Comparison of automated and traditional ECAP recording approaches in clinical practice

References

• Alvarez, I., A. Torre, M. Sainz, C. Roldán, H. Schoesser, and P. Spitzer. 2010. “Using Evoked Compound Action Potentials to Assess Activation of Electrodes and Predict C-Levels in the Tempo + Cochlear Implant Speech Processor.” Ear and Hearing 31 (2): 134–145. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181bdb88f.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bates, D., M. Mächler, B. Bolker, and S. Walker. 2015. “Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4.” Journal of Statistical Software 67 (1): 1–48. doi:https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brill, S., J. Müller, R. Hagen, A. Möltner, S.-J. Brockmeier, T. Stark, S. Helbig, et al. 2009. “Site of Cochlear Stimulation and Its Effect on Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potentials Using the MED-EL Standard Electrode Array.” Biomedical Engineering Online. 8 (12): 40. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-925X-8-40.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brown, C. J., M. L. Hughes, B. Luk, P. J. Abbas, A. Wolaver, and J. Gervais. 2000. “The Relationship between EAP and EABR Thresholds and Levels Used to Program the Nucleus 24 Speech Processor: data from Adults.” Ear and Hearing 21 (4): 151–163. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/00003446-200004000-00009..
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brown, C. J., P. J. Abbas, and B. Gantz. 1990. “Electrically Evoked Whole-Nerve Action Potentials: Data from Human Cochlear Implant Users.” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 88 (9): 1385–1391. doi:https://doi.org/10.1121/1.399716.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brown, C. J., P. J. Abbas, and B. J. Gantz. 1998. “Preliminary Experience with Neural Response Telemetry in the Nucleus CI24M Cochlear Implant.” American Journal of Otology 19 (5): 320–327.PMID: 9596182.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Charasse, B., J. M. Chanal, C. Berger-Vachon, and L. Collet. 2004. “Influence of Stimulus Frequency on NRT Recordings.” International Journal of Audiology 43 (43): 236–244. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14992020400050032.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Christov, F., M. Gluth, S. Hans, S. Lang, and D. Arweiler-Harbeck. 2019. “Impact of Cochlear Tonotopy on Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potentials (ECAPs).” Acta Oto-Laryngologica 139 (1): 22–25. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00016489.2018.1533993.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, L. 2009. “Practical Model Description of Peripheral Neural Excitation in Cochlear Implant Recipients: 1. Growth of Loudness and ECAP Amplitude with Current.” Hearing Research 247 (2): 87–99. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heares.2008.11.003.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cullington, H. 2000. “Preliminary Neural Response Telemetry Results.” British Journal of Audiology 34 (3): 131–140. doi:https://doi.org/10.3109/03005364000000123.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhanasingh, A., and C. Jolly. 2017. “An Overview of Cochlear Implant Electrode Array Designs.” Hearing Research 356 (12): 93–103. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heares.2017.10.005.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Franck, K. H., and S. J. Norton. 2001. “Estimation of Psychophysical Levels Using the Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential Measured with the Neural Response Telemetry Capabilities of Cochlear Corporation's CI24M Device.” Ear and Hearing 22 (8): 289–299. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/00003446-200108000-00004
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Garrido, L. C., K. Schwarz, K. Lauss, C. Paula Vernetta, A. Kontides, M. D. Gomez, A. G. Calvete, and M. A. Carceller Department of ENT, La Fe University and Polytechnic Hospital, Valencia, Spain 2018. “Comparison of a Traditional and Novel Evoked Compound Action Potentials Recording Approach and Evoked Auditory Brainstem Responses in Pediatric Cochlear Implants Users.” The Journal of International Advanced Otology, 14 (3): 353–358. doi:https://doi.org/10.5152/iao.2018.5591.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gärtner, L., T. Lenarz, and A. Büchner. 2018. “Fine-Grain Recordings of the Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential Amplitude Growth Function in Cochlear Implant Recipients.” BioMedical Engineering OnLine 17 (1): 140. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12938-018-0588-z.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• He, S., B. S. Shahsavarani, T. C. McFayden, H. Wang, K. E. Gill, L. Xu, X. Chao, J. Luo, R. Wang, and N. He. 2018. “Responsiveness of the Electrically Stimulated Cochlear Nerve in Children with Cochlear Nerve Deficiency.” Ear and Hearing 39 (3): 238–250. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0000000000000467.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• He, S., L. Xu, J. Skidmore, X. Chao, W. J. Riggs, R. Wang, C. Vaughan, J. Luo, M. Shannon, and C. Warner. 2020. “Effect of Increasing Pulse Phase Duration on Neural Responsiveness of the Electrically Stimulated Cochlear Nerve.” Ear and Hearing 41 (6): 1606–1618. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0000000000000876.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hothorn, T., F. Bretz, and P. Westfall. 2008. “Simultaneous Inference in General Parametric Models.” Biometrical Journal 50 (3): 346–363. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/bimj.200810425.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, J.-R., P. J. Abbas, C. J. Brown, C. P. Etler, S. O'Brien, and L.-S. Kim. 2010. “The Relationship between Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential and Speech Perception: A Study in Cochlear Implant Users with Short Electrode Array.” Otology and Neurotology 31: 1041–1048. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0b013e3181ec1d92.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kuznetsova, A., P. B. Brockhoff, and R. H. B. Christensen. 2017. “lmerTest Package: Tests in Linear Mixed Effects Models.” Journal of Statistical Software 82 (13): 1–26. doi:https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v082.i13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai, W. K., and N. Dillier. 2000. “A Simple Two-Component Model of the Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential in the Human Cochlea.” Audiology & Neuro-Otology 5: 333–345. doi:https://doi.org/10.1159/000013899.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, C. A., P. J. Abbas, and J. T. Rubinstein. 1999. “An Empirically Based Model of the Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential.” Hearing Research 135 (1-2): 1–18. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-5955(99)00081-7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Miller, C., P. Abbas, J. Rubinstein, B. Robinson, A. Matsuoka, and G. Woodworth. 1998. “Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potentials of guinea Pig and Cat: responses to Monopolar, Monophasic Stimulation.” Hearing Research 119: 142–154. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-5955(98)00046-X.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team 2018., "R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing," Vienna,
   Google Scholar
• Ramekers, D., H. Versnel, S. B. Strahl, E. M. Smeets, S. F. L. Klis, and W. Grolman. 2014. “Auditory-Nerve Responses to Varied Inter-Phase Gap and Phase Duration of the Electric Pulse Stimulus as Predictors for Neuronal Degeneration.” Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology 15 (1): 187–202. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10162-013-0440-x.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Roche, J. P., and M. R. Hansen. 2015. “On the Horizon: Cochlear Implant Technology.” Otolaryngology Clinics of North America 48 (6): 1097–1116. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otc.2015.07.009.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• RStudio, 2018. "RStudio - Open source and enterprise-ready professional software for R," RStudio, Inc., [Online]. Available: http://www.rstudio.com/. [Accessed 20 04 2018].
   Google Scholar
• Schvartz-Leyzac, K. C., and B. E. Pfingst. 2016. “Across-Site Patterns of Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential Amplitude-Growth Functions in Multichannel Cochlear Implant Recipients and the Effects of the Interphase Gap.” Hearing Research 341: 50–65. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heares.2016.08.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Souliere, J. C. R., S. M. Quigley, and A. W. Langman. 1994. “Cochlear Implants in Children.” Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America 27 (3): 533–556. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0030-6665(20)30668-X.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Strahl, S., A. Dierker, P. Spitzer, and K. Schwarz. 2018. “AutoART – a System for Automatic Determination of eCAP Thresholds.” in 21. Jahrestagung Der Deutschen Gesellschaft Für Audiologie. https://www.dga-ev.com/fileadmin/dga2018/site/data/final/0040.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Vaerenberg, B., C. Smits, G. De Ceulaer, E. Zir, S. Harman, N. Jaspers, Y. Tam, et al. 2014. “Cochlear Implant Programming: A Global Survey on the State of the Art.” The Scientific World Journal 2014: 1–12. doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/501738.
   Google Scholar
• van de Heyning, P., S. L. Arauz, M. Atlas, W.-D. Baumgartner, M. Caversaccio, R. Chester-Browne, P. Estienne, et al. 2016. “Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potentials Are Different Depending on the Site of Cochlear Stimulation.” Cochlear Implants International 17 (6): 251–262. 11 doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14670100.2016.1240427.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vos, J. J., J. D. Biesheuvel, J. J. Briaire, P. S. Boot, M. J. Gendt, O. M. Dekkers, M. Fiocco, and J. H. M. Frijns. 2018. “Use of Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potentials for Cochlear Implant Fitting: A Systematic Review.” Ear and Hearing 39 (3): 401–411. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0000000000000495.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar