Influence of subcortical auditory processing and cognitive measures on cocktail party listening in younger and older adults

References

• Akeroyd, M. A. 2008. “Are Individual Differences in Speech Reception Related to Individual Differences in Cognitive Ability? A Survey of Twenty Experimental Studies with Normal and Hearing-Impaired Adults.” International Journal of Audiology 47 (2): S53–S71. doi:10.1080/14992020802301142.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, S., A. Parbery-Clark, T. White-Schwoch, and N. Kraus. 2012. “Aging Affects Neural Precision of Speech Encoding.” The Journal of Neuroscience: The Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience 32 (41): 14156–14164. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2176-12.2012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, S., A. Parbery-Clark, H. G. Yi, and N. Kraus. 2011. “A Neural Basis of Speech-in-Noise Perception in Older Adults.” Ear and Hearing 32 (6): 750. doi:10.1097/AUD.0b013e31822229d3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baddeley, A. D. 1986. Working Memory. Oxford: Oxford Scientific Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Baddeley, A. D. 2000. Short-Term and Working Memory. In The Oxford Handbook of Memory, edited by E. Tulving and F. I. M. Craik, 77–92. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Basavaraj, V., and S. Venkatesan. 2009. Ethical Guidelines for Bio-Behavioral Research Involving Human Subjects. Mysore: All India Institute of Speech and Hearing. ISBN: 978-81-909355-6-2.
   Google Scholar
• Bidelman, G. M., J. W. Villafuerte, S. Moreno, and C. Alain. 2014. “Age-Related Changes in the Subcorticalecortical Encoding and Categorical Perception of Speech.” Neurobiology of Aging 35 (11): 2526–2540. doi:10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2014.05.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bregman, A. S. 1990. Auditory Scene Analysis: The Perceptual Organization of Sound. Cambridge: MIT.
   Google Scholar
• CHABA (Committee on Hearing, Bioacoustics, and Biomechanics). 1988. “Working Group on Speech Understanding and Aging, National Research Council. Speech Understanding and Aging.” Journal of Acoustical Society of America 83: 859–95. doi:10.1121/1.395965.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cherry, E. C. 1953. “Some Experiments on the Recognition of Speech, with One and Two Ears.” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 25 (5): 975–979. doi:10.1121/1.1907229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conway, A. R., N. Cowan, and M. F. Bunting. 2001. “The Cocktail Party Phenomenon Revisited: The Importance of Working Memory Capacity.” Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 8 (2): 331–335. doi:10.3758/BF03196169.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du, Y., Y. He, B. Ross, T. Bardouille, X. H. Wu, L. Li, and C. Alain. 2011. “Human Auditory Cortex Activity Shows Additive Effects of Spectral and Spatial Cues during Speech Segregation.” Cerebral Cortex 21 (3): 698–707. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhq136.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finney, D. J. 1952. Statistical Method in Biological Assay. London, England: C. Griffen.
   Google Scholar
• Gordon-Salant, S., and P. J. Fitzgibbons. 1995. “Recognition of Multiply Degraded Speech by Young and Elderly Listeners.” Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 38 (5): 1150–1156. doi:10.1044/jshr.3805.1150.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gregoire, J., and M. Van der Linden. 1997. “Effect of Age on Forward and Backward Digit Spans.” Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition 4 (2): 140–149. doi:10.1080/13825589708256642.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helfer, K., and R. Freyman. 2008. “Aging and Speech-on-Speech Masking.” Ear and Hearing 29 (1): 87–98. doi:10.1097/AUD.0b013e31815d638b.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humes, L. E. 2002. “Factors Underlying the Speech-Recognition Performance of Elderly Hearing-Aid Wearers.” Journal of Acoustical Society of America 112 (3): 1112–1132. doi:10.1121/1.1499132.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humes, L. E., J. H. Lee, and M. P. Coughlin. 2006. “Auditory Measures of Selective and Divided Attention in Young and Older Adults Using Single-Talker Competition.” Journal of Acoustical Society of America 120 (5): 2926–2937. doi:10.1121/1.2354070.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, K. L., T. G. Nicol, and N. Kraus. 2005. “Brain Stem Response to Speech: A Biological Marker of Auditory Processing.” Ear and Hearing 26 (5): 424–434. doi:10.1097/01.aud.0000179687.71662.6e
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kidd, G., T. L. Arbogast, C. R. Mason, and F. J. Gallun. 2005. “The Advantage of Knowing Where to Listen.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 118 (6): 3804–3815. doi:10.1121/1.2109187.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Killion, M., and P. Niquette. 2000. “What Can the Pure-Tone Audiogram Tell us About a Patient’s Snr Loss?” Hearing Journal 53 (3): 46–48, 50, 52–53. doi:10.1097/00025572-200003000-00006.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar, U. A., and M. Sandeep. 2013. Development and Test Trail of Computer Based Auditory-Cognitive Training Module for Individuals with Cochlear Hearing Loss. Mysore: AIISH.
   Google Scholar
• Mamo, S. K., J. H. Grose, and E. Buss. 2016. “Speech-Evoked ABR: Effects of Age and Simulated Neural Temporal Jitter.” Hearing Research 333: 201–209. doi:10.1016/j.heares.2015.09.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCreery, R. W., and P. G. Stelmachowicz. 2011. “Audibility-Based Predictions of Speech Recognition for Children and Adults with Normal Hearing.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 130 (6): 4070–4081. doi:10.1121/1.3658476.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meister, H., S. Schreitmüller, L. Grugel, M. Ortmann, D. Beutner, M. Walger, and I. G. Meister. 2013. “Cognitive Resources Related to Speech Recognition with a Competing Talker in Young and Older Listeners.” Neuroscience 232: 74–82. doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2012.12.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Methi, R., Avinash, and Kumar, U. A. 2009. “Development of Sentence Material for Quick Speech in Noise Test (Quick SIN) in Kannada.” Journal of Indian Speech and Hearing Association 23 (1): 59–65.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, D. R., M. Edmondson-Jones, P. Dawes, H. Fortnum, A. McCormack, R. H. Pierzycki, and K. J. Munro. 2014. “Relation between Speech-in-Noise Threshold, Hearing Loss and Cognition from 40–69 years of age.” PLoS One 9 (9): e107720. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0107720.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plomp, R., and A. M. Mimpen. 1979. “Speech-Reception Threshold for Sentences as a Function of Age and Noise Level.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 66 (5): 1333–1342. doi:10.1121/1.383554.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plomp, R. 1986. “A Signal-to-Noise Ratio Model for the Speech-Reception Threshold of the Hearing Impaired.” Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research 29 (2): 146–154. doi:10.1044/jshr.2902.146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pienkowski, M. 2017. “On the Etiology of Listening Difficulties in Noise despite Clinically Normal Audiograms.” Ear and Hearing 38 (2): 135–148. doi:10.1097/AUD.0000000000000388.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rönnberg, J., M. Rudner, T. Lunner, and A. A. Zekveld. 2010. “When Cognition Kicks in: Working Memory and Speech Understanding in Noise.” Noise and Health 12 (49): 263. doi:10.4103/1463-1741.70505.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudner, M., C. Foo, J. Ronnberg, and T. Lunner. 2007. “Phonological Mismatch Makes Aided Speech Recognition in Noise Cognitively Taxing.” Ear and Hearing 28 (6): 879–892. doi:10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181576c9c.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russo, N., T. Nicol, G. Musacchia, and N. Kraus. 2004. “Brainstem Responses to Speech Syllables.” Clinical Neurophysiology 115 (9): 2021–2030. doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2004.04.003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoof, T., and S. Rosen. 2016. “The Role of Age-Related Declines in Subcortical Auditory Processing in Speech Perception in Noise.” Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology 17 (5): 441–460. doi:10.1007/s10162-016-0564-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skoe, E., and N. Kraus. 2010. “Auditory Brain Stem Response to Complex Sounds: A Tutorial.” Ear and Hearing 31 (3): 302. doi:10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181cdb272.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song, J. H., E. Skoe, K. Banai, and N. Kraus. 2011. “Perception of Speech in Noise: Neural Correlates.” Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 23 (9): 2268–2279. doi:10.1162/jocn.2010.21556.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sörqvist, P. 2010. “The Role of Working Memory Capacity in Auditory Distraction.” Doctoral diss., Luleå Tekniska Universitet.
   Google Scholar
• Vander-Werff, K. R., and K. S. Burns. 2011. “Brain Stem Responses to Speech in Younger and Older Adults.” Ear and Hearing 32 (2): 168–180. doi:10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181f534b5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, L., and B. E. Pfingst. 2008. “Spectral and Temporal Cues for Speech Recognition: Implications for Auditory Prostheses.” Hearing Research 242 (1–2): 132–140. doi:10.1016/j.heares.2007.12.010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, L., and Y. Zheng. 2007. “Spectral and Temporal Cues for Phoneme Recognition in Noise.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 122 (3): 1758–1764. doi:10.1121/1.2767000
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, L., Y. Li, H. Wu, X. Li, H. Shu, Y. Zhang, and P. Li. 2016. “Effects of Semantic Context and Fundamental Frequency Contours on Mandarin Speech Recognition by Second Language Learners.” Frontiers in Psychology 7: 908. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00908.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar