Literature overview on P3 measurement as an objective measure of auditory performance in post-lingually deaf adults with a cochlear implant

References

• Barlow, N., S.C. Purdy, M. Sharma, E. Giles, and V. Narne. 2016. “The Effect of Short-Term Auditory Training on Speech in Noise Perception and Cortical Auditory Evoked Potentials in Adults with Cochlear Implants.” Seminars in Hearing 37 (1): 84–98. doi:10.1055/s-0035-1570335.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Beynon, A.J., and A.F. Snik. 2004. “Use of the Event-Related P300 Potential in Cochlear Implant Subjects for the Study of Strategy-Dependent Speech Processing.” International Journal of Audiology 43 (Suppl 1): S44–S47.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Beynon, A.J., A.F. Snik, and P. van den Broek. 2002. “Evaluation of Cochlear Implant Benefit with Auditory Cortical Evoked Potentials.” International Journal of Audiology 41 (7): 429–435.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beynon, A.J., A.F. Snik, D.F. Stegeman, and P. van den Broek. 2005. “Discrimination of Speech Sound Contrasts Determined with Behavioral Tests and Event-Related Potentials in Cochlear Implant Recipients.” Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 16 (1): 42–53.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Buckley, K.A., and E.A. Tobey. 2011. “Cross-Modal Plasticity and Speech Perception in Pre- and Postlingually Deaf Cochlear Implant Users.” Ear and Hearing 32 (1): 2–15. doi:10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181e8534c.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coles, M.G.H., and G. Gratton. 1986. “Cognitive Psychophysiology and the Study of States and Processes.” In: Energetics and Human Information Processing, edited by G.R.J. Hockey, A.W.K. Gaillard, and M.G.H. Coles, 409–424. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Debener, S., J. Hine, S. Bleeck, and J. Eyles. 2008. “Source Localization of Auditory Evoked Potentials after Cochlear Implantation.” Psychophysiology 45 (1): 20–24. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.2007.00610.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Didoné, D. D., M. V. Garcia, S. J. Oppitz, T. F. Finamôr da Silva, S. N. D. Santos, R. S. Bruno, V. A. V. D. S. Filha, and P. L. Cóser. 2016. “Auditory Evoked Potential P300 in Adults: Reference Values.” Einstein (Sao Paulo, Brazil) 14 (2): 208–212. doi:10.1590/S1679-45082016AO3586.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dietrich, A., and R. Kanso. 2010. “A Review of EEG, ERP, and Neuroimaging Studies of Creativity and Insight.” Psychological Bulletin 136 (5): 822–848. doi:10.1037/a0019749.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donchin, E., and M.G.H. Coles. 1988. “Is the P300 Component a Manifestation of Context Updating?” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 11 (03): 357–374. doi:10.1017/S0140525X00058027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doucet, M.E., F. Bergeron, M. Lassonde, P. Ferron, and F. Lepore. 2006. “Cross-Modal Reorganization and Speech Perception in Cochlear Implant Users.” Brain 129 (12): 3376–3383. doi:10.1093/brain/awl264.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Duncan, C. C., R. J. Barry, J. F. Connolly, C. Fischer, P. T. Michie, R. Näätänen, J. Polich, I. Reinvang, and C. Van Petten. 2009. “Event-Related Potentials in Clinical Research: Guidelines for Eliciting, Recording, and Quantifying Mismatch Negativity, P300, and N400.” Clinical Neurophysiology: Official Journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology 120 (11): 1883–1908. doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2009.07.045.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eggermont, J.J., and C.W. Ponton. 2003. “Auditory-Evoked Potential Studies of Cortical Maturation in Normal Hearing and Implanted Children: Correlations with Changes in Structure and Speech Perception.” Acta Oto-Laryngologica 123 (2): 249–252. doi:10.1080/0036554021000028098.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finke, M., A. Buchner, E. Ruigendijk, M. Meyer, and P. Sandmann. 2016. “On the Relationship between Auditory Cognition and Speech Intelligibility in Cochlear Implant Users: An ERP Study.” Neuropsychologia 87: 169–181. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.05.019.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman, D. 2003. “Cognition and Aging: A Highly Selective Overview of Event-Related Potential (ERP) Data.” Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 25 (5): 702–720. doi:10.1076/jcen.25.5.702.14578.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friesen, L.M., and T.W. Picton. 2010. “A Method for Removing Cochlear Implant Artifact.” Hearing Research 259 (1–2): 95–106. doi:10.1016/j.heares.2009.10.012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrido, M.I., J.M. Kilner, S.J. Kiebel, and K.J. Friston. 2007. “Evoked Brain Responses Are Generated by Feedback Loops.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 104 (52): 20961–20966. doi:10.1073/pnas.0706274105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gifford, R.H., J.K. Shallop, and A.M. Peterson. 2008. “Speech Recognition Materials and Ceiling Effects: Considerations for Cochlear Implant Programs.” Audiology &Amp; Neuro-Otology 13 (3): 193–205. doi:10.1159/000113510.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilles, A., K. Joos, P. Van de Heyning, D. De Ridder, and S. Vanneste. 2014. “From Sensation to Percept: The Neural Signature of Auditory Event-Related Potentials.” Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 42: 148–156. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.02.009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilley, P. M., A. Sharma, M. Dorman, C. C. Finley, A. S. Panch, and K. Martin. 2006. “Minimization of Cochlear Implant Stimulus Artifact in Cortical Auditory Evoked Potentials.” Clinical Neurophysiology: Official Journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology 117 (8): 1772–1782. doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2006.04.018.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giraud, A.L., and H.J. Lee. 2007. “Predicting Cochlear Implant Outcome from Brain Organisation in the Deaf.” Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience 25 (3–4): 381–390.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groenen, P.A., A.J. Beynon, A.F. Snik, and P. van den Broek. 2001. “Speech-Evoked Cortical Potentials and Speech Recognition in Cochlear Implant Users.” Scandinavian Audiology 30 (1): 31–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groenen, P. A. P., M. Makhdoum, J. L. Van Den Brink, M. H. P. Stollman, A. F. M. Snik, and P. Van Den Broek. 1996. “The Relation between Electric Auditory Brain Stem and Cognitive Responses and Speech Perception in Cochlear Implant Users.” Acta Oto-Laryngologica 116 (6): 785–790. doi:10.3109/00016489609137926.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halgren, E., N. Squires, C. Wilson, J. Rohrbaugh, T. Babb, and P. Crandall. 1980. “Endogenous Potentials Generated in the Human Hippocampal Formation and Amygdala by Infrequent Events.” Science 210 (4471): 803–805. doi:10.1126/science.7434000.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han, J. -H., F. Zhang, D. S. Kadis, L. M. Houston, R. N. Samy, M. L. Smith, and A. Dimitrijevic. 2016. “Auditory Cortical Activity to Different Voice Onset Times in Cochlear Implant Users.” Clinical Neurophysiology 127 (2): 1603–1617. doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2015.10.049.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henkin, Y., S. Tetin-Schneider, M. Hildesheimer, and L. Kishon-Rabin. 2009. “Cortical Neural Activity Underlying Speech Perception in Postlingual Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients.” Audiology &Amp; Neuro-Otology 14 (1): 39–53. doi:10.1159/000153434.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iwaki, T., N. Matsushiro, S. -R. Mah, T. Sato, E. Yasuoka, K. -I. Yamamoto, and T. Kubo. 2004. “Comparison of Speech Perception between Monaural and Binaural Hearing in Cochlear Implant Patients.” Acta Oto-Laryngologica 124 (4): 358–362. doi:10.1080/00016480310000548a.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordan, K., A. Schmidt, K. Plotz, H. von Specht, K. Begall, N. Roth, and H. Scheich. 1997. “Auditory Event-Related Potentials in Post- and Prelingually Deaf Cochlear Implant Recipients.” The American Journal of Otology 18 (6 Suppl): S116–S117.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kok, A. 2001. “On the Utility of P3 Amplitude as a Measure of Processing Capacity.” Psychophysiology 38 (3): 557–577.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kral, A., and J.J. Eggermont. 2007. “What's to Lose and What's to Learn: Development under Auditory Deprivation, Cochlear Implants and Limits of Cortical Plasticity.” Brain Research Reviews 56 (1): 259–269. doi:10.1016/j.brainresrev.2007.07.021.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kral, A., M.F. Dorman, and B.S. Wilson. 2019. “Neuronal Development of Hearing and Language: Cochlear Implants and Critical Periods.” Annual Review of Neuroscience 42 (1): 47. doi:10.1146/annurev-neuro-080317-061513.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kubo, T., K. Yamamoto, T. Iwaki, M. Matsukawa, K. Doi, and M. Tamura. 2001. “Significance of Auditory Evoked Responses (EABR and P300) in Cochlear Implant Subjects.” Acta Oto-Laryngologica 121 (2): 257–261. doi:10.1080/000164801300043749.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazard, D.S., H. Innes-Brown, and P. Barone. 2014. “Adaptation of the Communicative Brain to Post-Lingual Deafness. Evidence from Functional Imaging.” Hearing Research 307: 136–143. doi:10.1016/j.heares.2013.08.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazard, D. S., C. Vincent, F. Venail, P. Van de Heyning, E. Truy, O. Sterkers, P. H. Skarzynski, H. Skarzynski, K. Schauwers, S. O'Leary, et al. 2012. “Pre-, per- and Postoperative Factors Affecting Performance of Postlinguistically Deaf Adults Using Cochlear Implants: A New Conceptual Model over Time.” PLoS One 7 (11):E48739. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0048739.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathew, R., D. Vickers, P. Boyle, A. Shaida, D. Selvadurai, D. Jiang, and J. Undurraga. 2018. “Development of Electrophysiological and Behavioural Measures of Electrode Discrimination in Adult Cochlear Implant Users.” Hearing Research 367: 74–87. doi:10.1016/j.heares.2018.07.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mc Laughlin, M.,. A. Lopez Valdes, R.B. Reilly, and F.G. Zeng. 2013. “Cochlear Implant Artifact Attenuation in Late Auditory Evoked Potentials: A Single Channel Approach.” Hearing Research 302: 84–95. doi:10.1016/j.heares.2013.05.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oates, P.A., D. Kurtzberg, and D.R. Stapells. 2002. “Effects of Sensorineural Hearing Loss on Cortical Event-Related Potential and Behavioral Measures of Speech-Sound Processing.” Ear and Hearing 23 (5): 399–415. doi:10.1097/01.AUD.0000034777.12562.31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okusa, M., T. Shiraishi, T. Kubo, and Y. Nageishi. 1999. “Effects of Discrimination Difficulty on Cognitive Event-Related Brain Potentials in Patients with Cochlear Implants.” Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery: Official Journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery 121 (5): 610–615. doi:10.1016/S0194-5998(99)70067-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Picton, T.W., O.G. Lins, and M. Scherg. 1995. “The Recording and Analysis of Event-Related Potentials.” In: Handbook of Neuropsychology, edited by F. Boller and J. Grafman, 3–73. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
   Google Scholar
• Polich, J., and A. Kok. 1995. “Cognitive and Biological Determinants of P300: An Integrative Review.” Biological Psychology 41 (2): 103–146.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritter, W., and A.W.K. Gaillard. 2000. Tutorials in Event Related Potential Research: Endogenous Components. New York: Elsevier Science.
   Google Scholar
• Sandmann, P., N. Dillier, T. Eichele, M. Meyer, A. Kegel, R. D. Pascual-Marqui, V. L. Marcar, L. Jäncke, and S. Debener. 2012. “Visual Activation of Auditory Cortex Reflects Maladaptive Plasticity in Cochlear Implant Users.” Brain 135 (2): 555–568. doi:10.1093/brain/awr329.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sasaki, T., K. Yamamoto, T. Iwaki, and T. Kubo. 2009. “Assessing Binaural/Bimodal Advantages Using Auditory Event-Related Potentials in Subjects with Cochlear Implants.” Auris, Nasus, Larynx 36 (5): 541–546. doi:10.1016/j.anl.2008.12.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Senkowski, D., U. Pomper, I. Fitzner, A.K. Engel, and A. Kral. 2014. “Beta-Band Activity in Auditory Pathways Reflects Speech Localization and Recognition in Bilateral Cochlear Implant Users.” Human Brain Mapping 35 (7): 3107–3121. doi:10.1002/hbm.22388.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinkiewicz, D., L. Friesen, and B. Ghoraani. 2014. “Analysis of Cochlear Implant Artifact Removal Techniques using the Continuous Wavelet Transform.” Paper presented at the Conference Proceedings: Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 5482–5485. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.
   Google Scholar
• Sinkiewicz, D., L. Friesen, and B. Ghoraani. 2017. “A Novel Method for Extraction of Neural Response from Single Channel Cochlear Implant Auditory Evoked Potentials.” Medical Engineering &Amp; Physics 40: 47–55. doi:10.1016/j.medengphy.2016.11.009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soshi, T., S. Hisanaga, N. Kodama, Y. Kanekama, Y. Samejima, E. Yumoto, and K. Sekiyama. 2014. “Event-Related Potentials for Better Speech Perception in Noise by Cochlear Implant Users.” Hearing Research 316: 110–121. doi:10.1016/j.heares.2014.08.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strobel, A., S. Debener, B. Sorger, J. C. Peters, C. Kranczioch, K. Hoechstetter, A. K. Engel, B. Brocke, and R. Goebel. 2008. “Novelty and Target Processing during an Auditory Novelty Oddball: A Simultaneous Event-Related Potential and Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study.” NeuroImage 40 (2): 869–883. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.10.065.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stropahl, M., K. Plotz, R. Schönfeld, T. Lenarz, P. Sandmann, G. Yovel, M. De Vos, and S. Debener. 2015. “Cross-Modal Reorganization in Cochlear Implant Users: Auditory Cortex Contributes to Visual Face Processing.” NeuroImage 121: 159–170. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.07.062.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tremblay, K., N. Kraus, and T. McGee. 1998. “The Time Course of Auditory Perceptual Learning: Neurophysiological Changes during Speech-Sound Training.” Neuroreport 9 (16): 3557–3560. doi:10.1097/00001756-199811160-00003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Dinteren, R., M. Arns, M.L.A. Jongsma, and R.P.C. Kessels. 2014. “P300 Development across the Lifespan: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.” PLoS One 9 (2): e87347. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0087347.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Hoesel, R.J.M., and G.M. Clark. 1997. “Psychophysical Studies with Two Binaural Cochlear Implant Subjects.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 102 (1): 495–507. doi:10.1121/1.419611.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Wieringen, A., and J. Wouters. 2008. “LIST and LINT: Sentences and Numbers for Quantifying Speech Understanding in Severely Impaired Listeners for Flanders and The Netherlands.” International Journal of Audiology 47 (6): 348–355. doi:10.1080/14992020801895144.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verleger, R. 1997. “On the Utility of P3 Latency as an Index of Mental Chronometry.” Psychophysiology 34 (2): 131–156.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viola, F. C., M. De Vos, J. Hine, P. Sandmann, S. Bleeck, J. Eyles, and S. Debener. 2012. “Semi-Automatic Attenuation of Cochlear Implant Artifacts for the Evaluation of Late Auditory Evoked Potentials.” Hearing Research 284 (1–2): 6–15. doi:10.1016/j.heares.2011.12.010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viola, F.C., J.D. Thorne, S. Bleeck, J. Eyles, and S. Debener. 2011. “Uncovering Auditory Evoked Potentials from Cochlear Implant Users with Independent Component Analysis.” Psychophysiology 48 (11): 1470–1480. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.2011.01224.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner, L., N. Maurits, B. Maat, D. Baskent, and A.E. Wagner. 2018. “The Cochlear Implant EEG Artifact Recorded from an Artificial Brain for Complex Acoustic Stimuli.” IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering 26 (2): 392–399. doi:10.1109/TNSRE.2018.2789780.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar