ForwardFocus with cochlear implant recipients in spatially separated and fluctuating competing signals – introduction of a reference metric

References

• Brand, T., and B. Kollmeier. 2002. “Efficient Adaptive Procedures for Threshold and Concurrent Slope Estimates for Psychophysics and Speech Intelligibility Tests.” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 111 (6): 2801–2810. doi:10.1121/1.1479152.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Büchner, A., K. H. Dyballa, P. Hehrmann, S. Fredelake, and T. Lenarz. 2014. “Advanced Beamformers for Cochlear Implant Users: Acute Measurement of Speech Perception in Challenging Listening Conditions.” PLoS One 9 (4): e95542. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0095542.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busch, T., F. Vanpoucke, and A. van Wieringen. 2017. “Auditory Environment Across the Life Span of Cochlear Implant Users: Insights From Data Logging.” Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 60 (5): 1362–1377. doi:10.1044/2016_jslhr-h-16-0162.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawson, P. W., S. J. Mauger, and A. A. Hersbach. 2011. “Clinical Evaluation of Signal-to-noise ratio-based Noise Reduction in Nucleus® Cochlear Implant Recipients.” Ear and Hearing 32: 382–390. doi:10.1097/AUD.0b013e318201c200.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillier, N., and W. K. Lai. 2015. “Speech Intelligibility in Various Noise Conditions with the Nucleus® 5 CP810 Sound Processor.” Audiology Research 5: 69–75. http://www.audiologyresearch.org/index.php/audio/article/view/132.
   Google Scholar
• Dreschler, W. A., H. Verschuure, C. Ludvigsen, and S. Westermann. 2001. “ICRA Noises: Artificial Noise Signals with Speech-like Spectral and Temporal Properties for Hearing Aid Assessment.” Audiology, 40, 148–157. doi:10.3109/00206090109073110.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fetterman, B. L., and E. H. Domico. 2002. “Speech Recognition in Background Noise of Cochlear Implant Patinets.” Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery 126: 257–263. doi:10.1067/mhn.2002.123044.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fu, Q. J., and G. Nogaki. 2005. “Noise Susceptibility of Cochlear Implant Users: The Role of Spectral Resolution and Smearing.” Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology 6: 19–27. doi:10.1007/s10162-004-5024-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goehring, T., F. Bolner, J. J. M. Monaghan, B. van Dijk, A. Zarowski, and S. Bleeck. 2017. “Speech Enhancement Based on Neural Networks Improves Speech Intelligibility in Noise for Cochlear Implant Users. Hearing Research 344: 183–194. doi:10.1016/j.heares.2016.11.012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldsworthy, R. L. 2014. “Two-microphone Spatial Filtering Improves Speech Reception for Cochlear-implant Users in Reverberant Conditions with Multiple Noise Sources.” Trends in Hearing 18: pii: 2331216514555489. doi:10.1177/2331216514555489.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldsworthy, R. L., L. A. Delhorne, J. G. Desloge, and L. D. Braida. 2014. “Two-microphone Spatial Filtering Provides Speech Reception Benefits for Cochlear Implant Users in Difficult Acoustic Environments.” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 136 (2): 867–876. doi:10.1121/1.4887453.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamacher, V., W. H. Doering, G. Mauer, H. Fleischmann, and J. Hennecke. 1997. “Evaluation of Noise Reduction Systems for Cochlear Implant Users in Different Acoustic Environment.” American Journal of Otolaryngology 18(6): S46–S49.
   Google Scholar
• Hersbach, A. A., K. Arora, S. J. Mauger, and P. W. Dawson. 2012. “Combining Directional Microphone and Single-Channel Noise Reduction Algorithms.” Ear and Hearing 33: e13–e23. doi:10.1097/AUD.0b013e31824b9e21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hey, M., T. Hocke, and P. Ambrosch. 2017. “Speech Audiometry and Data Logging in CI Patients: Implications for Adequate Test Levels.” HNO 66 (1): 22–27. doi:10.1007/s00106-017-0419-8.
   Google Scholar
• Hey, M., T. Hocke, J. Hedderich, and J. Müller-Deile. 2014. “Investigation of a Matrix Sentence Test in Noise: Reproducibility and Discrimination Function in Cochlear Implant Patients.” International Journal of Audiology 53: 895–902. doi:10.3109/14992027.2014.938368.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hey, M., T. Hocke, S. Mauger, and J. Müller-Deile. 2016. “A Clinical Assessment of Cochlear Implant Recipient Performance: Implications for Individualized Map Settings in Specific Environments.” European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 273: 4011–4020. doi:10.1007/s00405-016-4130-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hochberg, I., A. Boothroyd, M. Weiss, and M. S. Sharon. 1992. “Effects of Noise and Noise Suppression on Speech Perception by Cochlear Implant Users.” Ear and Hearing 13: 263–271. doi:10.1097/00003446-199208000-00008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holden, L. K., C. C. Finley, J. B. Firszt, T. A. Holden, C. Brenner, L. G. Potts, B. D. Gotter, et al. 2013. “Factors Affecting Open-Set Word Recognition in Adults with Cochlear Implants.” Ear and Hearing 34: 342–360. doi:10.1097/AUD.0b013e3182741aa7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, Y., P. C. Loizou, N. Li, and K. Kasturi. 2007. “Use of a Sigmoidal-shaped Function for Noise Attenuation in Cochlear Implants.” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 122: EL128–EL134. doi:10.1121/1.2772401.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ISO. 2012. Acoustics – Audiometric test Methods – Part 3: Speech Audiometry. 8253-3. Berlin: Beuth publishing DIN.
   Google Scholar
• Kompis, M., M. Bettler, M. Vischer, P. Senn, and R. Häuslera. 2004. “Bilateral Cochlear Implantation and Directional Multi-microphone Systems.” International Congress Series 1273: 447–450. doi:10.1016/j.ics.2004.08.081.
   Google Scholar
• Mauger, S. J., K. Arora, and P.W. Dawson. 2012. “Cochlear Implant Optimized Noise Reduction.” Journal of Neural Engineering 9: 65007. doi:10.1088/1741-2560/9/6/065007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mauger, S. J., C. D. Warren, M. R. Knight, M. Goorevich, and E. Nel. 2014. “Clinical Evaluation of the Nucleus® 6 Cochlear Implant System: Performance Improvements with SmartSound iQ.” International Journal of Audiology 53: 564–576. doi:10.3109/14992027.2014.895431.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller-Deile, J., T. Kortmann, U. Hoppe, H. Hessel, and A. Morsnowski. 2009. “Improving Speech Comprehension Using a New Cochlear Implant Speech Processor. HNO 57 (6): 567–574. doi:10.1007/s00106-008-1781-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller-Deile, J., J. Kiefer, J. Wyss, J. Nicolai, and R. Battmer. 2008. “Performance Benefits for Adults Using a Cochlear Implant with Adaptive Dynamic Range Optimization (ADRO): A Comparative Study.” Cochlear Implants International 9: 8–26. doi:10.1179/cim.2008.9.1.8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Müller-Deile, J., B. J. Schmidt, and H. Rudert. 1995. “Effects of Noise on Speech Discrimination in Cochlear Implant Patients. The Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology Supplement 166: 303–306.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nelson, P. B., A. E. Carney, and D. A. Nelson. 2003. “Understanding Speech in Modulated Interference: Cochlear Implant Users and Normal-hearing Listeners.” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 113, 961–968. doi:10.1121/1.1531983.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oberhoffner, T., U. Hoppe, M. Hey, D. Hecker, H. Bagus, P. Voigt, S. Schicktanz, A. Braun, and T. Hocke. 2018. “Multicentric Analysis of the Use Behavior of Cochlear Implant Users.” Laryngorhinootologie 97 (5): 313–320. doi:10.1055/a-0574-2569.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patrick, J. F., P. A. Busby, and P. J. Gibson. 2006. “The Development of the Nucleus Freedom Cochlear Implant System.” Trends in Amplification 10 (4): 175–200. doi:10.1177/1084713806296386.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pollack, I., and J. M. Pickett. 1957. “Cocktail Party Effect.” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 29: 1262. doi:10.1121/1.1919140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qazi O., B. van Dijk, M. Moonen, and J. Wouters. 2012. “Speech Understanding Performance of Cochlear Implant Subjects Using Time-frequency Masking-based Noise Reduction.” IEEE Transactions on Bio-Medical Engineering 59 (5): 1364–1373. doi:10.1109/TBME.2012.2187650.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rader, T., H. Fastl, and U. Baumann. 2013. “Speech Perception with Combined Electric-acoustic Stimulation and Bilateral Cochlear Implants in a Multisource Noise Field.” Ear and Hearing 34: 324–332. doi:10.1097/AUD.0b013e318272f189.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramakers, G. G. J., Y. E. Smulders, A. van Zon, G. A. Van Zanten, W. Grolman, and I. Stegeman. 2017. “Correlation between Subjective and Objective Hearing Tests after Unilateral and Bilateral Cochlear Implantation. BMC Ear, Nose and Throat Disorders 17: 10. doi:10.1186/s12901-017-0043-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spriet, A., L. Van Deun, K. Eftaxiadis, J. Laneau, M. Moonen, B. van Dijk, A. van Wieringen, J. Wouters. 2007. “Speech Understanding in Background Noise with the Two-microphone Adaptive Beamformer BEAM in the Nucleus Freedom Cochlear Implant System.” Ear and Hearing 28: 62–72. doi:10.1097/01.aud.0000252470.54246.54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van den Bogaert, T., S. Doclo, J. Wouters, and M. Moonen. (2009). “Speech Enhancement with Multichannel Wiener Filter Techniques in Multimichrophone Binaural Hering Aids.” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 125: 360–371. doi:10.1121/1.3023069.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Hoesel, R. J., and G. M. Clark. 1995. “Evaluation of a Portable Two-microphone Adaptive Beamforming Speech Processor with Cochlear Implant Patients.” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 97: 2498–2503. doi:10.1121/1.411970.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagener, K., T. Brand, V. Kühnel, and B. Kollmeier. 1999. “Entwicklung und Evaluation Eines Satztests in Deutscher Sprache I–III: Design, Optimierung und Evaluation des Oldenburger Satztests.” Zeitschrift für Audiologie 38 (1–3): 4–15.
   Google Scholar
• Weissgerber, T., T. Rader, and U. Baumann. 2017. “Effectiveness of Directional Microphones in Bilateral/Bimodal Cochlear Implant Users-impact of Spatial and Temporal Noise Characteristics.” Otology & Neurotology 38 (10): e551–e557. doi:10.1097/mao.0000000000001524.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wesarg, T., B. Voss, F. Hassepass, R. Beck, A. Aschendorff, R. Laszig, and S. Arndt. 2018. “Speech Perception in Quiet and Noise With an Off the Ear CI Processor Enabling Adaptive Microphone Directionality.” Otology & Neurotology 39(4): e240–e249. doi:10.1097/MAO.0000000000001749.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wimmer, W., M. Caversaccio, and M. Kompis. 2015. “Speech Intelligibility in Noise with a Single-unit Cochlear Implant Audio Processor.” Otology & Neurotology 36, 1197–1202. doi:10.1097/MAO.0000000000000775.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wimmer, W., S. Weder, M. Caversaccio, and M. Kompis. 2016. “Speech Intelligibility in Noise with a Pinna Effect Imitating Cochlear Implant Processor.” Otology & Neurotology 37, 19–23. doi:10.1097/MAO.0000000000000866.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfe, J., S. Neumann, M. Marsh, E. Schafer, L. Lianos, J. Gilden, L. O’Neill, et al. 2015. “Benefits of Adaptive Signal Processing in a Commercially Available Cochlear Implant Sound Processor.” Otology & Neurotology 36 (7):1181–1190. doi:10.1097/MAO.0000000000000781.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wouters, J., and J. Vanden Berghe. 2001. “Speech Recognition in Noise for Cochlear Implantees with a Two-Microphone Monaural Adaptive Noise Reduction System.” Ear and Hearing 22, 420–430. doi:10.1097/00003446-200110000-00006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ye, H., G. Deng, S. J. Mauger, A. A. Hersbach, P. W. Dawson, and J. M. Heasman. 2013. “A Wavelet-Based Noise Reduction Algorithm and Its Clinical Evaluation in Cochlear Implants.” PLoS One 8, e75662. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0075662.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yousefian, N., and P. C. Loizou. 2011. “A Dual-Microphone Speech Enhancement Algorithm Based on the Coherence Function.” IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech and Language Processing 20 (2): 599–609.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar