310
Views
16
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Technical Report

Interpreting the Tinnitus Questionnaire (German version): what individual differences are clinically important?

ORCID Icon, &
Pages 553-557 | Received 23 Jun 2017, Accepted 14 Feb 2018, Published online: 28 Feb 2018

References

  • Adamchic, I., P. A. Tass, B. Langguth, C. Hauptmann, M. Koller, M. Schecklmann, F. Zeman, and M. Landgrebe. 2012. “Linking the Tinnitus Questionnaire and the Subjective Clinical Global Impression: Which Differences Are Clinically Important?” Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 10: 79. doi:10.1186/1477-7525-10-79.
  • Andresen, E. M. 2000. “Criteria for Assessing the Tools of Disability Outcomes Research.” Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 81: S15–S20. doi:10.1053/apmr.2000.20619.
  • Argstatter, H., M. Grapp, E. Hutter, P. K. Plinkert, and H. V. Bolay. 2015. “The Effectiveness of Neuro-Music Therapy According to the Heidelberg Model Compared to a Single Session of Educational Counseling as Treatment for Tinnitus: A Controlled Trial.” Journal of Psychosomatic Research 78 (3): 285–292. doi:10.1016/j.jpsychores.2014.08.012.
  • Cohen, J. 1988. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioural Sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Fleiss, J. 1986. Design and Analysis of Clinical Experiments. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
  • Goebel, G., and W. Hiller. 1998. Tinnitus-Fragebogen (TF). Ein Instrument zur Erfassung von Belastung und Schweregrad bei Tinnitus. Handanweisung. Goettingen: Hogrefe.
  • Hall, D. A. 2016. “Interpreting Treatment-Related Changes Using the Tinnitus Questionnaire in Argstatter H, Grapp M, Plinkert PK, Bolay HV. Heidelberg Neuro-Music Therapy for Chronic-Tonal Tinnitus-Treatment Outline and Psychometric Evaluation. Int Tinnitus J 2012;17(1):31–41.” The International Tinnitus Journal 20 (2): 73–75. doi:10.5935/0946-5448.20160014.
  • Hall, D. A., H. Haider, A. J. Szczepek, P. Lau, S. Rabau, J. Jones-Diette, and T. Fuller. 2016. “Systematic Review of Outcome Domains and Instruments Used in Clinical Trials of Tinnitus Treatments in Adults.” Trials 17 (1): 1. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27250987.
  • Hallam, R. S., S. C. Jakes, and R. Hinchcliffe. 1988. “Cognitive Variables in Tinnitus Annoyance.” British Journal of Clinical Psychology 27 (3): 213–222. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8260.1988.tb00778.x
  • Hiller, W., and G. Goebel. 1992. “A Psychometric Study of Complaints in Chronic Tinnitus.” Journal of Psychosomatic Research 36 (4): 337–348. doi:10.1016/0022-3999(92)90070-I.
  • Jacobson, N. S., and P. Truax. 1991. “Clinical Significance: A Statistical Approach to Defining Meaningful Change in Psychotherapy Research.” Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 59 (1): 12–19. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.59.1.12.
  • Kleinjung, T., T. Steffens, P. Sand, T. Murthum, G. Hajak, J. Strutz, and P. Eichhammer. 2007. “Which Tinnitus Patients Benefit from Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation?” Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery 137 (4): 589–595. doi:10.1016/j.otohns.2006.12.007.
  • Meikle, M. B., J. A. Henry, S. E. Griest, B. J. Stewart, H. B. Abrams, R. McArdle, P. J. Myers, et al. 2012. “The Tinnitus Functional Index: Development of a New Clinical Measure for Chronic, Intrusive Tinnitus.” Ear Hear 33 (2): 153–176. doi:10.1097/AUD.0b013e31822f67c0.
  • Mokkink, L. B., C. B. Terwee, D. L. Patrick, J. Alonso, P. W. Stratford, D. L. Knol, and H. C. De Vet. 2010. “The COSMIN Checklist for Assessing the Methodological Quality of Studies on Measurement Properties of Health Status Measurement Instruments: An International Delphi Study.” Quality of Life Research 19 (4): 539–549. doi:10.1007/s11136-010-9606-8.
  • Newman, C. W., S. A. Sandridge, and G. P. Jacobson. 1998. “Psychometric Adequacy of the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI) for Evaluating Treatment Outcome.” Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 9 (2): 153–160. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9564679.
  • Norman, G. R., J. A. Sloan, and K. W. Wyrwich. 2003. “Interpretation of Changes in Health-Related Quality of Life: The Remarkable Universality of Half a Standard Deviation.” Medical Care 41 (5): 582–592. doi:10.1097/01.MLR.0000062554.74615.4C.
  • Revicki, D. A., D. Cella, R. D. Hays, J. A. Sloan, W. R. Lenderking, and N. K. Aaronson. 2006. “Responsiveness and Minimal Important Differences for Patient Reported Outcomes.” Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 4 (1): 70. doi:10.1186/1477-7525-4-70.
  • Sawilowsky, S. 2009. “New Effect Size Rules of Thumb.” Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods 8 (2): 597–474. doi:10.22237/jmasm/1257035100.
  • Terwee, C. B., S. D. Bot, M. R. de Boer, D. A. van der Windt, D. L. Knol, J. Dekker, and H. C. de Vet. 2007. “Quality Criteria Were Proposed for Measurement Properties of Health Status Questionnaires.” Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 60 (1): 34–42. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.03.012.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.