http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9734-4261
References
- Bosman, A.J. & Smoorenburg, G. 1995. Intelligibility of Dutch CVC syllables and sentences for listeners with normal hearing and with three types of hearing impairment. Audiology, 34, 260–284.
- Bosman, A.J., Wouters, J. & Damman, W. 1995. Realisatie van een cd voor spraakaudiometrie in Vlaanderen. Logop En Foniatr, 9, 218–225.
- Brandy, W.T. 2002. Speech audiometry. In: Katz, J. (ed.) Handbook of Clinical Audiology: Fifth Edition. Philadelphia: LWW, pp. 96–110.
- Dillon, H. 2001. Assessing the outcomes of hearing rehabilitation. In: Dillon, H. (ed.) Hearing aids: Second Edition. New York: Thieme, pp. 349–369.
- Francart, T., van Wieringen, A. & Wouters, J. 2008. APEX 3: a multi-purpose test platform for auditory psychophysical experiments. J Neurosci Methods, 172, 283–293.
- Gelfand, S.A. 2001. Speech audiometry. In: Gelfand, S.A. (ed.) Essentials of Audiology: Second Edition. New York: Thieme, pp. 257–290.
- Jansen, S., Koning, R., Wouters, J. & van Wieringen, A. 2014. Development and validation of the Leuven intelligibility sentence test with male speaker (LIST-m). Int J Audiol, 53, 55–59.
- Jansen, S., Luts, H., Wagener, K.C., Kollmeier, B., Del Rio, M., et al. 2012. Comparison of three types of French speech-in-noise tests: a multi-center study. Int J Audiol, 51, 164–173.
- Levy, S.C., Freed, D.J., Nilsson, M., Moore, B.C.J. & Puria, S. 2015. Extended high-frequency bandwidth improves speech reception in the presence of spatially separated masking speech. Ear Hear, 36, e214–e224.
- Luts, H., Boon, E., Wable, J. & Wouters, J. 2008. FIST: A French sentence test for speech intelligibility in noise. Int J Audiol, 47, 373–374.
- Nilsson, M., Soli, S.D. & Sullivan, J.A. 1994. Development of the hearing in noise test for the measurement of speech reception thresholds in quiet and in noise. J Acoust Soc Am, 95, 1085–1099.
- Peirce, J.W. 2007. PsychoPy-Psychophysics software in Python. J Neurosci Methods, 162, 8–13.
- Plomp, R. & Mimpen, A.M. 1979. Improving the reliability of testing the speech reception threshold for sentences. Audiology, 18, 43–52.
- Revit, L., Killion, M. & Conley C. 2007. Developing and testing a laboratory sound system that yields accurate real-world results. The Hearing Review, 14, 54–61.
- van Wieringen, A. & Wouters, J. 2008. LIST and LINT: sentences and numbers for quantifying speech understanding in severely impaired listeners for Flanders and the Netherlands. Int J Audiol, 47, 348–355.
- Versfeld, N.J., Daalder, L., Festen, J.M. & Houtgast, T. 2000. Method for the selection of sentence materials for efficient measurement of the speech reception threshold. J Acoust Soc Am, 107, 1671–1684.
- Wouters, J., Damman, W. & Bosman, A.J. 1994. Vlaamse opname van woordenlijsten voor spraakaudiometrie. Logopedie, 7, 28–34.