Design and evaluation of the effectiveness of a corpus of congruent and incongruent English sentences for the study of event related potentials

References

• Block, C. K., and C. L. Baldwin. 2010. “Cloze Probability and Completion Norms for 498 Sentences: Behavioral and Neural Validation Using Event-Related Potentials.” Behavior Research Methods 42 (3): 665–670. doi:10.3758/BRM.42.3.665.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloom, P. A., and I. Fischler. 1980. “Completion Norms for 329 Sentence Contexts.” Memory & Cognition 8 (6): 631–642. doi:10.3758/BF03213783.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boersma, P. 2001. “Praat, a System for Doing Phonetics by Computer.” Glot International 5: 341–345. https://www.fon.hum.uva.nl/paul/chrono.html
   Google Scholar
• Boersma, P., and D. Weenink. 2016. Praat: Doing Phonetics by Computer [Computer Program]. Version 6.0.19, retrieved 13 June 2016 from http://www.praat.org/
   Google Scholar
• Bradshaw, J. L. 1984. “A Guide to Norms, Ratings, and Lists.” Memory & Cognition 12 (2): 202–206. doi:10.3758/BF03198435.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, C., and P. J. Hagoort. 1993. “The Processing Nature of the N400: Evidence from Masked Priming.” Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 5 (1): 34–44. doi:10.1162/jocn.1993.5.1.34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boudewyn, M. A., P. C. Gordon, D. Long, L. Polse, and T. Y. Swaab. 2012. “Does Discourse Congruence Influence Spoken Language Comprehension before Lexical Association? Evidence from Event-Related Potentials.” Language and Cognitive Processes 27 (5): 698–733. doi:10.1080/01690965.2011.577980.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cruse, D., S. Beukema, S. Chennu, J. G. Malins, A. M. Owen, and K. McRae. 2014. “The Reliability of the N400 in Single Subjects: Implications for Patients with Disorders of Consciousness.” NeuroImage. Clinical 4: 788–799. doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2014.05.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daltrozzo, J., N. Wioland, and B. Kotchoubey. 2007. “Sex Differences in Two Event-Related Potentials Components Related to Semantic Priming.” Archives of Sexual Behavior 36 (4): 555–568. doi:10.1007/s10508-006-9161-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillon, H. 2012. Hearing Aids. New York: Thieme Publishers, p. 608.
   Google Scholar
• Dimitrova, D. V., L. A. Stowe, G. Redeker, and J. C. Hoeks. 2012. “Less is Not More: Neural Responses to Missing and Superfluous Accents in Context.” Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 24 (12): 2400–2418. doi:10.1162/jocn_a_00302.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan, C. C., R. J. Barry, J. F. Connolly, C. Fischer, P. T. Michie, R. Näätänen, J. Polich, I. Reinvang, and C. Van Petten. 2009. “Event-Related Potentials in Clinical Research: Guidelines for Eliciting, Recording, and Quantifying Mismatch Negativity, P300, and N400.” Clinical Neurophysiology: Official Journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology 120 (11): 1883–1908. doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2009.07.045.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Federmeier, K. D. 2007. “Thinking Ahead: The Role and Roots of Prediction in Language Comprehension.” Psychophysiology 44 (4): 491–505. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.2007.00531.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Federmeier, K. D., C. Van Petten, T. J. Schwartz, and M. Kutas. 2003. “Sounds, Words, Sentences: age-Related Changes across Levels of Language Processing.” Psychology and Aging 18 (4): 858–872. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.18.4.858.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Federmeier, K. D., E. W. Wlotko, E. de Ochoa-Dewald, and M. Kutas. 2007. “Multiple Effects of Sentential Constraint on Word Processing.” Brain Research 1146: 75–84. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2006.06.101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gitelman, D. R., A. C. Nobre, S. Sonty, T. B. Parrish, and M. M. Mesulam. 2005. “Language Network Specializations: An Analysis with Parallel Task Designs and Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging.” Neuroimage 26 (4): 975–985. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.03.014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grieder, M., R. M. Crinelli, T. Koenig, L.-O. Wahlund, T. Dierks, and M. Wirth. 2012. “Electrophysiological and Behavioral Correlates of Stable Automatic Semantic Retrieval in Aging.” Neuropsychologia 50 (1): 160–171. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.11.014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagoort, P. 2008. “The Fractionation of Spoken Language Understanding by Measuring Electrical and Magnetic Brain Signals.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences 363 (1493): 1055–1069. doi:10.1098/rstb.2007.2159.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagoort, P., and C. M. Brown. 2000. “ERP Effects of Listening to Speech: Semantic ERP Effects.” Neuropsychologia 38 (11): 1518–1530. doi:10.1016/S0028-3932(00)00052-X.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hickok, G., and D. Poeppel. 2004. “Dorsal and Ventral Streams: A Framework for Understanding Aspects of the Functional Anatomy of Language.” Cognition 92 (1–2): 67–99. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2003.10.011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hickok, G., and D. Poeppel. 2007. “The Cortical Organization of Speech Processing.” Nature Reviews. Neuroscience 8 (5): 393–402. doi:10.1038/nrn2113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holt, R., C. Kung, and K. Demuth. 2018. “Listener Characteristics Modulate the Semantic Processing of Native vs. foreign-Accented Speech.” PLoS One 13 (12): e0207452. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0207452.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jerger, J., and J. Martin. 2005. “Some Effects of Aging on Event-Related Potentials during a Linguistic Monitoring Task.” International Journal of Audiology 44 (6): 321–330. doi:10.1080/14992020500146450.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klem, G. H., H. O. Lüders, H. H. Jasper, and C. Elger. 1999. “The Ten-Twenty Electrode System of the International Federation. The International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology.” Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 52: 3–6. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10590970/
   Google Scholar
• Katz, J. 2014. Handbook of Clinical Audiology, edited by Marshall Chasin, Kristina English, Linda J. Hood, and Kim L. Tillery, 927. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer Health.
   Google Scholar
• Komes, J., S. R. Schweinberger, and H. Wiese. 2014. “Fluency Affects Source Memory for Familiar Names in Younger and Older Adults: Evidence from Event-Related Brain Potentials.” NeuroImage 92, (C): 90–105. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.02.009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kutas, M. 1993. “In the Company of Other Words: Electrophysiological Evidence for Single-Word and Sentence Context Effects.” Language and Cognitive Processes 8 (4): 533–572. doi:10.1080/01690969308407587.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kutas, M., and K. D. Federmeier. 2000. “Electrophysiology Reveals Semantic Memory Use in Language Comprehension.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 4 (12): 463–470. doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01560-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kutas, M., and S. A. Hillyard. 1980. “Reading Senseless Sentences: Brain Potentials Reflect Semantic Incongruity.” Science 207 (4427): 203–205. doi:10.1126/science.7350657.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kutas, M., and S. A. Hillyard. 1984. “Brain Potentials during Reading Reflect Word Expectancy and Semantic Association.” Nature 307 (5947): 161–163. doi:10.1038/307161a0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lau, E. F., C. Phillips, and D. Poeppel. 2008. “A Cortical Network for Semantics: (De)Constructing the N400.” Nature Reviews Neuroscience 9 (12): 920–933. doi:10.1038/nrn2532.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Litcofsky, K. A., and J. G. Van Hell. 2017. “Switching Direction Affects Switching Costs: Behavioral, ERP and Time-Frequency Analyses of Intra-Sentential Codeswitching.” Neuropsychologia 97: 112–139. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.02.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, A. 2007. “The Representation of Object Concepts in the Brain.” Annual Review of Psychology 58: 25–45. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190143.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsumoto, A., T. Iidaka, K. Haneda, T. Okada, and N. Sadato. 2005. “Linking Semantic Priming Effect in Functional MRI and Event-Related Potentials.” Neuroimage 24 (3): 624–634. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.09.008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meulman, N., L. A. Stowe, S. A. Sprenger, M. Bresser, and M. S. Schmid. 2014. “An ERP Study on L2 Syntax Processing: When Do Learners Fail?.” Frontiers in Psychology 5: 1072–1117. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01072.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monsell, S., M. C. Doyle, and P. N. Haggard. 1989. “Effects of Frequency on Visual Word Recognition tasks – Where Are They.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 118 (1): 43–71. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.118.1.43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, B. C. J., S. Creeke, B. R. Glasberg, M. A. Stone, and A. Sek. 2012. “A Version of the TEN Test for Use with ER-3A Insert Earphones.” Ear and Hearing 33 (4): 554–557. doi:10.1097/AUD.0b013e31824b9e43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohala, J. J. 1988. “The Phonetics and Phonology of Aspects of Assimilation.” In Papers in Laboratory Phonology I – between the Grammar and Physics of Speech, edited by Kingston, J., Beckman, M.E., 258–275. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oostenveld, R., P. Fries, E. Maris, and J. M. Schoffelen. 2011. “FieldTrip: Open Source Software for Advanced Analysis of MEG, EEG, and Invasive Electrophysiological Data.” Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience 2011: 156869. doi:10.1155/2011/156869.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osterhout, L., and J. Nicol. 1999. “On the Distinctiveness, Independence, and Time Course of the Brain Responses to Syntactic and Semantic Anomalies.” Language and Cognitive Processes 14 (3): 283–317. doi:10.1080/016909699386310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osterhout, L., and P. J. Holcomb. 1992. “Event-Related Brain Potentials Elicited by Syntactic Anomaly.” Journal of Memory and Language 31 (6): 785–806. doi:10.1016/0749-596X(92)90039-Z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Proverbio, A. M., F. Riva, and A. Zani. 2010. “When Neurons Do Not Mirror the agent’s intentions: sex differences in neural coding of goal-directed actions.” Neuropsychologia 48 (5): 1454–1463. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.01.015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romei, L., I. J. A. Wambacq, J. Besing, J. Koehnke, and J. Jerger. 2011. “Neural Indices of Spoken Word Processing in Background Multi-Talker Babble.” International Journal of Audiology 50 (5): 321–333. doi:10.3109/14992027.2010.547875.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steffensen, S. C., A. J. Ohran, D. N. Shipp, K. Hales, S. H. Stobbs, and D. E. Fleming. 2008. “Gender-Selective Effects of the P300 and N400 Components of the Visual Evoked Potential.” Vision Research 48 (7): 917–925. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2008.01.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinhauer, K., S. H. Abada, E. Pauker, I. Itzhak, and S. R. Baum. 2010. “Prosody-Syntax Interactions in Aging: Event-Related Potentials Reveal Dissociations between on-Line and off-Line Measures.” Neuroscience Letters 472 (2): 133–138. doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2010.01.072.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swaab, T. Y., K. Ledoux, C. C. Camblin, and M. A. Boudewyn. 2011. “Language-Related ERP Components.” In The Oxford Handbook of Event-Related Potential Components, edited by Kappenman, E.S., Luck, S.J., 49. Oxford, UK: Oxford Handbooks Online.
   Google Scholar
• Thornton, A. R. D. 2007. “Instrumentation and Recording Parameters.” In Auditory Evoked Potentials: Basic Principles and Clinical Application, edited by Burkard, R., Don, M., Eggermont, J. , 73–101. Baltimore, MD: Lippincott William & Wilkins.
   Google Scholar
• Titone, D. A., and D. F. Salisbury. 2004. “Contextual Modulation of N400 Amplitude to Lexically Ambiguous Words.” Brain and Cognition 55 (3): 470–478. doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2004.02.073.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsolaki, A., V. Kosmidou, L. Hadjileontiadis, I. Y. Kompatsiaris, and M. Tsolaki. 2015. “Brain Source Localization of MMN, P300 and N400: Aging and Gender Differences.” Brain Research 1603: 32–49. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2014.10.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Heuven, W. J. B., P. Mandera, E. Keuleers, and M. Brysbaert. 2014. “SUBTLEX-UK: A New and Improved Word Frequency Database for British English.” Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (2006) 67 (6): 1176–1190. doi:10.1080/17470218.2013.850521.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Petten, C., and B. J. Luka. 2006. “Neural Localization of Semantic Context Effects in Electromagnetic and Hemodynamic studies.” Brain and Language 97 (3): 279–293. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2005.11.003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Petten, C., and B. J. Luka. 2012. “Prediction during Language Comprehension: Benefits, Costs, and ERP Components.” International Journal of Psychophysiology: Official Journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology 83 (2): 176–190. doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2011.09.015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valderrama, J. T., A. de la Torre, and B. Van Dun. 2018. “An Automatic Algorithm for Blink-Artifact Suppression Based on Iterative Template Matching: Application to Single Channel Recording of Cortical Auditory Evoked Potentials.” Journal of Neural Engineering 15 (1): 016008. doi:10.1088/1741-2552/aa8d95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, A. J., L. Yang, and B. J. Dyson. 2013. “Modulating Younger and Older adults’ performance in ignoring pictorial information during a word matching task.” Brain Cogn 83 (3): 351–359. doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2013.10.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wirth, M., H. Horn, T. Koenig, M. Stein, A. Federspiel, B. Meier, C. M. Michel, and W. Strik. 2007. “Sex Differences in Semantic Processing: Event-Related Brain Potentials Distinguish Between Lower and Higher Order Semantic Analysis During Word Reading.” Cerebral Cortex 17 (9): 1987–1997. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhl121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zipf, G. K. 1949. Human Behaviour and the Principle of Least Effort, 573. Oxford, England: Addison-Wesley Press.
   Google Scholar