The relation of hearing-specific patient-reported outcome measures with speech perception measures and acceptable noise levels in cochlear implant users

References

• Akeroyd, M. A., F. H. Guy, D. L. Harrison, and S. L. Suller. 2014. “A Factor Analysis of the SSQ (Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing Scale).” International Journal of Audiology 53 (2): 101–114. doi:10.3109/14992027.2013.824115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, E. S., D. A. Nelson, H. Kreft, P. B. Nelson, and A. J. Oxenham. 2011. “Comparing Spatial Tuning Curves, Spectral Ripple Resolution, and Speech Perception in Cochlear Implant Users.” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 130 (1): 364–375. doi:10.1121/1.3589255.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banh, J., G. Singh, and M. K. Pichora-Fuller. 2012. “Age Affects Responses on the Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ) by Adults with Minimal Audiometric Loss.” Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 23 (2): 81–91. doi:10.3766/jaaa.23.2.2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benjamini, Y., and Y. Hochberg. 1995. “Controlling the False Discovery Rate: A Practical and Powerful Approach to Multiple Testing.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological) 57 (1): 289–300. doi:10.2307/2346101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bosman, A. J., and G. F. Smoorenburg. 1995. “Intelligibility of Dutch CVC Syllables and Sentences for Listeners with Normal Hearing and with Three Types of Hearing Impairment.” International Journal of Audiology 34 (5): 260–284. doi:10.3109/00206099509071918.
   Google Scholar
• Brand, T., and B. Kollmeier. 2002. “Efficient Adaptive Procedures for Threshold and Concurrent Slope Estimates for Psychophysics and Speech Intelligibility Tests.” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 111 (6): 2801–2810. doi:10.1121/1.1479152.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bronkhorst, A. W., A. J. Bosman, and G. F. Smoorenburg. 1993. “A Model for Context Effects in Speech Recognition.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 93 (1): 499–509. doi:10.1121/1.406844.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capretta, N. R., and A. C. Moberly. 2016. “Does Quality of Life Depend on Speech Recognition Performance for Adult Cochlear Implant Users?” The Laryngoscope 126 (3): 699–706. doi:10.1002/lary.25525.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dingemanse, J. G., and A. Goedegebure. 2015. “Application of Noise Reduction Algorithm ClearVoice in Cochlear Implant Processing: Effects on Noise Tolerance and Speech Intelligibility in Noise in Relation to Spectral Resolution.” Ear and Hearing 36 (3): 357–367. doi:10.1097/AUD.0000000000000125.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dingemanse, J. G., and A. Goedegebure. 2018. “Optimising the Effect of Noise Reduction Algorithm ClearVoice in Cochlear Implant Users by Increasing the Maximum Comfort Levels.” International Journal of Audiology 57 (3): 230–235. doi:10.1080/14992027.2017.1390267.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dingemanse, J. G., and A. Goedegebure. 2019. “The Important Role of Contextual Information in Speech Perception in Cochlear Implant Users and Its Consequences in Speech Tests.” Trends in Hearing 23: 2331216519838672. doi:10.1177/2331216519838672.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dingemanse, J. G., J. L. Vroegop, and A. Goedegebure. 2018. “Effects of a Transient Noise Reduction Algorithm on Speech Intelligibility in Noise, Noise Tolerance and Perceived Annoyance in Cochlear Implant Users.” International Journal of Audiology 57 (5): 360–369. doi:10.1080/14992027.2018.1425004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donaldson, G. S., T. H. Chisolm, G. P. Blasco, L. J. Shinnick, K. J. Ketter, and J. C. Krause. 2009. “BKB-SIN and ANL Predict Perceived Communication Ability in Cochlear Implant Users.” Ear and Hearing 30 (4): 401–410. doi:10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181a16379.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dwyer, N. Y., J. B. Firszt, and R. M. Reeder. 2014. “Effects of Unilateral Input and Mode of Hearing in the Better Ear: Self-Reported Performance Using the Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale.” Ear and Hearing 35 (1): 126–136. doi:10.1097/AUD.0b013e3182a3648b.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farinetti, A., S. Roman, J. Mancini, K. Baumstarck-Barrau, R. Meller, J. P. Lavieille, and J. M. Triglia. 2015. “Quality of Life in Bimodal Hearing Users (Unilateral Cochlear Implants and Contralateral Hearing Aids).” European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 272 (11): 3209–3215. doi:10.1007/s00405-014-3377-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuller, Christina, Rolien Free, Bert Maat, and Deniz Başkent. 2012. “Musical Background Not Associated with Self-Perceived Hearing Performance or Speech Perception in Postlingual Cochlear-Implant Users.” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 132 (2): 1009–1016. doi:10.1121/1.4730910.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gatehouse, S., and M. A. Akeroyd. 2006. “Two-Eared Listening in Dynamic Situations.” International Journal of Audiology 45 (sup1): 120–124. doi:10.1080/14992020600783103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gatehouse, S., and W. Noble. 2004. “The Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ).” International Journal of Audiology 43 (2): 85–99. doi:10.1080/14992020400050014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaylor, J. M., G. Raman, M. Chung, J. Lee, M. Rao, J. Lau, and D. S. Poe. 2013. “Cochlear Implantation in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.” JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery 139 (3): 265–272. doi:10.1001/jamaoto.2013.1744.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gifford, R. H., J. K. Shallop, and A. M. Peterson. 2008. Speech recognition materials and ceiling effects: Considerations for cochlear implant programs. Audiology and Neuro-Otology, 13 (3): 193–205. doi:10.1159/000113510.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heng, J., G. Cantarero, M. Elhilali, and C. J. Limb. 2011. “Impaired Perception of Temporal Fine Structure and Musical Timbre in Cochlear Implant Users.” Hearing Research 280 (1-2): 192–200. doi:10.1016/j.heares.2011.05.017.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heo, J. H., J. H. Lee, and W. S. Lee. 2013. “Bimodal Benefits on Objective and Subjective Outcomes for Adult Cochlear Implant Users.” Korean Journal of Audiology 17 (2): 65–73. doi:10.7874/kja.2013.17.2.65.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hinderink, J. B., P. F. Krabbe, and P. Van Den Broek. 2000. “Development and Application of a Health-Related Quality-of-Life Instrument for Adults with Cochlear Implants: The Nijmegen Cochlear Implant Questionnaire.” Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery 123 (6): 756–765. doi:S0194-5998(00)94548-0 [pii]. doi:10.1067/mhn.2000.108203.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, I. C., J. L. Lee, P. Ketheeswaran, C. M. Jones, D. A. Revicki, and A. W. Wu. 2017. “Does Personality Affect Health-Related Quality of Life? A Systematic Review.” PloS One 12 (3): e0173806. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0173806.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, E., T. Ricketts, and B. Hornsby. 2009. The effect of extending high-frequency bandwidth on the acceptable noise level (ANL) of hearing-impaired listeners. Int J Audiol 48 (6): 353–362. doi:10.1080/14992020802662964.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klop, W. M., P. P. Boermans, M. B. Ferrier, W. B. van den Hout, A. M. Stiggelbout, and J. H. Frijns. 2008. “Clinical Relevance of Quality of Life Outcome in Cochlear Implantation in Postlingually Deafened Adults.” Otology & Neurotology 29 (5): 615–621. doi:10.1097/MAO.0b013e318172cfac.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koch, X., G. Dingemanse, A. Goedegebure, and E. Janse. 2016. “Type of Speech Material Affects Acceptable Noise Level Test Outcome.” Frontiers in Psychology 7: 186. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00186.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Looi, V., M. Mackenzie, and P. Bird. 2011. “Quality-of-Life Outcomes for Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients in New Zealand.” The New Zealand Medical Journal 124 (1340): 21–34.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McRackan, T. R., M. Bauschard, J. L. Hatch, E. Franko-Tobin, H. R. Droghini, S. A. Nguyen, and J. R. Dubno. 2018a. “Meta-Analysis of Quality-of-Life Improvement after Cochlear Implantation and Associations with Speech Recognition Abilities.” The Laryngoscope 128 (4): 982–990. doi:10.1002/lary.26738.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McRackan, T. R, M. Bauschard, J. L. Hatch, E. Franko-Tobin, H. R. Droghini, C. A. Velozo, S. A. Nguyen, and J. R. Dubno. 2018b. “Meta-Analysis of Cochlear Implantation Outcomes Evaluated with General Health-Related Patient-Reported Outcome Measures.” Otology & Neurotology 39 (1): 29–36. doi:10.1097/MAO.0000000000001620.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mertens, G., A. K. Punte, and P. Van de Heyning. 2013. “Self-Assessment of Hearing Disabilities in Cochlear Implant Users Using the SSQ and the Reduced SSQ5 Version.” Otology & Neurotology 34 (9): 1622–1629. doi:10.1097/MAO.0b013e31829ce980.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moberly, A. C, M. S. Harris, L. Boyce, K. Vasil, T. Wucinich, D. B. Pisoni, J. Baxter, C. Ray, and V. Shafiro. 2018. “Relating Quality of Life to Outcomes and Predictors in Adult Cochlear Implant Users: Are We Measuring the Right Things?” The Laryngoscope 128 (4): 959–966. doi:10.1002/lary.26791.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minimum Speech Test Battery (MSTB). 2011. New Minimum Speech Test Battery for adult cochlear implant users. Retrieved from: http://www.auditorypotential.com/MSTBfiles/MSTBManual2011-06-20%20.pdf. (accessed March 2018).
   Google Scholar
• Mueller, H. G., J. Weber, and B. W. Hornsby. 2006. The effects of digital noise reduction on the acceptance of background noise. Trends Amplif, 10 (2): 83–93.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nabelek, A. K., M. C. Freyaldenhoven, J. W. Tampas, S. B. Burchfiel, and R. A. Muenchen. 2006. “Acceptable Noise Level as a Predictor of Hearing Aid Use.” Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 17 (9): 626–639. doi:10.3766/jaaa.17.9.2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nabelek, A. K., F. M. Tucker, and T. R. Letowski. 1991. “Toleration of Background Noises: Relationship with Patterns of Hearing Aid Use by Elderly Persons.” Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 34 (3): 679–685. doi:10.1044/jshr.3403.679.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, E., D. B. Shipp, J. M. Chen, J. M. Nedzelski, and V. Y. Lin. 2011. “Postlingually Deaf Adults of All Ages Derive Equal Benefits from Unilateral Multichannel Cochlear Implant.” Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 22 (10): 637–643. doi:10.3766/jaaa.22.10.2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearsons, K. S., R. L. Bennett, and S. Fidell. 1977. Speech levels in various noise environments. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Peeters, H., F. Kuk, C. C. Lau, and D. Keenan. 2009. Subjective and objective evaluation of noise management algorithms. J Am Acad Audiol, 20 (2): 89–98. doi:10.3766/jaaa.20.2.2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plyler, P. N., J. Bahng, and D. von Hapsburg. 2008. “The Acceptance of Background Noise in Adult Cochlear Implant Users.” Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 51 (2): 502–515. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2008/036).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramakers, G. G. J., Y. E. Smulders, A. van Zon, G. A. Van Zanten, W. Grolman, and I. Stegeman. 2017. “Correlation Between Subjective and Objective Hearing Tests after Unilateral and Bilateral Cochlear Implantation.” BMC Ear, Nose and Throat Disorders 17 (1): 10. doi:10.1186/s12901-017-0043-y.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Smeds, K., F. Wolters, and M. Rung. 2015. “Estimation of Signal-to-Noise Ratios in Realistic Sound Scenarios.” Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 26 (2): 183–196. doi:10.3766/jaaa.26.2.7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smits, C., and T. Houtgast. 2006. “Measurements and Calculations on the Simple Up-Down Adaptive Procedure for Speech-in-Noise Tests.” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 120 (3): 1608–1621. doi:10.1121/1.2221405.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevenson, R. A., S. W. Sheffield, I. M. Butera, R. H. Gifford, and M. T. Wallace. 2017. “Multisensory Integration in Cochlear Implant Recipients.” Ear and Hearing 38 (5): 521–538. doi:10.1097/AUD.0000000000000435.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Studebaker, G. A. 1985. “A “Rationalized” Arcsine Transform.” Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 28 (3): 455–462. doi:10.1044/jshr.2803.455.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thornton, A. R., and M. J. Raffin. 1978. “Speech-Discrimination Scores Modeled as a Binomial Variable.” Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 21 (3): 507–518. doi:10.1044/jshr.2103.507.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vermeire, K., J. P. Brokx, F. L. Wuyts, E. Cochet, A. Hofkens, and P. H. Van de Heyning. 2005. “Quality-of-Life Benefit from Cochlear Implantation in the Elderly.” Otology & Neurotology 26 (2): 188–195. doi:10.1097/00129492-200503000-00010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Versfeld, N. J., L. Daalder, J. M. Festen, and T. Houtgast. 2000. “Method for the Selection of Sentence Materials for Efficient Measurement of the Speech Reception Threshold.” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 107 (3): 1671–1684. doi:10.1121/1.428451.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vroegop, J. L., J. G. Dingemanse, M. P. van der Schroeff, R. M. Metselaar, and A. Goedegebure. 2017. “Self-Adjustment of Upper Electrical Stimulation Levels in CI Programming and the Effect on Auditory Functioning.” Ear and Hearing 38 (4): e232–e240. doi:10.1097/AUD.0000000000000404.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Won, J. H., W. R. Drennan, and J. T. Rubinstein. 2007. “Spectral-Ripple Resolution Correlates with Speech Reception in Noise in Cochlear Implant Users.” Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology 8 (3): 384–392. doi:10.1007/s10162-007-0085-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, J., R. Tyler, H. Ji, C. Dunn, N. Wang, M. Hansen, and B. Gantz. 2015. “Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ) and Spatial Hearing Questionnaire (SHQ) Changes over Time in Adults with Simultaneous Cochlear Implants.” American Journal of Audiology 24 (3): 384–397. doi:10.1044/2015_AJA-14-0074.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar