Evaluation of a synthetic version of the digits-in-noise test and its characteristics in CI recipients

References

• Akeroyd, M. A., S. Arlinger, R. A. Bentler, A. Boothroyd, N. Dillier, W. A. Dreschler, J.-P. Gagné, International Collegium of Rehabilitative Audiology (ICRA) recommendations for the construction of multilingual speech tests, et al. 2015. “International Collegium of Rehabilitative Audiology (ICRA) Recommendations for the Construction of Multilingual Speech Tests. ICRA Working Group on Multilingual Speech Tests.” International Journal of Audiology 54(Suppl 2): 17–22. doi:https://doi.org/10.3109/14992027.2015.1030513.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bland, J. M., and D. G. Altman. 2010. “Statistical Methods for Assessing Agreement Between Two Methods of Clinical Measurement.” International Journal of Nursing Studies 47 (8): 931–936. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.10.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busch, T., F. Vanpoucke, and A. van Wieringen. 2017. “Auditory Environment Across the Life Span of Cochlear Implan Users: Insights from Data Logging.” JSLHR 60: 1362–1377.
   Google Scholar
• Buschermöhle, M., K. Wagener, D. Berg, M. Meis, and B. Kollmeier. 2014. “The German Digit Triplets Test (Part I): Implementations for Telephone, Internet and Mobile Devices.” Z Audiol 53 (4): 139–145.
   Google Scholar
• Cullington, H. E., and T. Aidi. 2017. “Is the Digit Triplet Test an Effective and Acceptable Way to Assess Speech Recognition in Adults Using Cochlear Implants in a Home Environment?” Cochlear Implants International 18 (2): 97–105. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14670100.2016.1273435.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• de Graaff, F., E. Huysmans, B. Philips, P. Merkus, S. T. Goverts, S. E. Kramer, C. Smits, et al. 2019. “Our Experience with Home Self-Assessment of Speech Recognition in the Care Pathway of 10 Newly Implanted Adult Cochlear Implant Users.” Clinical Otolaryngology : Official Journal of ENT-UK; Official Journal of Netherlands Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology & Cervico-Facial Surgery 44 (3): 446–451. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/coa.13307.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deuflhard, P., and A. Hohmann. 2002. Numerische Mathematik I. Eine Algorithmisch Orientierte Einführung. 3. überarbeitete Und Erweiterte Auflage. De Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• DIN EN ISO 8253-3:2012-08 Acoustics – audiometric test methods – part 3: speech audiometry (ISO 8253-3:2012); German version EN ISO 8253-3:2012. Beuth Verlag GmbH.
   Google Scholar
• Hagerman, B. 1982. “Sentences for Testing Speech Intelligibility in Noise.” Scandinavian Audiology 11 (2): 79–87. doi:https://doi.org/10.3109/01050398209076203.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hahlbrock, K. H. 1957. Sprachaudiometrie: Grundlagen Und Praktische Anwendung Einer Sprachaudiometrie Für Das Deutsche Sprachgebiet. Thieme.
   Google Scholar
• Hey, M., T. Hocke, and P. Ambrosch. 2018. “Speech Audiometry and Data Logging in CI Patients: Implications for Adequate Test Levels.” HNO 66 (Suppl 1): 22–27. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00106-017-0419-8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hey, M., T. Hocke, J. Hedderich, and J. Müller-Deile. 2014. “Investigation of a Matrix Sentence Test in Noise: Reproducibility and Discrimination Function in Cochlear Implant Patients.” International Journal of Audiology 53 (12): 895–902. doi:https://doi.org/10.3109/14992027.2014.938368.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hochmair-Desoyer, I., E. Schulz, L. Moser, and M. Schmidt. 1997. “The HSM Sentence Test as a Tool for Evaluating the Speech Understanding in Noise of Cochlear Implant Users.” The American Journal of Otology 18 (6 Suppl): S83.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hoppe, U., T. Hocke, and F. Digeser. 2018. “Bimodal Benefit for Cochlear Implant Listeners with Different Grades of Hearing Loss in the Opposite Ear.” Acta Oto-Laryngologica 138 (8): 713–721. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00016489.2018.1444281.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoppe, U., T. Hocke, A. Hast, and H. Iro. 2019. “Maximum Preimplantation Monosyllabic Score as Predictor of Cochlear Implant Outcome.” HNO 67 (Suppl 2): 62–68. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00106-019-0648-0.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kollmeier, B., and M. Wesselkamp. 1997. “Development and Evaluation of a German Sentence Test for Objective and Subjective Speech Intelligibility Assessment.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 102 (4): 2412–2421. doi:https://doi.org/10.1121/1.419624.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller-Deile, J., T. Kortmann, U. Hoppe, H. Hessel, and A. Morsnowski. 2009. “Improving Speech Comprehension Using a New Cochlear Implant Speech Processor.” HNO 57 (6): 567–574. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00106-008-1781-3.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Oberhoffner, T., U. Hoppe, M. Hey, D. Hecker, H. Bagus, P. Voigt, S. Schicktanz, A. Braun, and T. Hocke. 2018. “Multicentric Analysis of the Use Behavior of Cochlear Implant Users.” Laryngo-Rhino-Otologie 97 (5): 313–320. doi:https://doi.org/10.1055/a-0574-2569.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Philips, B., C. Smits, P. J. Govaerts, I. Doorn, and F. Vanpoucke. 2018. “Empowering Senior Cochlear Implant Users at Home via a Tablet Computer Application.” American Journal of Audiology 27 (3S): 417–430. doi:https://doi.org/10.1044/2018_AJA-IMIA3-18-0014.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schmidt, M., I. Hochmair-Desoyer, E. Schulz, and L. Moser. 1997. “Der HSM-Satztest. Fortschritte Der Akustik.” DAGA 97: 93–94.
   Google Scholar
• Smits, C. 2016. “Comment on ‘International Collegium of Rehabilitative Audiology (ICRA) Recommendations for the Construction of Multilingual Speech Tests’, by Akeroyd et al.” International Journal of Audiology 55 (4): 268–269. doi:https://doi.org/10.3109/14992027.2015.1131339.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smits, C., S. T. Goverts, and J. M. Festen. 2013. “The Digits-in-Noise Test: assessing Auditory Speech Recognition Abilities in Noise.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 133 (3): 1693–1706. doi:https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4789933.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smits, C., T. S. Kapteyn, and T. Houtgast. 2004. “Development and Validation of an Automatic Speech-in-Noise Screening Test by Telephone.” International Journal of Audiology 43 (1): 15–28. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14992020400050004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steffens, T., and M. Hacker. 2010. “Paediatric Cochlear Implantation Criteria Based in Speech Reception in Noise.” Cochlear Implants Int 1: 217–220.
   Google Scholar
• Wagener, K. C., V. Kühnel, and B. Kollmeier. 1999. “Entwicklung Und Evaluation Eines Satztests Für Die Deutsche Sprache III: Evaluation Des Oldenburger Satztests.” Z Audiol 3 (38): 86–95.
   Google Scholar
• Wesarg, T., B. Voss, F. Hassepass, R. Beck, A. Aschendorff, R. Laszig, and S. Arndt. 2018. “Speech Perception in Quiet and Noise with an off the Ear CI Processor Enabling Adaptive Microphone Directionality.” Otology & Neurotology : Official Publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology 39 (4): e240–e249. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000001749.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wimmer, W., M. Caversaccio, and M. Kompis. 2015. “Speech Intelligibility in Noise with a Single-Unit Cochlear Implant Audio Processor.” Otology and Neurotology 36 (7): 1197–1202. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000000775
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar