Envelope frequency following responses are stronger for high-pass than low-pass filtered vowels

References

• Aiken, S. J., and T. W. Picton. 2006. “Envelope Following Responses to Natural Vowels.” Audiology & Neuro-Otology 11 (4): 213–232. doi:10.1159/000092589.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aiken, S. J., and T. W. Picton. 2008. “Envelope and Spectral Frequency-following Responses to Vowel Sounds.” Hearing Research 245 (1–2): 35–47. doi:10.1016/j.heares.2008.08.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ananthakrishnan, S., A. Krishnan, and E. Bartlett. 2016. “Human Frequency Following Response: Neural Representation of Envelope and Temporal Fine Structure in Listeners with Normal Hearing and Sensorineural Hearing Loss.” Ear and Hearing 37 (2): e91. doi:10.1097/AUD.0000000000000247.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Billings, C. J. 2013. “Uses and Limitations of Electrophysiology with Hearing Aids.” Seminars in Hearing 34 (4): 257–269. doi:10.1055/s-0033-1356638.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Carney, L. H., T. Li, and J. M. McDonough. 2015. “Speech Coding in the Brain: Representation of Vowel Formants by Midbrain Neurons Tuned to Sound Fluctuations.” eNeuro 2 (4): 1–12. doi:10.1523/ENEURO.0004-15.2015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cebulla, M., E. Stürzebecher, and C. Elberling. 2006. “Objective Detection of Auditory Steady-state Responses: Comparison of One-sample and q-sample Tests.” Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 17 (2): 93–103. doi:10.3766/jaaa.17.2.3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cebulla, M., E. Stürzebecher, and K. D. Wernecke. 2001. “Objective Detection of the Amplitude Modulation following Response (AMFR): Detectión Objetiva de la Respuesta Consecuente de Amplitud Modulada (AMFR).” International Journal of Audiology 40 (5):245–252. doi:10.3109/00206090109073118.
   Google Scholar
• Chesnaye, M., S. Bell, J. Harte, and D. Simpson. 2018. “Objective Measures for Detecting the Auditory Brainstem Response: Comparisons of Specificity, Sensitivity and Detection Time.” International Journal of Audiology 57 (6): 468–478. doi:10.1080/14992027.2018.1447697.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, J. M., D. W. Purcell, J. A. Coyne, and S. J. Aiken. 2013. “Envelope Following Responses Elicited by English Sentences.” Ear and Hearing 34 (5): 637–650. doi:10.1097/AUD.0b013e31828e4dad.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clinard, C. G., and K. L. Tremblay. 2013. “What Brainstem Recordings May or May not be Able to Tell us About Hearing Aid–Amplified Signals.” In Seminars in Hearing, 270–277. Stuttgart, Germany: Thieme Medical Publishers. doi:10.1055/s-0033-1356639.
   Google Scholar
• De Sá, A. M., and L. B. Felix. 2003. “Multi-channel Evoked Response Detection Using Only Phase Information.” Journal of Neuroscience Methods 129 (1): 1–10. doi:10.1016/S0165-0270(03)00152-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Sá, A. M., L. B. Felix, and A. F. Infantosi. 2004. “A Matrix-based Algorithm for Estimating Multiple Coherence of a Periodic Signal and its Application to the Multichannel Eeg during Sensory Stimulation.” IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 51 (7): 1140–1146. doi:10.1109/TBME.2004.827952.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dimitrijevic, A., H. J. Michalewski, F. G. Zeng, H. Pratt, and A. Starr. 2008. “Frequency Changes in a Continuous Tone: Auditory Cortical Potentials.” Clinical Neurophysiology 119 (9): 2111–2124. doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2008.06.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Easwar, V., A. Banyard, S. J. Aiken, and D. W. Purcell. 2018a. “Phase Delays between Tone Pairs Reveal Interaction in Scalp-recorded Envelope Following Responses.” Neuroscience Letters 665: 257–262. doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2017.12.014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Easwar, V., A. Banyard, S. J. Aiken, and D. W. Purcell. 2018b. “Phase-locked Responses to the Vowel Envelope Vary in Scalp-recorded Amplitude Due to Across-frequency Response Interactions.” European Journal of Neuroscience 48 (10): 3126–3145. doi:10.1111/ejn.14161.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Easwar, V., D. W. Purcell, S. J. Aiken, V. Parsa, and S. D. Scollie. 2015a. “Effect of Stimulus Level and Bandwidth on Speech-evoked Envelope following Responses in Adults with Normal Hearing.” Ear and Hearing 36 (6): 619–634. doi:10.1097/AUD.0000000000000188.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Easwar, V., D. W. Purcell, S. J. Aiken, V. Parsa, and S. D. Scollie. 2015b. “Evaluation of Speech-evoked Envelope following Responses as an Objective Aided Outcome Measure: Effect of Stimulus Level, Bandwidth.” And Amplification in Adults with Hearing Loss. Ear and Hearing 36 (6): 635–652. doi:10.1097/AUD.0000000000000199.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Easwar, V., D. W. Purcell, and S. D. Scollie. 2012. “Electroacoustic Comparison of Hearing Aid Output of Phonemes in Running Speech versus Isolation: Implications for Aided Cortical Auditory Evoked Potentials Testing.” International Journal of Otolaryngology 2012: 1. doi:10.1155/2012/518202.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, T. R., and B. H. Deatherage. 1969. “The Effect of Frequency on the Auditory Evoked Response.” Psychonomic Science 15 (2): 95–96. doi:10.3758/BF03336219.
   Google Scholar
• Gelfand, S. A. 2017. Hearing: An Introduction to Psychological and Physiological Acoustics. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Glista, D., V. Easwar, D. W. Purcell, and S. Scollie. 2012. “A Pilot Study on Cortical Auditory Evoked Potentials in Children: Aided Caeps Reflect Improved High-frequency Audibility with Frequency Compression Hearing Aid Technology.” International Journal of Otolaryngology 2012: 1. doi:10.1155/2012/982894.
   Google Scholar
• Gorga, M. P., K. A. Beauchaine, and J. K. Reiland. 1987. “Comparison of Onset and Steady-state Responses of Hearing Aids: Implications for Use of the Auditory Brainstem Response in the Selection of Hearing Aids.” Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research 30 (1): 130–136. doi:10.1044/jshr.3001.130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenberg, S., J. T. Marsh, W. S. Brown, and J. C. Smith. 1987. “Neural Temporal Coding of Low Pitch. I. Human Frequency-following Responses to Complex Tones.” Hearing Research 25 (2–3): 91–114. doi:10.1016/0378-5955(87)90083-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guérit, F., J. Marozeau, and B. Epp. 2017. “Linear Combination of Auditory Steady-state Responses Evoked by Co-modulated Tones.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 142 (4): EL395–EL400. doi:10.1121/1.5007757.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herdman, A. T., T. W. Picton, and D. R. Stapells. 2002. “Place Specificity of Multiple Auditory Steady-state Responses.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 112 (4): 1569–1582. doi:10.1121/1.1506367.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hillenbrand, J., L. A. Getty, M. J. Clark, and K. Wheeler. 1995. “Acoustic Characteristics of American English Vowels.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 97 (5): 3099–3111. doi:10.1121/1.411872.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jewett, D. L., and J. S. Williston. 1971. “Auditory-evoked Far Fields Averaged from the Scalp of Humans.” Brain: a Journal of Neurology 94 (4): 681–696. doi:10.1093/brain/94.4.681.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Joris, P., C. Schreiner, and A. Rees. 2004. “Neural Processing of Amplitude-modulated Sounds.” Physiological Reviews 84 (2): 541–577. doi:10.1152/physrev.00029.2003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keidser, G., H. Dillon, L. Carter, and A. O’Brien. 2012. “Nal-nl2 Empirical Adjustments.” Trends in Amplification 16 (4): 211–223. doi:10.1177/1084713812468511.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kennedy, C., D. Mccann, M. J. Campbell, L. Kimm, and R. Thornton. 2005. “Universal Newborn Screening for Permanent Childhood Hearing Impairment: An 8-year Follow-up of a Controlled Trial.” The Lancet 366 (9486): 660–662. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67138-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korczak, P. A., J. Smart, R. Delgado, T. M Strobel, and C. Bradford. 2012. “Auditory Steady-state Responses.” Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 23 (3): 146–170. doi:10.3766/jaaa.23.3.3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laroche, M., H. R. Dajani, F. Prévost, and A. M. Marcoux. 2013. “Brainstem Auditory Responses to Resolved and Unresolved Harmonics of a Synthetic Vowel in Quiet and Noise.” Ear and Hearing 34 (1): 63–74. doi:10.1097/AUD.0b013e31826119a1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lv, J., D. M. Simpson, and S. L. Bell. 2007. “Objective Detection of Evoked Potentials Using a Bootstrap Technique.” Medical Engineering and Physics 29 (2): 191–198. doi:10.1016/j.medengphy.2006.03.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marynewich, S., L. M. Jenstad, and D. R. Stapells. 2012. “Slow Cortical Potentials and Amplification—part i: N1-p2 Measures.” International Journal of Otolaryngology 2012: 1. doi:10.1155/2012/921513.
   Google Scholar
• Ménard, M.,. S. Gallègo, C. Berger-Vachon, L. Collet, and H. Thai-Van. 2008. “Relationship between Loudness Growth Function and Auditory Steady-state Response in Normal-hearing Subjects.” Hearing Research 235 (1–2): 105–113. doi:10.1016/j.heares.2007.10.007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, B. C. 2012. An Introduction to the Psychology of Hearing. Netherlands: Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, B. C., B. R. Glasberg, and T. Baer. 1997. “A Model for the Prediction of Thresholds, Loudness, and Partial Loudness.” Journal of the Audio Engineering Society 45 (4): 224–240. http://www.aes.org/e-lib/browse.cfm?elib=10272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Picton, T. W., J. Vajsar, R. Rodriguez, and K. B. Campbell. 1987. “Reliability Estimates for Steady-state Evoked Potentials.” Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/Evoked Potentials Section 68 (2): 119–131. doi:10.1016/0168-5597(87)90039-6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Purdy, S. C., M. Sharma, K. J. Munro, and C. L. A. Morgan. 2013. “Stimulus Level Effects on Speech-evoked Obligatory Cortical Auditory Evoked Potentials in Infants with Normal Hearing.” Clinical Neurophysiology 124 (3): 474–480. doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2012.09.011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russo, N., E. Skoe, B. Trommer, T. Nicol, S. Zecker, A. Bradlow, and N. Kraus. 2008. “Deficient Brainstem Encoding of Pitch in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders.” Clinical Neurophysiology 119 (8): 1720–1731. doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2008.01.108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skoe, E., and N. Kraus. 2010. “Auditory Brain Stem Response to Complex Sounds: A Tutorial.” Ear and Hearing 31 (3): 302. doi:10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181cdb272.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stroebel, D., D. Swanepoel, and E. Groenewald. 2007. “Aided Auditory Steady-state Responses in Infants: Respuestas Auditivas de Estado Estable en Niños Con Auxiliares Auditivos.” International Journal of Audiology 46 (6): 287–292. doi:10.1080/14992020701212630.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valdes, J. L., M. C. Perez-Abalo, V. Martin, G. Savio, C. Sierra, E. Rodriguez, and O. Lins. 1997. “Comparison of Statistical Indicators for the Automatic Detection of 80 Hz Auditory Steady State Responses.” Ear and Hearing 18 (5): 420–429. doi:10.1097/00003446-199710000-00007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanheusden, F. J., S. L. Bell, M. A. Chesnaye, and D. M. Simpson. 2019. “Improved Detection of Vowel Envelope Frequency following Responses Using Hotelling's t2 Analysis.” Ear and Hearing 40 (1): 116–127. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000598
   Google Scholar
• Zhu, L., H. Bharadwaj, J. Xia, and B. Shinn-Cunningham. 2013. “A Comparison of Spectral Magnitude and Phase-locking Value Analyses of the Frequency-following Response to Complex Tones.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 134 (1): 384–395. doi:10.1121/1.4807498.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar