A systematic review of stimulus parameters for eliciting distortion product otoacoustic emissions from adult humans

References

• Abdala, C. 1996. Distortion product otoacoustic emission (2f1–f2) amplitude as a function of f2/f1 frequency ratio and primary tone level separation in human adults and neonates. J Acoust Soc Am, 100, 3726–3740.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdala, C. 2000. Distortion product otoacoustic emission (2f1–f2) amplitude growth in human adults and neonates. J Acoust Soc Am, 107, 446–456.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnold, D.J., Lonsbury-Martin, B.L. & Martin, G.K. 1999. High-frequency hearing influences lower-frequency distortion-product otoacoustic emissions. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 125, 215–222.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Beattie, R.C. 2003. Distortion product otoacoustic emissions: Comparison of sequential versus simultaneous presentation of primary-tone pairs. J Am Acad Audiol, 14, 471–484.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Beattie, R.C. & Ireland, A. 2000. Effects of sample size on the noise floor and distortion product otoacoustic emissions. Scand Audiol, 29, 93–102.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beattie, R.C. & Jones, R.L. 1998. Effects of relative levels of the primary tones on distortion product otoacoustic emissions in normal-hearing subjects. Audiology, 37, 187–197.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Beattie, R.C., Kenworthy, O.T. & Neal-Johnson, C.M. 2004. Distortion product otoacoustic emissions: Input–output functions for primary-tone pairs at 1000, 2000 and 4000 Hz in normal-hearing females. Aust N Z J Audiol, 26, 116–132.
   Google Scholar
• Bian, L. & Chen, S. 2008. Comparing the optimal signal conditions for recording cubic and quadratic distortion product otoacoustic emissions. J Acoust Soc Am, 124, 3739–3750.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonfils, P. & Avan, P. 1992. Distortion-product otoacoustic emissions. Values for clinical use. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 118, 1069–1076.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonfils, P., Avan, P., Londero, A., Trotoux, J. & Narcy, P. 1991. Objective low-frequency audiometry by distortion-product acoustic emissions. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 117, 1167–1171.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter, L., Williams, W. & Seeto, M. 2015. TE and DP otoacoustic emission data from an Australian cross-sectional hearing study. Int J Audiol, 54, 806–817.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chida, E., Fukuda, S., Satoh, N., Kashiwamura, M., Matsumura, M., et al 2001. Optimal stimulus level conditions for measurements of distortion product otoacoustic emissions. Auris Nasus Larynx Supp, 28, S19–S22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhar, S., Long, G.R. & Culpepper, N.B. 1998. The dependence of the distortion product 2f1–f2 on primary levels in non-impaired human ears. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 41, 1307–1318.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhar, S., Long, G.R., Talmadge, C.L. & Tubis, A. 2005. The effect of stimulus-frequency ratio on distortion product otoacoustic emission components. J Acoust Soc Am, 117, 3766–3776.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dreisbach, L.E., Long, K.M. & Lees, S.E. 2006. Repeatability of high-frequency distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in normal-hearing adults. Ear Hear, 27, 466–479.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dreisbach, L.E. & Siegel, J.H. 2001. Distortion-product otoacoustic emissions measured at high frequencies in humans. J Acoust Soc Am, 110, 2456–2469.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dreisbach, L.E. & Siegel, J.H. 2005. Level dependence of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions measured at high frequencies in humans. J Acoust Soc Am, 117, 2980–2988.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franklin, D.J., McCoy, M., Martin, G. & Lonsbury-Martin, B. 1992. Test/retest reliability of distortion-product and transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions. Ear Hear, 13, 417–429.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaskill, S.A. & Brown, A.M. 1990. The behavior of the acoustic distortion product, 2f1–f2, from the human ear and its relation to auditory sensitivity. J Acoust Soc Am, 88, 821–839.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorga, M., Neely, S.T. & Dorn, P.A. (2002). Distortion product otoacoustic emissions in relation to hearing loss. In: Robinette, M. & Glattke, T. (eds.) Otoacoustic Emissions: Second Edition. New York: Thieme, pp. 243–272.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, F.P., Lonsbury-Martin, B., Stagner, B., Coats, C. & Martin, G. 1989. Acoustic distortion products in humans: Systematic changes in amplitude as a function of f2/f1 ratio. J Acoust Soc Am, 85, 220–229.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hauser, R. & Probst, R. 1991. The influence of systematic primary-tone level variation L2–L1 on the acoustic distortion product emission 2f1–f2 in normal human ears. J Acoust Soc Am, 89, 280–286.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janssen, T., Kummer, P. & Arnold, W. 1995a. Wachstumsverhalten der Distorsions-produktemissionen bei kochleären Hörstörungen. Otorhinolaryngol NOVA, 5, 34–46.
   Google Scholar
• Janssen, T., Kummer, P. & Arnold, W. 1995b. Wachstumsverhalten der Distorsions­produktemissionen bei normaler Hörfunktion. Otorhinolaryngol NOVA, 5, 211–222.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, T.A., Neely, S., Garner, C. & Gorga, M. 2006. Influence of primary-level and primary-frequency ratios on human distortion product otoacoustic emissions. J Acoust Soc Am, 119, 418–428.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keppler, H., Dooge, I., Maes, L., De Haenens, W., Bockstael, A., et al 2010. Transient-evoked and distortion product otoacoustic emissions: A short-term test–retest reliability study. Int J Audiol, 49, 99–109.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kummer, P., Janssen, T. & Arnold, W. 1998. The level and growth behavior of the 2f1–f2 distortion product otoacoustic emission and its relationship to auditory sensitivity in normal hearing and cochlear hearing loss. J Acoust Soc Am, 103, 3431–3444.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kummer, P., Janssen, T., Hulin, P. & Arnold, W. 2000. Optimal L(1)–L(2) primary tone level separation remains independent of test frequency in humans . Hear Res, 146, 47–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lasky, R.E. 1998. Distortion product otoacoustic emissions in human newborns and adults. II. Level effects. J Acoust Soc Am, 103, 992–1000.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Londero, A., Bonfils, P. & Avan, P. 2002. Magnitudes and phases of human distortion-product otoacoustic emissions at 2f(1)–f(2) against f(2)/f(1): Effects of an audiometric notch. Hear Res, 167, 46–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lonsbury-Martin, B.L., Harris, F., Stagner, B., Hawkins, M. & Martin, G. 1990. Distortion product emissions in humans. I. Basic properties in normally hearing subjects. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl, 147, 3–14.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Marcrum, S.C., Kummer, P., Kreitmayer, C. & Steffens, T. 2016. Average optimal DPOAE primary tone levels in normal-hearing adults. Int J Audiol, 55, 325–332.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meinke, D.K., Clavier, O., Norris, J., Kline-Schoder, R., Allen, L., et al 2013. Distortion product otoacoustic emission level maps from normal and noise-damaged cochleae. Noise Health, 15, 315–325.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mills, D.M., Feeney, M.P. & Gates, G.A. 2007. Evaluation of cochlear hearing disorders: Normative distortion product otoacoustic emission measurements. Ear Hear, 28, 778–792.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moulin, A. 2000a. Influence of primary frequencies ratio on distortion product otoacoustic emissions amplitude. II. Interrelations between multicomponent DPOAEs, tone- burst-evoked OAEs, and spontaneous OAEs. J Acoust Soc Am, 107, 1471–1486.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moulin, A. 2000b. Influence of primary frequencies ratio on distortion product otoacoustic emissions amplitude. I. Intersubject variability and consequences on the DPOAE-gram. J Acoust Soc Am, 107, 1460–1470.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moulin, A., Bera, J. & Collet, L. 1994. Distortion product otoacoustic emissions and sensorineural hearing loss. Audiology, 33, 305–326.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Neely, S.T., Johnson, T., Kopun, J., Dierking, D. & Gorga, M. 2009. Distortion-product otoacoustic emission input/output characteristics in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired human ears. J Acoust Soc Am, 126, 728–738.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen, L.H., Popelka, G., Rasmussen, A. & Osterhammel, P. 1993. Clinical significance of probe-tone frequency ratio on distortion product otoacoustic emissions. Scand Audiol, 22, 159–164.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasmussen, A.N., Popelka, G., Osterhammel, P. & Nielsen, L. 1993. Clinical significance of relative probe-tone levels on distortion product otoacoustic emissions. Scand Audiol, 22, 223–229.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reavis, K.M., MacMillan, G., Dille, M. & Konrad-Martin, D. 2015. Meta-analysis of distortion product otoacoustic emission retest variability for serial monitoring of cochlear function in adults. Ear Hear, 36, e251–e260.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roede, J., Harris, F., Probst, R. & Xu, L. 1993. Repeatability of distortion product otoacoustic emissions in normally hearing humans. Audiology, 32, 273–281.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shamseer, L., Moher, D., Clarke, M., Ghersi, D., Liberati, A., et al 2015. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation. BMJ, 349, g7647.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smurzynski, J., Leonard, G., Kim, D., Lafreniere, D. & Jung, M. 1990. Distortion product otoacoustic emissions in normal and impaired adult ears. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 116, 1309–1316.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stover, L., Neely, S. & Gorga, M.P. 1999. Cochlear generation of intermodulation distortion revealed by DPOAE frequency functions in normal and impaired ears. J Acoust Soc Am, 106, 2669–2678.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stuart, A., Passmore, A., Culbertson, D. & Jones, S. 2009. Test-retest reliability of low-level evoked distortion product otoacoustic emissions. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 52, 671–681.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, X.M., Kim, D., Jung, M. & Randolph, K. 1996. Distortion product otoacoustic emission test of sensorineural hearing loss in humans: Comparison of unequal- and equal-level stimuli. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol, 105, 982–990.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutton, L.A., Lonsbury-Martin, B., Martin, G. & Whitehead, M. 1994. Sensitivity of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in humans to tonal over-exposure: Time course of recovery and effects of lowering L2. Hear Res, 75, 161–174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vento, B.A., Durrant, J., Sabo, D. & Boston, J. 2004. Development of f2/f1 ratio functions in humans. J Acoust Soc Am, 115, 2138–2147.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vinck, B.M., De Vel, E., Xu, Z. & Van Cauwenberge, P. 1996. Distortion product otoacoustic emissions: A normative study. Audiology, 35, 231–245.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner, W., Heppelman, G., Vonthein, R. & Zenner, H. 2008. Test-retest repeatability of distortion product otoacoustic emissions. Ear Hear, 29, 378–391.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitehead, M.L., McCoy, M.J., Lonsbury-Martin, B.L. & Martin, G.K. 1995a. Dependence of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions on primary levels in normal and impaired ears. I. Effects of decreasing L2 below L1. J Acoust Soc Am, 97, 2346–2358.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitehead, M.L., Stagner, B.B., McCoy, M.J., Lonsbury-Martin, B.L. & Martin, G.K. 1995b. Dependence of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions on primary levels in normal and impaired ears. II. Asymmetry in L1, L2 space. J Acoust Soc Am, 97, 2359–2377.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar