The effect of non-native and non-regional speech testing on a multi-lingual population

References

• Adank P., Evans B.G., Stuart-Smith J. & Scott S.K. 2009. Comprehension of familiar and unfamiliar native accents under adverse listening conditions. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform, 35, 520–529.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bent T. & Holt R.F. 2013. The influence of talker and foreign-accent variability on spoken word identification. J Acoust Soc Am, 133, 1677–1686.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brinkmann K. & Richter U. 1997. Ensuring reliability and comparability of speech audiometry in Germany. In M. Martin (ed.) Speech Audiometry. San Diego, CA: Singular, pp. 106–130.
   Google Scholar
• Bruce C., To C.T. & Newton C. 2012. Accent on communication: The impact of regional and foreign accent on comprehension in adults with aphasia. Disabil Rehabil, 34, 1024–1029.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen C.Y. 1986. Salient segmental features in Singapore Mandarin. J Chinese Linguist, 14, 114–151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clopper C.G. & Bradlow A.R. 2008. Perception of dialect variation in noise: intelligibility and classification. Lang Speech, 51, 175–198.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cutler A., Weber A., Smits R. & Cooper N. 2004. Patterns of English phoneme confusions by native and non-native listeners. J Acoust Soc Am, 116, 3668–3678.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon-Salant S., Yeni-Komshian G.H. & Fitzgibbons P.J. 2010. Recognition of accented English in quiet and noise by younger and older listeners. J Acoust Soc Am, 128, 3152–3160.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon-Salant S., Yeni-Komshian G.H., Fitzgibbons P.J., Cohen J.I. & Waldroup C. 2013. Recognition of accented and unaccented speech in different maskers by younger and older listeners. J Acoust Soc Am, 134, 618–627.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hudgins C.V., Hawkins J.E., Karlin J.E. & Stevens S.S. 1947. The development of recorded auditory tests for measuring hearing loss for speech. Laryngoscope, 57, 57–89.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lecumberri M.G. & Cooke M. 2006. Effect of masker type on native and non-native consonant perception in noise. J Acoust Soc Am, 119, 2445–2454.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee H.H. & Tan C.B. 2000. The Chinese in Malaysia. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Li P., Sepanski S. & Zhao X.W. 2006. Language history questionnaire: A web-based interface for bilingual research. Behav Res Methods, 38, 202–210.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim H.W., Wells B. & Howard S. 2015. Rate of multilingual phonological acquisition: evidence from a cross-sectional study of English-Mandarin-Malay. Clin Linguist Phonet, 29, 793–811.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu D. & Shi L.F. 2013. Performance-intensity functions of Mandarin word recognition tests in noise: test dialect and listener language effects. Am J Audiol, 22, 147–156.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayo L.H., Florentine M. & Buus S. 1997. Age of second-language acquisition and perception of speech in noise. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 40, 686–693.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGraw K.O. & Wong S.P. 1996. Forming inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients. Psychol Methods, 1, 30–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakamura K. & Gordon-Salant S. 2011. Speech perception in quiet and noise using the hearing in noise test and the Japanese hearing in noise test by Japanese listeners. Ear Hear, 32, 121–131.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsson M.J., Soli S.D. & Sullivan J.A. 1994. Development of the hearing in noise test for the measurement of speech reception thresholds in quiet and in noise. J Acoust Soc Am, 95, 1085–1099.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nissen S.L., Harris R.W., Channell R.W., Richardson N.E., Garlick J.A. et al. 2013. The effect of dialect on speech audiometry testing. Am J Audiol, 22, 233–240.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pichora-Fuller M.K. 2008. Use of supportive context by younger and older adult listeners: Balancing bottom-up and top-down information processing. Int J Audiol, 47, S72–S82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quar T.K., ZMS Mukari S., Alaudin Abdul Wahab N., Abdul Razak R., Omar M. et al. 2008. The Malay hearing in noise test. Int J Audiol, 47, 379–380.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramkissoon I. 2001. Speech recognition thresholds for multilingual populations. Commun Disord Q, 22, 158–162.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers C.L., Lister J.J., Febo D.M., Besing J.M. & Abrams H.B. 2006. Effects of bilingualism, noise, and reverberation on speech perception by listeners with normal hearing. Appl Psycholinguist, 27, 465–485.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudmin F. 1987. Speech reception thresholds for digits. J Aud Res, 27, 15–21.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shi L.F. 2010. Perception of acoustically degraded sentences in bilingual listeners who differ in age of English acquisition. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 53, 821–835.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi L.F. & Canizales L.A. 2013. Dialectal effects on a clinical Spanish word recognition test. Am J Audiol, 22, 74–83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sim T.W. 2012. Why are the native languages of the Chinese Malaysians in decline? J Taiwan Vernacular, 4, 63–95.
   Google Scholar
• Soli S.D. & Wong L.L. 2008. Assessment of speech intelligibility in noise with the hearing in noise test. Int J Audiol, 47, 356–361.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabri D., Chacra K.M.S.A. & Pring T. 2011. Speech perception in noise by monolingual, bilingual and trilingual listeners. Int J Lang Commun Disord, 46, 411–422.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang C. & van Heuven V.J. 2009. Mutual intelligibility of Chinese dialects experimentally tested. Lingua, 119, 709–732.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tauroza S. & Luk J. 1997. Accent and second language listening comprehension. RELC J, 28, 54–71.
   Google Scholar
• Ting H.M.H. 2013. Language, identity and mobility: Perspective of Malaysian Chinese youth. Malays J Chin Stud, 2, 83–102.
   Google Scholar
• Van Wijngaarden S.J., Steeneken H.J. & Houtgast T. 2002. Quantifying the intelligibility of speech in noise for non-native talkers. J Acoust Soc Am, 112, 3004–3013.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weisleder P. & Hodgson W.R. 1989. Evaluation of four Spanish word-recognition-ability lists. Ear Hear, 10, 387–393.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilcox G. 1978. The effect of accent on listening comprehension: A Singapore study. Engl Lang Teach J, 32, 118–127.
   Google Scholar
• Wong L.L. & Huang V. 2008. The Taiwanese Mandarin hearing in noise test. Int J Audiol, 47, 391–392.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong L.L., Soli S.D., Liu S., Han N. & Huang M.W. 2007. Development of the Mandarin hearing in noise test (MHINT). Ear Hear, 28, 70S–74S.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu K., Soli S.D., Zheng Y., Liu S., Li G. et al. 2015. Quantification of the effects of Mandarin dialect differences on the use of norm-referenced speech perception tests. Int J Audiol, 54, 461–466.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yao C.F. 1999. Salient features of Malaysian Mandarin by Cantonese speakers. BA thesis, National University of Singapore.
   Google Scholar
• Yew H.T. 1999. Salient features of Malaysian Mandarin by Hokkien speakers. BA thesis, National University of Singapore.
   Google Scholar