Evaluation of cochlear BP-100 and Oticon Ponto pro sound processors. Poster 3rd Int Symp Boneconduction Hearing and Cranio-facial Osseointegration (OSSEO 2011).
  • Desmet J., Bosman A.J., Snik A.F.M., Lambrechts P., Hol M.K.S. et al. 2013. Comparison of sound processing strategies for osseointegrated bone conduction implants in mixed hearing loss: multiple-channel nonlinear versus single-channel linear processing. Otol Neurotol, 34, 598–603.
  • Håkansson B. & Carlsson P. 1989. Skull simulator for direct bone conduction hearing devices. Scand Audiol, 18, 91–98.
  • Kochkin S. 2005. MarkeTrak VII: Customer satisfaction with hearing instruments in the digital age. Hear J, 58, 30–43.
  • Latzel M., Gebhart T.M. & Kiessling J. 2001. Benefit of a digital feedback suppression system for acoustical telephone communications. Scan Audiol, 52, 69–72.
  • Picou E.M. & Ricketts T.A. 2011. Comparison of wireless and acoustic hearing aid-based telephone listening strategies. Ear Hear, 32, 209–220.
  • Picou E.M. & Ricketts T.A. 2013. Efficacy of hearing-aid based telephone strategies for listeners with moderate-to-severe hearing loss. J Am Acad Audiol, 24, 59–70.
  • Plomp R. & Mimpen A.M. 1979. Improving the reliability of testing the speech reception threshold for sentences. Audiology, 18, 43–52.
  • Sandrock C. & Schum D.J. 2007. Wireless transmission of speech and data to, from, and between hearing aids. Hear J, 60, 12–16.
  • Snik A.F.M., Mylanus E.A.M., Proops D.W. et al. 2005. Consensus statements on the BAHA system: where do we stand at present? Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl, 195, 2–12.
  • Smits C., Kapteyn T.S. & Houtgast T. 2004. Development and validation of an automatic speech-in-noise screening test by telephone. Int J Audiol, 43, 15–28.
  • Yanz J.L. & Preves D.A. 2007. Assessing the feasibility of Bluetooth in hearing rehabilitation. Hear J, 60, 52–60.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.