Development of equally intelligible Telugu sentence-lists to test speech recognition in noise

References

• Bench, J. & Bamford, J. 1979. Speech-Hearing Tests and the Spoken Language of Hearing-Impaired Children. New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bevilacqua, M.C., Banhar, M.R., Da Costa, E.A., Vignoly, A.B. & Alvarenga, K.F. 2008. The Brazilian Portuguese hearing in noise test. Int J Audiol, 47, 364–365.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bosman, A.J. & Smoorenburg, G.F. 1995. Intelligibility of Dutch CVC syllables and sentences for listeners with normal hearing and with three types of hearing impairment. Audiology, 34, 260–284. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8837785.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brinkmann, K. & Richter, U. 1997. Ensuring reliability and comparability of speech audiometry in Germany. In: Martin, M. (ed.) Speech Audiometry. London: Whurr Publishers Ltd, 106–130.
   Google Scholar
• Byrne, D., Dillon, H., Tran, K., Arlinger, S., Wilbraham, K., et al. 1994. An international comparison of long-term average speech spectra. J Acoust Soc Am, 96, 2108–2120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cameron, S. & Dillon, H. 2007. The listening in spatialized noise-sentences test (LISN-S): Test-retest reliability study. Int J Audiol, 46, 145–153.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carhart, R. & Jerger, J.F. 1959. Preferred method for clinical determination of pure-tone thresholds. J Speech Hear Disord, 24, 330. Available at: http://jshd.pubs.asha.org/article.aspx?articleid = 1746766.
   Google Scholar
• Carhart, R. & Tillman, T.W. 1970. Interaction of competing speech signals with hearing losses. Arch Otolaryngol, 91, 273–279.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, H. & Silverman, S.R. 1978. Hearing and Deafness: Fourth Edition. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Delgutte, B. 2000. MATLABTM Software for synthesis of auditory chimeras. https://research.meei.harvard.edu/chimera.
   Google Scholar
• Etymotic Research. 2001. Quick SIN Speech in Noise Test Version 1.3. Elk Grove Village, IL.
   Google Scholar
• Francart, T., van Wieringen, A. & Wouters, J. 2008. APEX 3: A multi-purpose test platform for auditory psychophysical experiments. J Neurosci Methods, 172, 283–293.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frank, T. 2000. ANSI update: Maximum permissible ambient noise levels for audiometric test rooms. Am J Audiol, 9, 3–8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Geetha, C., Kumar, K.S.S., Manjula, P. & Pavan, M. 2014. Development and standardisation of the sentence identification test in the Kannada language. J Hear Sci, 4, OA18–OA26. Available at: http://www.journalofhearingscience.com/abstract/index/idArt/890267.
   Google Scholar
• Hagerman, B. 1982. Sentences for testing speech intelligibility in noise. Scand Audiol, 11, 79–87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hällgren, M., Larsby, B. & Arlinger, S. 2006. A Swedish version of the hearing in noise test (HINT) for measurement of speech recognition. Int J Audiol, 45, 227–237.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hochmuth, S., Kollmeier, B., Brand, T. & Jürgens, T. 2015. Influence of noise type on speech reception thresholds across four languages measured with matrix sentence tests. Int J Audiol, 54, 62–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jain, C., Narne, V.K., Singh, N.K. & Kumar, P. 2014. The developement of Hindi sentence test for speech recognition in noise. Int J Speech Lang Pathol Audiol, 2, 86–94.
   Google Scholar
• Jerger, J., Speaks, C. & Trammell, J.L. 1968. A new approach to speech audiometry. J Speech Hear Disord, 33, 318–328.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kalikow, D.N., Stevens, K.N. & Elliot, L.L. 1977. Development of a test of speech intelligibility in noise using sentence materials with controlled word predictability. J Acoust Soc Am, 61, 1337–1351.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Killion, M. (1997). SIN Test: A Speech in Noise Test. Elk Grove Village (IL): Etymotic Research.
   Google Scholar
• Kollmeier, B., Warzybok, A., Hochmuth, S., Zokoll, M.A., Uslar, V., et al. 2015. The multilingual matrix test: Principles, applications, and comparison across languages: A review. Int J Audiol, 54, 3–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kollmeier, B. & Wesselkamp, M. 1997. Development and evaluation of a German sentence test for objective and subjective speech intelligibility assessment. J Acoust Soc Am, 102, 2412–2421.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, S.B.R. & Mohanty, P. 2012. Speech recognition performance of adults: A proposal for a battery for Telugu. Theory Pract Lang Stud, 2, 193–204.
   Google Scholar
• MacLeod, A. & Summerfield, Q. 1990. A procedure for measuring auditory and audio-visual speech-reception thresholds for sentences in noise: Rationale, evaluation, and recommendations for use. Br J Audiol, 24, 29–43.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mendel, L.L. & Danhauer, J.L. 1997. Audiologic Evaluation and Management and Speech Perception Assessment, San Diego: Singular Publishing Group.
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen, J.B. & Dau, T. 2009. Development of a Danish speech intelligibility test. Int J Audiol, 48, 729–741.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsson, M., Soli, S.D. & Sullivan, J.A. 1994. Development of the hearing in noise test for the measurement of speech reception thresholds in quiet and in noise. J Acoust Soc Am, 95, 1085–1099.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozimek, E., Kutzner, D., Sek, A. & Wicher, A. 2009. Polish sentence tests for measuring the intelligibility of speech in interfering noise. Int J Audiol, 48, 433–443.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plomp, R. & Mimpen, A.M. 1979. Speech-reception threshold for sentences as a function of age and noise level. J Acoust Soc Am, 66, 1333–1342.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramakrishna, B.S., Nair, K.K., Chiplunkar, V.N., Atal, B.S. & Ramachandran, V. 1992. Some Aspect of the Relative Efficiencies of {I}ndian Languages. Bangalore: Indian Institute of Science.
   Google Scholar
• Scourfield, J. 2011. Development of an Afrikaans sentence perception test based on the CUNY topic related sentences – Phase 1: Sentence perception in noise [Unpublished master’s thesis]. University of Stellenbosch.
   Google Scholar
• Sreedhar, J.S., Lakshmi, V., Nagaraja, M.N. & Pushpa, S. 2011. Development and evaluation of paired words for testing of speech recognition threshold in Telugu: A preliminary report. J Ind Speech Hear Assoc, 25, 128–136.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, B. 2003. Speech-in-noise tests: How and why to include them in your basic test battery. Hear J, 56, 40–43.
   Google Scholar
• Theunissen, M., Swanepoel, D.W. & Hanekom, J. 2009. Sentence recognition in noise: Variables in compilation and interpretation of tests. Int J Audiol, 48, 743–757.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaillancourt, V., Laroche, C., Mayer, C., Basque, C., Nali, M., et al. 2005. Adaptation of the HINT (hearing in noise test) for adult Canadian Francophone populations. Int J Audiol, 44, 358–369.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Wieringen, A. & Wouters, J. 2008. LIST and LINT: Sentences and numbers for quantifying speech understanding in severely impaired listeners for Flanders and The Netherlands. Int J Audiol, 47, 348–355.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Versfeld, N.J., Daalder, L., Festen, J.M. & Houtgast, T. 2000. Method for the selection of sentence materials for efficient measurement of the speech reception threshold. J Acoust Soc Am, 107, 1671.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagener, K.C. & Brand, T. 2005. Sentence intelligibility in noise for listeners with normal hearing and hearing impairment: Influence of measurement procedure and masking parameters. Int J Audiol, 44, 144–156.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilcox, R. 2012. Introduction to Robust Estimation and Hypothesis Testing: Third Edition. Oxford: Academic Press. Available at: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780123869838000056.
   Google Scholar
• Wong, L.L., Soli, S.D., Liu, S., Han, N. & Huang, M.W. 2007. Development of the Mandarian hearing in noise test. Ear Hear, 28, 70–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong, L.L.N. & Soli, S.D. 2005. Development of the Cantonese hearing in noise test (CHINT). Ear Hear, 26, 276–289.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar