Longitudinal effect of deactivating stimulation sites based on low-rate thresholds on speech recognition in cochlear implant users

References

• Berenstein, C. K., L. H. Mens, J. J. Mulder, and F. J. Vanpoucke. 2008. “Current Steering and Current Focusing in Cochlear Implants: Comparison of Monopolar, Tripolar, and Virtual Channel Electrode Configurations.” Ear and Hearing 29 (2):250–260. doi:10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181645336.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bierer, J. A., and K. F. Faulkner. 2010. “Identifying Cochlear Implant Channels with Poor Electrode-Neuron Interface: Partial Tripolar, Single-Channel Thresholds and Psychophysical Tuning Curves.” Ear and Hearing 31 (2):247–258. doi:10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181c7daf4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bierer, J. A., and L. Litvak. 2016. “Reducing Channel Interaction through Cochlear Implant Programming May Improve Speech Perception: Current Focusing and Channel Deactivation.” Trends in Hearing 20:1–12. doi:10.1177/2331216516653389.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boex, C., M. I. Kos, and M. Pelizzone. 2003. “Forward Masking in Different Cochlear Implant Systems.” Journal of Acousttical Society of America 114 (4):2058–2065. doi:10.1121/1.1610452.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chatterjee, M., and R. V. Shannon. 1998. “Forward Masked Excitation Patterns in Multielectrode Electrical Stimulation.” Journal of Acoustical Society of America 103 (5):2565–2572. doi:10.1121/1.422777.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dingemanse, J. G., J. H. Frijns, and J. J. Briaire. 2006. “Psychophysical Assessment of Spatial Spread of Excitation in Electrical Hearing with Single and Dual Electrode Contact Maskers.” Ear and Hearing 27 (6):645–657. doi:10.1097/01.aud.0000246683.29611.1b.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fu, Q. J., and G. Nogaki. 2005. “Noise Susceptibility of Cochlear Implant Users: The Role of Spectral Resolution and Smearing.” Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology 6 (1):19–27. doi:10.1007/s10162-004-5024-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garofolo, J., L. Lamel, W. Fisher, J. Fiscus, D. Pallett, N. Dahlgren, and V. Zue. 1993. TIMIT Acoustic-Phonetic Continuous Speech Corpus LDC93S1. Philadelphia: Linguistic Data Consortium.
   Google Scholar
• Henry, B. A., C. M. McKay, H. J. McDermott, and G. M. Clark. 2000. “The Relationship between Speech Perception and Electrode Discrimination in Cochlear Implantees.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 108 (3):1269–1280. doi:10.1121/1.1287711.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holden, L. K., J. B. Firszt, R. M. Reeder, R. M. Uchanski, N. Y. Dwyer, and T. A. Holden. 2016. “Factors Affecting Outcomes in Cochlear Implant Recipients Implanted with a Perimodiolar Electrode Array Located in Scala Tympani.” Otology and Neurotology 37 (10):1662–1668. doi:10.1097/MAO.0000000000001241.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwon, B. J., and C. van den Honert. 2006. “Effect of Electrode Configuration on Psychophysical Forward Masking in Cochlear Implant Listeners.” Journal of Acoustical Society of America 119 (5):2994–3002. doi:10.1121/1.2184128.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Labadie, R. F., J. H. Noble, A. J. Hedley-Williams, L. W. Sunderhaus, B. M. Dawant, and R. H. Gifford. 2016. “Results of Postoperative, CT-Based, Electrode Deactivation on Hearing in Prelingually Deafened Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients.” Otology and Neurotology 37 (2):137–145. doi:10.1097/MAO.0000000000000926.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, N., and P. C. Loizou. 2010. “Masking Release and the Contribution of Obstruent Consonants on Speech Recognition in Noise by Cochlear Implant Users.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 128 (3):1262–1271. doi:10.1121/1.3466845.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long, C. J., T. A. Holden, G. H. McClelland, W. S. Parkinson, C. Shelton, D. C. Kelsall, and Z. M. Smith. 2014. “Examining the Electro-Neural Interface of Cochlear Implant Users Using Psychophysics, CT Scans, and Speech Understanding.” Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology 15 (2):293–304. doi:10.1007/s10162-013-0437-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorenzi, C., G. Gilbert, H. Carn, S. Garnier, and B. C. Moore. 2006. “Speech Perception Problems of the Hearing Impaired Reflect Inability to Use Temporal Fine Structure.” PNAS 103 (49):18866–18869. doi:10.1073/pnas.0607364103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mani, A., P. C. Loizou, A. Shoup, P. Roland, and P. Kruger. 2004. “Dichotic Speech Recognition by Bilateral Cochlear Implant Users.” Int Congress Series 1273:466–469. doi:10.1016/j.ics.2004.09.007.
   Google Scholar
• McKay, C. M. 2012. “Forward Masking as a Method of Measuring Place Specificity of Neural Excitation in Cochlear Implants: A Review of Methods and Interpretation.” Journal of Acoustical Society of America 131 (3):2209–2224. doi:10.1121/1.3683248.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKay, C. M., K. R. Henshall, R. J. Farrell, and H. J. McDermott. 2003. “A Practical Method of Predicting the Loudness of Complex Electrical Stimuli.” Journal of Acoustical Society of America 113 (4):2054–2063. doi:10.1121/1.1558378.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, D. A., H. A. Kreft, E. S. Anderson, and G. S. Donaldson. 2011. “Spatial Tuning Curves from Apical, Middle, and Basal Electrodes in Cochlear Implant Users.” Journal of Acoustical Society of America 129 (6):3916–3933. doi:10.1121/1.3583503.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsson, M., S. D. Soli, and J. A. Sullivan. 1994. “Development of the Hearing in Noise Test for the Measurement of Speech Reception Thresholds in Quiet and in Noise.” Journal of Acoustical Society of America 95 (2):1085–1099. doi:10.1121/1.408469.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oxenham, A. J., and H. A. Kreft. 2016. “Speech Masking in Normal and Impaired Hearing: Interactions between Frequency Selectivity and Inherent Temporal Fluctuations in Noise.” Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology 894:125–132. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-25474-6_14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfingst, B. E., and L. Xu. 2005. “Psychophysical Metrics and Speech Recognition in Cochlear Implant Users.” Audiology and Neurotology 10 (6):331–341. doi:10.1159/000087350.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qin, M. K., and A. J. Oxenham. 2003. “Effects of Simulated Cochlear-Implant Processing on Speech Reception in Fluctuating Maskers.” Journal of Acoustical Society of America 114 (1):446–454. doi:10.1121/1.1579009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rader, T., H. Fastl, and U. Baumann. 2013. “Speech Perception with Combined Electric-Acoustic Stimulation and Bilateral Cochlear Implants in a Multisource Noise Field.” Ear and Hearing 34 (3):324–332. doi:10.1097/AUD.0b013e318272f189.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reiss, L. A., C. W. Turner, S. A. Karsten, and B. J. Gantz. 2014. “Plasticity in Human Pitch Perception Induced by Tonotopically Mismatched Electro-Acoustic Stimulation.” Neuroscience 256:43–52. doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2013.10.024.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srinivasan, A. G., M. Padilla, R. V. Shannon, and D. M. Landsberger. 2013. “Improving Speech Perception in Noise with Current Focusing in Cochlear Implant Users.” Hearing Research 299:29–36. doi:10.1016/j.heares.2013.02.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stickney, G. S., F. G. Zeng, R. Litovsky, and P. Assmann. 2004. “Cochlear Implant Speech Recognition with Speech Maskers.” Journal of Acoustical Society of America 116 (2):1081–1091. doi:10.1121/1.1772399.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang, Q., R. Benitez, and F. G. Zeng. 2011. “Spatial Channel Interactions in Cochlear Implants.” Journal of Neural Engineering 8 (4):046029. doi:10.1088/1741-2560/8/4/046029.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thornton, A. R., and M. J. Raffin. 1978. “Speech-Discrimination Scores Modeled as a Binomial Variable.” Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 21 (3):507–518. doi:10.1044/jshr.2103.507.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Turner, C. W., B. J. Gantz, C. Vidal, A. Behrens, and B. A. Henry. 2004. “Speech Recognition in Noise for Cochlear Implant Listeners: Benefits of Residual Acoustic Hearing.” Journal of Acoustical Society of America 115 (4):1729–1735. doi:10.1121/1.1687425.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Won, J. H., W. R. Drennan, and J. T. Rubinstein. 2007. “Spectral-Ripple Resolution Correlates with Speech Reception in Noise in Cochlear Implant Users.” Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology 8 (3):384–392. doi:10.1007/s10162-007-0085-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, N. 2016. “Monopolar Detection Thresholds Predict Spatial Selectivity of Neural Excitation in Cochlear Implants: Implications for Speech Recognition.” PLoS One 11 (10):e0165476. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0165476.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, N. 2017. “Deactivating Stimulation Sites Based on Low-Rate Thresholds Improves Spectral Ripple and Speech Reception Thresholds in Cochlear Implant Users.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 141 (3):EL243. doi:10.1121/1.4977235.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, N., and L. Dong. 2017. “Evaluating Multipulse Integration as a Neural-Health Correlate in Human Cochlear-Implant Users: Relationship to Psychometric Functions for Detection.” Trends in Hearing 21:1–12. doi:10.1177/2331216517690108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, N., M. Cadmus, L. Dong, and J. Mathews. 2018. “Temporal Modulation Detection Depends on Sharpness of Spatial Tuning.” Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology 19 (3):317–330. doi:10.1007/s10162-018-0663-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, N., and B. E. Pfingst. 2016. “Evaluating Multipulse Integration as a Neural-Health Correlate in Human Cochlear-Implant Users: Relationship to Spatial Selectivity.” Journal of Acoustical Society of America 140 (3):1537–1547. doi:10.1121/1.4962230.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zirn, S., D. Polterauer, S. Keller, and W. Hemmert. 2016. “The Effect of Fluctuating Maskers on Speech Understanding of High-Performing Cochlear Implant Users.” International Journal of Audiology 55 (5):295–304. doi:10.3109/14992027.2015.1128124.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar