Individual differences in language and working memory affect children’s speech recognition in noise

References

• Akeroyd, M.A. 2008. Are individual differences in speech reception related to individual differences in cognitive ability? A survey of twenty experimental studies with normal and hearing-impaired adults. Int J Audiol, 47, S53–S71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alloway, T.P. 2007. Automated Working: Memory Assessment. Pearson, London: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Alloway, T.P., Gathercole, S.E. & Pickering, S.J. 2006. Verbal and visuospatial short-term and working memory in children: Are they separable? Child development, 77, 1698–1716.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arehart, K.H., Souza, P., Baca, R. & Kates, J.M. 2013. Working memory, age, and hearing loss: Susceptibility to hearing aid distortion. Ear Hear, 34, 251.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baddeley, A.D. 2000. Short-term and working memory. In: Tulving, E. & Craik, FIM. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Memory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 77–92.
   Google Scholar
• Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B. & Walker, S. 2014. lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4. R Package Version, 1.
   Google Scholar
• Bishop, D.V. 2003. Test for reception of grammar: TROG-2 version 2. Pearson Assessment.
   Google Scholar
• Blamey, P.J., Sarant, J.Z., Paatsch, L.E., Barry, J.G., Bow, C.P., et al. 2001. Relationships among speech perception, production, language, hearing loss, and age in children with impaired hearing. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 44, 264–285.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blandy, S. & Lutman, M. 2005. Hearing threshold levels and speech recognition in noise in 7-year-olds. Int J Audiol, 44, 435–443.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boersma, P. & Weenink, D. 2001. Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer.
   Google Scholar
• Caldwell, A. & Nittrouer, S. 2013. Speech perception in noise by children with cochlear implants. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 56, 13–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corbin, N.E., Bonino, A.Y., Buss, E. & Leibold, L.J. 2016. Development of open-set word recognition in children: Speech-shaped noise and two-talker speech maskers. Ear Hear, 37, 55–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cowan, N. (2004). On the psychophysics of memory. In: Kaernbach, C., Schröger, E., & Müller, H. (eds.) Psychophysics Beyond Sensation: Laws and Invariants of Human Cognition. Scientific Psychology Series. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 313–319.
   Google Scholar
• Davidson, L.S. & Skinner, M.W. 2006. Audibility and speech perception of children using wide dynamic range compression hearing aids. Am J Audiol, 15, 141–153.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• DesJardin, J.L., Ambrose, S.E., Martinez, A.S. & Eisenberg, L.S. 2009. Relationships between speech perception abilities and spoken language skills in young children with hearing loss. Int J Audiol, 48, 248–259.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunn, L.M. & Dunn, D.M. 2012. Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test, (PPVT-4). Johannesburg: Pearson Education Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Elliott, L.L. 1979. Performance of children aged 9 to 17 years on a test of speech intelligibility in noise using sentence material with controlled word predictability. J Acoust Soc Am, 66, 651–653.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenberg, L.S., Shannon, R.V., Martinez, A.S., Wygonski, J. & Boothroyd, A. 2000. Speech recognition with reduced spectral cues as a function of age. J Acoust Soc Am, 107, 2704–2710.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Entwisle, D.R. & Frasure, N.E. 1974. A contradiction resolved: Children's processing of syntactic cues. Dev Psychol, 10, 852–857.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fallon, M., Trehub, S.E. & Schneider, B.A. 2000. Children's perception of speech in multitalker babble. J Acoust Soc Am, 108, 3023–3029.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garlock, V.M., Walley, A.C. & Metsala, J.L. 2001. Age-of-acquisition, word frequency, and neighborhood density effects on spoken word recognition by children and adults. J Mem Lang, 45, 468–492.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldman, R. & Fristoe, M. 2000. Goldman-Fristoe Test of Articulation-2 (GFTA-2). Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
   Google Scholar
• Hillock-Dunn, A., Taylor, C., Buss, E. & Leibold, L.J. 2014. Assessing speech perception in children with hearing loss: What conventional clinical tools may miss. Ear Hear, 36, e57–e60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hnath-Chisolm, T.E., Laipply, E. & Boothroyd, A. 1998. Age-related changes on a children's test of sensory-level speech perception capacity. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 41, 94–106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humes, L.E. & Floyd, S.S. 2005. Measures of working memory, sequence learning, and speech recognition in the elderly. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 48, 224–235.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jerger, S., Jerger, J. & Lewis, S. 1981. Pediatric speech intelligibility test. II. Effect of receptive language age and chronological age. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol, 3, 101–118.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, C.E. 2000. Children's phoneme identification in reverberation and noise. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 43, 144–157.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knecht, H.A., Nelson, P.B., Whitelaw, G.M. & Feth, L.L. 2002. Background noise levels and reverberation times in unoccupied classrooms: Predictions and measurements. Am J Audiol, 11, 65–71.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lalonde, K. & Holt, R.F. 2014. Cognitive and linguistic sources of variance in 2-year-olds' speech-sound discrimination: A preliminary investigation. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 57, 308–326.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leibold, L.J. & Buss, E. 2013. Children's identification of consonants in a speech-shaped noise or a two-talker masker. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 56, 1144–1155.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levitt, H.C.C.H. 1971. Transformed up‐down methods in psychoacoustics. J Acoust Soc Am, 49, 467–477.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lunner, T. 2003. Cognitive function in relation to hearing aid use. Int J Audiol, 42, S49–S58.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magimairaj, B.M. & Montgomery, J.W. 2012. Children's verbal working memory: Role of processing complexity in predicting spoken sentence comprehension. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 55, 669–682.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall, L., Brandt, J.F., Marston, L.E. & Ruder, K. 1979. Changes in number and type of errors on repetition of acoustically distorted sentences as a function of age in normal children. J Am Aud Soc, 4, 218–225.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mattys, S.L., Davis, M.H., Bradlow, A.R. & Scott, S.K. 2012. Speech recognition in adverse conditions: A review. Lang Cogn Process, 27, 953–978.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McElree, B., Foraker, S. & Dyer, L. 2003. Memory structures that subserve sentence comprehension. J Mem Lang, 48, 67–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCreery, R., Ito, R., Spratford, M., Lewis, D., Hoover, B., et al. 2010. Performance-intensity functions for normal-hearing adults and children using computer-aided speech perception assessment. Ear Hear, 31, 95–101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCreery, R.W., Walker, E.A., Spratford, M., Oleson, J., Bentler, R., et al. 2015. Speech recognition and parent ratings from auditory development questionnaires in children who are hard of hearing. Ear Hear, 36, 60S–75S.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McCreery, R.W. & Stelmachowicz, P.G. 2011. Audibility-based predictions of speech recognition for children and adults with normal hearing. J Acoust Soc Am, 130, 4070–4081.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKellin, W.H., Shahin, K., Hodgson, M., Jamieson, J. & Pichora-Fuller, K. 2007. Pragmatics of conversation and communication in noisy settings. J Pragmat, 39, 2159–2184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metsala, J.L. & Walley, A.C. 1998. Spoken vocabulary growth and the segmental restructuring of lexical representations: Precursors to phonemic awareness and early reading ability.
   Google Scholar
• Munson, B. 2001. Relationships between vocabulary size and spoken word recognition in children aged 3 to 7. Contemp Issues Commun Sci Disord, 28, 20–29.
   Google Scholar
• Muñoz, K., Blaiser, D.K. & Schofield, H. 2012. Aided speech perception testing practices for three-to-six-year old children with permanent hearing loss. J Educ Aud, 18, 53–60.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, P.B. & Soli, S. 2000. Acoustical barriers to learning: Children at risk in every classroom. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch, 31, 356–361.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nittrouer, S., Caldwell-Tarr, A., Tarr, E., Lowenstein, J.H., Rice, C., et al. 2013. Improving speech-in-noise recognition for children with hearing loss: Potential effects of language abilities, binaural summation, and head shadow. Int J Audiol, 52, 513–525.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norman, D.A. & Bobrow, D.G. 1975. On data-limited and resource-limited processes. Cogn Psychol, 7, 44–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pichora-Fuller, M.K., Schneider, B.A. & Daneman, M. 1995. How young and old adults listen to and remember speech in noise. J Acoust Soc Am, 97, 593–608.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Development Team (2014) R: A language and environment for statistical computing [Computer software]: www.R-project.org.
   Google Scholar
• Rönnberg, J. 2003. Cognition in the hearing impaired and deaf as a bridge between signal and dialogue: A framework and a model. Int J Audiol, 42, S68–S76.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rönnberg, J., Lunner, T., Zekveld, A., Sörqvist, P., Danielsson, H., et al. 2013. The Ease of Language Understanding (ELU) model: Theoretical, empirical, and clinical advances. Front Syst Neurosci, 7, 31.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schafer, E.C. 2010. Speech perception in noise measures for children: A critical review and case studies. J Educ Aud, 16, 4–15.
   Google Scholar
• Scollie, S.D. 2008. Children's speech recognition scores: The speech Intelligibility Index and proficiency factors for age and hearing level. Ear Hear, 29, 543–556.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sörqvist, P., Stenfelt, S. & Rönnberg, J. 2012. Working memory capacity and visual–verbal cognitive load modulate auditory–sensory gating in the brainstem: Toward a unified view of attention. J Cogn Neurosci, 24, 2147–2154.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stelmachowicz, P.G., Hoover, B.M., Lewis, D.E., Kortekaas, R.W. & Pittman, A.L. 2000. The relation between stimulus context, speech audibility, and perception for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired children. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 43, 902–914.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Storkel, H.L. & Hoover, J.R. 2010. An online calculator to compute phonotactic probability and neighborhood density on the basis of child corpora of spoken American English. Behav Res Methods, 42, 497–506.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talarico, M., Abdilla, G., Aliferis, M., Balazic, I., Giaprakis, I., et al. 2006. Effect of age and cognition on childhood speech in noise perception abilities. Audiol Neurootol, 12, 13–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vance, M. & Martindale, N. 2012. Assessing speech perception in children with language difficulties: Effects of background noise and phonetic contrast. Int J Speech-Lang Pathol, 14, 48–58.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vance, M., Rosen, S. & Coleman, M. 2009. Assessing speech perception in young children and relationships with language skills. Int J Audiol, 48, 708–717.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wightman, F. & Allen, P. 1992. Individual differences in auditory capability among preschool children In: Werner L.A. and Rubel APA E.W. (eds.). Developmental Psychoacoustics. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, pp. 113–133.
   Google Scholar
• Zekveld, A.A., Kramer, S.E. & Festen, J.M. 2011. Cognitive load during speech perception in noise: The influence of age, hearing loss, and cognition on the pupil response. Ear and hearing, 32, 498–510.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar