The effect of an active transcutaneous bone conduction device on spatial release from masking

References

• Akeroyd, M. A., F. H. Guy, D. L. Harrison, and S. L. Suller. 2014. “A Factor Analysis of the SSQ (Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing Scale).” International Journal of Audiology 53 (2): 101–114. doi:10.3109/14992027.2013.824115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asp, F., A.-M. Jakobsson, and E. Berninger. 2018. “The Effect of Simulated Unilateral Hearing Loss on Horizontal Sound Localization Accuracy and Recognition of Speech in Spatially Separate Competing Speech.” Hearing Research 357: 54–63. doi:10.1016/j.heares.2017.11.008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asp, F., and S. Reinfeldt. 2018. “Horizontal Sound Localisation Accuracy in Individuals with Conductive Hearing Loss: Effect of the Bone Conduction Implant.” International Journal of Audiology 57 (9): 657–664. doi:10.1080/14992027.2018.1470337.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asp, F., and S. Reinfeldt. 2019. “Effects of Simulated and Profound Unilateral Sensorineural Hearing Loss on Recognition of Speech in Competing Speech.” Ear and hearing doi:10.1097/AUD.0000000000000764.
   Google Scholar
• Berninger, E., and K. K. Karlsson. 1999. “Clinical Study of Widex Senso on First-Time Hearing Aid Users.” Scandinavian Audiology 28 (2): 117–125. doi:10.1080/010503999424842.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Best, V., C. R. Mason, J. Swaminathan, E. Roverud, and G. Kidd. 2017. “Use of a Glimpsing Model to Understand the Performance of Listeners with and without Hearing Loss in Spatialized Speech Mixtures.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 141 (1): 81–91. doi:10.1121/1.4973620.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bronkhorst, A. W. 2000. “The Cocktail Party Phenomenon: A Review of Research on Speech Intelligibility in Multiple-Talker Conditions.” Acta Acustica United with Acustica 86: 117–128. http://www.ingentaconnect.com/
   Google Scholar
• Bronkhorst, A. W. 2015. “The Cocktail-Party Problem Revisited: Early Processing and Selection of Multi-Talker Speech.” Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 77 (5): 1465–1487. doi:10.3758/s13414-015-0882-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bronkhorst, A. W., and R. Plomp. 1988. “The Effect of Head-Induced Interaural Time and Level Differences on Speech Intelligibility in Noise.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 83 (4): 1508–1516. doi:10.1121/1.395906.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bronkhorst, A. W., and R. Plomp. 1992. “Effect of Multiple Speechlike Maskers on Binaural Speech Recognition in Normal and Impaired Hearing.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 92 (6): 3132–3139. doi:10.1121/1.404209.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brungart, D. S. 2001. “Informational and Energetic Masking Effects in the Perception of Two Simultaneous Talkers.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 109 (3): 1101–1109. doi:10.1121/1.1345696.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brungart, D. S., and B. D. Simpson. 2002. “The Effects of Spatial Separation in Distance on the Informational and Energetic Masking of a Nearby Speech Signal.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 112 (2): 664–676. doi:10.1121/1.1490592.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cherry, E. C. 1953. “Some Experiments on the Recognition of Speech, with One and with Two Ears.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 25 (5): 975–979. doi:10.1121/1.1907229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cherry, E. C., and W. K. Taylor. 1954. “Some Further Experiments upon the Recognition of Speech, with One and with Two Ears.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 26 (4): 554–559. doi:10.1121/1.1907373.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colquitt, J. L., E. Loveman, D. M. Baguley, T. E. Mitchell, P. Z. Sheehan, P. Harris, D. W. Proops, J. Jones, A. J. Clegg, and K. Welch. 2011. “Bone-Anchored Hearing Aids for People with Bilateral Hearing Impairment: A Systematic Review.” Clinical Otolaryngology 36 (5): 419–441. doi:10.1111/j.1749-4486.2011.02376.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, L., and U. Gather. 1993. “The Identification of Multiple Outliers.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 88 (423): 782–792. doi:10.2307/2290763.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drullman, R., and A. W. Bronkhorst. 2000. “Multichannel Speech Intelligibility and Talker Recognition Using Monaural, Binaural, and Three-Dimensional Auditory Presentation.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 107 (4): 2224–2235. doi:10.1121/1.428503.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubno, J. R., J. B. Ahlstrom, and A. R. Horwitz. 2008. “Binaural Advantage for Younger and Older Adults with Normal Hearing.” Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 51 (2): 539–556. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2008/039).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eeg-Olofsson, M., B. Håkansson, S. Reinfeldt, H. Taghavi, H. Lund, K. J. Jansson, E. Håkansson, and J. Stalfors. 2014. “The Bone Conduction Implant–First Implantation, Surgical and Audiologic Aspects.” Otology & Neurotology 35 (4): 679–685. doi:10.1097/MAO.0000000000000203
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eeg-Olofsson, M., S. Stenfelt, and G. Granström. 2011. “Implications for Contralateral Bone-Conducted Transmission as Measured by Cochlear Vibrations.” Otology & Neurotology : Official Publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology 32 (2): 192–198. doi:10.1097/MAO.0b013e3182009f16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eeg-Olofsson, M., S. Stenfelt, A. Tjellström, and G. Granström. 2008. “Transmission of Bone-Conducted Sound in the Human Skull Measured by Cochlear Vibrations.” International Journal of Audiology 47 (12): 761–769. doi:10.1080/14992020802311216.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ericson, M. A., D. S. Brungart, and B. D. Simpson. 2004. “Factors That Influence Intelligibility in Multitalker Speech Displays.” The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 14 (3): 313–334. doi:10.1207/s15327108ijap1403_6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freyman, R. L., K. S. Helfer, D. D. McCall, and R. K. Clifton. 1999. “The Role of Perceived Spatial Separation in the Unmasking of Speech.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 106 (6): 3578–3588. doi:10.1121/1.428211.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fullgrabe, C., B. C. Moore, and M. A. Stone. 2014. “Age-Group Differences in Speech Identification despite Matched Audiometrically Normal Hearing: contributions from Auditory Temporal Processing and Cognition.” Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience 6: 347.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gatehouse, S., and W. Noble. 2004. “The Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ).” International Journal of Audiology 43 (2): 85–99. doi:10.1080/14992020400050014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glyde, H., S. Cameron, H. Dillon, L. Hickson, and M. Seeto. 2013. “The Effects of Hearing Impairment and Aging on Spatial Processing.” Ear and Hearing 34 (1): 15–28. doi:10.1097/AUD.0b013e3182617f94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grothe, B., M. Pecka, and D. McAlpine. 2010. “Mechanisms of Sound Localization in Mammals.” Physiological Reviews 90 (3): 983–1012. doi:10.1152/physrev.00026.2009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagerman, B. 1982. “Sentences for Testing Speech Intelligibility in Noise.” Scandinavian Audiology 11 (2): 79–87. doi:10.3109/01050398209076203.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagerman, B. 1993. “Efficiency of Speech Audiometry and Other Tests.” British Journal of Audiology 27 (6): 423–425. doi:10.3109/03005369309076719.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagerman, B., and C. Kinnefors. 1995. “Efficient Adaptive Methods for Measuring Speech Reception Threshold in Quiet and in Noise.” International Journal of Audiology 24 (1): 71–77. doi:10.3109/14992029509042213.
   Google Scholar
• Håkansson, B., S. Reinfeldt, M. Eeg-Olofsson, P. Östli, H. Taghavi, J. Adler, J. Gabrielsson, S. Stenfelt, and G. Granström. 2010. “A Novel Bone Conduction Implant (BCI): Engineering Aspects and Pre-Clinical Studies.” International Journal of Audiology 49 (3): 203–215. doi:10.3109/14992020903264462.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawley, M. L., R. Y. Litovsky, and J. F. Culling. 2004. “The Benefit of Binaural Hearing in a Cocktail Party: effect of Location and Type of Interferer.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 115 (2): 833–843. doi:10.1121/1.1639908.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ihlefeld, A., S. J. Sarwar, and B. G. Shinn‐Cunningham. 2006. “Spatial Uncertainty Reduces the Benefit of Spatial Separation in Selective and Divided Listening.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 119 (5): 3417–3417. doi:10.1121/1.4786823.
   Google Scholar
• Kathleen Pichora-Fuller, M., B. A. Schneider, and M. Daneman. 1995. “How Young and Old Adults Listen to and Remember Speech in Noise.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 97: 593–608. doi:10.1121/1.412282.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kidd, G., Jr., T. L. Arbogast, C. R. Mason, and F. J. Gallun. 2005. “The Advantage of Knowing Where to Listen.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 118 (6): 3804–3815. doi:10.1121/1.2109187.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lingner, A., B. Grothe, L. Wiegrebe, and S. D. Ewert. 2016. “Binaural Glimpses at the Cocktail Party?” Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO 17 (5): 461–473. doi:10.1007/s10162-016-0575-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Litovsky, R. 2015. “Development of the Auditory System.” Handbook of Clinical Neurology 129: 55–72. doi:10.1016/B978-0-444-62630-1.00003-2.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Litovsky, R. Y., P. M. Johnstone, S. Godar, S. Agrawal, A. Parkinson, R. Peters, and J. Lake. 2006. “Bilateral Cochlear Implants in Children: Localization Acuity Measured with Minimum Audible Angle.” Ear and Hearing 27 (1): 43–59. doi:10.1097/01.aud.0000194515.28023.4b.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marrone, N., C. R. Mason, and G. Kidd. 2008a. “Tuning in the Spatial Dimension: Evidence from a Masked Speech Identification Task.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 124 (2): 1146–1158. doi:10.1121/1.2945710.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marrone, N., C. R. Mason, and G. Kidd. Jr 2008b. “The Effects of Hearing Loss and Age on the Benefit of Spatial Separation between Multiple Talkers in Reverberant Rooms.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 124 (5): 3064–3075. doi:10.1121/1.2980441.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noble, W., D. Byrne, and K. Ter-Horst. 1997. “Auditory Localization, Detection of Spatial Separateness, and Speech Hearing in Noise by Hearing Impaired Listeners.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 102 (4): 2343–2352. doi:10.1121/1.419618.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nolan, M., and D. J. Lyon. 1981. “Transcranial Attenuation in Bone Conduction Audiometry.” The Journal of Laryngology & Otology 95 (6): 597–608. doi:10.1017/S0022215100091155.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peissig, J., and B. Kollmeier. 1997. “Directivity of Binaural Noise Reduction in Spatial Multiple Noise-Source Arrangements for Normal and Impaired Listeners.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 101 (3): 1660–1670. doi:10.1121/1.418150.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Priwin, C., S. Stenfelt, G. Granström, A. Tjellström, and Bo Håkansson. 2004. “Bilateral Bone-Anchored Hearing Aids (BAHAs): An Audiometric Evaluation.” The Laryngoscope 114 (1): 77–84. doi:10.1097/00005537-200401000-00013.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinfeldt, S., B. Håkansson, H. Taghavi, and M. Eeg-Olofsson. 2015. “New Developments in Bone-Conduction Hearing Implants: A Review.” Medical Devices (Auckland, N.Z.) 8: 79–93. doi:10.2147/MDER.S39691.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Reinfeldt, S., B. Håkansson, H. Taghavi, K. J. Freden Jansson, and M. Eeg-Olofsson. 2015. “The Bone Conduction Implant: Clinical Results of the First Six Patients.” International Journal of Audiology 54 (6): 408–416. doi:10.3109/14992027.2014.996826
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snyder, J. M. 1973. “Interaural Attenuation Characteristics in Audiometry.” Laryngoscope 83 (11): 1847–1855.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stenfelt, S. 2012. “Transcranial Attenuation of Bone-Conducted Sound When Stimulation is at the Mastoid and at the Bone Conduction Hearing Aid Position.” Otology & Neurotology 33 (2): 105–114. doi:10.1097/MAO.0b013e31823e28ab.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stenfelt, S., and R. L. Goode. 2005. “Transmission Properties of Bone Conducted Sound: measurements in Cadaver Heads.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 118 (4): 2373–2391. doi:10.1121/1.2005847.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stenfelt, S., and M. Zeitooni. 2013. “Binaural Hearing Ability with Mastoid Applied Bilateral Bone Conduction Stimulation in Normal Hearing Subjects.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 134 (1): 481–493. doi:10.1121/1.4807637
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swaminathan, J., C. R. Mason, T. M. Streeter, V. Best, G. Kidd, Jr., and A. D. Patel. 2015. “Musical Training, Individual Differences and the Cocktail Party Problem.” Scientific Reports 5 (1): 11628. doi:10.1038/srep14401.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Taghavi, H., B. Håkansson, S. Reinfeldt, M. Eeg-Olofsson, K. J. Jansson, E. Hakansson, and B. Nasri. 2015. “Technical Design of a New Bone Conduction Implant (BCI) System.” International Journal of Audiology 54 (10): 736–744. doi:10.3109/14992027.2015.1051665.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zahorik, P., and A. M. Rothpletz. 2014. “Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ): Normative Data from Young, Normalhearing Listeners.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 135: 2165.
   Google Scholar
• Zeitooni, M., E. Maki-Torkko, and S. Stenfelt. 2016. “Binaural Hearing Ability with Bilateral Bone Conduction Stimulation in Subjects with Normal Hearing: Implications for Bone Conduction Hearing Aids.” Ear and Hearing 37 (6): 690–702. doi:10.1097/AUD.0000000000000336.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar