Subjective evaluation of single microphone noise reduction with different time constants

References

• Anzalone, M. C., L. Calandruccio, K. A. Doherty, and L. H. Carney. 2006. “Determination of the Potential Benefit of Time–Frequency Gain Manipulation.” Ear and Hearing 27 (5): 480–492. doi:10.1097/01.aud.0000233891.86809.df.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Begault, D. R., and L. J. Trejo. 2000. 3-D sound for virtual reality and multimedia. Moffett Field, CA United States: NASA Ames Research Center.
   Google Scholar
• Bentler, R., and L. K. Chiou. 2006. “Digital Noise Reduction: An Overview.” Trends in Amplification 10 (2): 67–82. doi:10.1177/1084713806289514.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bentler, R., Y.-H. Wu, J. Kettel, and R. Hurtig. 2008. “Digital Noise Reduction: Outcomes from Laboratory and Field Studies.” International Journal of Audiology 47 (8): 447–460. doi:10.1080/14992020802033091.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bisgaard, N., M. S. Vlaming, and M. Dahlquist. 2010. “Standard Audiograms for the IEC 60118-15 Measurement Procedure.” Trends in Amplification 14 (2): 113–120. doi:10.1177/1084713810379609.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brons, I., W. A. Dreschler, and R. Houben. 2014. “Detection Threshold for Sound Distortion Resulting from Noise Reduction in Normal-Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Listeners.” Journal of the Acoustic Society of America 136 (3): 1375. doi:10.1121/1.4892781.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brons, I., R. Houben, and W. A. Dreschler. 2012. “Perceptual Effects of Noise Reduction by Time–Frequency Masking of Noisy Speech.” Journal of the Acoustic Society of America 132 (4): 2690–2699. doi:10.1121/1.4747006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brons, I., R. Houben, and W. A. Dreschler. 2013. “Perceptual Effects of Noise Reduction with respect to Personal Preference, Speech Intelligibility, and Listening Effort.” Earing and Hearing 34 (1): 29–41. doi:10.1097/AUD.0b013e31825f299f.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brons, I., R. Houben, and W. A. Dreschler. 2014. “Effects of Noise Reduction on Speech Intelligibility, Perceived Listening Effort, and Personal Preference in Hearing-Impaired Listeners.” Trends in Hearing 18: 1–10. doi:10.1177/:2331216514553924.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung, K. 2004. “Challenges and Recent Developments in Hearing Aids. Part I. Speech Understanding in Noise, Microphone Technologies and Noise Reduction Algorithms.” Trends in Amplification 8 (3): 83–124. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15678225 doi:10.1177/108471380400800302.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• De Baene, W., A. Vandierendonck, M. Leman, A. Widmann, and M. Tervaniemi. 2004. “Roughness Perception in Sounds: Behavioral and ERP Evidence.” Biological Psychology 67 (3): 319–330. doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2004.01.003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desjardins, J. L., and K. A. Doherty. 2014. “The Effect of Hearing Aid Noise Reduction on Listening Effort in Hearing-Impaired Adults.” Earing and Hearing 35 (6): 600–610. doi:10.1097/AUD.0000000000000028.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillon, H. 2001. Hearing Aids. Australia: Boomerang Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dittrich, R., R. Hatzinger, and W. Katzenbeisser. 2004. “A Log-Linear Approach for Modelling Ordinal Paired Comparison Data on Motives to Start a PhD Programme.” Statistical Modelling: An International Journal 4 (3): 181–193. doi:10.1191/1471082X04st072oa.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubno, J. R., D. D. Dirks, and D. E. Morgan. 1984. “Effects of Age and Mild Hearing Loss on Speech Recognition in Noise.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 76 (1): 87–96. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6747116 doi:10.1121/1.391011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ephraim, Y., and D. Malah. 1984. “Speech Enhancement Using a Minimum-Mean Square Error Short-Time Spectral Amplitude Estimator.” IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing 32 (6): 1109–1121. doi:10.1109/TASSP.1984.1164453.
   Google Scholar
• Galster, J., and T. Ricketts. 2004. “The Effect of Digital Noise Reduction Time Constants on Speech Recognition in Noise. Poster Presented at the 2004 International Hearing Aid Research Conference (IHCON), Lake Tahoe, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Gygi, B., and D. Ann Hall. 2016. “Background Sounds and Hearing-Aid Users: A Scoping Review.” International Journal of Audiology 55 (1): 1–10. doi:10.3109/14992027.2015.1072773.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, M. 2002. “Effects of Multi-Channel Compression Time Constants on Subjectively Perceived Sound Quality and Speech Intelligibility.” Earing and Hearing 23 (4): 369–380. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12195179 doi:10.1097/00003446-200208000-00012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houben, R., T. M. Dijkstra, and W. A. Dreschler. 2013. “Analysis of Individual Preferences for Tuning of Noise-Reduction Algorithms.” Journal of the Audio Engineering Society 60 :1024–1037.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houtgast, T. 1989. “Frequency Selectivity in Amplitude-Modulation Detection.” Journal of Acoustic Society of America 85 (4): 1676–1680. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2708683 doi:10.1121/1.397956.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, Y., and P. C. Loizou. 2007. “A Comparative Intelligibility Study of Single-Microphone Noise Reduction Algorithms.” Journal of Acoustic Society of America 122 (3): 1777. 2766778 doi:10.1121/1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huber, R., T. Bisitz, T. Gerkmann, et al. 2018. “Comparison of Single-Microphone Noise Reduction Schemes: Can Hearing Impaired Listeners Tell the Difference?” International Journal of Audiology 57: 55–61. doi:10.1080/14992027.2017.1279758.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ITU-T. 1996. “Methods for Subjective Determination of Transmission Quality.” In Recommendation P.800, edited by Union IT, Geneva: International Telecommunication Union.
   Google Scholar
• Kortlang, S., Z. Chen, T. Gerkmann, et al. 2018. “Evaluation of Combined Dynamic Compression and Single Channel Noise Reduction for Hearing Aid Applications.” International Journal Audiology 57: S43–S54. doi:10.1080/14992027.2017.1300695.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, C.-W., and S.-F. Lei. 2007. “Signal Subspace Approach for Speech Enhancement in Nonstationary Noises.” ISCIT'07: IEEE International Symposium on Communications and Information Technologies, Sydney, Australia: IEEE. 1580–1585.
   Google Scholar
• Loizou, P. C. 2013. Speech Enhancement: Theory and Practice. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Loizou, P. C., and G. Kim. 2011. “Reasons Why Current Speech-Enhancement Algorithms Do Not Improve Speech Intelligibility and Suggested Solutions.” IEEE Transactions on Audio Speech and Language Processing 19 (1): 47–56. doi:10.1109/Tasl.2010.2045180.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Marzinzik, M. 2001. Noise Reduction Schemes for Digital Hearing Aids and Their Use for the Hearing Impaired. Oldenburg: Universität Oldenburg.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, B. C. J., T. H. Stainsby, J. I. Alcántara, and V. Kühnel. 2004. “The Effect on Speech Intelligibility of Varying Compression Time Constants in a Digital Hearing Aid.” International Journal of Audiology 43 (7): 399–409. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15515639 doi:10.1080/14992020400050051.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neher, T., and K. C. Wagener. 2016. “Investigating Differences in Preferred Noise Reduction Strength among Hearing Aid Users.” Trends in Hearing 20: 2331216516655794. doi:10.1177/2331216516655794.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neuman, A. C., M. H. Bakke, C. Mackersie, S. Hellman, and H. Levitt. 1995. “Effect of Release Time in Compression Hearing Aids: Paired‐Comparison Judgments of Quality.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 98 (6): 3182–3187. doi:10.1121/1.413807.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pichora‐Fuller, M. K., B. A. Schneider, and M. Daneman. 1995. “How Young and Old Adults Listen to and Remember Speech in Noise.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 97 (1): 593–608. doi:10.1121/1.412282.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rangachari, S., and P. C. Loizou. 2006. “A Noise-Estimation Algorithm for Highly Non-Stationary Environments.” Speech Communication 48 (2): 220–231. doi:10.1016/j.specom.2005.08.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Studebaker, G. A. 1985. “A “Rationalized” Arcsine Transform.” Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing 28 (3): 455–462. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/4046587 doi:10.1044/jshr.2803.455.
   Google Scholar
• Tufts, J. B., and M. R. Molis. 2007. “Perception of Roughness by Listeners with Sensorineural Hearing Loss.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 121 (4): EL161–EL167. doi:10.1121/1.2710744.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Versfeld, N. J., L. Daalder, J. M. Festen, and T. Houtgast. 2000. “Method for the Selection of Sentence Materials for Efficient Measurement of the Speech Reception Threshold.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 107 (3): 1671–1684. doi:10.1121/1.428451.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vuorialho, A., M. Sorri, I. Nuojua, and A. Muhli. 2006. “Changes in Hearing Aid Use Over the Past 20 Years.” European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology: Official Journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS): Affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology – Head and Neck Surgery 263 (4): 355–360. doi:10.1007/s00405-005-1007-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, Y.-H., E. Stangl, O. Chipara, S. S. Hasan, A. Welhaven, and J. Oleson. 2018. “Characteristics of Real-World Signal to Noise Ratios and Speech Listening Situations of Older Adults with Mild to Moderate Hearing Loss.” Earing and Hearing 39 (2): 293–304. doi:10.1097/AUD.0000000000000486.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar