Channel discrimination along all contacts of the cochlear implant electrode array and its relation to speech perception

References

• Agresti, A. 2002. “Categorical Data Analysis.” In Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/0471249688.
   Google Scholar
• Bierer, J. A. 2007. “Threshold and Channel Interaction in Cochlear Implant Users: Evaluation of the Tripolar Electrode Configuration.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 121 (3): 1642–1653. doi:https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2436712.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bosman, A. J., and G. F. Smoorenburg. 1995. “Intelligibility of Dutch CVC Syllables and Sentences for Listeners with Normal Hearing and with Three Types of Hearing Impairment.” International Journal of Audiology 34 (5): 260–284. doi:https://doi.org/10.3109/00206099509071918.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, L. M., T. A Zwolan, and G. H. Wakefield. 1997. “Comparison of Electrode Discrimination, Pitch Ranking, and Pitch Scaling Data in Postlingually Deafened Adult Cochlear Implant Subjects.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 101 (1): 440–455. doi:https://doi.org/10.1121/1.417989.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Miguel, Á. R., A. A. Argudo, S. A. Borkoski Barreiro, J. C. Falcón González, and A. R. Macías. 2018. “Imaging Evaluation of Electrode Placement and Effect on Electrode Discrimination on Different Cochlear Implant Electrode Arrays.” European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 275: 1385–1394. doi:10.1007/s00405-018-4943-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Debruyne, J. A., T. Francart, A. M. L. Janssen, K. Douma, and J. P. L. Brokx. 2017. “Fitting Prelingually Deafened Adult Cochlear Implant Users Based on Electrode Discrimination Performance.” International Journal of Audiology 56 (3): 174–185. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14992027.2016.1243262.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donaldson, G. S., H. A Kreft, and L. Litvak. 2005. “Place-Pitch Discrimination of Single- Versus Dual-Electrode Stimuli by Cochlear Implant Users (L).” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 118 (2): 623–626. doi:https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1937362.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Firszt, J. B., D. B. Koch, M. Downing, and L. Litvak. 2007. “Current Steering Creates Additional Pitch Percepts in Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients”. Otology & Neurotology 28 (5): 629–636. doi:10.1097/01.mao.0000281803.36574.bc.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friesen, L. M., R. V. Shannon, D. Baskent, and X. Wang. 2001. “Speech Recognition in Noise as a Function of the Number of Spectral Channels: Comparison of Acoustic Hearing and Cochlear Implants.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 110 (2): 1150–1163. doi:https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1381538.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frijns, J. H. M., R. K. Kalkman, F. J. Vanpoucke, J. S. Bongers, and J. J. Briaire. 2009. “Simultaneous and Non-Simultaneous Dual Electrode Stimulation in Cochlear Implants: Evidence for Two Neural Response Modalities.” Acta Oto-Laryngologica 129 (4): 433–439. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00016480802610218.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frijns, J. H. M., W. M. C. Klop, R. M. Bonnet, and J. J. Briaire. 2003. “Optimizing the Number of Electrodes with High-Rate Stimulation of the Clarion CII Cochlear Implant.” Acta Oto-Laryngologica 123 (2): 138–142. doi:10.1080/0036554021000028126
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goehring, J. L., D. L. Neff, J. L. Baudhuin, and M. L. Hughes. 2014. “Pitch Ranking, Electrode Discrimination, and Physiological Spread of Excitation Using Current Steering in Cochlear Implants.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 136 (6): 3159. doi:https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4900634.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, G. L., J. H. Won, W. R. Drennan, and J. T. Rubinstein. 2013. “Relationship between Channel Interaction and Spectral-Ripple Discrimination in Cochlear Implant Users.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 133 (1): 425–433. doi:https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4768881.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenway, B., Y. C. Tam, Z. Vanat, F. Harris, R. Gray, J. Birchall, R. Carlyon, and P. Axon. 2015. “Pitch Discrimination: An Independent Factor in Cochlear Implant Performance Outcomes.” Otology & Neurotology 36 (9): 1472–1479. doi:10.1097/MAO.0000000000000845.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koch, D. B., M. Downing, M. J. Osberger, and L. Litvak. 2007. “Using Current Steering to Increase Spectral Resolution in CII and HiRes 90K Users.” Ear and Hearing 28: 38S–41S. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0b013e31803150de.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawless, H. T. 2010. “A Simple Alternative Analysis for Threshold Data Determined by Ascending Forced-Choice Methods of Limits.” Journal of Sensory Studies 25 (3): 332–346. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-459X.2009.00262.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long, C. J., T. A Holden, G. H. McClelland, W. S. Parkinson, C. Shelton, D. C. Kelsall, and Z. M. Smith. 2014. “Examining the Electro-Neural Interface of Cochlear Implant Users Using Psychophysics, CT Scans, and Speech Understanding.” Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology 15 (2): 293–304. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10162-013-0437-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKay, C. M., H. J. McDermott, and R. P. Carlyon. 2000. “Place and Temporal Cues in Pitch Perception: Are They Truly Independent?” Acoustics Research Letters Online 1 (1): 25–30. doi:https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1318742.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, D. A., D. J. Van Tasell, A. C. Schroder, S. Soli, and S. Levine. 1995. “Electrode Ranking of “Place Pitch” and Speech Recognition in Electrical Hearing.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 98 (4): 1987–1999. doi:https://doi.org/10.1121/1.413317.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfingst, B. E., and L. Xu. 2004. “Across-Site Variation in Detection Thresholds and Maximum Comfortable Loudness Levels for Cochlear Implants.” Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology 5 (1): 11–24. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10162-003-3051-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfingst, B. E., L. Xu, and C. S. Thompson. 2004. “Across-Site Threshold Variation in Cochlear Implants: Relation to Speech Recognition.” Audiology and Neuro-Otology 9 (6): 341–352. doi:https://doi.org/10.1159/000081283.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potts, L. G., M. W. Skinner, B. D. Gotter, M. J. Strube, and C. A Brenner. 2007. “Relation between Neural Response Telemetry Thresholds, T- and C-Levels, and Loudness Judgments in 12 Adult Nucleus 24 Cochlear Implant Recipients.” Ear and Hearing 28 (4): 495–511. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0b013e31806dc16e.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shannon, R. V. 1983. “Multichannel Electrical Stimulation of the Auditory Nerve in Man. I. Basic Psychophysics.” Hearing Research 11 (2): 157–189. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-5955(83)90077-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shannon, R. V., Q. J. Fu, and J. Galvin. 2004. “The Number of Spectral Channels Required for Speech Recognition Depends on the Difficulty of the Listening Situation.” Acta Oto-Laryngologica Supplementum 124 (0): 50–54. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/03655230410017562.
   Google Scholar
• Snel-Bongers, J., J. J. Briaire, F. J. Vanpoucke, and J. H. M. Frijns. 2012. “Spread of Excitation and Channel Interaction in Single- and Dual-Electrode Cochlear Implant Stimulation.” Ear and Hearing 33 (3): 367–376. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0b013e318234efd5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snel-Bongers, J., A. P. Netten, P.-P. B. M. Boermans, L. J. C. Rotteveel, J. J. Briaire, and J. H. M. Frijns. 2018. “Evidence-Based Inclusion Criteria for Cochlear Implantation in Patients with Postlingual Deafness.” Ear and Hearing 39 (5): 1008–1014. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0000000000000568.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Townshend, B., N. Cotter, D. Van Compernolle, and R. L. White. 1987. “Pitch Perception by Cochlear Implant Subjects.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 82 (1): 106–115. doi:https://doi.org/10.1121/1.395554.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeng, F. G. 2002. “Temporal Pitch in Electric Hearing.” Hearing Research 174 (1–2): 101–106. doi:10.1016/S0378-5955(02)00644-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeng, F. G. 2004. “Trends in Cochlear Implants.” Trends in Amplification 8 (1): 1–34. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/108471380400800102.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar