Preferences for digital noise reduction and microphone mode settings in hearing-impaired listeners with low and high tolerances for background noise

References

• Bentler, R., Y. H. Wu, J. Kettel, and R. Hurtig. 2008. “Digital Noise Reduction: Outcomes from Laboratory and Field Studies.” International Journal of Audiology 47 (8): 447–460. doi:10.1080/14992020802033091.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bilger, R. C., J. M. Nuetzel, W. M. Rabinowitz, and C. Rzeczkowski. 1984. “Standardization of a Test of Speech Perception in Noise.” Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 27 (1): 32–48. doi:10.1044/jshr.2701.32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boymans, M., and W. A. Dreschler. 2000. “Field Trials Using a Digital Hearing Aid with Active Noise Reduction and Dual-Microphone Directionality.” International Journal of Audiology 39 (5): 260–268.
   Google Scholar
• Brons, I., R. Houben, and W. A. Dreschler. 2014. “Effects of Noise Reduction on Speech Intelligibility, Perceived Listening Effort, and Personal Preference in Hearing-Impaired Listeners.” Trends in Hearing 18: 1–10. doi:10.1177/2331216514553924.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Convery, E., G. Keidser, and L. Hartley. 2011. “Perception of a Self-Fitting Hearing Aid among Urban Dwelling Hearing-Impaired Adults in a Developed Country.” Trends in Amplification 15 (4): 175183. doi:10.1177/1084713811424886.
   Google Scholar
• Cosmos Dist. Inc. n.d. Quality Recordings for the Hearing Health Care Industry. Kelowna, B.C.
   Google Scholar
• Daneman, M., and P. A. Carpenter. 1980. “Individual Differences in Working Memory and Reading.” Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 19 (4): 450–466. doi:10.1016/S0022-5371(80)90312-6.
   Google Scholar
• Desjardins, J. L. 2016. “The Effects of Hearing Aid Directional Microphone and Noise Reduction Processing on Listening Effort in Older Adults with Hearing Loss.” Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 27 (1): 29–41. doi:10.3766/jaaa.15030.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desjardins, J. L., and K. A. Doherty. 2014. “The Effect of Hearing Aid Noise Reduction on Listening Effort in Hearing-Impaired Adults.” Ear and Hearing 35 (6): 600–610. doi:10.1097/AUD.0000000000000028.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eddins, D. A., A. V. Klein, M. L. Arnold, and J. Ellison. 2013. “Acceptable Noise Level: Effect of Presentation Level, Digital Noise Reduction, and Stimulus Type.” Poster presented at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Audiology, Anaheim, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, B., H. Abrams, J. Ellison, M. McKinney, and K. Recker. 2011. “Psychoacoustic Mechanisms Behind Acceptable Noise Level Thresholds.” Podium presentation presented at the annual meeting of the American Auditory Society, Scottsdale, AZ.
   Google Scholar
• Eiler, C., D. Baskent, K. Recker, and B. Edwards. 2008. “Genetic Algorithms: Are They the Future of Hearing Aid Fittings?” The Hearing Journal 61: 16, 18–21. doi:10.1097/01.HJ.0000343021.84357.78.
   Google Scholar
• Franklin, C. A., Jr., J. W. Thelin, A. K. Nabelek, and S. B. Burchfield. 2006. “The Effect of Speech Presentation Level on Acceptance of Background Noise in Listeners with Normal Hearing.” Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 17 (2): 141–146. doi:10.3766/jaaa.17.2.6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fredelake, S., I. Holube, A. Schlueter, and M. Hansen. 2012. “Measurement of the Acceptable Noise Level for Single-Microphone Noise Reduction Algorithms.” International Journal of Audiology 51 (4): 299–308. doi:10.3109/14992027.2011.645075.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freyaldenhoven, M. C., A. K. Nabelek, S. B. Burchfield, and J. W. Thelin. 2005. “Acceptable Noise Level as a Measure of Directional Hearing Aid Benefit.” Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 16 (4): 228–236. doi:10.3766/jaaa.16.4.4.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Galster, J. A., and J. Pisa. 2010. Improving the Patient Experience in Noise: Fast-acting Single Microphone Noise Reduction. Technology Paper. Eden Prairie, MN: Starkey Hearing Technologies.
   Google Scholar
• Hagerman, B., and A. Olofsson. 2004. “A Method to Measure the Effect of Noise Reduction Algorithms Using Simultaneous Speech and Noise.” Acta Acustica United with Acustica 90: 356–361.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holube, I., S. Fredelake, M. Vlaming, and B. Kollmeier. 2010. “Development and Analysis of an International Speech Test Signal (ISTS).” International Journal of Audiology 49 (12): 891–903. doi:10.3109/14992027.2010.506889.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houben, R., T. M. H. Dijkstra, and W. A. Dreschler. 2012. “Analysis of Individual Preferences for Tuning Noise-Reduction Algorithms.” Journal of the Audio Engineering Society 60: 1024–1037.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kayser, H., S. D. Ewert, J. Anemü Ller, T. Rohdenburg, and V. Hohmann. 2009. “Database of Multichannel in-Ear and behind-the-Ear Head-Related and Binaural Room Impulse Responses.” EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing 2009: 1–10. doi:10.1155/2009/298605.
   Google Scholar
• Keidser, G., H. Dillon, M. Flax, T. Ching, and S. Brewer. 2011. “The NAL-NL2 Prescription Procedure.” Audiology Research 1: 88–90. doi:10.4081/audiores.2011.e24.
   Google Scholar
• Keidser, G., A. O’Brien, J. U. Hain, M. McLelland, and I. Yeend. 2009. “The Effect of Frequency-Dependent Microphone Directionality on Horizontal Localization Performance in Hearing-Aid Users.” International Journal of Audiology 48 (11): 789–803. doi:10.3109/14992020903036357.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, J. S., and M. F. Bryan. 2011. “The Effects of Asymmetric Directional Microphone Fittings on Acceptance of Background Noise.” International Journal of Audiology 50 (5): 290–296. doi:10.3109/14992027.2010.551786.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuk, F., P. Korhonen, C. Lau, D. Keenan, and M. Norgaard. 2013. “Evaluation of a Pinna Compensation Algorithm for Sound Localization and Speech Perception in Noise.” American Journal of Audiology 22 (1): 84–93. doi:10.1044/1059-0889(2012/12-0043).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lister, A. 2017. Personal Communication. Data Warehouse: Data from Over 600,000 Z Series and Muse Hearing Aids. Eden Prairie, MN: Starkey Hearing Technologies.
   Google Scholar
• Mueller, H. G., J. Weber, and B. W. Hornsby. 2006. “The Effects of Digital Noise Reduction on the Acceptance of Background Noise.” Trends in Amplification 10 (2): 83–93. doi:10.1177/1084713806289553.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nabelek, A. K., M. C. Freyaldenhoven, J. W. Tampas, S. B. Burchfield, and R. A. Muenchen. 2006. “Acceptable Noise Level as a Predictor of Hearing Aid Use.” Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 17 (9): 626–639.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nabelek, A. K., F. M. Tucker, and T. R. Letowski. 1991. “Toleration of Background Noises: Relationship with Patterns of Hearing Aid Use by Elderly Persons.” Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 34 (3): 679–685. doi:10.1044/jshr.3403.679.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neher, T. 2014. “Relating Hearing Loss and Executive Functions to Hearing Aid Users’ Preference for, and Speech Recognition with, Different Combinations of Binaural Noise Reduction and Microphone Directionality.” Frontiers in Neuroscience 8: 391. doi:10.3389/fnins.2014.00391.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neher, T., G. Grimm, and V. Hohmann. 2014. “Perceptual Consequences of Different Signal Changes Due to Binaural Noise Reduction: Do Hearing Loss and Working Memory Capacity Play a Role?” Ear and Hearing 35: 213–227. doi:10.1097/AUD.0000000000000054.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neher, T., G. Grimm, V. Hohmann, and B. Kollmeier. 2014. “Do Hearing Loss and Cognitive Function Modulate Benefit from Different Binaural Noise-Reduction Settings?” Ear and Hearing 35: 52–62. doi:10.1097/AUD.0000000000000003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neher, T., and K. C. Wagener. 2016. “Investigating Differences in Preferred Noise Reduction Strength among Hearing Aid Users.” Trends in Hearing 20: 2331216516655794. doi:10.1177/2331216516655794.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neher, T., K. C. Wagener, and R. L. Fischer. 2016. “Directional Processing and Noise Reduction in Hearing Aids: Individual and Situational Influences on Preferred Setting.” Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 27 (8): 628–646.  doi:10.3766/jaaa.15062.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohlenforst, B., D. Wendt, S. E. Kramer, G. Naylor, A. A. Zekveld, and T. Lunner. 2018. “Impact of SNR, Masker Type and Noise Reduction Processing on Sentence Recognition Performance and Listening Effort as Indicated by the Pupil Dilation Response.” Hearing Research 365: 90–99. doi:10.1016/j.heares.2018.05.003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsen, W.O. 1998. “Average Speech Levels and Spectra in Various Speaking/Listening Conditions: A Summary of the Pearson, Bennett, & Fidell 1977 Report.” Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 7: 1–5. doi:10.1044/1059-0889(1998/012).
   Google Scholar
• Peeters, H., F. Kuk, C. Lau, and D. Keenan. 2009. “Subjective and Objective Evaluation of Noise Management Algorithms.” Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 20 (2): 89–98. doi:10.3766/jaaa.20.2.2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pisa, J., M. Burk, and E. A. Galster. 2010. “Evidence-Based Design of a Noise-Management Algorithm.” The Hearing Journal 63 (4): 42–48. doi:10.1097/01.HJ.0000370859.58483.67.
   Google Scholar
• Recker, K., and B. Edwards. 2013. “The Effect of Presentation Level on Normal-Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Listeners’ Acceptable Speech and Noise Levels.” Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 24 (1): 17–25. doi:10.3766/jaaa.24.1.3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ricketts, T. A., and B. W. Hornsby. 2005. “Sound Quality Measures for Speech in Noise through a Commercial Hearing Aid Implementing Digital Noise Reduction.” Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 16 (5): 270–277. doi:10.3766/jaaa.16.5.2.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ricketts, T., and H. G. Mueller. 1999. “Making Sense of Directional Microphone Hearing Aids.” American Journal of Audiology 8 (2): 117–127.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sarampalis, A., S. Kalluri, B. Edwards, and E. Hafter. 2009. “Objective Measures of Listening Effort: Effects of Background Noise and Noise Reduction.” Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 52 (5): 1230–1240. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2009/08-0111).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, S., G. Spanos, J. Lilly, and K. Recker. in review. “Comparison of Two Hearing-Aid Noise Management Schemes in Listeners with Low and High Tolerances for Background Noise.” International Journal of Audiology.
   Google Scholar
• Surr, R. K., B. E. Walden, M. T. Cord, and L. Olson. 2002. “Influence of Environmental Factors on Hearing Aid Microphone Preference.” Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 13 (6): 308–322.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tampas, J. W., and A. W. Harkrider. 2006. “Auditory Evoked Potentials in Females with High and Low Acceptance of Background Noise When Listening to Speech.” Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 119 (3): 1548–1561. doi:10.1121/1.21167147.
   Google Scholar
• Wagener, K., T. Brand, and B. Kollmeier. 1999. “Entwicklung Und Evaluation Eines Satztests Für Die Deutsche Sprache. IIII: Design, Optimierung Und Evaluation Des Oldenburger Satztests [Development and Evaluation of a Sentence Test for the German Language. I-III: Design, Optimization and Evaluation of the Oldenburg Sentence Test].” Zeitschrift Für Audiologie (Audiol Acoust) 38: 44486–155695.
   Google Scholar
• Walden, B. E., R. K. Surr, M. T. Cord, and O. Dyrlund. 2004. “Predicting Hearing Aid Microphone Preference in Everyday Listening.” Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 15 (5): 365–396. doi:10.3766/jaaa.15.5.4.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Walden, B. E., R. K. Surr, M. T. Cord, K. W. Grant, V. Summers, and A. B. Dittberner. 2007. “The Robustness of Hearing Aid Microphone Preferences in Everyday Listening Environments.” Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 18 (5): 358–379. doi:10.3766/jaaa.18.5.2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walden, B. E., R. K. Surr, K. W. Grant, W. Van Summers, M. T. Cord, and O. Dyrlund. 2005. “Effect of Signal-to-Noise Ratio on Directional Microphone Benefit and Preference.” Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 16 (9): 662–676. doi:10.3766/jaaa.16.9.4.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wendt, D., R. K. Hietkamp, and T. Lunner. 2017. “Impact of Noise and Noise Reduction on Processing Effort: A Pupillometry Study.” Ear and Hearing 38 (6): 690–700. doi:10.1097/AUD.0000000000000454.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, Y. H., and E. Stangl. 2013. “The Effect of Hearing Aid Signal-Processing Schemes on Acceptable Noise Levels: Perception and Prediction.” Ear and Hearing 34 (3): 333–341. doi:10.1097/AUD.0b013e31827417d4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, J., and W. Han. 2014. “Improvement of Adult BTE Hearing Aid Wearers’ Front/Back Localization Performance Using Digital Pinna-Cue Preserving Technologies: An Evidence-Based Review.” Korean Journal of Audiology 18 (3): 97–104. doi:10.7874/kja.2014.18.3.97.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zakis, J. A., J. Hau, and P. J. Blamey. 2009. “Environmental Noise Reduction Configuration: Effects on Preferences, Satisfaction, and Speech Understanding.” International Journal of Audiology 48 (12): 853–867. doi:10.3109/14992020903131117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar