Design and verification of a measurement setup for wireless remote microphone systems (WRMSs)

References

• AAA. 2011. Clinical Practice Guidelines: Remote Microphone Hearing Assistance Technologies for Children and Youth from Birth to 21 Years. American Academy of Audiology.
   Google Scholar
• ANSI/ASA S3.47. 2014. Specification of Performance Measurement of Hearing Assistance Devices/Systems. American National Standards Institute.
   Google Scholar
• ASHA Ad Hoc Committee on FM Systems. 2002. Guidelines for Fitting and Monitoring FM Systems. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.
   Google Scholar
• Bagatto, M., J. DesGeorges, A. King, P. Kitterick, D. Laurnagaray, D. Lewis, P. Roush, D. P. Sladen, and A. Marie Tharpe. 2019. “Consensus Practice Parameter: Audiological Assessment and Management of Unilateral Hearing Loss in Children.” International Journal of Audiology 58: 805–815. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14992027.2019.1654620
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benítez-Barrera, C. R, et al. 2019. “Remote Microphone System Use at Home: Impact on Child-Directed Speech.” Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 62 (6): 2002–2008. doi:https://doi.org/10.1044/2019_JSLHR-H-18-0325.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chisolm, T. H., C. M. Noe, R. McArdle, and H. Abrams. 2007. “Evidence for the Use of Hearing Assistive Technology by Adults: The Role of the FM System.” Trends in Amplification 11 (2): 73–89. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1084713807300879.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Crandell, C., J. Smaldino, and C. Flexer. 2005. Sound Field Amplification: Applications to Speech Perception and Classroom Acoustics. Thomson Delmar Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Cruz, A. D. d, et al. 2019. “The Effects of Using Hearing Aids and a Frequency Modulated System on Listening Effort among Adolescents with Hearing Loss.” International Journal of Audiology 59: 117–123. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14992027.2019.1671992.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, D., and E. Patronis. 2014. Sound System Engineering. 3rd ed. Indianapolis, IN: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• EUHA. 2017. Wireless remote microphone systems – configuration, verification and measurement of individual benefits [Online]. https://www.euha.org/content/uploads/2020/12/euha-guideline-04-06-en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Fitschen, C., J. Tchorz, and H. Husstedt. 2017. Vergleich des Sprachverstehens bei verschiedenen drahtlosen Übertragungsanlagen (FM-Anlagen) [Comparison of Speech Intelligibility of Different Wireless Remote Microphone Systems (FM systems)]. Aalen, Germany: Deutsche Gesellschaft für Audiologie e.V.
   Google Scholar
• Fitzpatrick, E. M, et al. 2010. “Users’ Perspectives on the Benefits of FM Systems with Cochlear Implants.” International Journal of Audiology 49 (1): 44–53. doi:https://doi.org/10.3109/14992020903202512.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Füllgrabe, C., B. C. J. Moore, and M. A. Stone. 2015. “Age-Group Differences in Speech Identification Despite Matched Audiometrically Normal Hearing: Contributions from Auditory Temporal Processing and Cognition.” Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience 6: 347. doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2014.00347.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griepentrog, S., M. Frenz, T. Jürgens, and H. Husstedt. 2019. “Comparison of the Individual Benefit of a Wireless Remote Microphone System in the Laboratory with the Situation in a Classroom.” Heidelberg, Germany: Deutsche Gesellschaft Für Audiologie e.V.
   Google Scholar
• Hahlbrock, K.-H. 1957. Sprachaudiometrie [Speech audiometry]. 1st ed. Stuttgart: Thieme.
   Google Scholar
• Holube, I., S. Fredelake, M. Vlaming, and B. Kollmeier. 2010. “Development and Analysis of an International Speech Test Signal (ISTS).” International Journal of Audiology 49 (12) : 891–903. doi:https://doi.org/10.3109/14992027.2010.506889.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopkins, H., and N. Stryker. 1948. “A Proposed Loudness-Efficiency Rating for Loud-Speakers and the Determination of System Power Requirements for Enclosures.” Proceedings of the IRE 36 (3): 315–335. March, doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/JRPROC.1948.226221.
   Google Scholar
• Husstedt, H. 2016. Praxistaugliche und realitätsnahe Messung des Sprachverstehen für drahtlose Übertragungsanlagen [Practical and realistic measurement of speech intelligibility of wireless remote microphone systems]. Hannover, Germany: Deutsche Gesellschaft für Audiologie e.V.
   Google Scholar
• Husstedt, H., and C. Fitschen. 2018. Nutzens von drahtlosen akustischen Übertragungsanlagen bei Menschen ohne Hörbeeinträchtigung [Benefit of Wireless Remote Microphone Systems for People without Hearing Loss]. Halle, Germany: Deutsche Gesellschaft für Audiologie e.V.
   Google Scholar
• Husstedt, H., and J. Steinhauer. 2016. Practicability Study of a Setup for the Evaluation of Wireless Remote Microphone Technology. Phoenix, AZ, American Academy of Audiology.
   Google Scholar
• IEC 60118-15. 2012. Electroacoustics – Hearing Aids – Part 15: Methods for Characterising Signal Processing in Hearing Aids with a Speech-like Signal. International Electrotechnical Commission.
   Google Scholar
• IEC 60645-1. 2017. Electroacoustics – Audiometric equipment – Part 1: Equipment for Pure-Tone and Speech Audiometry. International Electrotechnical Commission.
   Google Scholar
• International Telecommunication Union (ITU). 1993. [Online]. Accessed April 12 2016. www.itu.int/rec/T-REC-G.227-198811-I/en
   Google Scholar
• ISO 21388. 2020. Acoustics – Hearing Aid Fitting Management (HAFM). International Organization for Standardization.
   Google Scholar
• ISO 8253-3. 2012. Acoustics – Audiometric Test Methods – Part 3: Speech Audiometry. International Organization for Standardization.
   Google Scholar
• Katz, J., M. Chasin, K. English, and L. Hood. 2014. Handbook of Clinical Audiology. 7th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
   Google Scholar
• Kolderup, K. 2020. LE Audio and the Future of Hearing. Las Vegas, NV: Bluetooth Special Interest Group (SIG).
   Google Scholar
• Maidment, D. W., A. B. Barker, and J. Xia. 2018. “A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Assessing the Effectiveness of Alternative Listening Devices to Conventional Hearing Aids in Adults with Hearing Loss.” International Journal of Audiology 57 (10): 721–729. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14992027.2018.1493546.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metz, M. 2014. Sandlin’s Textbook of Hearing Aid Amplification: Technical and Clinical Considerations. Plural Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Musiek, F. E., G. D. Chermak, D.-E. Bamiou, and J. Shinn. 2018. “CAPD: The Most Common ‘Hidden Hearing Loss’.” The ASHA Leader 23: 6–9. doi:https://doi.org/10.1044/leader.FMP.23032018.6.
   Google Scholar
• Nilsson, M., S. D. Soli, and J. A. Sullivan. 1994. “Development of the Hearing in Noise Test for the Measurement of Speech Reception Thresholds in Quiet and in Noise.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 95 (2): 1085–1099. doi:https://doi.org/10.1121/1.408469.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schafer, E. C., and L. M. Thibodeau. 2006. “Speech Recognition in Noise in Children with Cochlear Implants While Listening in Bilateral, Bimodal, and FM-System Arrangements.” American Journal of Audiology 15 (2): 114–126. doi:https://doi.org/10.1044/1059-0889(2006/015).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schafer, E. C., J. Wolfe, T. Lawless, and B. Stout. 2009. “Effects of FM-Receiver Gain on Speech-Recognition Performance of Adults with Cochlear Implants.” International Journal of Audiology 48 (4): 196–203. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14992020802572635.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Studebaker, G. A. 1985. “A "Rationalized" Arcsine Transform.” Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 28 (3): 455–462. doi:https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.2803.455.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thibodeau, L. 2010. “Benefits of Adaptive FM Systems on Speech Recognition in Noise for Listeners Who Use Hearing Aids.” American Journal of Audiology 19 (1): 36–45. doi:https://doi.org/10.1044/1059-0889(2010/09-0014).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thibodeau, L. 2014. “Comparison of Speech Recognition with Adaptive Digital and FM Remote Microphone Hearing Assistance Technology by Listeners Who Use Hearing Aids.” American Journal of Audiology 23 (2): 201–210. doi:https://doi.org/10.1044/2014_AJA-13-0065.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valente, M., H. Hosford-Dunn, and R. Roeser. 2008. Audiology: Treatment. Thieme.
   Google Scholar
• Vroegop, J. L., J. G. Dingemanse, N. C. Homans, and A. Goedegebure. 2017. “Evaluation of a Wireless Remote Microphone in Bimodal Cochlear Implant Recipients.” International Journal of Audiology 56 (9): 643–649. 09 02, doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14992027.2017.1308565.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vroegop, J. L., N. C. Homans, A. Goedegebure, and M. P. van der Schroeff. 2018. “A Directional Remote-Microphone for Bimodal Cochlear Implant Recipients.” International Journal of Audiology 57 (11): 858–863. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14992027.2018.1508896.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, E. A., M. Curran, M. Spratford, and P. Roush. 2019. “Remote Microphone Systems for Preschool-Age Children Who Are Hard of Hearing: Access and Utilization.” International Journal of Audiology 58: 200–207. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14992027.2018.1537523.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winkler, A., and I. Holube. 2018. “Einfluss des Störgeräuschs auf das Sprachverstehen von Einsilbern [Effect of Noise on Speech Recognition of Monosyllables].” Zeitschrift Für Audiologie 57: 138–147.
   Google Scholar
• Winkler, A., I. Holube, and H. Husstedt. 2019. “Der Freiburger Einsilbertest im Störschall [The Freiburg Monosyllabic Speech Test in Noise].” Zeitschrift Für HNO 68: 1–11. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00106-019-00763-6.
   Google Scholar
• Zanin, J., and G. Rance. 2016. “Functional Hearing in the Classroom: Assistive Listening Devices for Students with Hearing Impairment in a Mainstream School Setting.” International Journal of Audiology 55 (12): 723–729. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14992027.2016.1225991.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar