Adult normative data for the speech in babble (SiB) test

References

• American Academy of Audiology (AAA). 2010. Clinical Practice Guidelines – Diagnosis, Treatment, and Management of Children and Adults with Central Auditory Processing Disorders. American Academy of Audiology. Reston, VA.
   Google Scholar
• American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA). 2005. (Central) Auditory Processing Disorders [Technical Report]. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA).
   Google Scholar
• Andrade, A. N., M. C. Iorio, and D. Gil. 2015. “Speech Recognition in Individuals with Sensorineural Hearing Loss.” Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngol 82 (3): 334–340. doi:10.1016/j.bjorl.2015.10.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bamiou, D. E., V. V. Iliadou, S. Zanchetta, and C. Spyridakou. 2015. “What Can We Learn about Auditory Processing from Adult Hearing Questionnaires?” Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 26 (10): 824–837. doi:10.3766/jaaa.15009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ben-David, B. M., V. Y. Tse, and B. A. Schneider. 2012. “Does It Take Older Adults Longer than Younger Adults to Perceptually Segregate a Speech Target from a Background Masker?” Hearing Research 290 (1–2): 55–63. doi:10.1016/j.heares.2012.04.022.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brand, T., and B. Kollmeier. 2002. “Efficient Adaptive Procedures for Threshold and Concurrent Slope Estimates for Psychophysics and Speech Intelligibility Tests.” Journal of Acoustic Society of America 111 (6): 2801–2810. doi:10.1121/1.1479152.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• British Society of Audiology (BSA). 2018. Position Statement and Practice Guidance Auditory processing disorder (APD). Seafield, Bathgate.
   Google Scholar
• Byrne, D., H. Dillon, K. Tran, S. Arlinger, K. Wilbraham, R. Cox, B. Hagerman., et al. 1994. “An International Comparison of Long‐Term Average Speech Spectra.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 96 (4): 2108–2120. doi:10.1121/1.410152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carhart, R., and T. W. Tillman. 1970. “Interaction of Competing Speech Signals with Hearing Losses.” Archives of Otolaryngology (Chicago, Ill.: 1960) 91 (3): 273–279. doi:10.1001/archotol.1970.00770040379010. doi:10.1001/archotol.1970.00770040379010.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chermak, G. D., D. E. Bamiou, V. Vivian Iliadou, and F. E. Musiek. 2017. “Practical Guidelines to Minimise Language and Cognitive Confounds in the Diagnosis of CAPD: A Brief Tutorial.” International Journal of Audiology 56 (7): 499–506. doi:10.1080/14992027.2017.1284351.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawes, P., and D. V. Bishop. 2007. “The SCAN-C in Testing for Auditory Processing Disorder in a Sample of British Children.” International Journal of Audiology 46 (12): 780–786. doi:10.1080/14992020701545906.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Field, A. 2014. Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS Statistics. 4th Ed. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Füllgrabe, C., B. C. Moore, and M. A. Stone. 2015. “Age-Group Differences in Speech Identification despite Matched Audiometrically Normal Hearing: Contributions from Auditory Temporal Processing and Cognition.” Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience 6: 347. doi:10.3389/fnagi.2014.00347.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gustafsson, H. A., and S. D. Arlinger. 1994. “Masking of Speech by amplitude-modulated noise.” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 95 (1): 518–529. doi:10.1121/1.408346.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutschalk, A., S. Uppenkamp, B. Riedel, A. Bartsch, T. Brandt, and M. Vogt-Schaden. 2015. “Pure Word Deafness with Auditory Object Agnosia after Bilateral Lesion of the Superior Temporal Sulcus.” Cortex 73: 24–35. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2015.08.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hind, S. E., R. Haines-Bazrafshan, C. L. Benton, W. Brassington, B. Towle, and D. R. Moore. 2011. “Prevalence of Clinical Referrals Having Hearing Thresholds within Normal Limits.” International Journal of Audiology 50 (10): 708–716. doi:10.3109/14992027.2011.582049.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iliadou, V. V., M. Ptok, H. Grech, E. R. Pedersen, A. Brechmann, N. Deggouj, C. Kiese-Himmel., et al. 2017. “A European Perspective on Auditory Processing Disorder-Current Knowledge and Future Research Focus.” Frontiers in Neurology 8: 622.doi:10.3389/fneur.2017.00622. eCollection 2017.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koo, T. K., and M. Y. Li. 2016. “A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research.” Journal of Chiropractic Medicine 15 (2): 155–163. doi:10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunaratnam, N. 2003. “Speech in Babble versus Speech in Noise in Normal Subjects and in Patients with Neurological Lesions.” MSc dissertation UCL.
   Google Scholar
• Landis, J. R., and G. G. Koch. 1977. “The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data.” Biometrics 33 (1): 159–174. doi: 10.2307/2529310. doi:10.2307/2529310
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McArdle, R., and R. H. Wilson. 2008. “Predicting Word-Recognition Performance in Noise by Young Listeners with Normal Hearing Using Acoustic, Phonetic, and Lexical Variables.” Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 19 (6): 507–518. doi:10.3766/jaaa.19.6.6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoof, T., and S. Rosen. 2014. The role of auditory and cognitive factors in understanding speech in noise by normal-hearing older listeners. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, 6. doi:10.3389/fnagi.2014.00307
   Google Scholar
• Spyridakou, C., L. M. Luxon, and D. E. Bamiou. 2012. “Patient Reported Speech in Noise Difficulties and Hyperacusis Symptoms and Correlation with Test Results.” Laryngoscope 122 (7): 1609–1614. doi:10.1002/lary.23337.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabri, D., K. M. Abou Chacra, and T. Pring. 2011. “Speech Perception in Noise by Monolingual, Bilingual and Trilingual Listeners.” International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders 46 (4): 411–422. doi:10.3109/13682822.2010.519372.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, B. 2003. “Speech-in-Noise Tests: How and Why to Include Them in Your Basic Test Battery.” The Hearing Journal 56 (1): 40–42. doi:10.1097/01.HJ.0000293000.76300.ff.
   Google Scholar
• Wagener, K. C., and T. Brand. 2005. “Sentence Intelligibility in Noise for Listeners with Normal Hearing and Hearing Impairment: Influence of Measurement Procedure and Masking Parameters.” International Journal of Audiology 44 (3): 144–156. doi:10.1080/14992020500057517.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, R. H. 2003. “Development of a Speech- in- Multitalker Babble Paradigm to Assess Word-Recognition Performance.” Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 14 (9): 453–470.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wilson, R. H. 2011. “Clinical Experience with the Words-in-Noise Test on 3430 Veterans: Comparisons with Pure-Tone Thresholds and Word Recognition in Quiet.” Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 22 (7): 405–423. doi:10.3766/jaaa.22.7.3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, R. H., C. S. Carnell, and A. L. Cleghorn. 2007. “The Words-in-Noise (WIN) Test with Multitalker Babble and Speech-Spectrum Noise Maskers.” Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 18 (6): 522–529. doi:10.3766/jaaa.18.6.7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, R. H., and R. A. McArdle. 2005. “Speech Signals Used to Evaluate Functional Status of the Auditory System.” Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development 42 (Suppl 4): 79–94. doi:10.1682/JRRD.2005.06.0096.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wilson, R. H., and R. A. McArdle. 2012. “Speech-in-Noise Measures: Variable Versus Fixed Speech and Noise Levels.” International Journal of Audiology 51 (9): 708–712. doi:10.3109/14992027.2012.684407.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, R. H., R. A. McArdle, and S. L. Smith. 2007. “An Evaluation of the BKB-SIN, HINT, QuickSIN, and WIN Materials on Listeners with Normal Hearing and Listeners with Hearing Loss.” Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 50 (4): 844–856. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2007/059).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar