Desynchronisation of auditory steady-state responses related to changes in interaural phase differences: an objective measure of binaural hearing

References

• Aickin M. & Gensler H. 1996. Adjusting for multiple testing when reporting research results: The Bonferroni vs Holm methods. Am J Public Health, 86, 726–728.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Clinical Neurophysiology Society. 2006. Guideline 5: Guidelines for standard electrode position nomenclature. Am J Electroneurodiagnostic Technol, 46, 222–225.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Carhart R. & Jerger J. 1959. Preferred method for clinical determination of pure-tone thresholds. J Speech Hear Disord, 24, 330–345.
   Google Scholar
• Cebulla M., Stürzebecher E. & Elberling C. 2006. Objective detection of auditory steady-state responses: Comparison of one-sample and q-sample tests. J Am Acad Audiol, 17, 93–103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clinard C.G., Hodgson S.L. & Scherer M.E. Neural correlates of the binaural masking level difference in human frequency-following responses. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 2016. [Epub ahead of print]. doi: 10.1007/s10162-016-0603-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dajani H.R. & Picton T.W. 2006. Human auditory steady-state responses to changes in interaural correlation. Hear Res, 219, 85–100.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Debruyne F. 1984. Binaural interaction in early, middle and late auditory evoked responses. Scand Audiol, 13, 293–296.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Cheveigné A. & Simon J.Z. 2008. Denoising based on spatial filtering. J Neurosci Methods, 171, 331–339.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobie R.A. & Berlin C.I. 1979. Binaural interaction in brainstem-evoked responses. Arch Otolaryngol, 105, 391–398.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobie R.A. & Norton S.J. 1980. Binaural interaction in human auditory evoked potentials. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol, 49, 303–313.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dobie R.A. & Wilson M.J. 1994. Objective detection of 40-Hz auditory evoked potentials: phase coherence vs. magnitude–squared coherence. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol, 92, 405–413.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Galambos R. & Makeig S. 1992. Physiological studies of central masking in man. I: The effects of noise on the 40-Hz steady-state response. J Acoust Soc Am, 92, 2683–2690.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giraud A.L., Lorenzi C., Ashburner J., Wable J., Johnsrude I., et al. 2000. Representation of the temporal envelope of sounds in the human brain. J Neurophysiol, 84, 1588–1598.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grothe B., Pecka M. & Mcalpine D. 2010. Mechanisms of sound localization in mammals. Physiol Rev, 90, 983–1012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haywood N.R., Undurraga J.A., Marquardt T. & Mcalpine D. 2015. A comparison of two objective measures of binaural processing. Trends Hear, 19, 1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herdman A.T., Lins O., Van Roon P., Stapells D.R., Scherg M., et al. 2002. Intracerebral sources of human auditory steady-state responses. Brain Topogr, 15, 69–86.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofmann M. & Wouters J. 2010. Electrically evoked auditory steady state responses in cochlear implant users. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol, 11, 267–282.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hotelling H. 1931. The generalization of student’s ratio. Ann Math Stat, 2, 360–378.
   Google Scholar
• IBM Corp. 2013. SPSS Statistics for Windows (version 23.0) [Computer program]. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.
   Google Scholar
• Iglewicz B. & Banerjee S. 2001. A simple univariate outlier identification procedure. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Statistical Association; 5–9 August 2001; Department of Statistics, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA. Statistical Computing Section. CD-ROM.
   Google Scholar
• Kevanishvili Z. & Lagidze Z. 1987. Masking level difference: an electrophysiological approach. Scand Audiol, 16, 3–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimber A.C. 1990. Exploratory data analysis for possibly censored data from skewed distributions. J R Stat Soc Ser C (Applied Stat), 39, 21–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klumpp R.G. & Eady H.R. 1956. Some measurements of interaural time difference thresholds. J Acoust Soc Am, 28, 859–860.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magezi D.A. & Krumbholz K. 2010. Evidence for opponent-channel coding of interaural time differences in human auditory cortex. J Neurophysiol, 104, 1997–2007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McPherson D.L. & Starr A. 1993. Binaural interaction in auditory evoked potentials: Brainstem, middle- and long-latency components. Hear Res, 66, 91–98.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakagawa S. 2004. A farewell to Bonferroni: The problems of low statistical power and publication bias. Behav Ecol, 15, 1044–1045.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Picton T.W., John M.S., Dimitrijevic A. & Purcell D. 2003. Human auditory steady-state responses. Int J Audiol, 42, 177–219.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rayleigh F.R.S. 1880. XII. On the resultant of a large number of vibrations of the same pitch and of arbitrary phase. Philos Mag J Sci Fifth Ser, 10, 73–78.
   Google Scholar
• Ross B. 2008. A novel type of auditory responses: Temporal dynamics of 40-Hz steady-state responses induced by changes in sound localization. J Neurophysiol, 100, 1265–1277.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross B., Draganova R., Picton T.W. & Pantev C. 2003. Frequency specificity of 40-Hz auditory steady-state responses. Hear Res, 186, 57–68.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross B., Fujioka T., Tremblay K.L. & Picton T.W. 2007a. Aging in binaural hearing begins in mid-life: evidence from cortical auditory-evoked responses to changes in interaural phase. J Neurosci, 27, 11172–11178.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross B., Herdman A.T. & Pantev C. 2005. Stimulus induced desynchronization of human auditory 40-Hz steady-state responses. J Neurophysiol, 94, 4082–4093.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross B., Picton T.W. & Pantev C. 2002. Temporal integration in the human auditory cortex as represented by the development of the steady-state magnetic field. Hear Res, 165, 68–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross B., Tremblay K.L. & Picton T.W. 2007b. Physiological detection of interaural phase differences. J Acoust Soc Am, 121, 1017–1027.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The MathWorks Inc. 2013. Matlab (version R2103a) [Computer program]. Natick, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Tollin D.J. & Yin T.C.T. 2005. Interaural phase and level difference sensitivity in low-frequency neurons in the lateral superior olive. J Neurosci, 25, 10648–10657.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tremblay K., Picton T.W. & Ross B. 2007. Auditory evoked MEG responses to interaural phase changes: Effects of aging on response latencies. Int Congr Ser, 1300, 69–72.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson J.R. & Krishnan A. 2005. Human frequency-following responses to binaural masking level difference stimuli. J Am Acad Audiol, 16, 184–195.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wong W.Y.S. & Stapells D.R. 2004. Brain stem and cortical mechanisms underlying the binaural masking level difference in humans: an auditory steady-state response study. Ear Hear, 25, 57–67.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yost W.A. & Dye R.H. 1988. Discrimination of interaural differences of level as a function of frequency. J Acoust Soc Am, 83, 1846–1851.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou J. & Durrant J.D. 2003. Effects of interaural frequency difference on binaural fusion evidenced by electrophysiological versus psychoacoustical measures. J Acoust Soc Am, 114, 1508–1515.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zwislocki J. & Feldman R.S. 1956. Just noticeable differences in dichotic phase. J Acoust Soc Am, 28, 860–864.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar