321
Views
14
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

A polymorphism in human estrogen-related receptor beta (ESRRβ) predicts audiometric temporary threshold shift

, , , , , & show all
Pages 571-579 | Received 16 Oct 2015, Accepted 16 May 2016, Published online: 11 Jul 2016

References

  • American National Standards Institute (ANSI). 1999. Maximum permissible ambient noise level for audiometric test rooms. ANSI, S3.1–1999.
  • Ben Saïd M., Ayedi L., Mnejja M., Hakim B., Khalfallah A. et al. 2011. A novel missense mutation in the ESRRΒ gene causes DFNB35 hearing loss in a Tunisian family. Eur J Med Genet, 54(6), 535–541.
  • Brozkova D.S., Lastuvkova J., Machalova E., Lisonova J., Trkova M. et al. 2012. DFNB35 due to a novel mutation in the ESRRB gene in a Czech consanguineous family. Int J Ped Otorhinolaryngol, 76, 1681–1684.
  • Chen J. & Nathans J. 2007. Estrogen-related receptor beta/NR3B2 controls epithelial cell fate and endolymph production by the Stria Vascularis. Develop Cell, 13(3), 325–337.
  • Collet L. 1993. Use of otoacoustic emissions to explore the medial olivocochlear system in humans. Br J Audiol, 27(2), 155–159.
  • Collin R.W., Kalay E., Tariq M., Peters T., van der Zwaag B. et al. 2008. Mutations of ESRRΒ encoding estrogen-related receptor beta cause autosomal-recessive nonsyndromic hearing impairment DFNB35. Am J Hum Genet, 82(1), 125–138.
  • Craig J. 2008. Complex diseases: Research and applications. Nat Edu, 1(1), 184.
  • Dirks D.D., Ahlstrom J.B. & Eisenberg L.S. 1996. Comparison of probe insertion methods on estimates of ear canal SPL. J Am Acad Audiol, 7(1), 31–38.
  • Emmerich E., Richter R., Reinhold U., Linss V. & Linss W. 2000. Effects of industrial noise exposure on distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) and hair cell loss of the cochlea-long term experiments in awake guinea pigs. Hear Res, 148(1–2), 9–17.
  • Gates G.A., Mills D., Nam B.H., D'Agostino R. & Rubel E.W. 2002. Effects of age on the distortion product otoacoustic emission growth functions. Hear Res, 163(1–2), 53–60.
  • Henderson D., Bielefeld E.C., Harris K.C. & Hu B.H. 2006. The role of oxidative stress in noise-induced hearing loss. Ear Hear, 27, 1–19.
  • Hoffman H., Ko C., Themann C., Dillon C. & Franks J. 2006. Reducing noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) to achieve us healthy people 2010 goals. Am J Epidemiol, S122.
  • Hunter D.J. 2005. Gene-environment interactions in human diseases. Nat Rev Genet, 6, 287–298.
  • Hussain D.M., Gorga M.P., Neely S.T., Keefe D.H. & Peters J. 1998. Transient evoked otoacoustic emissions in patients with normal hearing and in patients with hearing loss. Ear Hear, 19(6), 434–449.
  • Kirchner D.B., Evenson E., Dobie R.A., Rabinowitz P., Crawford J. et al. 2012. Occupational noise-induced hearing loss: ACOEM task force on occupational hearing loss. J Occup Environ Med, 54, 106–108.
  • Konings A., Van Laer L. & Van Camp G. 2009a. Genetic studies on noise-induced hearing loss: a review. Ear Hear, 30(2), 151–159.
  • Konings A., Van Laer L., Wiktorek‐Smagur A., Rajkowska E., Pawelczyk M. et al. 2009b. Candidate Gene Association Study for Noise‐induced Hearing Loss in Two Independent Noise‐exposed Populations. Ann Hum Genet, 73(2), 215–224.
  • Kowalski T.J., Pawelczyk M., Rajkowska E., Dudarewicz A. & Sliwinska-Kowalska M. 2014. Genetic variants of CDH23 associated with noise-induced hearing loss. Otol Neurotol, 35(2), 358–365.
  • Kramer S., Dreisbach L., Lockwood J., Baldwin K., Kopke R. et al. 2006. Efficacy of the antioxidant N-acetylcysteine (NAC) in protecting ears exposed to loud music. J Am Acad Audiol, 17(4), 265–278.
  • Kujawa S.G. & Liberman M.C. 2009. Adding insult to injury: Cochlear nerve degeneration after “temporary” noise-induced hearing loss. J Neurosci , 29(45), 14077–14085.
  • Kummer P., Janssen T. & Arnold W. 1998. The level and growth behavior of the 2 f1-f2 distortion product otoacoustic emission and its relationship to auditory sensitivity in normal hearing and cochlear hearing loss. J Acoust Soc Am, 103(6), 3431–3444.
  • Le Prell C.G., Dell S., Hensley B., Hall J.W., Campbell K.C. et al. 2012. Digital music exposure reliably induces temporary threshold shift in normal-hearing human subjects. Ear Hearing, 33(6), e44–e58.
  • Le Prell C.G., Johnson A.C., Lindblad A.C., Skjonsberg A., Ulfendahl M. et al. 2011a. Increased vitamin plasma levels in Swedish military personnel treated with nutrients prior to automatic weapon training. Noise Health, 13(55), 432–443.
  • Le Prell C.G., Yang Q. & Harris J.G. 2011b. Modification of digital music files for use in human temporary threshold shift studies. J Acoust Soc Am, 130(4), EL142–EL146.
  • Lee K., Khan S., Ansar M., Santos-Cortez R.L., Ahmad W. et al. 2011. A novel ESRRΒ deletion is a rare cause of autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing impairment among Pakistani families. Genet Res Int, 2011, 1–4.
  • Lin C.Y., Wu J.L., Shih T.S., Tsai P.J., Sun Y.M. et al. 2010. N-Acetyl-cysteine against noise-induced temporary threshold shift in male workers. Hear Res, 269(1-2), 42–47.
  • Marshall L. & Heller L.M. 1998. Transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions as a measure of noise-induced threshold shift. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 41(6), 1319–1334.
  • Mills D.M. 2001. Distortion product otoacoustic emissions and neural responses measure different things: Using the difference for differential diagnosis of cochlear dysfunction. Abstract. XVIIth Biennial Symposium of the International Evoked Response Audiometry Study Group
  • Nageris B.I., Raveh E., Zilberberg M. & Attias J. 2007. Asymmetry in noise-induced hearing loss: relevance of acoustic reflex and left or right handedness. Otol Neurotol, 28(4), 434–437.
  • Niskar A.S., Kieszak S.M., Holmes A.E., Esteban E., Rubin C. et al. 2001. Estimated prevalence of noise-induced hearing threshold shifts among children 6 to 19 years of age: The third national health and nutrition examination survey, 1988–1994, United States. Pediatrics, 108(1), 40–43.
  • Nuclear Receptors Nomenclature Committee. 1999. A unified nomenclature system for the nuclear receptor superfamily. Cell, 97(2), 161–163.
  • Pawelczyk M., Van Laer L., Fransen E., Rajkowska E., Konings A. et al. 2009. Analysis of gene polymorphisms associated with K ion circulation in the inner ear of patients susceptible and resistant to noise-induced hearing loss . Ann Hum Genet, 73(Pt 4), 411–421.
  • Phillips S.L. & Mace S. 2008. Sound level measurements in music practice rooms. Music Perform Res, 2(1), 36–47.
  • Phillip S.L., Henrich V.C. & Mace S.T. 2009. Prevalence of noise-induced hearing loss in student musicians. Int J Audiol, 49(4), 309–316.
  • Phillips S.L., Richter S.J., Teglas S.L., Bhatt I.S., Morehouse R.C. et al. 2015. Feasibility of a bilateral 4000-6000 Hz notch as a phenotype for genetic association analysis. Int J Audiol, 54(10), 645–652.
  • Raghuram S., Stayrook K.R., Huang P., Rogers P.M., Nosie A.K. et al. 2007. Identification of heme as the ligand for the orphan nuclear receptors REV-ERBalpha and REV-ERBbeta. Nat Struct Mol Biol, 14(12), 1207–1213.
  • Rajan R. 2000. Centrifugal pathways protect hearing sensitivity at the cochlea in noisy environments that exacerbate the damage induced by loud sound. J Neurosci, 20(17), 6684–6693.
  • Sliwinska-Kowalska M. & Pawelczyk M. 2013. Contribution of genetic factors to noise-induced hearing loss: A human studies review. Mutat Res, 752(1), 61–65.
  • Tang H., Quertermous T., Rodriguez B., Kardia S.L., Zhu X. et al. 2005. Genetic structure, self-identified race/ethnicity, and confounding in case-control association studies. Am J Hum Genet, 76(2), 268–275.
  • Van Laer L., Carlsson P., Ottschytsch N., Bondeson M., Konings A. et al. 2006. The contribution of genes involved in potassium-recycling in the inner ear to noise-induced hearing loss. Hum Mutat, 27(8), 786–795.
  • Ward W.D., Glorig A. & Sklar D.L. 1959. Temporary threshold shift from octave-band noise: Applications to damage-risk criteria. J Occup Med, 1(7), 408.
  • Wurtz J.M., Bourguet W., Renaud J.P., Vivat V., Chambon P. et al. 1996. A canonical structure for the ligand-binding domain of nuclear receptors. Nat Struct Biol, 3(1), 87–94.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.