Advanced search
Publication Cover
International Journal of Audiology Volume 57, 2018 - Issue 1
Submit an article Journal homepage
624
Views
15
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Tolerable delay for speech production and perception: effects of hearing ability and experience with hearing aids

Tobias GoehringInstitute of Sound and Vibration Research, University of Southampton, Southampton, UKCorrespondence[email protected]
,
Josie L. ChapmanInstitute of Sound and Vibration Research, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
,
Stefan BleeckInstitute of Sound and Vibration Research, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
&
Jessica J. M. Monaghan*Institute of Sound and Vibration Research, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
Pages 61-68 | Received 10 Oct 2016, Accepted 07 Aug 2017, Published online: 24 Aug 2017

References

  • Agnew, J., and J. M. Thornton. 2000. “Just Noticeable and Objectionable Group Delays in Digital Hearing Aids.” Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 11: 330–336.
  • Borges, R. C., M. H. Costa, J. A. Cordioli, and L. F. Assuiti. 2013. “An Adaptive Occlusion Canceller for Hearing Aids.” Paper presented at the Proceedings of the IEEE 21st European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO), 1–5.
  • Bramslow, L. 2010. “Preferred Signal Path Delay and High-Pass Cut-Off in Open Fittings.” International Journal of Audiology 49: 634–644. doi:10.3109/14992021003753482.
  • Chen, J., Y. Wang, S. E. Yoho, D. Wang, and E. W. Healy. 2016. “Large-Scale Training to Increase Speech Intelligibility for Hearing-Impaired Listeners in Novel Noises.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 139: 2604–2612. doi:10.1121/1.4948445.
  • Dillon, H., G. Keidser, A. O'Brien, and H. Silberstein. 2003. “Sound Quality Comparisons of Advanced Hearing Aids.” The Hearing Journal 56: 30–32. doi:10.1097/01.HJ.0000293908.50552.34.
  • Groth, J., and M. B. Sondergaard. 2004. “Disturbance Caused by Varying Propagation Delay in Non-Occluding Hearing Aid Fittings.” International Journal of Audiology 43: 594–599.
  • Hétu, R., and H. T. Quoc. 1992. “Can an Inactivated Hearing Aid Act as a Hearing Protector?” Canadian Acoustics 20: 35–36.
  • Litovsky, R. Y., H. S. Colburn, W. A. Yost, and S. J. Guzman. 1999. “The Precedence Effect.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 106: 1633–1654.
  • Löllmann, H. W., and P. Vary. 2009. “Low Delay Noise Reduction and Dereverberation for Hearing Aids.” EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing 2009: 437807. doi:10.1155/2009/437807.
  • Mejia, J., H. Dillon, and M. Fisher. 2008. “Active Cancellation Of Occlusion: An Electronic Vent for Hearing Aids and Hearing Protectors.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 124: 235–240. doi:10.1121/1.2908279.
  • Monaghan, J. J. M., T. Goehring, X. Yang, F. Bolner, S. Wang, M. C. Wright, and S. Bleeck. 2017. “Auditory Inspired Machine Learning Techniques can Improve Speech Intelligibility and Quality for Hearing-Impaired Listeners.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 141: 1985–1998. doi:10.1121/1.4977197.
  • Stone, M. A., and B. C. J. Moore. 1999. “Tolerable Hearing Aid Delays. I. Estimation of Limits Imposed by the Auditory Path Alone Using Simulated Hearing Losses.” Ear and Hearing 20: 182–192.
  • Stone, M. A., and B. C. J. Moore. 2002. “Tolerable Hearing Aid Delays. II. Estimation of Limits Imposed During Speech Production.” Ear and Hearing 23: 325–338.
  • Stone, M. A., and B. C. J. Moore. 2003. “Tolerable Hearing Aid Delays. III. Effects on Speech Production and Perception of Across-Frequency Variation in Delay.” Ear and Hearing 24: 175–183. doi:10.1097/01.AUD.0000058106.68049.9C.
  • Stone, M. A., and B. C. J. Moore. 2005. “Tolerable Hearing-Aid Delays: IV. Effects on Subjective Disturbance During Speech Production by Hearing-Impaired Subjects.” Ear and Hearing 26: 225–235.
  • Stone, M. A., B. C. J. Moore, K. Meisenbacher, and R. P. Derleth. 2008. “Tolerable Hearing aid Delays. V. Estimation of Limits for Open Canal Fittings.” Ear and Hearing 29: 601–617.
  • Stromsta, C.1962. “Delays Associated with Certain Sidetone Pathways.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 34: 392–396. doi:10.1121/1.1918139.
  • Stuart, A., J. Kalinowski, M. P. Rastatter, and K. Lynch. 2002. “Effect of Delayed Auditory Feedback on Normal Speakers at Two Speech Rates.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 111: 2237–2241.
  • Summerfield, Q. 1992. “Lipreading and Audio-Visual Speech Perception.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences 335: 71–78. doi:10.1098/rstb.1992.0009.
  • Zakis, J. A., B. Fulton, and B. R. Steele. 2012. “Preferred Delay and Phase-Frequency Response of Open-Canal Hearing Aids with Music at Low Insertion Gain.” International Journal of Audiology 51: 906–913. doi:10.3109/14992027.2012.701020.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.