The P300 auditory event-related potential as a method to assess the benefit of contralateral hearing aid use in bimodal listeners: a proof-of-concept

References

• Arnoldner, C., and V. Y. W. Lin. 2013. “Expanded Selection Criteria in Adult Cochlear Implantation.” Cochlear Implants International 14 (sup4): 10–13. doi:10.1179/1467010013Z.000000000123.
   Google Scholar
• Beynon, A. J., and A. F. Snik. 2004. “Use of the Event-Related P300 Potential in Cochlear Implant Subjects for the Study of Strategy-Dependent Speech Processing.” International Journal of Audioogyl 43 (Suppl 1): 44–47.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brokx, J. P., and S. G. Nooteboom. 1982. “Intonation and the Perceptual Separation of Simultaneous Voices.” Journal of Phonetics 10: 23–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ching, T. Y. C., P. Incerti, and M. Hill. 2004. “Binaural Benefits for Adults Who Use Hearing Aids and Cochlear Implants in opposite Ears.” Ear and Hearing 25 (1): 9–21. doi:10.1097/01.AUD.0000111261.84611.C8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, J. G. 1981. “Uses and Abuses of Hearing Loss Classification.” ASHA 23 (7): 493–500.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Crew, J. D., J. J. Galvin Iii, D. M. Landsberger, and Q. J. Fu. 2015. “Contributions of Electric and Acoustic Hearing to Bimodal Speech and Music Perception.” PLoS One 10 (3): E 0120279. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0120279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donchin, E., and M. G. H. Coles. 1988. “On the Conceptual Foundations of Cognitive Psychology.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 1: 406–417. doi:10.1017/S0140525X00058246.
   Google Scholar
• Duncan, C. C., R. J. Barry, J. F. Connolly, C. Fischer, P. T. Michie, R. Näätänen, J. Polich, I. Reinvang, and C. Van Petten. 2009. “Event-Related Potentials in Clinical Research: Guidelines for Eliciting, Recording, and Quantifying Mismatch Negativity, P300, and N400.” Clinical Neurophysiology 120 (11): 1883–1908. doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2009.07.045.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunn, C. C., R. S. Tyler, and S. A. Witt. 2005. “Benefit of Wearing a Hearing Aid on the Unimplanted Ear in Adult Users of a Cochlear Implant.” Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 48 (3): 668–680. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2005/046).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El Fata, F., C. J. James, M.-L. Laborde, and B. Fraysse. 2009. “How Much Residual Hearing Is “Useful” for Music Perception with Cochlear Implants?” Audiology and Neurotology 14 (Suppl 1): 14–21. doi:10.1159/000206491.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Groenen, P. A., A. J. Beynon, A. F. Snik, and P. van den Broek. 2001. “Speech-Evoked Cortical Potentials and Speech Recognition in Cochlear Implant Users.” Scandinavian Audiology 30 (1): 31–40. doi:10.1080/010503901750069554.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hillyard, S. A., K. C. Squires, J. W. Bauer, and P. H. Lindsay. 1971. “Evoked Potential Correlates of Auditory Signal Detection.” Science 172 (3990): 1357–1360. doi:10.1126/science.172.3990.1357.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iwaki, T., N. Matsushiro, S.-R. Mah, T. Sato, E. Yasuoka, K.-I. Yamamoto, and T. Kubo. 2004. “Comparison of Speech Perception between Monaural and Binaural Hearing in Cochlear Implant Patients.” Acta Oto-Laryngologica 124: 358–362. doi:10.1080/00016480310000548a.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kok, A. 1988. “Overlap between P300 and Movement-Related-Potentials: A Response to Verleger.” Biological Psychology 27 (1): 51–58. doi:10.1016/0301-0511(88)90005-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kong, Y.Y., G. S. Stickney, and F. G. Zeng. 2005. “Speech and Melody Recognition in Binaurally Combined Acoustic and Electric Hearing.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 117 (3): 1351–1361. doi:10.1121/1.1857526.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kutas, M., G. McCarthy, and E. Donchin. 1977. “Augmenting Mental Chronometry: The P300 as a Measure of Stimulus Evaluation Time.” Science (New York, N.Y.) 197 (4305): 792–795. doi:10.1126/science.887923.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, B. A., K. L. Tremblay, and P. Korczak. 2008. “Speech Evoked Potentials: From the Laboratory to the Clinic.” Ear and Hearing 29 (3): 285–313. doi:10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181662c0e.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mok, M., D. Grayden, R. C. Dowell, and D. Lawrence. 2006. “Speech Perception for Adults Who Use Hearing Aids in Conjunction with Cochlear Implants in opposite Ears.” Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 49 (2): 338–351. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2006/027).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parasuraman, R., and J. Beatty. 1980. “Brain Events Underlying Detection and Recognition of Weak Sensory Signals.” Science 210 (4465): 80–83. doi:10.1126/science.7414324.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Picton, TW. 2011. “Human Auditory Evoked Potentials.” In Chapter 12, Endogenous Auditory Evoked Potentials: Attention Must Be Paid, 399–448. San Diego: Plural Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Polich, J. 2007. “Updating P300: An Integrative Theory of P3a and P3b.” Clinical Neurophysiology: Official Journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology 118 (10): 2128–2148. doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2007.04.019.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potts, L.G., M. W. Skinner, R. A. Litovsky, M. J. Strube, and F. Kuk. 2009. “Recognition and Localization of Speech by Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients Wearing a Digital Hearing Aid in the Nonimplanted Ear (Bimodal Hearing).” Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 20 (6): 353–373. doi:10.3766/jaaa.20.6.4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team. 2013. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL http://www.R-project.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Reichenbach, T., and A. J. Hudspeth. 2012. “Discrimination of Low-Frequency Tones Employs Temporal Fine Structure.” PLoS One 7 (9): e45579. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0045579.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritter, W., R. Simson, and H. G. Vaughan, Jr., 1972. “Association Cortex Potentials and Reaction Time in Auditory Discrimination.” Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology. 33 (6): 547–555. doi:10.1016/0013-4694(72)90245-3
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ritter, W., and H. G. Vaughan. 1969. “Averaged Evoked Responses in Vigilance and Discrimination: A Reassessment.” Science (New York, N.Y.) 164 (3877): 326–328. doi:10.1126/science.164.3877.326.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sasaki, T., K. Yamamoto, T. Iwaki, and T. Kubo. 2009. “Assessing Binaural/Bimodal Advantages Using Auditory Event-Related Potentials in Subjects with Cochlear Implants.” Auris Nasus Larynx 36 (5): 541–546. doi:10.1016/j.anl.2008.12.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, Z. M., B. Delgutte, and A. J. Oxenham. 2002. “Chimaeric Sounds Reveal Dichotomies in Auditory Perception.” Nature 416 (6876): 87–90. doi:10.1038/416087a.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Squires, K. C., S. A. Hillyard, and P. H. Lindsay. 1973. “Vertex Potentials Evoked during Auditory Signal Detection: Relation to Decision Criteria.” Percept Psychophys 14: 263–272.
   Google Scholar
• Starr, A., P. Sandroni, and H. J. Michalewski. 1995. “Readiness to Respond in a Target Detection Task: Pre- and Post-Stimulus Event-Related Potentials in Normal Subjects.” Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology. 96 (1): 76–92. doi:10.1016/0013-4694(94)00162-E.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sutton, S., M. Braren, J. Zubin, and E. R. John. 1965. “Evoked-Potential Correlates of Stimulus Uncertainty.” Science 150 (3700): 1187–1188. doi:10.1126/science.150.3700.1187.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talsma, D., and M. G. Woldorff. 2005. “Methods for the Estimation and Removal of Artifacts and Overlap in ERP Waveforms.” In Event-Related Potentials: A Methods Handbook, edited by Handy, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 122.
   Google Scholar
• Tyler, Richard S., Aaron J. Parkinson, Blake S. Wilson, Shelley Witt, John P. Preece, and William Noble. 2002. “Patients Utilizing a Hearing Aid and a Cochlear Implant: Speech Perception and Localization.” Ear and Hearing 23 (2): 98–105. doi:10.1097/00003446-200204000-00003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Hoesel, R. J. M. 2012. “Contrasting Benefits from Contralateral Implants and Hearing Aids in Cochlear Implant Users.” Hearing Research 288 (1–2): 100–113. doi:10.1016/j.heares.2011.11.014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wickham, H. 2009. ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. New York: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar