References
- Aimoni, C., A. Ciorba, S. Hatzopoulos, G. Ramacciotti, M. Mazzoli, C. Bianchini, M. Rosignoli, H. Skarżyński, and P. H. Skarżyński. 2016. “Cochlear Implants in Subjects over Age 65: Quality of Life and Audiological Outcomes.” Medical Science Monitor : International Medical Journal of Experimental and Clinical Research 22: 3035–3042. doi:https://doi.org/10.12659/msm.896869.
- Başkent, D. 2010. “Phonemic Restoration in Sensorineural Hearing Loss Does Not Depend on Baseline Speech Perception Scores.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 128 (4): EL169–174. doi:https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3475794.
- Benatti, A., S. Montino, L. Girasoli, P. Trevisi, and R. Bovo. 2013. “Cochlear Implantation in the Elderly: Surgical and Hearing Outcomes.” BMC Surgery 13 (Suppl 2): S1.
- Beyea, J. A., K. P. McMullen, M. S. Harris, D. M. Houston, J. M. Martin, V. A. Bolster, O. F. Adunka, et al. 2016. “Cochlear Implants in Adults: Effects of Age and Duration of Deafness on Speech Recognition.” Otology & Neurotology : Official Publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology 37 (9): 1238–1245. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000001162.
- Boyle, P. J., T. B. Nunn, A. F. O'Connor, and B. C. J. Moore. 2013. “STARR: A Speech Test for Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Auditory Prostheses under Realistic Conditions.” Ear and Hearing 34 (2): 203–212. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0b013e31826a8e82.
- Ching, T. Y., M. Hill, and H. Dillon. 2004. “Fitting and Evaluating a Hearing Aid for Recipients of Unilateral Cochlear Implants: The NAL Approach. Part 1.” Hearing Review 11: 14–22.
- Ching, T. Y. C., P. Incerti, M. Hill, and E. van Wanrooy. 2006. “An Overview of Binaural Advantages for Children and Adults Who Use Binaural/Bimodal Hearing Devices.” Audiology and Neurotology 11 (1): 6–11. doi:https://doi.org/10.1159/000095607.
- Claes, A. J., P. Van de Heyning, A. Gilles, A. Hofkens-Van den Brandt, V. Van Rompaey, and G. Mertens. 2018. “Impaired Cognitive Functioning in Cochlear Implant Recipients over the Age of 55 Years: A Cross-Sectional Study Using the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status for Hearing-Impaired Individuals (RBANS-H.” Frontiers in Neuroscience 12: 580. doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2018.00580.
- Cullington, H. E., and F. G. Zeng. 2011. “Comparison of Bimodal and Bilateral Cochlear Implant Users on Speech Recognition with Competing Talker, Music Perception, Affective Prosody Discrimination, and Talker Identification.” Ear and Hearing 32 (1): 16–30. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181edfbd2.
- Cutugno, F., S. Prosser, and M. Turrini. 2000. Audiometria Vocale. Vol. I. Padova, Italy: GN ReSound Italia.
- De Seta, D., Y. Nguyen, A. Vanier, E. Ferrary, J. -P. Bebear, B. Godey, A. Robier, et al. 2016. “Five-Year Hearing Outcomes in Bilateral Simultaneously Cochlear-Implanted Adult Patients.” Audiology and Neurotology 21 (4): 261–267. doi:https://doi.org/10.1159/000448582.
- Devocht, E. M. J., A. M. L. Janssen, J. Chalupper, R. J. Stokroos, and E. L. J. George. 2017. “The Benefits of Bimodal Aiding on Extended Dimensions of Speech Perception: Intelligibility, Listening Effort, and Sound Quality.” Trends in Hearing 21: 2331216517727900. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/2331216517727900.
- Dincer D’Alessandro, H., D. Ballantyne, P. J. Boyle, E. De Seta, M. DeVincentiis, and P. Mancini. 2018a. “Temporal Fine Structure Processing, Pitch, and Speech Perception in Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients.” Ear and Hearing 39: 679–686. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0000000000000525.
- Dincer D’Alessandro, H., D. Ballantyne, E. De Seta, A. Musacchio, and P. Mancini. 2016. “Adaptation of the STARR Test for Adult Italian Population: A Speech Test for a Realistic Estimate in Real-Life Listening Conditions.” International Journal of Audiology 55 (4): 262–267. doi:https://doi.org/10.3109/14992027.2015.1124296.
- Dincer D’Alessandro, H., P. J. Boyle, D. Ballantyne, M. De Vincentiis, and P. Mancini. 2018b. “The Role of Speech Rate for Italian-Speaking Cochlear Implant Users: Insights for Everyday Speech Perception.” International Journal of Audiology 57 (11): 851–857. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14992027.2018.1498139.
- Dincer D’Alessandro, H., and P. Mancini. 2019. “Perception of Lexical Stress Cued by Low-Frequency Pitch and Insights into Speech Perception in Noise for Cochlear Implant Users and Normal Hearing Adults.” European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 276 (10): 2673–2680. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-019-05502-9.
- Dincer D’Alessandro, H., G. Sennaroğlu, E. Yücel, E. Belgin, and P. Mancini. 2015. “Binaural Squelch and Head Shadow Effects in Children with Unilateral Cochlear Implants and Contralateral Hearing Aids.” Acta Otorhinolaryngologica Italica : Organo Ufficiale Della Società Italiana di Otorinolaringologia e Chirurgia Cervico-Facciale 35: 343–349.
- Dorman, M. F., and R. H. Gifford. 2017. “Speech Understanding in Complex Listening Environments by Listeners Fit with Cochlear Implants.” Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research : JSLHR 60 (10): 3019–3026. doi:https://doi.org/10.1044/2017_JSLHR-H-17-0035.
- Firszt, J. B., R. M. Reeder, L. K. Holden, and N. Y. Dwyer, Asymmetric Hearing Study Team. 2018. “Results in Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients with Varied Asymmetric Hearing: A Prospective Longitudinal Study of Speech Recognition, Localization, and Participant Report.” Ear and Hearing 39 (5): 845–862. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0000000000000548.
- Francart, T., J. Brokx, and J. Wouters. 2009. “Sensitivity to Interaural Time Differences with Combined Cochlear Implant and Acoustic Stimulation.” Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO 10 (1): 131–141. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10162-008-0145-8.
- Friedland, D. R., C. Runge-Samuelson, H. Baig, and J. Jensen. 2010. “ Case-Control Analysis of Cochlear Implant Performance in Elderly Patients.” Archives of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery 136 (5): 432–438. doi:https://doi.org/10.1001/archoto.2010.57.
- Gallo, S., and A. Castiglione. 2019. “The Signal-to-Noise Ratio Assessment in Cochlear Implanted Patients Through the Italian Matrix Sentence Test (Oldenburg Test).” Hearing Balance and Communication 17 (2): 145–148. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/21695717.2019.1603949.
- Gordon-Salant, S., and S. S. Cole. 2016. “Effects of Age and Working Memory Capacity on Speech Recognition Performance in Noise among Listeners with Normal Hearing.” Ear and Hearing 37 (5): 593–602. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0000000000000316.
- He, N., J. R. Dubno, and J. H. Mills. 1998. “Frequency and Intensity Discrimination Measured in a Maximum-Likelihood Procedure from Young and Aged Normal-Hearing Subjects.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 103 (1): 553–565. doi:https://doi.org/10.1121/1.421127.
- Heinrich, A., H. Henshaw, and M. A. Ferguson. 2015. “The Relationship of Speech Intelligibility with Hearing Sensitivity, Cognition, and Perceived Hearing Difficulties Varies for Different Speech Perception Tests.” Frontiers in Psychology 6: 782.
- Heydebrand, G., S. Hale, L. Potts, B. Gotter, and M. Skinner. 2007. “Cognitive Predictors of Improvements in Adults' Spoken Word Recognition Six Months After Cochlear Implant Activation.” Audiology & Neuro-Otology 12 (4): 254–264. doi:https://doi.org/10.1159/000101473.
- Hoppe, U., T. Hocke, and F. Digeser. 2018. “Bimodal Benefit for Cochlear Implant Listeners with Different Grades of Hearing Loss in the Opposite Ear.” Acta Oto-Laryngologica 138 (8): 713–721. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00016489.2018.1444281.
- Hua, H.,. B. Johansson, L. Magnusson, B. Lyxell, and R. J. Ellis. 2017. “Speech Recognition and Cognitive Skills in Bimodal Cochlear Implant Users.” Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research : JSLHR 60 (9): 2752–2763. doi:https://doi.org/10.1044/2017_JSLHR-H-16-0276.
- Humes, L. E. 2005. “Do ‘auditory processing’ tests measure auditory processing in the elderly?” Ear and Hearing 26: 109–119.
- Illg, A., M. Bojanowicz, and A. Lesinski-Schiedat. 2014. “Evaluation of the Bimodal Benefit in a Large Cohort of Cochlear Implant Subjects Using a Contralateral Hearing Aid.” Otology & Neurotology : Official Publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology 35: e240–e244. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000000529.
- Kollmeier, B., A. Warzybok, S. Hochmuth, M. A. Zokoll, V. Uslar, T. Brand, and K. C. Wagener. 2015. “The Multilingual Matrix Test: Principles, Applications, and Comparison Across Languages: A Review.” International Journal of Audiology 54 (sup2): 3–16. doi:https://doi.org/10.3109/14992027.2015.1020971.
- Lazard, D. S., C. Vincent, F. Venail, P. V. Van de Heyning, E. Truy, O. Sterkers, H. Skarzynski, et al. 2012. “Pre-, per- and Postoperative Factors Affecting Performance of Postlinguistically Deaf Adults Using Cochlear Implants: A New Conceptual Model over time.” PLoS One 7 (11): e48739 doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0048739.
- Luntz, M., N. Yehudai, and T. Shpak. 2007. “Hearing Progress and Fluctuations in Bimodal-Binaural Hearing Users (Unilateral Cochlear Implants and Contralateral Hearing Aid).” Acta oto-laryngologica 127 (10): 1045–1050. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00016480601158740.
- Magni, E., G. Binetti, A. Bianchetti, R. Rozzini, and M. Trabucchi. 1996. “Mini-Mental State Examination: A Normative Study in Italian Elderly Population.” European Journal of Neurology 3 (3): 198–202. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-1331.1996.tb00423.x.
- Mahmoud, A. F., and M. J. Ruckenstein. 2014. “Speech Perception Performance as a Function of Age at Implantation among Postlingually Deaf Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients.” Otology & Neurotology : Official Publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology 35 (10): e286–e291. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000000581.
- McKay, M. C. 2018. “Brain Plasticity and Rehabilitation with a Cochlear Implant.” Advances in Hearing Rehabilitation 81: 57–65. doi:https://doi.org/10.1159/000485586.
- Moore, B. C. J. 2014. “Effects of Age and Hearing Loss on the Processing of Auditory Temporal Fine Structure.” In Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology. Volume 894. Physiology, Psychoacoustics and Cognition in Normal and Impaired Hearing, edited by P. van Dijk, D. Başkent, E. Gaudrain, E. de Kleine, A. Wagner, C. Lanting, 1–8. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing AG.
- Mosnier, I., J. P. Bebear, M. Marx, B. Fraysse, E. Truy, G. Lina-Granade, M. Mondain, et al. 2014. “Predictive Factors of Cochlear Implant Outcomes in the Elderly.” Audiology and Neurotology 19 (1): 15–20. doi:https://doi.org/10.1159/000371599.
- Neher, T., T. Behrens, S. Carlile, C. Jin, L. Kragelund, A. S. Petersen, and A. van Schaik. 2009. “Benefit from Spatial Separation of Multiple Talkers in Bilateral Hearing-Aid Users: Effects of Hearing Loss, Age, and Cognition.” International Journal of Audiology 48 (11): 758–774. Novdoi:https://doi.org/10.3109/14992020903079332.
- Neuman, A. C., and M. A. Svirsky. 2013. “Effect of Hearing Aid Bandwidth on Speech Recognition Performance of Listeners Using a Cochlear Implant and Contralateral Hearing Aid (Bimodal Hearing).” Ear and Hearing 34 (5): 553–561. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0b013e31828e86e8.
- Pearsons, K. S., R. L. Bennett, and S. Fidell. 1976. Speech Levels in Various Environments. Bolt, Beranek and Newman. Report No. 3281. Washington, DC: EPA.
- Plomp, R., and A. M. Mimpen. 1979. “Improving the Reliability of Testing the Speech Reception Threshold for Sentences.” Audiology : Official Organ of the International Society of Audiology 18 (1): 43–52. doi:https://doi.org/10.3109/00206097909072618.
- Potts, L. G., M. W. Skinner, R. A. Litovsky, M. J. Strube, and F. Kuk. 2009. “Recognition and Localization of Speech by Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients Wearing a Digital Hearing Aid in the Nonimplanted Ear (Bimodal Hearing).” Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 20 (6): 353–373. doi:https://doi.org/10.3766/jaaa.20.6.4.
- Puglisi, G. E., A. Warzybok, S. Hochmuth, C. Visentin, A. Astolfi, N. Prodi, and B. Kollmeier. 2015. “An Italian Matrix Sentence Test for the Evaluation of Speech Intelligibility in Noise.” International Journal of Audiology 54 (sup2): 44–50. doi:https://doi.org/10.3109/14992027.2015.1061709.
- Roberts, D. S., H. W. Lin, B. S. Herrmann, and D. J. Lee. 2013. “Differential Cochlear Implant Outcomes in Older Adults.” The Laryngoscope 123 (8): 1952–1956. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.23676.
- Rohloff, K., M. Koopmann, D. Wei, C. Rudack, and E. Savvas. 2017. “Cochlear Implantation in the Elderly: Does Age Matter?” Otology & Neurotology : Official Publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology 38 (1): 54–59. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000001262.
- Rosenthal, R. 1994. “Parametric Measures of Effect Size.” In The Handbook of Research Synthesis, edited by H. Cooper, L. V. Hedges, 231–244. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
- Saija, J. D., E. G. Akyürek, T. C. Andringa, and D. Başkent. 2014. “Perceptual Restoration of Degraded Speech Is Preserved with Advancing Age.” Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO 15 (1): 139–148. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10162-013-0422-z.
- Sheffield, S. W., and R. H. Gifford. 2014. “The Benefits of Bimodal Hearing: Effect of Frequency Region and Acoustic Bandwidth.” Audiology and Neurotology 19 (3): 151–163. doi:https://doi.org/10.1159/000357588.
- Simpson, A., H. J. McDermott, and R. C. Dowell. 2005. “Benefits of Audibility for Listeners with Severe High-Frequency Hearing Loss.” Hearing Research 210 (1-2): 42–52. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heares.2005.07.001.
- Studebaker, G. A. 1985. “A "Rationalized" Arcsine Transform.” Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 28 (3): 455–462. doi:https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.2803.455.
- Turrini, M., F. Cutugno, P. Maturi, S. Prosser, F. A. Leoni, and E. Arslan. 1993. Bisyllabic words for speech audiometry: a new italian material. Acta Otorhinolaryngologica Italica : Organo Ufficiale Della Società Italiana di Otorinolaringologia e Chirurgia Cervico-Facciale 13: 63–77.
- Vaerenberg, B. 1., P. J. Govaerts, G. de Ceulaer, K. Daemers, and K. Schauwers. 2011. “Experiences of the Use of FOX, an Intelligent Agent, for Programming Cochlear Implant Sound Processors in New Users.” International Journal of Audiology 50 (1): 50–58. doi:https://doi.org/10.3109/14992027.2010.531294.
- Van Rooij, J. C., and R. Plomp. 1990. “Auditive and Cognitive Factors in Speech Perception by Elderly Listeners.” Acta Oto-Laryngologica. Supplementum 476: 177–181. doi:https://doi.org/10.3109/00016489109127275.
- van Wieringen, A., and J. Wouters. 2008. “LIST and LINT: sentences and Numbers for Quantifying Speech Understanding in Severely Impaired Listeners for Flanders and The Netherlands.” International Journal of Audiology 47 (6): 348–355. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14992020801895144.
- Weatherby, A., K. R. Henshall, and C. M. McKay. 2003. “The Effects of Frequency Response on Speech Perception for Cochlear Implant Users.” Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 14 (10): 582–591. doi:https://doi.org/10.3766/jaaa.14.10.7.
- Yang, Z., and M. Cosetti. 2016. “Safety and Outcomes of Cochlear Implantation in the Elderly: A Review of Recent Literature.” Journal of Otology 11 (1): 1–6. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joto.2016.03.004.
- Zwolan, T. A., K. Henion, P. Segel, and C. Runge. 2014. “The Role of Age on Cochlear Implant Performance, Use, and Health Utility: A Multicenter Clinical Trial.” Otology & Neurotology : Official Publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology 35 (9): 1560–1568. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000000583.