435
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Hearing aid fine-tuning based on Dutch descriptions

, , &
Pages 507-515 | Received 13 Aug 2015, Accepted 24 Jan 2017, Published online: 20 Feb 2017

References

  • Boretzki, M. 2000. Quantification of significant sound quality attributes in the context of hearing instrument fine tuning. Phonak Focus, 25.
  • Cornelisse, L.E., Seewald, R.C. & Jamieson, D.G. 1995. The input/output formula: A theoretical approach to fitting of personal amplification devices. J Acoust Soc Am, 97, 1854–1864.
  • Cox, R.M. & Alexander, G.C. 1995. The abbreviated profile of hearing aid benefit. Ear Hear, 16, 176–186.
  • Cox, R.M. & Alexander, G.C. 2002. The International Outcome Inventory for hearing aids (IOI-HA): Psychometric properties of the English version. Int J Audiol, 41, 30–35.
  • Dijkstra, T., Ypma, A., de Vries, B. & Leenen, J. 2007. The learning hearing aid: Common-sense reasoning in hearing aid circuits. Hearing Review, 14, 34–53.
  • Dillon, H. 1999. NAL-NL1: A new prescriptive fitting procedure for non-linear hearing aids. Hear J, 52, 10–16.
  • Dillon, H. 2001. Hearing Aids. New York and Stuttgart: Thieme, pp. 312–321.
  • Dillon, H., James, A. & Ginis, J. 1997. Client Oriented Scale of Improvement (COSI) and its relationship to several other measures of benefit and satisfaction provided by hearing aids. J Am Acad Audiol, 8, 27–43.
  • FDA. 2006. Guidance for the use of Bayesian statistics in medical device clinical trials – Guidance for industry and FDA staff. Washington, DC: FDA. Docket number 2006D-0191.
  • Franck, B.A., Dreschler, W.A. & Lyzenga, J. 2004. Methodological aspects of an adaptive multidirectional pattern search to optimize speech perception using three hearing-aid algorithms. J Acoust Soc Am, 116, 3620–3628.
  • Gabrielsson, A., Hagerman, B., Bech-Kristensen, T. & Lundberg, G. 1990. Perceived sound quality of reproductions with different frequency responses and sound levels. J Acoust Soc Am, 88, 1359–1366.
  • Gardner, R.C. 2001. Psychological Statistics Using SPSS for Windows. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • Humes, L. 1999. Dimensions of hearing aid outcome. J Am Acad Audiol, 10, 26–39.
  • Jenstad, L.M., van Tassel, D.J. & Ewert, C. 2003. Hearing aid troubleshooting based on patients’ descriptions. J Am Acad Audiol, 14, 347–360.
  • Keidser, G., Dillon, H., Carter, L. & O’Brien, A. 2012. NAL-NL2 empirical adjustments. Trends Amplif, 16, 211–223.
  • Kiessling, J., Schubert, M. & Archut, A. 1996. Adaptive fitting of hearing instruments by category loudness scaling (ScalAdapt). Scand Audiol, 25, 153–160.
  • Killion, M.C. & Fikret-Pasa, S. 1993. The 3 types of sensorineural hearing loss: loudness and intelligibility considerations. Hear J, 46, 31–36.
  • Kochkin, S. 2005. MarkeTrak VII: Customer satisfaction with hearing instruments in the digital age. Hear J, 58, 30–37.
  • Levitt, H. 2007. A historical perspective on digital hearing aids: How digital technology has changed modern hearing aids. Trends Amplif, 14, 7–24.
  • Lundberg, G., Ovegård, A., Hagerman, B., Gabrielsson, A. & Brändström, U. 1992. Perceived sound quality in a hearing aid with vented and closed earmould equalized in frequency response. Scand Audiol, 21, 87–92.
  • Moore, B.C., Alcantara, J.I. & Glasberg, B.R. 1998. Development and evaluation of a procedure for fitting multi-channel compression hearing aids. Br J Audiol, 32, 177–195.
  • Moore, B.C., Marriage, J., Alcantara, J.I. & Glasberg, B.R. 2005. Comparison of two adaptive procedures for fitting a multi-channel compression hearing aid. Int J Audiol, 44, 345–357.
  • Mueller, H.G. & Hawkins, D.B. 2006. Trouble-shooting hearing aid fitting issues? The case of the missing “ping”. Hear J, 59, 10–20.
  • Nelson, J.A. 2001. Fine tuning multi-channel compression hearing instruments. Hear Rev, 58, 30–35.
  • Pastoors, A.D., Gebhart, T.M. & Kiessling, J. 2001. A fitting strategy for digital hearing aids based on loudness and sound quality. Scand Audiolo Suppl, 52, 60–64.
  • Scollie, S., Seewald, R., Cornelisse, L., Moodie, S., Bagatto, M., et al. 2005. The desired sensation level multistage input/output algorithm. Trends Amplif, 9, 159–197.
  • Tharpe, A.M., Biswas, G. & Hall, J.W. 1993. Development of an expert system for pediatric auditory brainstem response interpretation. J Am Acad Audiol, 4, 163–171.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.