Perceived listening effort and speech intelligibility in reverberation and noise for hearing-impaired listeners

References

• Brand, T. & Hohmann, V. 2002. An adaptive procedure for categorical loudness scaling. J Acoust Soc Am, 112, 1597–1604.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brand, T. & Kollmeier, B. 2002. Efficient adaptive procedures for threshold and concurrent slope estimates for psychophysics and speech intelligibility tests. J Acoust Soc Am, 111, 2801–2810.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duquesnoy, A.J. & Plomp, R. 1980. Effect of reverberation and noise on the intelligibility of sentences in cases of presbyacusis. J Acoust Soc Am, 68, 537–544.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feuerstein, J. 1992. Monaural versus binaural hearing: Ease of listening, word recognition and attentional effort. Ear Hear, 13, 80–86.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• George, E.L.J., Goverts, S.T., Festen, J.M. & Houtgast, T. 2010. Measuring the effects of reverberation and noise on sentence intelligibility for hearing-impaired listeners. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 53, 1429–1439.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gosselin, P.A. & Gagne, P. 2011. Older adults expend more listening effort than young adults recognizing speech in noise. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 54, 944–958.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IEC. 2003. Sound System Equipment – Part 16: Objective rating of speech intelligibility by speech transmission index, International Standard IEC 60268-16 (International Electrotechnical Commission), Geneva, Switzerland.
   Google Scholar
• Klink, K., Schulte, M. & Meis, M. 2012. Measuring listening effort in the field of audiology – A literature review of methods (part 2). Z Audiol, 51, 96–105.
   Google Scholar
• Larsby, B., Hällgren, M., Lyxell, B. & Arlinger, S. 2005. Cognitive performance and perceived effort in speech processing tasks: Effects of different noise backgrounds in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired subjects. Int J Audiol, 44, 131–143.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ljung, R. & Kjellberg, A. 2009. Long reverberation time decreases recall of spoken information. Build Acoustics, 16, 301–312.
   Google Scholar
• Luts, H., Eneman, K., Wouters, J., Schulte, M., Vormann, M., et al 2010. Multicenter evaluation of signal enhancement algorithms for hearing aids. J Acoust Soc Am, 127, 1491–1505.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morimoto, M., Sato, H. & Kobayashi, M. 2004. Listening difficulty as a subjective measure for evaluation of speech transmission performance in public spaces. J Acoust Soc Am, 116, 1607–1613.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng, E.H.N., Rudner, M., Lunner, T., Pedersen, M.S. & Rönnberg, J. 2013. Effects of noise and working memory capacity on memory processing of speech for hearing aid users. Int J Audiol, 52, 433–441.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng, E.H.N., Rudner, M., Lunner, T. & Rönnberg, J. 2015. Noise reduction improves memory for target language speech in competing native but not foreign language. Ear Hear, 36, 82–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Picou, E.M., Gordon, J. & Ricketts, T.A. 2016. The effects of noise and reverberation on listening effort for listeners with normal hearing. Ear Hear, 37, 1–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rennies, J., Holube, I. & Verhey, J.L. 2013. Loudness of speech and speech-like signals. Acta Acustica United with Acustica, 99, 268–282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rennies, J., Schepker, H., Holube, I. & Kollmeier, B. 2014. Listening effort and speech intelligibility in listening situations affected by noise and reverberation. J Acoust Soc Am, 136, 2642–2653.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarampalis, A., Kalluri, S., Edwards, B. & Hafter, E. 2009. Objective measures of listening effort: Effects of background noise and noise reduction. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 52, 1230–1240.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sato, H., Morimoto, M., Sato, H. & Wada, M. 2008. Relationship between listening difficulty and acoustical objective measures in reverberant sound fields. J Acoust Soc Am, 123, 2087–2093.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sato, H., Morimoto, M. & Wada, M. 2012. Relationship between listening difficulty rating and objective measures in reverberant and noisy sound fields for young adults and elderly persons. J Acoust Soc Am, 131, 4596–4605.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schroeder, M.R. 1981. Modulation transfer functions: Definition and measurement. Acustica, 49, 179–182.
   Google Scholar
• Smeds, K., Wolters, F. & Rung, M. 2015. Estimation of signal-to-noise ratios in realistic sound scenarios. J Am Acad Aud, 26, 183–196.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steeneken, H.J.M. & Houtgast, T. 1980. A physical method for measuring speech transmission quality. J Acoust Soc Am, 67, 318–326.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagener, K. & Brand, T. 2005. Sentence intelligibility in noise for listeners with normal hearing and hearing impairment: Influence of measurement procedure and masking parameters. Int J Audiol, 44, 144–156.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagener, K., Brandt, T. & Kollmeier, B. 1999a. Entwicklung und Evaluation eines Satztests für die deutsche Sprache II: Optimierung des Oldenburger Satztests (Development and evaluation of a German sentence test II: optimization of the Oldenburg sentence test). Z Audiol, 38, 44–56.
   Google Scholar
• Wagener, K., Brandt, T. & Kollmeier, B. 1999b. Entwicklung und Evaluation eines Satztests für die deutsche Sprache III: Evaluation des Oldenburger Satztests (Development and evaluation of a German sentence test II: evaluation of the Oldenburg sentence test). Z Audiol, 38, 86–95.
   Google Scholar
• Wagener, K., Kühnel, V. & Kollmeier, B. 1999c. Entwicklung und Evaluation eines Satztests für die deutsche Sprache I: Design des Oldenburger Satztests (Development and evaluation of a German sentence test I: design of the Oldenburg sentence test). Z Audiol, 38, 4–15.
   Google Scholar
• Wobbrock, J.O., Findlater, L., Gergle, D. & Higgins, J.J. 2011. The Aligned Rank Transform for nonparametric factorial analyses using only ANOVA procedures. Proc. ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI), 143–146. Vancouver, Canada, May 2011.
   Google Scholar