Financial reward has differential effects on behavioural and self-report measures of listening effort

References

• Alhanbali, S., P. Dawes, R. E. Millman, and K. J. Munro. 2019. “Measures of Listening Effort Are Multidimensional.” Ear and Hearing 40 (5): 1084–1097. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0000000000000697.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beh, H. C. 1990. “Achievement-Motivation, Performance and Cardiovascular Activity.” International Journal of Psychophysiology: official Journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology 10 (1): 39–45. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-8760(90)90043-D.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bijleveld, E., R. Custers, and H. Aarts. 2009. “The Unconscious Eye Opener: Pupil Dilation Reveals Strategic Recruitment of Resources upon Presentation of Subliminal Reward Cues.” Psychological Science 20 (11): 1313–1315. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02443.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brehm, J. W., and E. A. Self. 1989. “The Intensity of Motivation.” Annual Review of Psychology 40: 109–131. doi:https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.40.020189.000545.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• British Society of Audiology (BSA) 2017. Recommended Procedure: Pure-Tone Air-Conduction and Bone-Condition Threshold Audiometry with and without Masking. British Society of Audiology. Retrieved from: https://www.bsa.org
   Google Scholar
• Capa, R. L., M. Audiffren, and S. Ragot. 2008. “The Effects of Achievement Motivation, Task Difficulty, and Goal Difficulty on Physiological, Behavioral, and Subjective Effort.” Psychophysiology 45 (5): 859–868. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.2008.00675.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrillo de la Peña, M. T., and F. Cadeveira. 2000. “The Effect of Motivational Instructions on P300 Amplitude.” Clinical Neurophysiology 30 (4): 232–239. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0987-7053(00)00220-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carver, C. S. 2006. “Approach, Avoidance, and the Self-Regulation of Affect and Action.” Motivation and Emotion 30 (2): 105–110. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-006-9044-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. 1988. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioural Sciences. New York: Academic Press. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/C2013-0-10517-X.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, M. H., I. S. Johnsrude, A. Hervais-Adelman, K. Taylor, and C. McGettigan. 2005. “Lexical Information Drives Perceptual Learning of Distorted Speech: Evidence from the Comprehension of Noise-Vocoded Sentences.” Journal of Experimental Psychology. General 134 (2): 222–241. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.134.2.222.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deci, E. L., R. Koestner, and R. M. Ryan. 1999. “A Meta-Analytic Review of Experiments Examining the Effects of Extrinsic Rewards on Intrinsic Motivation.” Psychological Bulletin 125 (6): 627–668. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.125.6.627.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deci, E. L., and R. M. Ryan. 1985. Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behaviour. New York: Plenum.
   Google Scholar
• Drullman, R., J. M. Festen, and R. Plomp. 1994. “Effect of Reducing Slow Temporal Modulations on Speech Reception.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 95 (5 Pt 1): 2670–2680. doi:https://doi.org/10.1121/1.409836.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faul, F.,. E. Erdfelder, A. Buchner, and A. G. Lang. 2009. “Statistical Power Analyses Using G*Power 3.1: Tests for Correlation and Regression Analyses.” Behavior Research Methods 41 (4): 1149–1160. doi:https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gatehouse, S., and J. Gordon. 1990. “Response Times to Speech Stimuli as Measures of Benefit from Amplification.” British Journal of Audiology 24 (1): 63–68. doi:https://doi.org/10.3109/03005369009077843.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gatehouse, S., and W. Noble. 2004. “The Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ).” International Journal of Audiology 43 (2): 85–99. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14992020400050014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hackley, S. A., and F. Valle-Inclán. 1998. “Automatic Alerting Does Not Speed Late Motoric Processes in a Reaction-Time Task.” Nature 391 (6669): 786–788. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/35849.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart, S., and L. Staveland. 1988. “Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of Empirical and Theoretical Research.” Advances in Psychology 52: 139–183. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4115(08)62386-9.
   Google Scholar
• Heggestad, E. D., and R. Kanfer. 2000. “Individual Differences in Trait Motivation: Development of the Motivational Trait Questionnaire.” International Journal of Educational Research 33 (7-8): 751–776. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-0355(00)00049-5.
   Google Scholar
• Heinrich, A., M. A. Ferguson, and S. L. Mattys. 2019. “Effects of Cognitive Load on Pure-Tone Audiometry Thresholds in Younger and Older Adults.” Ear and Hearing 41 (4): 907–917. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0000000000000812.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herrmann, B., and I. Johnsrude. 2020. “A Model of Listening Engagement (MoLE).” Hearing Research 397: 108016. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heares.2020.108016
   Google Scholar
• Hinsz, V. B., and D. K. Jundt. 2005. “Exploring Individual Differences in a Goal-Setting Situation Using the Motivational Trait Questionnaire.” Journal of Applied Social Psychology 35 (3): 551–571. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2005.tb02135.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houben, R., M. van Doorn-Bierman, and W. A. Dreschler. 2013. “Using Response Time to Speech as a Measure for Listening Effort.” International Journal of Audiology 52 (11): 753–761. doi:https://doi.org/10.3109/14992027.2013.832415.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, S. E., H. A. Hutchings, F. L. Rapport, C. M. McMahon, and I. Boisvert. 2018. “Social Connectedness and Perceived Listening Effort in Adult Cochlear Implant Users: A Grounded Theory to Establish Content Validity for a New Patient-Reported Outcome Measure.” Ear and Hearing 39 (5): 922–934. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0000000000000553.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humphreys, M. S., and W. Revelle. 1984. “Personality, Motivation, and Performance: A Theory of the Relationship between Individual Differences and Information Processing.” Psychological Review 91 (2): 153–184. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.91.2.153.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaandorp, Marre W., Annette M. B. De Groot, Joost M. Festen, Cas Smits, and S. Theo Goverts. 2016. “The Influence of Lexical-Access Ability and Vocabulary Knowledge on Measures of Speech Recognition in Noise.” International Journal of Audiology 55 (3): 157–167. doi:https://doi.org/10.3109/14992027.2015.1104735.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D., and J. Beatty. 1966. “Pupil Diameter and Load on Memory.” Science (New York, N.Y.) 154 (3756): 1583–1585. doi:https://doi.org/10.1126/science.154.3756.1583.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, T. F., and D. M. Webster. 2000. “Individual Differences in Argument Scrutiny as Motivated by Need for Cognitive Closure.” Basic and Applied Social Psychology 22 (2): 119–129. doi:https://doi.org/10.1207/S15324834BASP2202_5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knight, S., and A. Heinrich. 2017. “Different Measures of Auditory and Visual Stroop Interference and Their Relationship to Speech Intelligibility in Noise.” Frontiers in Psychology 8: 230. doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00230.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knight, S., and A. Heinrich. 2018. “Visual Inhibition Measures Predict Speech-in-Noise Perception Only in People with Low Levels of Education.” Front Psychol 9: 2779. doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02779.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koelewijn, T., A. A. Zekveld, T. Lunner, and S. E. Kramer. 2018. “The Effect of Reward on Listening Effort as Reflected by the Pupil Dilation Response.” Hear Res 367: 106–112. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heares.2018.07.011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruglanski, A. W. 2004. The Psychology of Closed Mindedness. New York: Psychology Press
   Google Scholar
• Kruglanski, A. W., J. J. Belanger, X. Chen, C. Kopetz, A. Pierro, and L. Mannetti. 2012. “The Energetics of Motivated Cognition: A Force-Field Analysis.” Psychological Review 119 (1): 1–20. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025488.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruglanski, A. W., N. Peri, and D. Zakai. 1991. “Interactive Effects of Need for Closure and Initial Confidence on Social Information Seeking.” Social Cognition 9 (2): 127–148. doi:https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.1991.9.2.127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruglanski, A. W., and D. M. Webster. 1996. “Motivated Closing of the Mind: “Seizing” and “ "freezing".” Psychological Review 103 (2): 263–283. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.103.2.263.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruglanski, A. W., D. M. Webster, and A. Klem. 1993. “Motivated Resistance and Openness to Persuasion in the Presence or Absence of Prior Information.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 65 (5): 861–876. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.65.5.861.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsby, B., M. Hällgren, and B. Lyxell. 2008. “The Interference of Different Background Noises on Speech Processing in Elderly Hearing Impaired Subjects.” International Journal of Audiology 47 (sup2): S83–S90. doi: https://doi.org/10.80/14992020802301159.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lepper, M. R., D. Greene, and R. E. Nisbett. 1973. “Undermining Children’s Intrinsic Interest with Extrinsic Rewards: A Test of the “over-Justification” Hypothesis.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 28 (1): 129–137. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/h0035519.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyxell, B., and J. Rönnberg. 1992. “The Relationship between Verbal Ability and Sentence-Based Speechreading.” Scandinavian Audiology 21 (2): 67–72. doi:https://doi.org/10.3109/01050399209045984.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marslen-Wilson, W., and L. K. Tyler. 1980. “The Temporal Structure of Spoken Language Understanding.” Cognition 8 (1): 1–71. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(80)90015-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McClelland, D. C., J. W. Atkinson, R. A. Clark, and E. L. Lowell. 1953. The Achievement Motive. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/11144-000.
   Google Scholar
• McGarrigle, R., K. J. Munro, P. Dawes, A. J. Stewart, D. R. Moore, J. G. Barry, and S. Amitay. 2014. “Listening Effort and Fatigue: What Exactly Are we Measuring? A British Society of Audiology Cognition in Hearing Special Interest Group 'White paper'.” International Journal of Audiology 53 (7): 433–440. doi:https://doi.org/10.3109/14992027.2014.890296.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMahon, C. M., I. Boisvert, P. de Lissa, L. Granger, R. Ibrahim, C. Y. Lo, K. Miles, and P. L. Graham. 2016. “Monitoring Alpha Oscillations and Pupil Dilation across a Performance-Intensity Function.” Frontiers in Psychology 7: 745. doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00745.
   Google Scholar
• Millisecond Software 2015. Inquisit 5. Retrieved from https://www.millisecond.com
   Google Scholar
• Millman, R. E., S. R. Johnson, and G. Prendergast. 2015. “The Role of Phase-Locking to the Temporal Envelope of Speech in Auditory Perception and Speech Intelligibility.” Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 27 (3): 533–545. doi:https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_00719.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirkovic, B., S. Debener, J. Schmidt, M. Jaeger, and T. Neher. 2019. “Effects of Directional Sound Processing and Listener's Motivation on EEG Responses to Continuous Noisy Speech: Do Normal-Hearing and Aided Hearing-Impaired Listeners Differ?” Hearing Research 377: 260–270. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heares.2019.04.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pals, C., A. Sarampalis, H. van Rijn, and D. Başkent. 2015. “Validation of a Simple Response-Time Measure of Listening Effort.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 138 (3): EL187–EL192. doi:https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4929614.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pichora-Fuller, M. K., S. E. Kramer, M. A. Eckert, B. Edwards, B. W. Hornsby, L. Humes, U. Lemke, et al. 2016. “Hearing Impairment and Cognitive Energy: The Framework for Understanding Effortful Listening (FUEL).” Ear and Hearing 37 (1): 5S–27S. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0000000000000312.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Picou, E. M., L. M. Charles, and T. A. Ricketts. 2017. “Child-Adult Differences in Using Dual-Task Paradigms to Measure Listening Effort.” American Journal of Audiology 26 (2): 143–154. doi:https://doi.org/10.1044/2016_AJA-16-0059.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Picou, E. M., and T. A. Ricketts. 2014. “Increasing Motivation Changes Subjective Reports of Listening Effort and Choice of Coping Strategy.” International Journal of Audiology 53 (6): 418–426. doi:https://doi.org/10.3109/14992027.2014.880814.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Picou, E. M., and T. A. Ricketts. 2018. “The Relationship between Speech Recognition, Behavioural Listening Effort, and Subjective Ratings.” International Journal of Audiology 57 (6): 457–467. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14992027.2018.1431696.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinheiro, J., and D. M. Bates. 2000. Mixed Effects Models in S and S-Plus. New York: Springer. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/b98882.
   Google Scholar
• Pinheiro, J., D. Bates, S. DebRoy, and D. Sarkar, R Core Team 2020. Nlme: Linear and Nonlinear Mixed Effects Models. Retrieved from https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/nlme/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Pisoni, D. B., and J. Tash. 1974. “Reaction Times to Comparisons within and across Phonetic Categories.” Perception and Psychophysics 15 (2): 285–290. doi:https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03213946.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team 2018. The R Foundation for Statistical Computing Platform. Vienna, Austria. Retrieved from http://www.R-project.org
   Google Scholar
• Richter, M. 2016. “The Moderating Effect of Success Importance on the Relationship between Listening Demand and Listening Effort.” Ear and Hearing 37 Suppl 1: 111S–117S. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0000000000000295.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richter, M., E. Baeriswyl, and A. Roets. 2012. “Personality Effects on Cardiovascular Reactivity: Need for Closure Moderates the Impact of Task Difficulty on Engagement-Related Myocardial Beta-Adrenergic Activity.” Psychophysiology 49 (5): 704–707. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.2011.01350.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richter, M., G. H. E. Gendolla, and R. A. Wright. 2016. “Three Decades of Research on Motivational Intensity Theory: What We Have Learned about Effort and What We Still Don’t Know.” Advances in Motivational Science 3: 149–186. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.adms.2016.02.001.
   Google Scholar
• Roets, A., A. W. Kruglanski, M. Kossowska, A. Pierro, and Y. Hong. 2015. “Chapter Four - The Motivated Gatekeeper of Our Minds: New Directions in Need for Closure Theory and Research.” In J. M. Olson and M. P. Zanna (Eds.) Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 52: 221–283. London: Academic Press. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.aesp.2015.01.001.
   Google Scholar
• Roets, A., and A. van Hiel. 2008. “Why Some Hate to Dilly-Dally and Others Do Not: The Arousal-Invoking Capacity of Decision-Making for Low- and High-Scoring Need for Closure Individuals.” Social Cognition 26 (3): 333–346. doi:https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2008.26.3.333.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roets, A., and A. van Hiel. 2011. “Item Selection and Validation of a Brief, 15-Item Version of the Need for Closure Scale.” Personality and Individual Differences 50 (1): 90–94. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.09.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rönnberg, J. 2003. “Cognition in the Hearing Impaired and Deaf as a Bridge between Signal and Dialogue: A Framework and a Model.” International Journal of Audiology 42 (sup1): 68–76. doi:https://doi.org/10.3109/14992020309074626.
   Google Scholar
• Rönnberg, J., E. Holmer, and M. Rudner. 2019. “Cognitive Hearing Science and Ease of Language Understanding.” International Journal of Audiology 58 (5): 247–261. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14992027.2018.1551631.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rönnberg, Jerker, Thomas Lunner, Adriana Zekveld, Patrik Sörqvist, Henrik Danielsson, Björn Lyxell, Orjan Dahlström, et al. 2013. “The Ease of Language Understanding (ELU) Model: Theoretical, Empirical, and Clinical Advances.” Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience 7: 31. doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2013.00031.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rönnberg, J., M. Rudner, C. Foo, and T. Lunner. 2008. “Cognition Counts: A Working Memory System for Ease of Language Understanding (ELU).” International Journal of Audiology 47 (sup2): S99–S105. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14992020802301167.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothauser, E. H., W. D. Chapman, N. Guttman, M. H. L. Hecker, K. S. Nordby, H. Silbiger, G. E. Urbanek, and M. Weinstock. 1969. “IEEE Recommended Practice for Speech Quality Measurements.” IEEE Transactions on Audio and Electroacoustics 17 (3): 225–246.
   Google Scholar
• Rummel, A., and R. Feinberg. 1988. “Cognitive Evaluation Theory: A Meta-Analytic Review of the Literature.” Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal 16 (2): 147–164. doi:https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.1988.16.2.147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sankaran, S.,. E. Szumowska, and M. Kossowska. 2017. “ "When the going gets tough, the tough get going": Motivation towards closure and effort investment in the performance of cognitive tasks.” Motiv Emot 41 (3): 308–332. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-017-9613-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shannon, R., F. Zeng, V. Kamath, J. Wygonski, and M. Ekelid. 1995. “Speech Recognition with Primarily Temporal Cues.” Science (New York, N.Y.) 270 (5234): 303–304. doi:https://doi.org/10.1126/science.270.5234.303.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strand, J. F., V. A. Brown, M. B. Merchant, H. E. Brown, and J. Smith. 2018. “Measuring Listening Effort: Convergent Validity, Sensitivity, and Links with Cognitive and Personality Measures.” Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research: JSLHR 61 (6): 1463–1486. doi:https://doi.org/10.1044/2018_JSLHR-H-17-0257.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strauss, D. J., and A. L. Francis. 2017. “Toward a Taxonomic Model of Attention in Effortful Listening.” Cognitive, Affective and Behavioral Neuroscience 17 (4): 809–825. doi:https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-017-0513-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Studebaker, G. A. 1985. “A "rationalized" arcsine transform.” Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 28 (3): 455–462. doi:https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.2803.455.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tang, S. H., and V. C. Hall. 1995. “The over-Justification Effect: A Meta-Analysis.” Applied Cognitive Psychology 9 (5): 365–404. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.2350090502.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Mathworks R 2018a. Matlab. Natick, Massachusetts.
   Google Scholar
• Viola, V.,. A. Tosoni, A. Brizi, I. Salvato, A. W. Kruglanski, G. Galati, and L. Mannetti. 2015. “Need for Cognitive Closure Modulates How Perceptual Decisions Are Affected by Task Difficulty and Outcome Relevance.” PLoS One 10 (12): e0146002. doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0146002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webster, D. M., and A. W. Kruglanski. 1994. “Individual Differences in Need for Cognitive Closure.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 67 (6): 1049–1062. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.67.6.1049.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weis, T., S. Puschmann, A. Brechmann, and C. M. Thiel. 2013. “Positive and Negative Reinforcement Activate Human Auditory Cortex.” Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 7: 842. doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00842.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiersma, U. J. 1992. “The Effects of Extrinsic Rewards in Intrinsic Motivation: A Meta-Analysis.” Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology 65 (2): 101–114. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.1992.tb00488.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winn, M. B. 2016. “Rapid Release from Listening Effort Resulting from Semantic Context, and Effects of Spectral Degradation and Cochlear Implants.” Trends in Hearing 20: 233121651666972. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/2331216516669723.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woods, D. L., M. M. Kishiyamaa, E. W. Lund, T. J. Herron, B. Edwards, O. Poliva, R. F. Hink, and B. Reed. 2011. “Improving Digit Span Assessment of short-term verbal memory .” J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 33 (1): 101–111. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13803395.2010.493149.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, M., G. J. Siegle, M. R. McNeil, S. R. Pratt, and C. Palmer. 2019. “The Role of Reward and Task Demand in Value-Based Strategic Allocation of Auditory Comprehension Effort.” Hearing Research 381: 107775 doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heares.2019.107775.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar