476
Views
17
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Clinical validation of automated audiometry with continuous noise-monitoring in a clinically heterogeneous population outside a sound-treated environment

, , , &
Pages 507-513 | Received 28 Apr 2015, Accepted 12 Apr 2016, Published online: 20 May 2016

References

  • ASHA. (2004). Guidelines for the Audiologic Assessment of Children from Birth to 5 Years of Age. Rockville: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.
  • Brennan-Jones C.G., Taljaard D.S., Brennan-Jones S.E.F., Bennett R.J., Swanepoel D. & Eikelboom R.E. 2016. Self-reported hearing loss and manual audiometry: a rural versus urban comparison. Austr J Rural Health, 24, 130–135.
  • Edwards A.L. (2010). Evaluation of the Kuduwave 5000 Audiometer for Compliance with Standards for Hearing Conservation Purposes Johannesburg, South Africa: Council for Scientific and Industrial Research.
  • Eikelboom R.H., Swanepoel D., Motakef S. & Upson G.S. 2013. Clinical validation of the AMTAS automated audiometer. Int J Audiol, 52, 342–349.
  • Gössing P. & Richter U. (2003). Characteristic data of the circumaural earphone Sennheiser HDA 200 in the conventional and the extended high frequency range. In U. Richter (ed.), Characteristic Data of Different Kinds of Earphones Used in the Extended High Frequency Range for pure-Tone Audiometry. Braunschweig: PTB Report PTB-MA-72.
  • Ho A.T., Hildreth A.J. & Lindsey L. 2009. Computer-assisted audiometry versus manual audiometry. Otol Neurotol, 30, 876–883.
  • ISO. (1994). Acoustics – Reference Zero for the Calibration of Audiometric Equipment- Part 2: Reference Equivalent Threshold Sound Pressure Levels for Pure Tones and Insert Earphones. ISO 389–382:1994. Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization.
  • ISO. (1998). Acoustics – Reference Zero for the Calibration of Audiometric Equipment – Part 1: Reference Equivalent Threshold Sound Pressure Levels for Pure Tones and Supra-Aural Earphones: ISO 389–381:1998. Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization.
  • ISO. (2010). Acoustics-Audiometric Test Methods-Part 1: Basic Pure Tone Air and Bone Conduction Audiometry. ISO 8253–8251 2010. Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization.
  • Landry J.A. & Green W.B. 1999. Pure-tone audiometric threshold test-retest variability in young and elderly adults. J Speech-Lang Pathol Audiol, 23, 74–80.
  • Maclennan-Smith F., Swanepoel D. & Hall J.W. III. 2013. Validity of diagnostic pure-tone audiometry without a sound-treated environment in older adults. Int J Audiol, 52, 66–73.
  • Mahomed F., Swanepoel D., Eikelboom R.H. & Soer M. 2013. Validity of automated threshold audiometry. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ear Hear, 34, 745–752.
  • Margolis R.H., Eikelboom R.H., Johnson C., Ginter S.M., Swanepoel D. & Moore B.C. 2013. False air-bone gaps at 4 kHz in listeners with normal hearing and sensorineural hearing loss. Int J Audiol, 52, 526–532.
  • Margolis R.H., Frisina R. & Walton J.P. 2011. AMTAS®: automated method for testing auditory sensitivity: II. Air conduction audiograms in children and adults. Int J Audiol, 50, 434–439.
  • Margolis R.H., Glasberg B.R., Creeke S. & Moore B.C. 2010. AMTAS: automated method for testing auditory sensitivity: validation studies. Int J Audiol, 49, 185–194.
  • Margolis R.H., Wilson R.H., Popelka G.R., Eikelboom R.H., Swanepoel de W. & Saly G.L. 2015. Distribution characteristics of normal pure-tone thresholds. Int J Audiol, 54, 796–805.
  • Munro K.J. & Agnew N. 1999. A comparison of inter-aural attenuation with the Etymotic ER-3A insert earphone and the Telephonics TDH-39 supra-aural earphone. Br J Audiol, 33, 259–262.
  • Rutjes A.W., Reitsma J.B., Di Nisio M., Smidt N., van Rijn J.C. & Bossuyt P.M. 2006. Evidence of bias and variation in diagnostic accuracy studies. CMAJ, 174, 469–476.
  • Slevin M., Farrington N., Duffy G., Daly L. & Murphy J.F.A. 2000. Altering the NICU and measuring infants' responses. Acta Pædiatrica, 89, 577–581.
  • Sparks D.W. 1972. The feasibility of computerized audiometry. J Audit Res, 12, 62–66.
  • Storey K.K., Munoz K., Nelson L., Larsen J. & White K. 2014. Ambient noise impact on accuracy of automated hearing assessment. Int J Audiol, 53, 730–736.
  • Swanepoel D. & Biagio L. 2011. Validity of diagnostic computer-based air and forehead bone conduction audiometry. J Occup Environ Hyg, 8, 210–214.
  • Swanepoel D., Mngemane S., Molemong S., Mkwanazi H. & Tutshini S. 2010. Hearing assessment-reliability, accuracy, and efficiency of automated audiometry. Telemed J E Health, 16, 557–563.
  • von Bekesy G. 1947. A new audiometer. Acta Oto-Laryngologica, 35, 411–422.
  • Windmill I.M. & Freeman B.A. 2013. Demand for audiology services: 30-yr projections and impact on academic programs. J Am Acad Audiol, 24, 407–416.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.