424
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Influence of stimulus presentation rate on intraoperative ECAP thresholds in cochlear implant users

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon show all
Pages 296-300 | Received 01 Jun 2017, Accepted 04 Dec 2018, Published online: 12 Jan 2019

References

  • Alhowary, A. A, K. El-Radaideh, A. Al-Rusan, D. B. Hani, W. Khraise, A. Al Omari, F. Alzoubi, et al. 2017. “Effect of Total Intravenous vs Volatile Anesthetics on Intraoperatively Acquired Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential in Children Undergoing Cochlear Implant Surgery: A Randomized Prospective Study.” Journal of Clinical Anesthesia 36:80–83. doi:10.1016/j.jclinane.2016.10.008.
  • Botros, A., and C. Psarros. 2010. “Neural Response Telemetry Reconsidered: I. The Relevance of ECAP Threshold Profiles and Scaled Profiles to Cochlear Implant Fitting.” Ear and Hearing 31 (3):367–379. doi:10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181c9fd86.
  • Charasse, B., J. M. Chanal, C. Berger-Vachon, and L. Collet. 2004. “Influence of Stimulus Frequency on NRT Recordings.” International Journal of Audiology 43 (4):236–244. doi:10.1080/14992020400050032
  • Crawford, M. W., M. C. White, E. J. Propst, C. Zaarour, S. Cushing, C. Pehora, A. L. James., et al. 2009. “Dose-dependent Suppression of the Electrically Elicited Stapedius Reflex by General Anesthetics in Children Undergoing Cochlear Implant Surgery. Anesthesia and Analgesia 108 (5):1480–1487. doi:10.1213/ane.0b013e31819bdfd5.
  • Franck, K. H., and S. J. Norton. 2001. “Estimation of Psychophysical Levels Using the Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential Measured with the Neural Response Telemetry Capabilities of Cochlear Corporation’s CI24M Device.” Ear and Hearing 22 (4):289–299. doi:10.1097/00003446-200108000-00004.
  • Grolman, W., A. Maat, F. Verdam, Y. Simis, B. Carelsen, N. Freling, R. A. Tange., et al. 2009. “Spread of Excitation Measurements for the Detection of Electrode Array Foldovers: a Prospective Study Comparing 3-Dimensional Rotational X-ray and Intraoperative Spread of Excitation Measurements.” Otology and Neurotology 30 (1):27–33. doi:10.1097/MAO.0b013e31818f57ab.
  • Lasky, R. E. 1997. “Rate and Adaptation Effects on the Auditory Evoked Brainstem Response in Human Newborns and Adults.” Hearing Research 111 (1–2):165–176. doi:10.1016/S0378-5955(97)00106-8.
  • McKay, C. M., and N. Smale. 2017. “The Relation between ECAP Measurements and the Effect of Rate on Behavioral Thresholds in Cochlear Implant Users.” Hearing Research 346:62–70. doi:10.1016/j.heares.2017.02.009
  • Mittal, R., and S. S. Panwar. 2009. “Correlation between Intra-operative High Rate Neural Response Telemetry Measurements and Behaviourally Obtained Threshold and Comfort Levels in Patients Using Nucleus 24 Cochlear Implants.” Cochlear Implants International 10 (2):103–111. doi:10.1179/cim.2009.10.2.103.
  • Molisz, A., A. Zarowski, A. Vermeiren, T. Theunen, L. De Coninck, J. Siebert, E. F. Offeciers., et al. 2015. “Postimplantation Changes of Electrophysiological Parameters in Patients with Cochlear Implants.” Audiology and Neurotology 20 (4):222–228. doi:10.1159/000377615.
  • Müller, A., T. Hocke, and P. Mir-Salim. 2015. “Intraoperative Findings on ECAP-measurement: Normal or Special Case?” International Journal of Audiology 54 (4):257--264. doi:10.3109/14992027.2014.969410.
  • Scorpecci, A., A. D’Elia, P. Malerba, I. Cantore, P. Consolino, F. Trabalzini, G. Paludetti., et al. 2016. “Maps Created Using a New Objective Procedure (C-NRT) correlate with Behavioral, loudness-balanced Maps: a Study in Adult Cochlear Implant Users.” European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 273 (12):4167–4173. doi:10.1007/s00405-016-4115-1.
  • Seyle, K., and C. J. Brown. 2002. “Speech Perception Using Maps Based on Neural Response Telemetry Measures.” Ear and Hearing 23 (Supplement):72S–79S. doi:10.1097/00003446-200202001-00009.
  • Venail, F., T. Mura, M. Akkari, C. Mathiolon, S. Menjot de Champfleur, J. P. Piron, M. Sicard., et al. 2015. “Modeling of Auditory Neuron Response Thresholds with Cochlear Implants.” BioMed Research International 2015:1. doi:10.1155/2015/394687
  • Zuniga, M. G., A. Rivas, A. Hedley-Williams, R. H. Gifford, R. Dwyer, B. M. Dawant, L. W. Sunderhaus., et al. 2017. “Tip Fold-over in Cochlear Implantation: Case Series.” Otology and Neurotology: Official Publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology 38 (2):199–206. doi:10.1097/MAO.0000000000001283
  • Zarowski et al. 2018. in press.
  • Zarowski, A., Molisz, A. Cardinael, E. Vermeiren, A. Theunen, T., et al. 2018. Electrode Impedance as a Strong Predictive Factor for Behavioural T/C-Levels in Cochlear Implant Patients. in press.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.