The relationship between speech recognition, behavioural listening effort, and subjective ratings

References

• Best, V., J. Mejia, K. Freeston, R. J. Van Hoesel, and H. Dillon. 2015. “An Evaluation of the Performance of Two Binaural Beamformers in complex and dynamic multitalker environments.” International Journal of Audiology 54, 727–735. doi:10.3109/14992027.2015.1059502.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boothroyd, A. 2008. “The Performance/Intensity Function: An Underused Resource.” Ear and Hearing 429, 479–491. doi:10.1097/AUD.0b013e318174f067.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, R., G. Alexander, C. Gilmore, and K. Pusakulich. 1988. “Use of the Connected Speech Test (CST) with Hearing-Impaired Listeners.” Ear and Hearing 9, 198–207. doi:10.1097/00003446-198808000-00005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, H., and S. R. Silverman. 1960. Hearing and Deafness. New York, NY: Holt Reinhart and Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Desjardins, J. L. 2016. “The Effects of Hearing Aid Directional Microphone and Noise Reduction Processing on Listening Effort in Older Adults with Hearing Loss.” Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 27, 29–41. doi:10.3766/jaaa.15030.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dirks, D. D., D. E. Morgan, and J. R. Dubno. 1982. “A Procedure for Quantifying the Effects of Noise on Speech Recognition.” The Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 47, 114–123. doi:10.1044/jshd.4702.114.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dunn, O. J. 1961. “Multiple Comparisons Among Means.” Journals - American Statistical Association 56, 52–64. doi:10.1080/01621459.1961.10482090.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gagné, J.-P., J. Besser, and U. Lemke, 2017. “Behavioral Assessment of Listening Effort Using a Dual-Task Paradigm: A Review.” Trends in Hearing 233121651668728. doi:10.1177/2331216516687287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gatehouse, S. and J. Gordon. 1990. “Response Times to Speech Stimuli as Measures of Benefit from Amplification.” British Journal of Audiology 24, 63–68. doi:10.3109/03005369009077843.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gosselin, P. A. and J. P. Gagne, 2011. “Older Adults Expend More Listening Effort Than Young Adults Recognizing Speech in Noise.” Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 54, 944–958. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2010/10-0069).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heinrich, A., B. A. Schneider, and F. I. M. Craik. 2008. “Investigating the Influence of Continuous Babble on Auditory Short-Term Memory Performance.” Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 61, 735–751. doi:10.1080/17470210701402372.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hicks, C.B., and A.M. Tharpe. 2002. “Listening Effort and Fatigue in School-Age Children With and Without Hearing Loss.” Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 45, 573–584. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2002/046).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hornsby, B. W. 2013. “The Effects of Hearing Aid Use on Listening Effort and Mental Fatigue Associated with Sustained Speech Processing Demands.” Ear and Hearing 34, 523–534. doi:10.1097/AUD.0b013e31828003d8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hua, H., J. Karlsson, S. Widén, C. Möller, and B. Lyxell. 2013. “Quality of Life, Effort and Disturbance Perceived in Noise: A Comparison Between Employees with Aided Hearing Impairment and Normal Hearing.” International Journal of Audiology 52642–649. doi:10.3109/14992027.2013.803611.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humes, L. E. and L. Roberts, 1990. “Speech-Recognition Difficulties of the Hearing-Impaired Elderly: The Contributions of Audibility.” Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 33, 726–735. doi:10.1044/jshr.3304.726.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kahneman, D. 1973. Attention and Effort. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Keidser, G., H. Dillon, L. Carter, and A. O'Brien. 2012. “NAL-NL2 Empirical Adjustments.” Trends in Amplification 16, 211–223. doi:10.1177/1084713812468511.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kramer, S., T. Kapteyn, and T. Houtgast. 2006. “Occupational Performance: Comparing Normally-Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Employees Using the Amsterdam Checklist for Hearing and Work.” International Journal of Audiology 45, 503–512. doi:10.1080/14992020600754583.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsby, B., M. Hällgren, B. Lyxell, and S. Arlinger. 2005. “Cognitive Performance and Perceived Effort in Speech Processing Tasks: Effects of Different Noise Backgrounds in Normal-Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Subjects[Desempeño cognitivo y percepción del esfuerzo en tareas de procesamiento del lenguaje: Efectos de las diferentes condiciones de fondo en sujetos normales e hipoacúsicos].” International Journal of Audiology 44, 131–143. doi:10.1080/14992020500057244.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luts, H., K. Eneman, J. Wouters, M. Schulte, M. Vormann, M. Buechler, N. Dillier, R. Houben, W.A Dreschler, and M. Froehlich. 2010. “Multicenter Evaluation of Signal Enhancement Algorithms for Hearing Aids.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 127, 1491–1505. doi:10.1121/1.3299168.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackersie, C. L. and H. Cones. 2011. “Subjective and Psychophysiological Indexes of Listening Effort in a Competing-Talker Task.” Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 22, 113–22. doi:10.3766/jaaa.22.2.6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackersie, C. L., I. X. Macphee, and E. W. Heldt. 2015. “Effects of Hearing Loss on Heart Rate Variability and Skin Conductance Measured During Sentence Recognition in Noise.” Ear and Hearing 36, 145–154. doi:10.1097/AUD.0000000000000091.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mccoy, S., P. Tun, C. Cox, M. Colangelo, R. Stewart, and A. Wingfield. 2005. “Hearing Loss and Perceptual Effort: Downstream Effects on Older Adults’ Memory for Speech.” The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 58, 22–33. doi:10.1080/02724980443000151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, D., F. Craik, K. Li, and B. Schneider. 2000. “Comparing the Effects of Aging and Background Noise on Short-Term Memory Performance.” Psychology and Aging 15, 323–334. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.15.2.323.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Obleser, J., M. Wöstmann, N. Hellbernd, A. Wilsch, and B. Maess. 2012. “Adverse Listening Conditions and Memory Load Drive a Common Alpha Oscillatory Network.” Journal of Neuroscience 32, 12376–12383. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4908-11.2012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pichora-Fuller, M. K., S. E. Kramer, M. A. Eckert, B. Edwards, B. W. Y. Hornsby, L E. Humes, U. Lemke, T. Lunner, M. Matthen, C.L. Mackersie and G. Naylor. 2016. “Hearing Impairment and Cognitive Energy: The Framework for Understanding Effortful Listening (FUEL).” Ear and Hearing 37, 5S–27S. doi:10.1097/AUD.0000000000000312.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Picou, E. M., E. Aspell, and T. A. Ricketts. 2014. “Potential Benefits and Limitations of Three Types of Directional Processing in Hearing Aids.” Ear and Hearing 35, 339–352. doi:10.1097/AUD.0000000000000004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Picou, E. M., J. Gordon, and T. A. Ricketts. 2016. “The Effects of Noise and Reverberation on Listening Effort in Adults With Normal Hearing.” Ear and Hearing 37, 1–13. doi:10.1097/AUD.0000000000000222.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Picou, E. M., T. M. Moore, and T. A. Ricketts. 2017. “The Effects of Directional Processing on Objective and Subjective Listening Effort.” Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 60, 199–211. doi:10.1044/2016_JSLHR-H-15-0416.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Picou, E. M. and T. A. Ricketts. 2014a “The Effect of Changing the Secondary Task in Dual-Task Paradigms for Measuring Listening Effort.” Ear and Hearing 35, 611–622. doi:10.1097/AUD.0000000000000055.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Picou, E. M. and T. A. Ricketts. 2014b. “Increasing Motivation Changes Subjective Reports of Listening Effort and Choice of Coping Strategy.” International Journal of Audiology 53, 418–426. doi:10.3109/14992027.2014.880814.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Picou, E. M. and T. A. Ricketts. Forthcoming. “An Evaluation of Hearing Aid Beamforming Microphone Arrays in a Noisy Laboratory Setting.” Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Picou, E. M., T. A. Ricketts, and B. W. Hornsby. 2013. “How Hearing Aids, Background Noise, and Visual Cues Influence Objective Listening Effort.” Ear and Hearing 34, e52–64. doi:10.1097/AUD.0b013e31827f0431.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Picou, E. M., T. A. Ricketts, and B. W. Y. Hornsby. 2011. “Visual Cues and Listening Effort: Individual Variability.” Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 54, 1416–1430. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2011/10-0154).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plomp, R. 1986. “A Signal-to-Noise Ratio Model for the Speech-Reception Threshold of the Hearing Impaired.” Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 29, 146–154. doi:10.1044/jshr.2902.146.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rabbitt, P. 1968. “Channel-Capacity, Intelligibility and Immediate Memory.” The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 20, 241–248. doi:10.1080/14640746808400158.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rennies, J., H. Schepker, I. Holube, and B. Kollmeier. 2014. “Listening Effort and Speech Intelligibility in Listening Situations Affected by Noise and Reverberation.” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 136, 2642–2653. doi:10.1121/1.4897398.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rönnberg, J., T. Lunner, A. Zekveld, P. Sörqvist, H. Danielsson, B. Lyxell, Ö. Dahlström, C. Signoret, S. Stenfelt, M. K. Pichora-Fuller, and M. Rudner. 2013. “The Ease of Language Understanding (ELU) Model: Theory, Data, and Clinical Implications.” Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience 7, 1–17. doi:10.3389/fnsys.2013.00031.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sarampalis, A., S. Kalluri, B. Edwards, and E. Hafter. 2009. “Objective Measures of Listening Effort: Effects of Background Noise and Noise Reduction.” Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 52, 1230–1240. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2009/08-0111).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sato, H., J. S. Bradley, and M. Morimoto. 2005. “Using Listening Difficulty Ratings of Conditions for Speech Communication in Rooms.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 117, 1157–1167. doi:10.1121/1.1849936.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Streiner, D. L. 2003. Starting at the Beginning: An Introduction to Coefficient Alpha and Internal Consistency. Journal of Personality Assessment 80, 99–103. doi:10.1207/S15327752JPA8001_18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Studebaker, G. A. 1985. “A Rationalized Arcsine Transform ”. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 28, 455–462. doi:10.1044/jshr.2803.455.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wilson, G. M. and M. A. Sasse. “Straight From the Heart: Using Physiological Measurements in the Evaluation of Media Quality.” Proceedings of the Society for the Study of Artificial Intelligence and the Simulation of Behaviour (AISB) Convention, 2001. 63–73.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, Y.-H., N. Aksan, M. Rizzo, E. Stangl, X. Zhang, and R. Bentler. 2014. “Measuring Listening Effort: Driving Simulator Versus Simple Dual-Task Paradigm.” Ear and Hearing 35, 623–632. doi:10.1097/AUD.0000000000000079.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeh, Y.-Y. and C. D. Wickens. 1988. “Dissociation of Performance and Subjective Measures of Workload.” Human Factors, 30, 111–120. doi:10.1177/001872088803000110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zekveld, A. A. and S. E. Kramer. 2014. “Cognitive Processing Load Across a Wide Range of Listening Conditions: Insights From Pupillometry.” Psychophysiology, 51, 277–284. doi:10.1111/psyp.12151.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zekveld, A. A., S. E. Kramer, and J. M. Festen. 2010. “Pupil Response as an Indication of Effortful Listening: The Influence of Sentence Intelligibility.” Ear and Hearing 31, 480–490. doi:10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181d4f251.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zijlstra, F. R. H. 1993. Efficiency in Work Behaviour: A Design Approach for Modern Tools. Delft, the Netherlands: Delft University Press.
   Google Scholar