514
Views
9
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Simulated patients versus seminars to train case history and feedback skills in audiology students: A randomized controlled trial

, , &
Pages 758-764 | Received 09 Feb 2016, Accepted 05 Jul 2016, Published online: 09 Aug 2016

References

  • Australian Medical Association. 2011. Position statement. The role of simulated learning environments in postgraduate medical education and training. Viewed 09 February 2016, https://ama.com.au/position-statement/role-simulated-learning-environments-postgraduate-medical-education-and-training
  • Barrows H.S. 1971. Simulated patients (programmed patients): The development and use of a new technique in medical education. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
  • Barrows H.S. 1993. An overview of the uses of standardized patients for teaching and evaluating clinical skills. AAMC. Acad Med, 68, 443–451.
  • Barrows H.S. & Abrahamson S. 1964. The programmed patient: A technique for appraising student performance in clinical neurology. J Med Educ, 39, 802–805.
  • Becker K.L., Rose L.E., Berg J.B., Park H. & Shatzer J.H. 2006. The teaching effectiveness of standardized patients. J Nurs Educ, 45, 103–111.
  • Beullens J., Rethans J.J., Goedhuys J. & Buntinx F. 1997. The use of standardized patients in research in general practice. Fam Pract, 14, 58–62.
  • Blackstock F.C., Watson K.M., Morris N.R., Jones A., Wright A., et al. 2013. Simulation can contribute a part of cardiorespiratory physiotherapy clinical education: Two randomized trials. Simul Healthc, 8, 32–42.
  • Bokken L., Linssen T., Scherpbier A., Van der Vleuten C. & Rethans J. 2009. Feedback by simulated patients in undergraduate medical education: A systematic review of the literature. Med Educ, 43, 202–210.
  • Bokken L., Rethans J., Scherpbier A. & Van der Vleuten C. 2008. Strengths and weaknesses of simulated and real patients in the teaching of skills to medical students: A review. Simul Healthc, 3, 161–169.
  • Bridgen D. & Dangerfield P. 2008. The role of simulation in medical education. Clin Teach, 5, 167–170.
  • Crofts J.F., Bartlett C., Ellis D., Hunt L.P., Fox R. et al. 2006. Training for shoulder dystocia: A trial of simulation using low-fidelity and high-fidelity mannequins. Obstet Gynecol, 108, 1477–1485.
  • Davis D., O’Brien M.A., Freemantle N., Wolf F.M., Mazmanian P. et al. 1999. Impact of formal continuing medical education: Do conferences, workshops, rounds, and other traditional continuing education activities change physician behavior or health care outcomes? J Am Med Assoc, 282, 867–874.
  • de Giovanni D., Roberts T. & Norman G. 2009. Relative effectiveness of high- versus low-fidelity simulation in learning heart sounds. Med Educ, 43, 661–668.
  • de Jong Z., van Nies J.A.B., Peters S.W.M., Vink S., Dekker F.W. et al. 2010. Interactive seminars or small group tutorials in preclinical medical education: Results of a randomized controlled trial. BMC Med Educ, 10, 1–9.
  • Fiksdal A.S., Kumbamu A., Jadhav A.S., Cocos C., Nelsen L.A. et al. 2014. Evaluating the process of online health information searching: A qualitative approach to exploring consumer perspectives. J Med Internet Res, 16, e224.
  • Grady J.L., Kehrer R.G., Trusty C.E., Entin E.B., Entin E.E. et al. 2008. Learning nursing procedures: The influence of simulator fidelity and student gender on teaching effectiveness. J Nurs Educ, 47, 403–408.
  • Hamstra S.J., Brydges R., Hatala R., Zendejas B. & Cook D.A. 2014. Reconsidering fidelity in simulation-based training. Acad Med, 89, 387–392.
  • Harder B.N. 2010. Use of simulation in teaching and learning in health sciences: A systematic review. J Nurs Educ, 49, 23–28.
  • Health Workforce Australia. 2011. A national approach for the integration of simulated learning environments into audiology education. Viewed 09 February 2016, http://www.hwa.gov.au/resources/publications.
  • Hill A.E., Davidson B.J. & Theodoros D.G. 2010. A review of standardized patients in clinical education: Implications for speech-language pathology programs. Int J Speech Lang Pathol, 12, 259–270.
  • Hill A.E., Davidson B.J. & Theodoros D.G. 2015. An investigation of the standardised patient interview rating scale (SPIRS) for the assessment of speech pathology students in a simulation clinic. Int J Pract-Based Learn Health Soc Care, 3, 58–76.
  • Hughes J., Wilson W.J., MacBean N. & Hill A.E. A tool for assessing case history and feedback skills in audiology student skills working with simulated patients. Int J Audiol. Submitted.
  • Issenberg S.B., McGaghie W.C., Petrusa E.R., Lee Gordon D. & Scalese R.J. 2005. Features and uses of high-fidelity medical simulations that lead to effective learning: A BEME systematic review. Med Teach, 27, 10–28.
  • Ladyshewsky R. 1999. Simulated patients and assessment. Med Teach, 21, 266–269.
  • Lee K.H., Grantham H. & Boyd R. 2008. Comparison of high- and low-fidelity mannequins for clinical performance assessment. Emerg Med Australas, 20, 508–514.
  • Liu L., Schneider P. & Miyazaki M. 1997. The effectiveness of using simulated patients versus videotapes of simulated patients to teach clinical skills to occupational and physical therapy students. Occup Ther J Res, 17, 159–172.
  • Matsumoto E.D., Hamstra S.J., Radomski S.B. & Cusimano M.D. 2002. The effect of bench model fidelity on endourological skills: A randomized controlled study. J Urol, 167, 1243–1247.
  • Meurling L., Hedman L., Lidefelt K.J., Escher C., Fellander-Tsai L. et al. 2014. Comparison of high- and low equipment fidelity during paediatric simulation team training: A case control study. BMC Med Educ, 14, 221.
  • Mounsey A.L., Bovbjerg V., White L. & Gazewood J. 2006. Do students develop better motivational interviewing skills through role-play with standardised patients or with student colleagues? Med Educ, 40, 775–780.
  • Munshi F., Lababidi H. & Alyousef S. 2015. Low- versus high-fidelity simulations in teaching and assessing clinical skills. J T U Med Sci, 10, 12–15.
  • Naeve-Velguth S., Christensen S.A. & Woods S. 2013. Simulated patients in audiology education: Student reports. J Am Acad Audiol, 24, 740–746.
  • Nestel D. & Bearman M. 2014. Simulated Patient Methodology: Theory, Evidence and Practice. Brisbane, Australia: Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Norman G., Dore K. & Grierson L. 2012. The minimal relationship between simulation fidelity and transfer of learning. Med Educ, 46, 636–647.
  • Owen H., Mugford B., Follows V. & Plummer J.L. 2006. Comparison of three simulation-based training methods for management of medical emergencies. Resuscitation, 71, 204–211.
  • Papadakis M.A., Croughan-Minihane M., Fromm L.J., Wilkie H.A. & Ernster V.L. 1997. A comparison of two methods to teach smoking-cessation techniques to medical students. Acad Med, 72, 725–727.
  • Ragatz B.H., Hoversland R.C., Koritnik D.R. & Hill B.E. 1994. Utilization of physicians as standardized patients in a medical biochemistry course. Biochem Educ, 22, 70–74.
  • Rodgers D.L., Securro S Jr. & Pauley R.D. 2009. The effect of high-fidelity simulation on educational outcomes in an advanced cardiovascular life support course. Simul Healthc, 4, 200–206.
  • Scerbo M.W., Schmidt E.A. & Bliss J.P. 2006. Comparison of a virtual reality simulator and simulated limbs for phlebotomy training. J Infus Nurs, 29, 214–224.
  • Standards Australia. 2009. Australian Standard AS ISO 8253.1-2009. Acoustics - audiometric test methods. Part 1: Basic pure tone air and bone conduction threshold audiometry. Sydney, Australia: Author.
  • Wilson W.J., Hill A.E., Hughes J., Sher A. & Laplante-Levesque A. 2010. Student audiologists' impressions of a simulation training program. Aust N Z J Audiol, 31, 19–30.
  • Zraick R. 2012. Review of the use of standardized patients in speech-language pathology clinical education. Int J Ther Rehabil, 19, 112–118.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.