Hearing aid noise suppression and working memory function

References

• Akeroyd, M. A. 2008. “Are Individual Differences in Speech Reception Related to Individual Differences in Cognitive Ability? A Survey of Twenty Experimental Studies with Normal and Hearing-Impaired Adults.” International Journal of Audiology 47 (sup2): 53–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ANSI (American National Standards Institute). 1997. “Methods for Calculation of the Speech Intelligibility Index (S3.5-1997).” http://webstore.ansi.org/RecordDetail.aspx?sku=ANSI%2FASA+S3.5-1997+(R2012)
   Google Scholar
• Arehart, K., P. Souza, J. Kates, T. Lunner, and M. S. Pedersen. 2015. “Relationship among Signal Fidelity, Hearing Loss, and Working Memory for Digital Noise Suppression.” Ear and Hearing 36 (5): 505–516. doi:10.1097/AUD.0000000000000173
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baddeley, A. D. 1986. Working Memory. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bilger, R. C., J. M. Nuetzel, W. M. Rabinowitz, and C. Rzeczkowski. 1984. “Standardization of a Test of Speech Perception in Noise.” Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 27 (1): 32–48. doi:10.1044/jshr.2701.32
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Breithaupt, C., T. Gerkmann, and R. L. Martin. 2008. “A Novel a Priori SNR Estimation Approach Based on Selective Cepstro-Temporal Smoothing.” Paper presented at IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), Las Vegas, NV, USA, March 31–April 4, 4897–4900.
   Google Scholar
• Brons, I., R. Houben, and W. A. Dreschler. 2013. “Perceptual Effects of noise reduction with Respect to Personal Preference, Speech Intelligibility, and Listening Effort.” Ear and Hearing 34 (1): 29–41. doi:10.1097/AUD.0b013e31825f299f
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buschermöhle, M., K. C. Wagener, D. Berg, M. Meis, and B. Kollmeier. 2014. “The German Digit Triplets Test (Part I): Implementations for Telephone, Internet and Mobile Devices.” Zeitschrift für Audiologie (Audiological Acoustics) 53: 139–145.
   Google Scholar
• Carroll, R., M. Meis, M. Schulte, M. Vormann, J. Kiessling, and H. Meister. 2015. “Development of a German Reading Span Test with Dual Task Design for Application in Cognitive Hearing Research.” International Journal of Audiology 54 (2): 136–141. doi:10.3109/14992027.2014.952458
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daneman, M., and P. A. Carpenter. 1980. “Individual Differences in Working Memory and Reading.” Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 19 (4): 450–466. doi:10.1016/S0022-5371(80)90312-6
   Google Scholar
• Desjardins, J. L., and K. A. Doherty. 2014. “The Effect of Hearing Aid Noise Reduction on Listening Effort in Hearing-Impaired Adults.” Ear and Hearing 35 (6): 600–610. doi:10.1097/AUD.0000000000000028
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillon, H. 2012. Hearing Aids. Sydney, Australia: Boomerang Press.
   Google Scholar
• Doherty, K. A., and J. L. Desjardins. 2015. “The Benefit of Amplification on Auditory Working Memory Function in Middle-Aged and Young-Older Hearing Impaired Adults.” Frontiers in Psychology 6: 721. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00721
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fidell, L. S., and B. G. Tabachnick. 2006. Using Multivariate Statistics. New York: Harper and Row.
   Google Scholar
• Gerkmann, T., and R. C. Hendriks. 2012. “Unbiased MMSE-Based Noise Power Estimation with Low Complexity and Low Tracking Delay.” IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing 20 (4): 1383–1393. doi:10.1109/TASL.2011.2180896
   Google Scholar
• Grimm, G., T. Herzke, D. Berg, and V. Hohmann. 2006. “The Master Hearing Aid: A PC-Based Platform for Algorithm Development and Evaluation.” Acta Acustica United with Acustica 92, 618–628.
   Google Scholar
• Grimm, G., V. Hohmann, and B. Kollmeier. 2009. “Increase and Subjective Evaluation of Feedback Stability in Hearing Aids by a Binaural Coherence-Based Noise Reduction Scheme.” IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing 17 (7): 1408–1419. doi:10.1109/TASL.2009.2020531
   Google Scholar
• Habicht, J., B. Kollmeier, and T. Neher. 2016. “Are Experienced Hearing Aid Users Faster at Grasping the Meaning of a Sentence than Inexperienced Users? An Eye-Tracking Study.” Trends in Hearing 20: 1–13. doi:10.1177/2331216516660966
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaeggi, S. M., M. Buschkuehl, W. J. Perrig, and B. Meier. 2010. “The Concurrent Validity of the N-Back Task as a Working Memory Measure.” Memory 18 (4): 394–412. doi:10.1080/09658211003702171
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D. 1973. Attention and Effort. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Kates, J. M. 2008. Digital Hearing Aids. San Diego, CA: Plural.
   Google Scholar
• Kayser, H., S. D. Ewert, J. Anemüller, T. Rohdenburg, V. Hohmann, and B. Kollmeier. 2009. “Database of Multichannel in-Ear and behind-the-Ear Head-Related and Binaural Room Impulse Responses.” EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing 2009 (1): 298605. doi:10.1155/2009/298605
   Google Scholar
• Lunner, T., M. Rudner, and J. Rönnberg. 2009. “Cognition and Hearing Aids.” Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 50 (5): 395–403. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9450.2009.00742.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neher, T. 2014. “Relating Hearing Loss and Executive Functions to Hearing Aid Users’ Preference for, and Speech Recognition with, Different Combinations of Binaural Noise Reduction and Microphone Directionality”. Frontiers in Neuroscience 8: 391. doi:10.3389/fnins.2014.00391
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neher, T., G. Grimm, and V. Hohmann. 2014a. “Perceptual Consequences of Different Signal Changes Due to Binaural Noise Reduction: Do Hearing Loss and Working Memory Capacity Play a Role?” Ear Hear 35: e213–e227. doi:10.1097/AUD.0000000000000054
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neher, T., G. Grimm, V. Hohmann, and B. Kollmeier. 2014b. “Do Hearing Loss and Cognitive Function Modulate Benefit from Different Binaural Noise-Reduction Settings?” Ear Hear 35: e52–e62. doi:10.1097/AUD.0000000000000003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neher, T., and K. C. Wagener. 2016. “Investigating Differences in Preferred Noise Reduction Strength among Hearing Aid Users.” Trends in Hearing 20: 1–14. doi:10.1177/2331216516655794
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng, E. H., M. Rudner, T. Lunner, M. S. Pedersen, and J. Rönnberg. 2013. “Effects of Noise and Working Memory Capacity on Memory Processing of Speech for Hearing-Aid Users.” International Journal of Audiology 52 (7): 433–441. doi:10.3109/14992027.2013.776181
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng, E. H., M. Rudner, T. Lunner, and J. Rönnberg. 2015. “Noise Reduction Improves Memory for Target Language Speech in Competing Native but Not Foreign Language Speech.” Ear Hear 36 (1): 82–91. doi:10.1097/AUD.0000000000000080
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng, E. H. N., E. Classon, B. Larsby, S. Arlinger, T. Lunner, M. Rudner, J. Rönnberg, et al. 2014. “Dynamic Relation Between Working Memory Capacity and Speech Recognition in Noise During the First 6 Months of Hearing Aid Use.” Trends in Hearing 18: 1–10. doi:10.1177/2331216514558688
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen, J. B., T. Dau, and T. Neher. 2014. “A Danish Open-Set Speech Corpus for Competing-Speech Studies.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 135 (1): 407–420. doi:10.1121/1.4835935
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niklès, J. M., and K. Tschopp. 1996. “Audiologische Grundlagen des Basler Satztests.” Audiologische Akustik (Audiol Acoust) 2: 70–75.
   Google Scholar
• Rabbitt, P. M. 1966. “Recognition: Memory for Words Correctly Heard in Noise.” Psychonomic Science 6 (8): 383–384. doi:10.3758/BF03330948
   Google Scholar
• Ruoff, A. 1990. Häufigkeitswörterbuch gesprochener Sprache. Tübingen, Germany: Max Niemeyer Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Rönnberg, J., M. Rudner, C. Foo, and T. Lunner. 2008. “Cognition Counts: A Working Memory System for Ease of Language Understanding (ELU).” International Journal of Audiology 47(Suppl 2): S99–S105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rönnberg, J., M. Rudner, T. Lunner, and A. A. Zekveld. 2010. “When Cognition Kicks in: Working Memory and Speech Understanding in Noise.” Noise & Health 12 (49): 263–269. doi:10.4103/1463-1741.70505
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlueter, A., U. Lemke, B. Kollmeier, and I. Holube. 2014. “Intelligibility of Time-Compressed Speech: The Effect of Uniform Versus Non-Uniform Time-Compression Algorithms.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 135 (3): 1541–1555. doi:10.1121/1.4863654
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smeds, K., N. Bergman, S. Hertzman, and T. Nyman. 2010. Noise Reduction in Modern Hearing Aids – Long-Term Average Gain Measurements using Speech. In Binaural Processing and Spatial Hearing, edited by J. M. Buchholz, T. Dau, J. Cristensen-Dalsgaard, and T. Poulsen, 445–452. Elsinore, Denmark: The Danavox Jubilee Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Souza, P., K. Arehart, and T. Neher. 2015. “Working Memory and Hearing Aid Processing: Literature Findings, Future Directions, and Clinical Applications.” Frontiers in Psychology 6: 1894. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01894
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tschopp, K., and L. Ingold. 1992. “Die Entwicklung einer deutschen Version des SPIN-Tests (Speech Perception in Noise).” In Moderne Verfahren der Sprachaudiometrie, edited by B. Kollmeier, 311–329. Heidelberg, Germany: Median-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Tschopp, K., and H. J. Züst. 1994. “Performance of Normally Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Listeners Using a German Version of the SPIN Test.” Scandinavian Audiology 23 (4): 241–247. doi:10.3109/01050399409047515
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar