Comparison of bimodal benefit for the use of DSL v5.0 and NAL-NL2 in cochlear implant listeners

References

• Advanced Bionics. 2016. “Optimizing Hearing for Listeners with a Cochlear Implant and Contralateral Hearing Aid.” Advanced Bionics. https://advancedbionics.com/content/dam/advancedbionics/Documents/Regional/US/libraries/bimodal/Bimodal-Fitting-Formula-Whitepaper.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Armstrong, M., P. Pegg, C. James, and P. Blamey. 1997. “Speech Perception in Noise with Implant and Hearing Aid.” The American Journal of Otology 18 (6 Suppl): S140–S141.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ching, T. Y. C., P. Incerti, and M. Hill. 2004. “Binaural Benefits for Adults Who Use Hearing Aids and Cochlear Implants in Opposite Ears.” Ear and Hearing 25 (1): 9–21. doi:10.1097/01.AUD.0000111261.84611.C8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ching, T. Y.C., E. E. Johnson, S. Hou, H. Dillon, V. Zhang, L. Burns, P. van Buynder, A. Wong, and C. Flynn. 2013. “A Comparison of NAL and DSL Prescriptive Methods for Paediatric Hearing-Aid Fitting: Predicted Speech Intelligibility and Loudness.” International Journal of Audiology 52 (Suppl 2): S29–S38. doi:10.3109/14992027.2013.765041.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ching, T. Y.C., C. Psarros, M. Hill, H. Dillon, and P. Incerti. 2001. “Should Children Who Use Cochlear Implants Wear Hearing Aids in the Opposite Ear?” Ear and Hearing 22 (5): 365–380. doi:10.1097/00003446-200110000-00002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, R. M., and G. C. Alexander. 1995. “The Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit.” Ear and Hearing 16 (2): 176–186. doi:10.1097/00003446-199504000-00005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorman, M. F., and R. H. Gifford. 2010. “Combining Acoustic and Electric Stimulation in the Service of Speech Recognition.” International Journal of Audiology 49 (12): 912–919. doi:10.3109/14992027.2010.509113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorman, M. F., P. Loizou, S. Wang, T. Zhang, A. Spahr, L. Loiselle, and S. Cook. 2014. “Bimodal Cochlear Implants: The Role of Acoustic Signal Level in Determining Speech Perception Benefit.” Audiology and Neurotology 19 (4): 234–238. doi:10.1159/000360070.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• English, R., K. Plant, M. Maciejczyk, and R. Cowan. 2016. “Fitting Recommendations and Clinical Benefit Associated with Use of the NAL-NL2 Hearing-Aid Prescription in Nucleus Cochlear Implant Recipients.” International Journal of Audiology 55 (Suppl 2): S45–S50. doi:10.3109/14992027.2015.1133936.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gatehouse, S. 1993. “Role of Perceptual Acclimatization in the Selection of Frequency Responses for Hearing Aids.” Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 4 (5): 296–306.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Holube, I., S. Fredelake, M. Vlaming, and B. Kollmeier. 2010. “Development and Analysis of an International Speech Test Signal (ISTS).” International Journal of Audiology 49 (12): 891–903. doi:10.3109/14992027.2010.506889.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoppe, U., and A. Hast. 2017. “Sprachaudiometrie Bei Der Indikation Von Hörhilfen Und Hörimplantaten.” HNO 65 (3): 195–202. doi:10.1007/s00106-016-0291-y.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hoppe, U., T. Hocke, and F. Digeser. 2018. “Bimodal Benefit for Cochlear Implant Listeners with Different Grades of Hearing Loss in the Opposite Ear.” Acta Oto-Laryngologica 138 (8): 713–721. doi:10.1080/00016489.2018.1444281.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, E. E., and H. Dillon. 2011. “A Comparison of Gain for Adults from Generic Hearing Aid Prescriptive Methods: Impacts on Predicted Loudness, Frequency Bandwidth, and Speech Intelligibility.” Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 22 (7): 441–459. doi:10.3766/jaaa.22.7.5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keidser, G., H. Dillon, L. Carter, and A. O’Brien. 2012. “NAL-NL2 Empirical Adjustments.” Trends in Amplification 16 (4): 211–223. doi:10.1177/1084713812468511.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Keilmann, A. M., A. M. Bohnert, J. Gosepath, and W. J. Mann. 2009. “Cochlear Implant and Hearing Aid: A New Approach to Optimizing the Fitting in This Bimodal Situation.” European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 266 (12): 1879–1884. doi:10.1007/s00405-009-0993-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kollmeier, B., and M. Wesselkamp. 1997. “Development and Evaluation of a German Sentence Test for Objective and Subjective Speech Intelligibility Assessment.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 102 (4): 2412–2421. doi:10.1121/1.419624.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mok, M.,. D. Grayden, R. C. Dowell, and D. Lawrence. 2006. “Speech Perception for Adults Who Use Hearing Aids in Conjunction with Cochlear Implants in Opposite Ears.” Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 49 (2): 338. (2006/027). doi:10.1044/1092-4388.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morera, C., L. Cavalle, M. Manrique, A. Huarte, R. Angel, A. Osorio, L. Garcia-Ibañez, E. Estrada, and C. Morera-Ballester. 2012. “Contralateral Hearing Aid Use in Cochlear Implanted Patients: Multicenter Study of Bimodal Benefit.” Acta Oto-Laryngologica 132 (10): 1084–1094. doi:10.3109/00016489.2012.677546.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neuman, A. C., A. Zeman, J. Neukam, B. Wang, and M. A. Svirsky. 2019. “The Effect of Hearing Aid Bandwidth and Configuration of Hearing Loss on Bimodal Speech Recognition in Cochlear Implant Users.” Ear and Hearing 40 (3): 621–635. doi:10.1097/AUD.0000000000000638.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polonenko, M. J., S. D. Scollie, S. Moodie, R. C. Seewald, D. Laurnagaray, J. Shantz, and A. Richards. 2010. “Fit to Targets, Preferred Listening Levels, and Self-Reported Outcomes for the DSL v5.0 a Hearing Aid Prescription for Adults.” International Journal of Audiology 49 (8): 550–560. doi:10.3109/14992021003713122.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potts, L. G., M. W. Skinner, R. A. Litovsky, M. J. Strube, and F. Kuk. 2009. “Recognition and Localization of Speech by Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients Wearing a Digital Hearing Aid in the Nonimplanted Ear (Bimodal Hearing).” Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 20 (6): 353–373. doi:10.3766/jaaa.20.6.4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scollie, S.,. R. Seewald, L. Cornelisse, S. Moodie, M. Bagatto, D. Laurnagaray, S. Beaulac, and J. Pumford. 2005. “The Desired Sensation Level Multistage Input/Output Algorithm.” Trends in Amplification 9 (4): 159–197. doi:10.1177/108471380500900403.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sheffield, S. W., M. Simha, K. N. Jahn, and R. H. Gifford. 2016. “The Effects of Acoustic Bandwidth on Simulated Bimodal Benefit in Children and Adults with Normal Hearing.” Ear and Hearing 37 (3): 282–288. doi:10.1097/AUD.0000000000000281.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siburt, H. W., and A. E. Holmes. 2015. “Bimodal Programming: A Survey of Current Clinical Practice.” American Journal of Audiology 24 (2): 243. doi:10.1044/2015_AJA-14-0069.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyler, R. S., A. J. Parkinson, B. S. Wilson, S. Witt, J. P. Preece, and W. Noble. 2002. “Patients Utilizing a Hearing Aid and a Cochlear Implant: Speech Perception and Localization.” Ear and Hearing 23 (2): 98–105. doi:10.1097/00003446-200204000-00003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veugen, L. C. E., J. Chalupper, A. F. M. Snik, A. J. van Opstal, and L. H. M. Mens. 2016. “Matching Automatic Gain Control Across Devices in Bimodal Cochlear Implant Users.” Ear and Hearing 37 (3): 260–270. doi:10.1097/AUD.0000000000000260.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vroegop, J. L., N. C. Homans, M. P. van der Schroeff, and A. Goedegebure. 2019. “Comparing Two Hearing Aid Fitting Algorithms for Bimodal Cochlear Implant Users.” Ear and Hearing 40 (1): 98–106. doi:10.1097/AUD.0000000000000597.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. 2019. “Grades of Hearing Impairment.” https://www.who.int/pbd/deafness/hearing_impairment_grades/en/
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, T., M. F. Dorman, and A. J. Spahr. 2010. “Information from the Voice Fundamental Frequency (F0) Region Accounts for the Majority of the Benefit When Acoustic Stimulation is Added to Electric Stimulation.” Ear and Hearing 31 (1): 63–69. doi:10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181b7190c.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar