Is there evidence for the added value and correct use of manual and automatically switching multimemory hearing devices? A scoping review

References

• Arksey, H., and L. O'Malley. 2005. “Scoping Studies: Towards a Methodological Framework.” International Journal of Social Research Methodology 8: 19–32.
   Google Scholar
• Banerjee, S. 2011. “Hearing Aids in the Real World: Use of Multimemory and Volume Controls.” Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 22: 359–374.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bentler, R. A., D. P. Niebuhr, T. A. Johnson, and G. A. Flamme. 2003. “Impact of Digital Labeling on Outcome Measures.” Ear and Hearing 24: 215–224.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berninger, E., and I. Nordstrom. 1997. “Multiple Memory Hearing Aid. Consistency of Program-Usage in Real-World Listening Situations.” Scandinavian Audiology 26: 252–256.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buechler, M. 2001. “How Good Are Automatic Program Selection Features?” Hearing Review 8: 50–55.
   Google Scholar
• Busch, T., F. Vanpoucke, and A. van Wieringen. 2017. “Auditory Environment Across the Life Span of Cochlear Implant Users: Insights From Data Logging.” Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 60: 1362–1377.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cord, M. T., R. K. Surr, B. E. Walden, and L. Olson. 2002. “Performance of Directional Microphone Hearing Aids in Everyday Life.” Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 13: 295–307.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Davis, K., N. Drey, and D. Gould. 2009. “What Are Scoping Studies? A Review of the Nursing Literature.” International Journal of Nursing Studies 46: 1386–1400.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawes, P., S. Powell, and K. J. Munro. 2011. “The Placebo Effect and the Influence of Participant Expectation on Hearing Aid Trials.” Ear and Hearing 32: 767–774.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabriel, B. 2002. “Study Measures User Benefit of Two Modern Hearing Aid Features.” Hearing Journal 55: 46–50.
   Google Scholar
• Gatehouse, S. 1992. “The Time Course and Magnitude of Perceptual Acclimatization to Frequency Responses: Evidence from Monaural Fitting of Hearing Aids.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 92: 1258–1268.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldstein, D. P., A. R. Shields, and R. E. Sandlin. 1991. “A Multiple Memory, Digitally-Controlled Hearing Instrument.” Hearing Instruments 42: 18–21.
   Google Scholar
• Keidser, G. 1995. “The Relationship Between Listening Conditions and Alternative Amplification Schemes for Multiple Memory Hearing Aids.” Ear and Hearing 16: 575–586.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keidser, G., H. Dillon, and D. Byrne. 1996. “Guidelines for Fitting Multiple Memory Hearing Aids.” Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 7: 406–418.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Keidser, G., H. S. Limareff, S. Simmons, C. Gul, Z. Hayes, C. Sawers, B. Thomas, K. Holland, and K. Korchek. 2005. “Clinical Evaluation of Australian Hearing's Guidelines for Fitting Multiple Memory Hearing Aids.” Australian and New Zealand Journal of Audiology 27: 51–68.
   Google Scholar
• Keidser, G., A. Pellegrino, A. Delifotis, J. Ridgway, and M. Clarke. 1997. “The Use of Different Frequency Response Characteristics in Everyday Environments.” Australian Journal of Audiology 19: 9–21.
   Google Scholar
• Kiessling, J., B. Brenner, J. Nelson, O. Dyrlund, and J. Groth. 2007. “Feldstudie zum Nutzungsverhalten von Hörgeräten: Datalogging versus Selbsteinschätzung.” Zeitschrift für Audiologie 46: 48–55.
   Google Scholar
• Kochkin, S. 2007. “Increasing Hearing Aid Adoption Through Multiple Environmental Listening Utility.” Hearing Journal 60: 28–31.
   Google Scholar
• Kuk, F. K. 1992. “Evaluation of the Efficacy of a Multimemory Hearing Aid.” Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 3: 338–348.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kuk, F. K. 1996. “Subjective Preference for Microphone Types in Daily Listening Environments.” Hearing Journal 49: 29–38.
   Google Scholar
• Mauger, S. J., C. D. Warren, M. R. Knight, M. Goorevich, and E. Nel. 2014. “Clinical Evaluation of the Nucleus® 6 Cochlear Implant System: Performance Improvements with SmartSound iQ.”International Journal of Audiology 53: 564–576.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olson, L., M. Ioannou, and T. D. Trine. 2004. “Appraising an Automatically Switching Directional System in the Real World.” Hearing Journal 57: 32–38.
   Google Scholar
• Palmer, C., R. Bentler, and H. G. Mueller. 2006. “Evaluation of a Second-Order Directional Microphone Hearing Aid: II. Self-Report Outcomes.” Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 17: 190–201.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, M. D. J., C. M. Godfrey, H. Khalil, P. McInerney, D. Parker, and C. B. Soares. 2015. “Guidance for Conducting Systematic Scoping Reviews.” International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare 13: 141–146.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Punch, J. L., R. Robb, and A. H. Shovels. 1994. “Aided Listener Preferences in Laboratory Versus Real-World Environments.” Ear and Hearing 15: 50–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ricketts, T. A., and R. A. Bentler. 1992. “Comparison of Two Digitally Programmable Hearing Aids.” Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 3: 101–112.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ricketts, T., P. Henry, and D. Gnewikow. 2003. “Full Time Directional Versus User Selectable Microphone Modes in Hearing Aids.” Ear and Hearing 24: 424–439.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ringdahl, A., M. Eriksson-Mangold, B. Israelsson, A. Lindkvist, and S. Mangold. 1990. “Clinical Trials with a Programmable Hearing Aid Set for Various Listening Environments.” British Journal of Audiology 24: 235–242.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stelmachowicz, P. G., D. E. Lewis, and E. Carney. 1994. “Preferred Hearing-Aid Frequency Responses in Simulated Listening Environments.” Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research 37: 712–719.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van den Heuvel, J., S. T. Goverts, and T. S. Kapteyn. 1997. “Evaluation of Fitting Rules with a Programmable Hearing Aid.” Audiology 36: 261–278.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walden, B. E., R. K. Surr, M. T. Cord, and O. Dyrlund. 2004. “Predicting Hearing Aid Microphone Preference in Everyday Listening.” Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 15: 365–396.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wolfe, J., S. Neumann, M. Marsh, E. Schafer, L. Lianos, J. Gilden, L. O’Neill, . 2015. “Benefits of Adaptive Signal Processing in a Commercially Available Cochlear Implant Sound Processor.” Otology & Neurotology 36: 1181–1190.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeng, F. G. 2015. “Do or Die for Hearing Aid Industry.” Hearing Journal 68: 6.
   Google Scholar