How repetition influences speech understanding by younger, middle-aged and older adults

References

• Akeroyd, M. A. 2008. “Are Individual Differences in Speech Reception Related to Individual Differences in Cognitive Ability? A Survey of Twenty Experimental Studies with Normal and Hearing-Impaired Adults.” International Journal of Audiology 47 (sup2): S53–S71. doi:10.1080/14992020802301142.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, S., T. White-Schwoch, A. Parbery-Clark, and N. Kraus. 2013. “A Dynamic Auditory-Cognitive System Supports Speech-in-Noise Perception in Older Adults.” Hearing Research 300: 18–32. doi:10.1016/j.heares.2013.03.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, R., J. P. Röer, S. Dentale, and A. Buchner. 2012. “Habituation of the Irrelevant Sound Effect: Evidence for an Attentional Theory of Short-Term Memory Disruption.” Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition 38 (6): 1542–1557. doi:10.1037/a0028459.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desjardins, J. L., and K. A. Doherty. 2013. “Age-Related Changes in Listening Effort for Various Types of Masker Noises.” Ear and Hearing 34 (3): 261–272. doi:10.1097/AUD.0b013e31826d0ba4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubno, J. R., A. R. Horwitz, and J. B. Ahlstrom. 2003. “Recovery from Prior Stimulation: Masking of Speech by Interrupted Noise for Younger and Older Adults with Normal Hearing.” The Journal of Acoustical Society of America 113 (4): 2084–2094. doi:10.1121/1.1555611.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ezzatian, P., L. Li, K. Pichora-Fuller, and B. Schneider. 2011. “The Effect of Priming on Release from Informational Masking Is Equivalent for Younger and Older Adults.” Ear and Hearing 32 (1): 84–96. doi:10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181ee6b8a.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Folstein, M. F., S. E. Folstein, and P. R. McHugh. 1975. “Mini-Mental State: A Practical Method for Grading the Cognitive State.” Of Patients for the Clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research 12 (3): 189–198. doi:10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freyman, R. L., J. Terpening, A. C. Costanzi, and K. S. Helfer. 2017. “The Effect of Aging and Priming on Same/Different Judgments between Text and Partially Masked Speech.” Ear Hear 38 (6): 672–671. doi:10.1097/AUD.0000000000000450.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Füllgrabe, C., B. C. Moore, and M. A. Stone. 2015. “Age-Group Differences in Speech Identification Despite Matched Audiometrically Normal Hearing: Contributions from Auditory Temporal Processing and Cognition.” Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience 6: 347. doi:10.3389/fnagi.2014.00347.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Getzmann, S., J. Lewald, and M. Falkenstein. 2014. “Using Auditory Pre-Information to Solve the Cocktail-Party Problem: Electrophysiological Evidence for Age-Specific Differences.” Frontiers in Neuroscience 8: 413. doi:10.3389/fnins.2014.00413.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon-Salant, S., and P. J. Fitzgibbons. 1993. “Temporal Factors and Speech Recognition Performance in Young and Elderly Listeners.” Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research 36 (6): 1276–1285. doi:10.1044/jshr.3606.1276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grose, J. H., S. K. Mamo, and J. W. Hall. 2009. “Age Effects in Temporal Envelope Processing: Speech Unmasking and Auditory Steady-State Responses.” Ear Hear 30 (5): 568–575. doi:10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181ac128f.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grose, J. H., H. L. Porter, and E. Buss. 2016. “Aging and Spectro-Temporal Integration of Speech.” Trends in Amplification 20:1–11. doi:10.1177/2331216516670388.
   Google Scholar
• Hasher, L., and R. T. Zacks. 1988. “Working Memory, Comprehension, and Aging: A Review and a New View.” The Psychology of Learning and Motivation 193–225. doi:10.1016/S0079-7421(08)60041-9.
   Google Scholar
• Helfer, K. S., J. Chevalier, and R. L. Freyman. 2010. “Aging, Spatial Cues, and Single- versus Dual-Task Performance in Competing Speech Perception.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 128 (6): 3625–3633. doi:10.1121/1.3502462.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helfer, K. S., and R. L. Freyman. 2014. “Stimulus and Listener Factors Affecting Age-Related Changes in Competing Speech Perception.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 136 (2): 748–759. doi:10.1121/1.4887463.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helfer, K. S., and R. L. Freyman. 2016. “Age Equivalence in the Benefit of Repetition for Speech Understanding.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 140 (5): EL371–EL377. doi:10.1121/1.4966586.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helfer, K. S., and A. Jesse. 2015. “Lexical Influences on Competing Speech Perception in Younger, Middle-Aged, and Older Adults.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 138 (1): 363–376. doi:10.1121/1.4923155.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helfer, K. S., G. R. Merchant, and R. L. Freyman. 2016. “Aging and the Effect of Target-Masker Alignment.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 140 (5): 3844–3853. doi:10.1121/1.4967297.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humes, L. E., J. H. Lee, and M. P. Coughlin. 2006. “Auditory Measures of Selective and Divided Attention in Young and Older Adults Using Single- Talker Competition.” The Journal of Acoustical. Society of America 120 (5): 2926–2937. doi:10.1121/1.2354070.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, J. A., and R. L. Freyman. 2012. “Effect of Priming on Energetic and Informational Masking in a Same-Different Task.” Ear and Hearing 33 (1): 124–133. doi:10.1097/AUD.0b013e31822b5bee.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joyce, C. A., K. A. Paller, T. J. Schwartz, and M. Kutas. 1999. “An Electrophysiological Analysis of Modality-Specific Aspects of Word Repetition.” Psychophysiology 36 (5): 655–665. doi:10.1111/1469-8986.3650655.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koelewijn, T., A. A. Zekveld, J. M. Festen, and S. E. Kramer. 2012. “Pupil Dilation Uncovers Extra Listening Effort in the Presence of a Single-talker Masker.” Ear and Hearing 33 (2): 291–300. doi:10.1097/AUD.0b013e3182310019.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• La Voie, D., and L. L. Light. 1994. “Adult Age Differences in Repetition Priming: A Meta-Analysis.” Psychology and Aging 9 (4): 539–553. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.9.4.539.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neher, T., T. Lunner, K. Hopkins, and B. C. J. Moore. 2012. “Binaural Temporal Fine Structure Sensitivity, Cognitive Function, and Spatial Speech Recognition of Hearing-Impaired Listeners.” The Journal of Acoustical Society of America 131 (4): 2561–2564. doi:10.1121/1.3689850.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pajo, K. 2013. “The Occurrence of 'What', 'Where', 'What House' and Other Repair Initiations in the Home Environment of Hearing-impaired Individuals.” International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders 48 (1): 66. doi:10.1111/j.1460-6984.2012.00187.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rivenez, M., C. J. Darwin, L. Bourgeon, and A. Guillaume. 2007. “Unattended Speech Processing: Effect of Vocal-Tract Length.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 121 (2): EL90–EL95. doi:10.1121/1.2430762.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roer, J. P., R. Bell, and A. Buchner. 2014. “Evidence for Habituation of the Irrelevant-Sound Effect on Serial Recall.” Memory and Cognition 42 (4): 609–621. doi:10.3758/s13421-013-0381-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rugg, M. D. 1985. “The Effects of Semantic Priming and Work Repetition on Event-related Potentials.” Psychophysiology 22 (6): 642–647. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.1985.tb01661.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salthouse, T. A. 2000. “Aging and Measures of Processing Speed.” Biological Psychology 54 (1–3): 35–54. doi:10.1016/S0301-0511(00)00052-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shafiro, V., S. Sheft, R. Risley, and B. Gygi. 2015. “Effects of Age and Hearing Loss on the Intelligibility of Interrupted Speech.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 137 (2): 745–756. doi:10.1121/1.4906275.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheldon, S.,. M. K. Pichora-Fuller, and B. A. Schneider. 2008. “Priming and Sentence Context Support Listening to Noise-Vocoded Speech by Younger and Older Adults.” The Journal of Acoustical Society of America 123 (1): 489–499. doi:10.1121/1.2783762.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sohoglu, E., J. E. Peelle, R. P. Carlyon, and M. H. Davis. 2014. “Top-down Influences of Written Text on Perceived Clarity of Degraded Speech.” Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance 40 (1): 186–199. doi:10.1037/a0033206.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tun, P. A., S. McCoy, and A. Wingfield. 2009. “Aging, Hearing Acuity, and the Attentional Costs of Effortful Listening.” Psychology and Aging 24 (3): 761–766. doi:10.1037/a0014802.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tun, P. A., G. O'Kane, and A. Wingfield. 2002. “Distraction by Competing Speech in Young and Older Adult listeners.” Psychology and Aging 17 (3): 453–467. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.17.3.453.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tye-Murray, N. 1991. “Repair Strategy Usage by Hearing-Impaired Adults and Changes following Communication Therapy.” Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 34 (4): 921–928. doi:10.1044/jshr.3404.921.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Weintraub, S., S. S. Dikmen, R. K. Heaton, D. S. Tulsky, P. D. Zelazo, P. J. Bauer, N. E. Carlozzi, et al. 2013. “Cognition Assessment Using the NIH Toolbox.” Neurology 80 (11 Suppl 3): S54–S64. doi:10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182872ded.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wild, C. J., M. H. Davis, and I. S. Johnsrude. 2012. “Human Auditory Cortex is Sensitive to the Perceived Clarity of Speech.” Neuroimage 60 (2): 1490–1502. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.01.035.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wingfield, A., A. H. Alexander, and S. Cavigelli. 1994. “Does Memory Constrain Utilization of Top-down Information in Spoken Word Recognition? Evidence from Normal Aging.” Language and Speech 37 (3): 221–235. doi:10.1177/002383099403700301.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Woods, W. S., S. Kalluri, S. Pentony, and N. Nooraei. 2013. “Predicting the Effect of Hearing Loss and Audibility on Amplified Speech Perception in a Multi-Talker Listening Scenario.” The Journal of Acoustical Society of America 133 (6): 4268–4278. doi:10.1121/1.4803859.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, M., H. Li, Z. Hong, X. Xian, J. Li, X. Wu, and L. Li. 2012. “Effects of Aging on the Ability to Benefit from Prior Knowledge of Message Content in Masked Speech Recognition.” Speech Communication 54 (4): 529–542. doi:10.1016/j.specom.2011.11.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar