1,723
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Temporal fine structure: associations with cognition and speech-in-noise recognition in adults with normal hearing or hearing impairment

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 778-786 | Received 16 Jun 2020, Accepted 18 Jun 2021, Published online: 22 Jul 2021

References

  • Bernstein, J. G., H. Danielsson, M. Hällgren, S. Stenfelt, J. Rönnberg, and T. Lunner. 2016. “Spectrotemporal Modulation Sensitivity as a Predictor of Speech-Reception Performance in Noise with Hearing Aids.” Trends in Hearing 20: 233121651667038. doi:10.1177/2331216516670387.
  • Besser, J., A. A. Zekveld, S. E. Kramer, J. Rönnberg, and J. M. Festen. 2012. “New Measures of Masked Text Recognition in Relation to Speech-in-Noise Perception and their Associations with Age and Cognitive Abilities.” Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 55 (1): 194–209. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2011/11-0008).
  • Brand, T. 2000. Analysis and Optimization of Psychophysical Procedures in Audiology. Oldenburg, Germany: BIS Verlag.
  • Buss, E., J. W. Hall, III, and J. H. Grose. 2004. “Temporal Fine-Structure Cues to Speech and Pure Tone Modulation in Observers with Sensorineural Hearing Loss.” Ear and Hearing 25 (3): 242–250. doi:10.1097/01.AUD.0000130796.73809.09
  • Daneman, M., and P. A. Carpenter. 1980. “Individual Differences in Working Memory and Reading.” Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 19 (4): 450–466. doi:10.1016/S0022-5371(80)90312-6.
  • Ewert, S. D., and T. Dau. 2000. “Characterizing Frequency Selectivity for Envelope Fluctuations.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 108 (3 Pt 1): 1181–1196. doi:10.1121/1.1288665.
  • Ewert, S. D., N. Paraouty, and C. Lorenzi. 2020. “A Two‐Path Model of Auditory Modulation Detection Using Temporal Fine Structure and Envelope Cues.” European Journal of Neuroscience 51 (5): 1265–1214. Advance online publication, doi:10.1111/ejn.13846.
  • Füllgrabe, C. 2013. “Age-Dependent Changes in Temporal-Fine-Structure Processing in the Absence of Peripheral Hearing Loss.” American Journal of Audiology 22 (2): 313–315. doi:10.1044/1059-0889(2013/12-0070).
  • Füllgrabe, C., A. J. Harland, A. P. Sęk, and B. C. Moore. 2017. “Development of a Method for Determining Binaural Sensitivity to Temporal Fine Structure.” International Journal of Audiology 56 (12): 926–935. doi:10.1080/14992027.2017.1366078.
  • Füllgrabe, C., and B. C. Moore. 2017. “Evaluation of a Method for Determining Binaural Sensitivity to Temporal Fine Structure (TFS-AF Test) for Older Listeners with Normal and Impaired Low-Frequency Hearing.” Trends in Hearing 21: 2331216517737230. doi:10.1177/2331216517737230.
  • Füllgrabe, C., B. C. Moore, and M. A. Stone. 2014. “Age-Group Differences in Speech Identification despite Matched Audiometrically Normal Hearing: Contributions from Auditory Temporal Processing and Cognition.” Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience 6: 347. doi:10.3389/fnagi.2014.00347.
  • Hacker, M. J., and R. Ratcliff. 1979. “A Revised Table of d’ for M-Alternative Forced Choice.” Attention, Perception & Psychophysics 26 (2): 168–170. doi:10.3758/BF03208311.
  • Hafter, E. R., and S. C. Carrier. 1972. “Binaural Interaction in Low-Frequency Stimuli: The Inability to Trade Time and Intensity Completely.” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 51 (6): 1852–1862. doi:10.1121/1.1913044.
  • Hagerman, B. 1982. “Sentences for Testing Speech Intelligibility in Noise.” Scandinavian Audiology 11 (2): 79–87. doi:10.3109/01050398209076203.
  • Hällgren, M., B. Larsby, and S. Arlinger. 2006. “A Swedish Version of the Hearing in Noise Test (HINT) for Measurement of Speech Recognition.” International Journal of Audiology 45 (4): 227–237. doi:10.1080/14992020500429583.
  • Holm, S. 1979. “A Simple Sequential Rejective Multiple Test Procedure.” Scandinavian Journal of Statistics 6: 65–70.
  • Hopkins, K., and B. C. Moore. 2010. “Development of a Fast Method for Measuring Sensitivity to Temporal Fine Structure Information at Low Frequencies.” International Journal of Audiology 49 (12): 940–946. doi:10.3109/14992027.2010.512613.
  • Hopkins, K., and B. C. Moore. 2011. “The Effects of Age and Cochlear Hearing Loss on Temporal Fine Structure Sensitivity, Frequency Selectivity, and Speech Reception in Noise.” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 130 (1): 334–349. doi:10.1121/1.3585848.
  • Hopkins, K., B. C. Moore, and M. A. Stone. 2008. “Effects of Moderate Cochlear Hearing Loss on the Ability to Benefit from Temporal Fine Structure Information in Speech.” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 123 (2): 1140–1153. doi:10.1121/1.2824018.
  • King, A., K. Hopkins, and C. J. Plack. 2014. “The Effects of Age and Hearing Loss on Interaural Phase Difference Discrimination.” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 135 (1): 342–351. doi:10.1121/1.4838995.
  • King, A., K. Hopkins, C. J. Plack, N. H. Pontoppidan, L. Bramsløw, R. K. Hietkamp, M. Vatti, et al. 2017. “The Effect of Tone-Vocoding on Spatial Release from Masking for Old, Hearing-Impaired Listeners.” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 141 (4): 2591–2603. doi:10.1121/1.4979593.
  • Kortlang, S., M. Mauermann, and S. D. Ewert. 2016. “Suprathreshold Auditory Processing Deficits in Noise: Effects of Hearing Loss and Age.” Hearing Research 331: 27–40. doi:10.1016/j.heares.2015.10.004.
  • Léger, A. C., B. C. Moore, and C. Lorenzi. 2012. “Abnormal Speech Processing in Frequency Regions Where Absolute Thresholds Are Normal for Listeners with High-Frequency Hearing Loss.” Hearing Research 294 (1–2): 95–103. doi:10.1016/j.heares.2012.10.002.
  • Lőcsei, G., J. H. Pedersen, S. Laugesen, S. Santurette, T. Dau, and E. N. MacDonald. 2016. “Temporal Fine-Structure Coding and Lateralized Speech Perception in Normal-Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Listeners.” Trends in Hearing 20: 2331216516660962. doi:10.1177/2331216516660962.
  • Lopez-Poveda, E. A., P. T. Johannesen, P. Perez-González, J. L. Blanco, S. Kalluri, and B. Edwards. 2017. “Predictors of Hearing-Aid Outcomes.” Trends in Hearing 21: 2331216517730526. doi:10.1177/2331216517730526.
  • Mishra, S., T. Lunner, S. Stenfelt, J. Rönnberg, and M. Rudner. 2013. “Seeing the Talker’s Face Supports Executive Processing of Speech in Steady State Noise.” Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience 7: 96. doi:10.3389/fnsys.2013.00096.
  • Moore, B. C. 2016. “Effects of Age and Hearing Loss on the Processing of Auditory Temporal Fine Structure.” In Physiology, Psychoacoustics and Cognition in Normal and Impaired Hearing, Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, edited by P. van Dijk, 894, Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
  • Moore, B. C., and A. Sęk. 2016. “Preferred Compression Speed for Speech and Music and Its Relationship to Sensitivity to Temporal Fine Structure.” Trends in Hearing 20: 2331216516640486. doi:10.1177/2331216516640486.
  • Moore, B. C., D. A. Vickers, and A. Mehta. 2012. “The Effects of Age on Temporal Fine Structure Sensitivity in Monaural and Binaural Conditions.” International Journal of Audiology 51 (10): 715–721. doi:10.3109/14992027.2012.690079.
  • Neher, T., T. Lunner, K. Hopkins, and B. C. Moore. 2012. “Binaural Temporal Fine Structure Sensitivity, Cognitive Function, and Spatial Speech Recognition of Hearing-Impaired Listeners (L) a.” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 131 (4): 2561–2564. doi:10.1121/1.3689850.
  • Nilsson, M., S. D. Soli, and J. A. Sullivan. 1994. “Development of the Hearing in Noise Test for the Measurement of Speech Reception Thresholds in Quiet and in Noise.” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 95 (2): 1085–1099. doi:10.1121/1.408469.
  • Perez, E., A. McCormack, and B. A. Edmonds. 2014. “Sensitivity to Temporal Fine Structure and Hearing-Aid Outcomes in Older Adults.” Frontiers in Neuroscience 8: 7. doi:10.3389/fnins.2014.00007.
  • Raven, J. 2008. The Raven Progressive Matrices Tests: their Theoretical Basis and Measurement Model. Uses and Abuses of Intelligence. Studies Advancing Spearman and Raven’s Quest for Non-Arbitrary Metrics, 17–68. Unionville, USA: Royal Fireworks Press.
  • RöNnberg, Jerker, Stig Arlinger, Björn Lyxell, and Catharina Kinnefors, 1989. “Visual Evoked Potentials: Relation to Adult Speechreading and Cognitive Function.” Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 32 (4): 725–735. doi:10.1044/jshr.3204.725.
  • Rönnberg, J., T. Lunner, E. H. N. Ng, B. Lidestam, A. A. Zekveld, P. Sörqvist, B. Lyxell et al. 2016. “Hearing Impairment, Cognition and Speech Understanding: Exploratory Factor Analyses of a Comprehensive Test Battery for a Group of Hearing Aid Users, the n200 Study.” International Journal of Audiology 55 (11): 623–620. doi:10.1080/14992027.2016.1219775.
  • Strelcyk, O., and T. Dau. 2009. “Relations between Frequency Selectivity, Temporal Fine-Structure Processing, and Speech Reception in Impaired Hearing.” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 125 (5): 3328–3345. doi:10.1121/1.3097469.
  • Van der Ven, A. H. G. S., and J. L. Ellis. 2000. “A Rasch Analysis of Raven’s Standard Progressive Matrices.” Personality and Individual Differences 29 (1): 45–64. doi:10.1016/S0191-8869(99)00177-4.
  • Verschooten, E., S. Shamma, A. J. Oxenham, B. C. Moore, P. X. Joris, M. G. Heinz, and C. J. Plack. 2019. “The Upper Frequency Limit for the Use of Phase Locking to Code Temporal Fine Structure in Humans: A Compilation of Viewpoints.” Hearing Research 377: 109–121. doi:10.1016/j.heares.2019.03.011.
  • Yumba, W. K. 2017. “Cognitive Processing Speed, Working Memory, and the Intelligibility of Hearing Aid-Processed Speech in Persons with Hearing Impairment.” Frontiers in Psychology 8: 1308. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01308.
  • Zekveld, A. A., E. L. George, S. E. Kramer, S. T. Goverts, and T. Houtgast. 2007. “The Development of the Text Reception Threshold Test: A Visual Analogue of the Speech Reception Threshold Test.” Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 50 (3): 576–584. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2007/040).
  • Zekveld, A. A., M. Pronk, H. Danielsson, and J. Rönnberg. 2018. “Reading Behind the Lines: The Factors Affecting the Text Reception Threshold in Hearing Aid Users.” Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 61 (3): 762–775. doi:10.1044/2017_JSLHR-H-17-0196.