Preliminary evaluation of a novel non-linear frequency compression scheme for use in children

References

• Alexander, J.M. 2016. Nonlinear frequency compression: Influence of start frequency and input bandwidth on consonant and vowel recognition. J Acoust Soc Am, 139, 938–957.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bentler, R., Walker, E., McCreery, R., Arenas, R.M. & Roush, P. 2014. Nonlinear frequency compression in hearing aids: impact on speech and language development. Ear Hear, 35, 143–152.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Best, V., Carlile, S., Jin, C. & van Schaik, A. 2005. The role of high frequencies in speech localization. J Acoust Soc Am, 118, 353–363.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brennan, M.A., McCreery, R., Kopun, J., Hoover, B., Alexander, J., et al. 2014. Paired comparisons of nonlinear frequency compression, extended bandwidth, and restricted bandwidth hearing aid processing for children and adults with hearing loss. J Am Acad Audiol, 25, 983–998.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brungart, D.S. & Simpson, B.D. 2009. Effects of bandwidth on auditory localization with a noise masker. J Acoust Soc Am, 126, 3199–3208.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glista, D. & Scollie, S. 2012. Development and evaluation of an English language measure of detection of word-final plurality markers: The University of Western Ontario Plurals Test. Am J Audiol, 21, 76–81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glista, D., Scollie, S., Bagatto, M., Seewald, R., Parsa, V., et al. 2009. Evaluation of nonlinear frequency compression: clinical outcomes. Int J Audiol, 48, 632–644.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glista, D., Scollie, S. & Sulkers, J. 2012. Perceptual acclimatization post nonlinear frequency compression hearing aid fitting in older children. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 55, 1765–1787.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glista, D., Hawkins, M., Scollie, S., Wolfe, J., Bohnert, A. & Rehmann, J. 2016. Pediatric verification for SoundRecover2. Best Practice Protocol, April 2016, Phonak AG.
   Google Scholar
• Hillock-Dunn, A., Buss, E., Duncan, N., Roush, P. & Leibold, L. 2014. Effects of nonlinear frequency compression on speech identification in children with hearing loss. Ear Hear, 35, 353–365.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hornsby, B.W. & Ricketts, T.A. 2006. The effects of hearing loss on the contribution of high- and low-frequency speech information to speech understanding. II. Sloping hearing loss. J Acoust Soc Am, 119, 1752–1763.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• John, A., Wolfe, J., Scollie, S., Schafer, E.C., Hudson, M., et al. 2014. Evaluation of wideband frequency responses and non-linear frequency compression for children with cookie-bite audiometric configurations. J Am Acad Audiol, 25, 1022–1033.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, E.E., & Light, K.C. 2015. A patient-centered, provider-facilitated approach to the refinement of nonlinear frequency compression parameters based on subjective preference ratings of amplified sound quality. J Am Acad Audiol, 28, 689–702.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, E., Ricketts, T. & Hornsby, B. 2009. The effect of extending high-frequency bandwidth on the acceptable noise level (ANL) of hearing-impaired listeners. Int J Audiol, 48, 353–362.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCreery, R.W., Alexander, J., Brennan, M.A., Hoover, B., Kopun, J., et al. 2014. The influence of audibility on speech recognition with nonlinear frequency compression for children and adults with hearing loss. Ear Hear, 35, 440–447.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDermott, H. 2010a. The benefits of nonlinear frequency compression for a wide range of hearing losses. Audiology Online, January.
   Google Scholar
• McDermott, H. 2010b. SoundRecover – the importance of wide perceptual bandwidth. Background Story, March 2010, Phonak AG.
   Google Scholar
• McDermott, H. 2011. A technical comparison of digital frequency-lowering algorithms available in two current hearing aids. PLoS One, 6, e22358.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parsa, V., Scollie, S., Glista, D. & Seelisch, A. 2013. Nonlinear frequency compression: effects on sound quality ratings of speech and music. Trends Amplif, 17, 54–68.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Peterson, G.E. & Lehiste, I. 1962. Revised CNC lists for auditory tests. J Speech Hear Disord, 27, 62–70.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pittman, A.L. 2008. Short-term word-learning rate in children with normal hearing and children with hearing loss in limited and extended high-frequency bandwidths. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 51, 785–797.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Posen, M.P., Reed, C.M. & Braida, L.D. 1993. Intelligibility of frequency-lowered speech produced by a channel vocoder. J Rehabil Res Dev, 30, 26–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, J., Stainsby, T.H., Baer, T. & Moore, B.C.J. 2009. Evaluation of a frequency transposition algorithm using wearable hearing aids. Int J Audiol, 48, 384–393.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rehmann, J., Jha, S. & Allegro Baumann, S. 2016. SoundRecover2 – the adaptive frequency compression algorithm. Phonak Insight Paper.
   Google Scholar
• Salorio-Corbetto, M., Baer, T. & Moore, B.C.J. 2017. Quality ratings of frequency-compressed speech by participants with extensive high-frequency dead regions in the cochlea. Int J Audiol, 56, 106–120.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitt, N., Winkler, A., Boretzki, M. & Holube, I. 2016. A phoneme perception test method for high-frequency hearing aid fitting. J Am Acad Audiol, 27, 367–379.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scollie, S., Glista, D., Seto, J., Dunn, A., Schuett, B., et al. 2016. Fitting frequency lowering signal processing applying the AAA pediatric amplification guideline: updates and protocols. J Am Acad Audiol, 27, 219–236.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherbecoe, R.L. & Studebaker, G.A. 2004. Supplementary formulas and tables for calculating and interconverting speech recognition scores in transformed acrsine units. Int J Audiol, 43, 442–448.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Souza, P., Arehart, K.H., Kates, J.M., et al. 2013. Exploring the limits of frequency lowering. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 56, 1349–1363.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stelmachowicz, P.G., Lewis, D.E., Choi, S. & Hoover, B. 2007. Effect of stimulus bandwidth on auditory skills in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired children. Ear Hear, 28, 483–494.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stelmachowicz, P.G., Pittman, A.L., Hoover, B.M. & Lewis, D.E. 2001. Effect of stimulus bandwidth on the perception of/s/in normal- and hearing impaired children and adults. J Acoust Soc Am, 110, 2183–2190.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stelmachowicz, P.G., Pittman, A.L., Hoover, B.M. & Lewis, D.E. 2004. Novel-word learning in children with normal hearing and hearing loss. Ear Hear, 25, 47–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Studebaker, G.A. 1985. A “rationalized" arcsine transform”. J Speech Hear Res, 28, 455–462.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wolfe, J., John, A.B., Schafer, E., Nyffeler, M., Boretzki, M., et al. 2010. Evaluation of non-linear frequency compression for school-age children with moderate to moderately-severe hearing loss. J Am Acad Audiol, 21, 618–628.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfe, J., John, A.B., Schafer, E.C., Hudson, M.A., Boretzki, M., et al. 2015. Evaluation of wideband frequency responses and non-linear frequency compression for children with mild to moderate high-frequency hearing loss. Int J Audiol, 54, 170–181.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfe, J.A., John, E., Schafer, M., Nyffeler, M., Boretzki, T., et al. 2011. Long-term effects of non-linear frequency compression for children with moderate hearing loss. Int J Audiol, 50, 396–404.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar