Implementation and evaluation of a Danish test battery for auditory processing disorder in children

References

• ASHA, Working Group on Auditory Processing Disorders. 2005. (Central) Auditory Processing Disorders. Rockville, MD: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. Available at: http://www.asha.org/policy/TR2005-00043.htm [Accessed June 23, 2016].
   Google Scholar
• Bocca, E., Calearo, C. & Cassinari, V. 1954. A new method for testing hearing in temporal lobe tumours; Preliminary report. Acta Otolaryngol, 44, 219–221.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broadbent, D.E. 1954. The role of auditory localization in attention and memory span. J Exp Psychol, 47, 191–196.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chermak, G.D. & Musiek, F.E. 1997. Behavioral central auditory tests. Chapter 5 in Chermak, G.D. & Musiek, F.E. Central Auditory Processing Disorders: New Perspectives. San Diego, CA: Singular Pub. Group, pp. 109–127.
   Google Scholar
• Demanez, L., Dony-Closon, B., Lhonneux-Ledoux, E. & Demanez, J.P. 2003. Central auditory processing assessment: A French-speaking battery. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg, 57, 275–290.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Domitz, D.M. & Schow, R.L. 2000. A new CAPD battery—multiple auditory processing assessment: Factor analysis and comparisons with SCAN. Am J Audiol, 9, 101–111.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Elberling, C., Ludvigsen, C. & Lyregaard, P.E. 1989. DANTALE: A new Danish speech material. Scand Audiol, 18, 169–175.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuente, A. & McPherson, B. 2006. Auditory processing tests for Spanish-speaking adults: An initial study. Int J Audiol, 45, 645–659.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, J. & Smith, P.S. 1991. The staggered spondaic word test. A ten-minute look at the central nervous system through the ears. Ann N Y Acad Sci, 620, 233–251.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Keith, R.W. 1984. Dichotic listening in children. In Beasley D.S. (eds.) Audition in Children: Methods of Study. San Diego, CA: College-Hill Press.
   Google Scholar
• Keith, R.W. 2000. Development and standardization of SCAN-C test for auditory processing disorders in children. J Am Acad Audiol, 11, 438–445.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kimura, D. 1961a. Some effects of temporal-lobe damage on auditory perception. Can J Psychol, 15, 156–165.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimura, D. 1961b. Cerebral dominance and the perception of verbal stimuli. Can J Psychol, 15, 166–171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krishnamurti, S. 2014. Monaural low-redundancy speech tests. Chapter 13 in Musiek, F.E. & Chermak, G.D. (eds.) Handbook of Central Auditory Processing Disorder: Auditory Neuroscience and Diagnosis, Vol. 2. San Diego, CA: Plural Publishing, pp. 349–367.
   Google Scholar
• Mattsson, T.S., Follestad, T., Andersson, S., Lind, O., Øygarden, J., et al. Normative data for diagnosing Auditory Processing Disorder in Norwegian children aged 7–12 years. (In preparation).
   Google Scholar
• McCullagh, J. & Bamiou, D. 2014. Measures of binaural interaction. Chapter 16 in Musiek, F.E. & Chermak, G.D. (eds.) Handbook of Central Auditory Processing Disorder: Auditory Neuroscience and Diagnosis, Vol. 2. San Diego. CA: Plural Publishing, pp. 435–469.
   Google Scholar
• Moncrieff, D.W. & Wilson, R.H. 2009. Recognition of randomly presented one-, two-, and three-pair dichotic digits by children and young adults. J Am Acad Audiol, 20, 58–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Musiek, F.E. 1983. Assessment of central auditory dysfunction: The dichotic digit test revisited. Ear Hear, 4, 79–83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Musiek, F.E. 1994. Frequency (pitch) and duration pattern tests. J Am Acad Audiol, 5, 265–268.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Musiek, F.E., Baran, J.A. & Pinheiro, M.L. 1990. Duration pattern recognition in normal subjects and patients with cerebral and cochlear lesions. Audiology, 29, 304–313.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Musiek, F.E., Chermak, G.D., Weihing, J., Zappulla, M. & Nagle, S. 2011. Diagnostic accuracy of established central auditory processing test batteries in patients with documented brain lesions. J Am Acad Audiol, 22, 342–358.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Musiek, F.E., Gollegly, K.M., Kibbe, K.S. & Verkest-Lenz, S.B. 1991. Proposed screening test for central auditory disorders: Follow-up on the dichotic digits test. Am J Otol, 12, 109–113.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Musiek, F.E. & Pinheiro, M.L. 1987. Frequency patterns in cochlear, brainstem, and cerebral lesions. Audiology, 26, 79–88.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Musiek, F.E., Shinn, J.B., Jirsa, R., Bamiou, D.E., Baran, J.A., et al. 2005. GIN (Gaps-In-Noise) test performance in subjects with confirmed central auditory nervous system involvement. Ear Hear, 26, 608–618.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neijenhuis, K., Snik, A., Priester, G., van Kordenoordt, S. & van den Broek, P. 2002. Age effects and normative data on a Dutch test battery for auditory processing disorders. Int J Audiol, 41, 334–346.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neijenhuis, K., Snik, A. & van den Broek, P. 2003. Auditory processing disorders in adults and children: Evaluation of a test battery. Int J Audiol, 42, 391–400.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neijenhuis, K.A.M., Stollman, M.H.P., Snik, A.F.M. & Van den Broek, P. 2001. Development of a central auditory test battery for adults. Audiology, 40, 69–77.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schlegel, A. 2012. Cronbach’s Alpha [MATLAB program]. Available at http://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/fileexchange/38320-cronbach-s-alpha/content/CronbachAlpha.m (Accessed 21 February 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Shinn, J. 2014. Temporal Processing Tests. Chapter 15 in Musiek, F.E. & Chermak, G.D. (eds.) Handbook of Central Auditory Processing Disorder: Auditory Neuroscience and Diagnosis, Vol. 2. San Diego, CA: Plural Publishing, pp. 405–434.
   Google Scholar
• Stollman, M.H.P., Neijenhuis, K.A.M., Jansen, S., Simkens, H.M.F., Snik, A.F.M., et al. 2004a. Development of an auditory test battery for young children: A pilot study. Int J Audiol, 43, 330–338.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stollman, M.H.P., van Velzen, E.C.W., Simkens, H.M.F., Snik, A.F.M. & van den Broek, P. 2004b. Development of auditory processing in 6–12-year-old children: A longitudinal study. Int J Audiol, 43, 34–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tavakol, M. & Dennick, R. 2011. Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha. Int J Med Educ, 2, 53–55.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Weihing, J. & Atcherson, S.R. 2014. Dichotic listening tests. Chapter 14 in Musiek, F.E. & Chermak, G.D. (eds.) Handbook of Central Auditory Processing Disorder: Auditory Neuroscience and Diagnosis, Vol. 2. San Diego, CA: Plural Publishing, 369–404.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, R.H., Moncrieff, D.W., Townsend, E.A. & Pillion, A.L. 2003. Development of a 500-Hz masking-level difference protocol for clinic use. J Am Acad Audiol, 14, 1–8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wilson, R.H., Preece, J.P., Salamon, D.L., Sperry, J.L. & Bornstein, S.P. 1994. Effects of time compression and time compression plus reverberation on the intelligibility of Northwestern University Auditory Test No. 6. J Am Acad Audiol, 5, 269–277.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar