Automated detection of auditory response: applying sequential detection strategies with constant significance level to magnitude-squared coherence

References

• Cebulla, M., and E. Stürzebecher. 2015. “Automated Auditory Response Detection: Further Improvement of the Statistical Test Strategy by Using Progressive Test Steps of Iteration.” International Journal of Audiology 54 (8): 568–572. doi:10.3109/14992027.2015.1017659.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cebulla, M., E. Stürzebecher, and C. Elberling. 2006. “Objective Detection of Auditory Steady-State Responses: Comparison of One-Sample and q-Sample Tests.” Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 17 (2): 93–103. doi:10.3766/jaaa.17.2.3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’haenens, W., B. M. Vinck, L. Maes, A. Bockstael, H. Keppler, B. Philips, F. Swinnen, I. Dhooge. 2010. “Determination and Evaluation of Clinically Efficient Stopping Criteria for the Multiple Auditory Steady-State Response Technique.” Clinical Neurophysiology 121 (8): 1267–1278. doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2010.03.008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobie, R. A., and M. J. Wilson. 1989. “Analysis of Auditory Evoked Potentials by Magnitude-Squared Coherence.” Ear and Hearing 10 (1): 2–13. doi:10.1097/00003446-198902000-00002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fagerland, M. W., S. Lydersen, and P. Laake. 2013. “The McNemar Test for Binary Matched-Pairs Data: Mid-p and Asymptotic Are Better than Exact Conditional.” BMC Medical Research Methodology 13 (1): 91. doi:10.1186/1471-2288-13-91.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fisher, R. A. 1929. “Tests of Significance in Harmonic Analysis.” Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A 125 (796): 54–59. doi:10.1098/rspa.1929.0151.
   Google Scholar
• Fridman, J., R. Zappulla, M. Bergelson, E. Greenblatt, L. Mails, F. Morrell, T. Hoeppner, et al. 1984. “Application of Phase Spectral Analysis for Brain Stem Auditory Evoked Potential Detection in Normal Subjects and Patients with Posterior Fossa Tumors.” International Journal of Audiology 23 (1): 99–113. doi:10.3109/00206098409072825.
   Google Scholar
• Hochberg, Y., and A. C. Tamhane. 1987. Multiple Comparison Procedures. New York, NY: John Wiley Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Israelsson, K.-E., R. Bogo, and E. Berninger. 2015. “Reliability in Hearing Threshold Prediction in Normal-Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Participants Using Mixed Multiple ASSR.” Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 26 (3): 299–310. doi:10.3766/jaaa.26.3.9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• John, M. S., D. K. Brown, P. J. Muir, and T. W. Picton. 2004. “Recording Auditory Steady-State Responses in Young Infants.” Ear and Hearing 25 (6): 539–553. doi:10.1097/01.AUD.0000148050.80749.AC.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kay, S. M. 1998. “Fundamentals of Statistical Signal Processing, Volume 2: Detection Theory.” Signal Processing II: 672.
   Google Scholar
• Korczak, P., J. Smart, R. Delgado, T. M. Strobel, and C. Bradford. 2012. “Auditory Steady-state Responses.” Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 23 (3): 146–170. doi:10.3766/jaaa.23.3.3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miranda de Sá, A. M. F. L. 2004. “A Note on the Sampling Distribution of Coherence Estimate for the Detection of Periodic Signals.” IEEE Signal Processing Letters 11 (3): 323–325. doi:10.1109/LSP.2003.821751
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miranda de Sá, A. M. F. L., A. F. C. Infantosi, and D. M. Simpson. 2002. “Coherence between One Random and One Periodic Signal for Measuring the Strength of Responses in the Electro-Encephalogram during Sensory Stimulation.” Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing 40 (1): 99–104. doi:10.1007/BF02347702.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miranda de Sá, A. M. F. L., and A. F. C. Infantosi. 2007. “Evaluating the Relationship of Non-Phase Locked Activities in the Electroencephalogram during Intermittent Stimulation: A Partial Coherence-Based Approach.” Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing 45 (7): 635–642. doi:10.1007/s11517-007-0191-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panahi, R., Z. Jafari, and S. Hasani. 2014. *European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 271 (9): 2385–2392. doi:10.1007/s00405-013-2731-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Resende, L., S. Carvalho, T. dos Santos, F. Abdo, M. Romão, M. Ferreira, and C. Tierra-Criollo. 2015. “Auditory Steady-State Responses in School-Aged Children: A Pilot Study.” Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation 12 (1): 13. doi:10.1186/s12984-015-0003-y.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stürzebecher, E., and M. Cebulla. 2013. “Automated Auditory Response Detection: Improvement of the Statistical Test Strategy.” International Journal of Audiology 52 (12): 861–864. doi:10.3109/14992027.2013.822995.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stürzebecher, E., M. Cebulla, and C. Elberling. 2005. “Automated Auditory Response Detection: Statistical Problems with Repeated Testing.” International Journal of Audiology 44 (2): 110–117. doi:10.1080/14992020400029228.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torres Fortuny, A., M. C. Pérez Abalo, R. C. Sotero Díaz, L. Rioja Rodríguez, E. Rodríguez Dávila, L. Galán García, and E. Eimil Suarez. 2011. “Stopping Criteria for Averaging the Multiple Auditory Steady-State Response.” Acta Otorrinolaringológica Española 62 (3): 173–180. doi:10.1016/j.otoeng.2010.10.001.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Valdes, J. L., M. C. Perez-Abalo, V. Martin, G. Savio, C. Sierra, E. Rodriguez, and O. Lins. 1997. “Comparison of Statistical Indicators for the Automatic Detection of 80 Hz Auditory Steady State Responses.” Ear and Hearing 18 (5): 420–429. doi:10.1097/00003446-199710000-00007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar