References
- Akeroyd, M. A. 2008. “Are Individual Differences in Speech Reception Related to Individual Differences in Cognitive Ability? A Survey of Twenty Experimental Studies with Normal and Hearing-Impaired Adults.” International Journal of Audiology 47 (sup2): S53–S71. In: doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14992020802301142.
- Ansi, A. 1997. S3. 5-1997, Methods for the Calculation of the Speech Intelligibility Index. New York: American National Standards Institute, 19, 90–119.
- Armstrong, J. S., and F. Collopy. 1992. “Error Measures for Generalizing about Forecasting Methods: Empirical Comparisons.” International Journal of Forecasting 8 (1): 69–80. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-2070(92)90008-W.
- Aronoff, J. M., and D. M. Landsberger. 2013. “The Development of a Modified Spectral Ripple Test.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 134 (2): EL217–EL222. doi:https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4813802.
- Beutelmann, R., and T. Brand. 2006. “Prediction of Speech Intelligibility in Spatial Noise and Reverberation for Normal-Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Listeners.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 120 (1): 331–342. doi:https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2202888.
- Bosman, A. J., and G. F. Smoorenburg. 1995. “Intelligibility of Dutch CVC Syllables and Sentences for Listeners with Normal Hearing and with Three Types of Hearing Impairment.” International Journal of Audiology 34 (5): 260–284. doi:https://doi.org/10.3109/00206099509071918.
- Brand, T., and B. Kollmeier. 2002. “Efficient Adaptive Procedures for Threshold and Concurrent Slope Estimates for Psychophysics and Speech Intelligibility Tests.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 111 (6): 2801–2810. doi:https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1479152.
- Carroll, R., A. Warzybok, B. Kollmeier, and E. Ruigendijk. 2016. “Age-Related Differences in Lexical Access Relate to Speech Recognition in Noise.” Frontiers in Psychology 7: 990. doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00990.
- Ching, T. Y., H. Dillon, and D. Byrne. 1998. “Speech Recognition of Hearing-Impaired Listeners: Predictions from Audibility and the Limited Role of High-Frequency Amplification.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 103 (2): 1128–1140. doi:https://doi.org/10.1121/1.421224.
- Dau, T., B. Kollmeier, and A. Kohlrausch. 1997. “Modeling Auditory Processing of Amplitude Modulation. I. detection and Masking with Narrow-Band Carriers.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 102 (5): 2892–2905. doi:https://doi.org/10.1121/1.420344.
- Dubno, J. R., F.-S. Lee, L. J. Matthews, J. B. Ahlstrom, A. R. Horwitz, and J. H. Mills. 2008. “Longitudinal Changes in Speech Recognition in Older Persons.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 123 (1): 462–475. doi:https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2817362.
- Eberly, L. E. 2007. “Multiple Linear Regression.” In: Topics in Biostatistics edited by W. T. Ambrosius, 165–187. Switzerland: Springer.
- Efron, B. 1992. “Bootstrap Methods: Another Look at the Jackknife.” In: Breakthroughs in Statistics: Methodology and Distribution. edited by S. Kotz and N. L. Johnson. New York, NY: Springer New York. 569–593.
- Fontan, L., T. Cretin-Maitenaz, and C. Füllgrabe. 2020a. “Predicting Speech Perception in Older Listeners with Sensorineural Hearing Loss Using Automatic Speech Recognition.” Trends in Hearing 24: 233121652091476. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/2331216520914769.
- Fontan, Lionel, Isabelle Ferrané, Jérôme Farinas, Julien Pinquier, Julien Tardieu, Cynthia Magnen, Pascal Gaillard, et al. 2017. “Automatic Speech Recognition Predicts Speech Intelligibility and Comprehension for Listeners with Simulated Age-Related Hearing Loss.” Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 60 (9): 2394–2405. doi:https://doi.org/10.1044/2017_JSLHR-S-16-0269.
- Fontan, L., M. Le Coz, C. Azzopardi, M. A. Stone, and C. Füllgrabe. 2020b. “Improving Hearing-Aid Gains Based on Automatic Speech Recognition.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 148 (3): EL227–EL233. doi:https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0001866.
- French, N. R., and J. C. Steinberg. 1947. “Factors Governing the Intelligibility of Speech Sounds.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 19 (1): 90–119. doi:https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1916407.
- Füllgrabe, C. 2020. “When Hearing Loss Masquerades as Cognitive Decline.” Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry 91 (12): 1248–1248. doi:https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2020-324707.
- Füllgrabe, C., B. C. J. Moore, and M. A. Stone. 2015. “Age-Group Differences in Speech Identification Despite Matched Audiometrically Normal Hearing: Contributions from Auditory Temporal Processing and Cognition.” Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience 6: 347.
- Gustafsson, H. Å., and S. D. Arlinger. 1994. “Masking of Speech by Amplitude-Modulated Noise.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 95 (1): 518–529. doi:https://doi.org/10.1121/1.408346.
- Hawkins, J. Jr, and S. Stevens. 1950. “The Masking of Pure Tones and of Speech by White Noise.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 22 (1): 6–13 doi:https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1906581.
- Hochmuth, S., B. Kollmeier, T. Brand, and T. Jürgens. 2015. “Influence of Noise Type on Speech Reception Thresholds across Four Languages Measured with Matrix Sentence Tests.” International Journal of Audiology 54 (sup2): 62–70. doi:https://doi.org/10.3109/14992027.2015.1046502.
- Hohmann, V. 1993. Dynamikkompression für Hörgeräte - Psychoakustische Grundlagen und Algorithmen. Dissertation, Georg August Universität Göttingen, Göttingen.
- Hoth, S., and I. Baljić. 2017. “Aktuelle Audiologische Diagnostic.” Laryngo-Rhino-Otologie 96 (S 01): S4–S42.
- Hu, H.,. X. Xi, L. L. Wong, S. Hochmuth, A. Warzybok, and B. Kollmeier. 2018. “Construction and Evaluation of the Mandarin Chinese Matrix (CMNmatrix) Sentence Test for the Assessment of Speech Recognition in Noise.” International Journal of Audiology 57 (11): 838–850. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14992027.2018.1483083.
- Hülsmeier, D., A. Warzybok, B. Kollmeier, and M. R. Schädler. 2020. “Simulations with FADE of the Effect of Impaired Hearing on Speech Recognition Performance Cast Doubt on the Role of Spectral Resolution.” Hearing Research 395: 107995. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heares.2020.107995.
- Hülsmeier, D., A. Warzybok, and M. R. Schädler. 2018. “Extension of the framework for auditory discrimination experiments (FADE) to predict the Goettingen (everyday) sentence speech test”. In Speech Communication; 13th ITG-Symposium. 1–5.
- ISO:226. 2003. “226: 2003: Acoustics–Normal Equal-Loudness-Level Contours.” International Organization for Standardization 02 (04): 143–149.
- Jamaluddin, S. A. 2016. “Development and Evaluation of the Digit Triplet and Auditory-Visual Matrix Sentence Tests in Malay.” PhD thesis.
- Jürgens, T., and T. Brand. 2009. “Microscopic Prediction of Speech Recognition for Listeners with Normal Hearing in Noise Using an Auditory Model.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 126 (5): 2635–2648. doi:https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3224721.
- Kates, J. M., and K. H. Arehart. 2014. “The Hearing-Aid Speech Perception Index (HASPI).” Speech Communication 65: 75–93. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.specom.2014.06.002.
- Kelly, H., G. Lin, N. Sankaran, J. Xia, S. Kalluri, and S. Carlile. 2017. “Development and Evaluation of a Mixed Gender, Multi-Talker Matrix Sentence Test in Australian English.” International Journal of Audiology 56 (2): 85–91. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14992027.2016.1236415.
- Kollmeier, B., and J. Kiessling. 2018. “Functionality of Hearing Aids: State-of-the-Art and Future Model-Based Solutions.” International Journal of Audiology 57 (sup3): S3–S28. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14992027.2016.1256504.
- Kollmeier, B., M. R. Schädler, A. Warzybok, B. T. Meyer, and T. Brand. 2016. “Sentence Recognition Prediction for Hearing-Impaired Listeners in Stationary and Fluctuation Noise with Fade: Empowering the Attenuation and Distortion Concept by Plomp with a Quantitative Processing Model.” Trends in Hearing 20: 233121651665579. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/2331216516655795.
- Kollmeier, Birger, Anna Warzybok, Sabine Hochmuth, Melanie A. Zokoll, Verena Uslar, Thomas Brand, Kirsten C. Wagener, et al. 2015. “The Multilingual Matrix Test: Principles, Applications, and Comparison across Languages: A Review.” International Journal of Audiology 54 (sup2): 3–16. doi:https://doi.org/10.3109/14992027.2015.1020971.
- Larsby, B., and S. Arlinger. 1998. “A Method for Evaluating Temporal, Spectral and Combined Temporal-Spectral Resolution of Hearing.” Scandinavian Audiology 27 (1): 3–12. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/010503998419641.
- Liberman, M. C. 2015. “Hidden Hearing Loss.” Scientific American 313 (2): 48–53. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican0815-48.
- Lin, F. R., E. J. Metter, R. J. O’brien, S. M. Resnick, A. B. Zonderman, and L. Ferrucci. 2011. “Hearing Loss and Incident Dementia.” Archives of Neurology 68 (2): 214–220. doi:https://doi.org/10.1001/archneurol.2010.362.
- Lopez-Poveda, E. A., P. T. Johannesen, P. Pérez-González, J. L. Blanco, S. Kalluri, and B. Edwards. 2017. “Predictors of Hearing-Aid Outcomes.” Trends in Hearing 21: 233121651773052. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/2331216517730526.
- Meyer, B. T., and B. Kollmeier. 2011. “Robustness of Spectro-Temporal Features against Intrinsic and Extrinsic Variations in Automatic Speech Recognition.” Speech Communication 53 (5): 753–767. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.specom.2010.07.002.
- Moore, B. C. J., B. R. Glasberg, and M. A. Stone. 2004. “New Version of the TEN Test with Calibrations in dB HL.” Ear and Hearing 25 (5): 478–487. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/01.aud.0000145992.31135.89
- Nagaraj, N. K. 2017. “Working Memory and Speech Comprehension in Older Adults with Hearing Impairment.” Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 60 (10): 2949–2964. doi:https://doi.org/10.1044/2017_JSLHR-H-17-0022.
- O’Beirne, G. A., R. H. Trounson, A. D. McClelland, S. Jamaluddin, and M. A. Maclagan. 2015. “Development of an Auditory-Visual Matrix Sentence Test in New Zealand English.” Journal of International Advanced Otology 11: 56–56.
- Parker, Thomas, David M. Cash, Chris Lane, Kirsty Lu, Ian B. Malone, Jennifer M. Nicholas, Sarah James, et al. 2020. “Pure Tone Audiometry and Cerebral Pathology in Healthy Older Adults.” Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry 91 (2): 172–176. doi:https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2019-321897.
- Pavlovic, C. V. 1988. “Erratum: “Derivation of Primary Parameters and Procedures for Use in Speech Intelligibility Predictions” [j. acoust. soc. am. 82, 413–422 (1987)].” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 83 (2): 827–827. doi:https://doi.org/10.1121/1.396558.
- Pavlovic, C. V. 1987. “Derivation of Primary Parameters and Procedures for Use in Speech Intelligibility Predictions.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 82 (2): 413–422. doi:https://doi.org/10.1121/1.395442.
- Pavlovic, C. V., G. A. Studebaker, and R. L. Sherbecoe. 1986. “An Articulation Index Based Procedure for Predicting the Speech Recognition Performance of Hearing-Impaired Individuals.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 80 (1): 50–57. doi:https://doi.org/10.1121/1.394082.
- Plomp, R. 1978. “Auditory Handicap of Hearing Impairment and the Limited Benefit of Hearing Aids.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 63 (2): 533–549. doi:https://doi.org/10.1121/1.381753.
- Rankovic, C. M. 1991. “An Application of the Articulation Index to Hearing Aid Fitting.” Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 34 (2): 391–402. doi:https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.3402.391.
- Rönnberg, J. 2003. “Cognition in the Hearing Impaired and Deaf as a Bridge between Signal and Dialogue: A Framework and a Model.” International Journal of Audiology 42 (sup1): 68–76. doi:https://doi.org/10.3109/14992020309074626.
- Schädler, M. R., D. Hülsmeier, A. Warzybok, S. Hochmuth, and B. Kollmeier. 2016a. “Microscopic Multilingual Matrix Test Predictions Using an ASR-Based Speech Recognition Model.” Interspeech : 610–614. doi:https://doi.org/10.21437/Interspeech.2016
- Schädler, M. R., D. Hülsmeier, A. Warzybok, and B. Kollmeier. 2020a. “Individual Aided Speech-Recognition Performance and Predictions of Benefit for Listeners with Impaired Hearing Employing Fade.” Trends in Hearing 24: 233121652093892. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/2331216520938929.
- Schädler, M. R., and B. Kollmeier. 2015. “Separable Spectro-Temporal Gabor Filter Bank Features: Reducing the Complexity of Robust Features for Automatic Speech Recognition.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 137 (4): 2047–2059. doi:https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4916618.
- Schädler, M. R., P. Kranzusch, C. Hauth, and A. Warzybok. 2020b. Simulating Spatial Speech Recognition Performance with an Automatic-Speech-Recognition-Based Model. Berlin, Germany: Deutsche Gesellschaft für Akustik.
- Schädler, M. R., A. Warzybok, S. D. Ewert, and B. Kollmeier. 2016b. “A Simulation Framework for Auditory Discrimination Experiments: Revealing the Importance of Across-Frequency Processing in Speech Perception.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 139 (5): 2708–2722. doi:https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4948772.
- Schädler, M. R., A. Warzybok, and B. Kollmeier. 2018. “Objective Prediction of Hearing Aid Benefit across Listener Groups Using Machine Learning: Speech Recognition Performance with Binaural Noise-Reduction Algorithms.” Trends in Hearing 22: 233121651876895. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/2331216518768954.
- Schepker, H., K. Haeder, J. Rennies, and I. Holube. 2016. “Perceived Listening Effort and Speech Intelligibility in Reverberation and Noise for Hearing-Impaired Listeners.” International Journal of Audiology 55 (12): 738–747. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14992027.2016.1219774.
- Shaw, E., and M. Vaillancourt. 1985. “Transformation of Sound-Pressure Level from the Free Field to the Eardrum Presented in Numerical Form.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 78 (3): 1120–1123. doi:https://doi.org/10.1121/1.393035.
- Smoorenburg, G. F. 1992. “Speech Reception in Quiet and in Noisy Conditions by Individuals with Noise-Induced Hearing Loss in Relation to Their Tone Audiogram.” In: The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 91 (1): 421–437. doi:https://doi.org/10.1121/1.402729.
- Spille, C., S. D. Ewert, B. Kollmeier, and B. T. Meyer. 2018. “Predicting Speech Intelligibility with Deep Neural Networks.” Computer Speech & Language 48: 51–66. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csl.2017.10.004.
- Spille, C., B. Kollmeier, and B. T. Meyer. 2018. “Comparing Human and Automatic Speech Recognition in Simple and Complex Acoustic Scenes.” Computer Speech & Language 52: 123–140. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csl.2018.04.003.
- Stiles, D. J., R. A. Bentler, and K. K. McGregor. 2012. “The Speech Intelligibility Index and the Pure-Tone Average as Predictors of Lexical Ability in Children Fit with Hearing Aids.” Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 55 (3): 764–778. doi:https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2011/10-0264).
- Wagener, K., T. Brand, and B. Kollmeier. 1999a. “Entwicklung Und Evaluation Eines Satztests Für Die Deutsche Sprache. I-III: Design, Optimierung Und Evaluation Des Oldenburger Satztests (Development and Evaluation of a Sentence Test for the German Language. I-III: Design, Optimization and Evaluation of the Oldenburg Sentence Test).” Zeitschrift Für Audiologie (Audiological Acoustics) 38: 4–15.
- Wagener, K., and B. Kollmeier. 2004. “Göttinger Und Oldenburger Satztest.” Zeitschrift Für Audiologie (Audiological Acoustics) 43 (3): 134–141.
- Wagener, K. C., V. Kühnel, and B. Kollmeier. June 1999b. “Entwicklung Und Evaluation Eines Satztests Für Die Deutsche Sprache I: Design Des Oldenburger Satztests.” Zeitschrift Für Audiologie (Audiological Acoustics) 38 ((1)(6): 4–15.
- Wardenga, N., C. Batsoulis, K. C. Wagener, T. Brand, T. Lenarz, and H. Maier. 2015. “Do You Hear the Noise? The German Matrix Sentence Test with a Fixed Noise Level in Subjects with Normal Hearing and Hearing Impairment.” International Journal of Audiology 54 (sup2): 71–79. doi:https://doi.org/10.3109/14992027.2015.1079929.
- Zamaninezhad, L., V. Hohmann, A. Büchner, M. R. Schädler, and T. Jürgens. 2017. “A Physiologically-Inspired Model Reproducing the Speech Intelligibility Benefit in Cochlear Implant Listeners with Residual Acoustic Hearing.” Hearing Research 344: 50–61. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heares.2016.10.023.